This group say they want to protect on one hand - but then allow the deviant of society to brain wash and then misuse others or each other outside the Laws of Nature; Allowing for the existence of Voluntary Slavery and Slavery - Through the relinquishment of inalienable rights. This Group, Communist / Socialist in nature, places a form of "Subjugated Peace" under a central national government; Instead of abiding by the True Principles of Freedom established in small well represented and independent republics;
They are a proponent of reverse hate; and are a proponent for the use of National Federal force, accumulated by government "laws" which have been created without authority - i.e. under thePRETENSE OF AUTHORITY.
Georgia State Elections Division Suite 1104, West Tower 2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, SE Atlanta, GA 30334-1505 (404) 656-2871 FAX (404) 651-9536 http://www.sos.state.ga.u s/elections
Division of Elections Office of the Attorney General 44 South Clinton Avenue, 7th Floor P.O Box 304 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0304 (609) 292-3760 FAX (609)777-1280 http://www.njelections.org
Director of Elections, General Law Division Secretary of State/ Election Division Post Office Box 12060 Austin, TX 78711-2060 (512) 463-5650 FAX (512) 475-2811 http://www.sos.state.tx.us /elections/index.shtml
UTAH
Utah State Elections Office Utah State Capitol Complex East Office Building, Suite E325 P.O. Box 142325 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-2325 (801) 538-1041 FAX (801) 538-1133 http://www.elections.utah. gov
VERMONT
Director of Elections and Campaign Finance Office of Secretary of State 26 Terrace Street, Drawer 09 Montpelier, Vermont 05609-1101 (802) 828-2304 FAX (802) 828-5171 http://www.sec.state.vt.us /#elections
VIRGIN ISLANDS
Supervisor of Elections Election System of the Virgin Islands Post Office Box 1499, Kingshill St. Croix, VI 00851-1499 (340) 773-1021 FAX (340) 773-4523 http://www.vivote.gov
VIRGINIA
Secretary of State, Board of Elections 200 North 9th Street, Room 101 Richmond, VA 23219 (800) 552-9745 or (804) 864-8901 FAX (804) 371-0194 http://www.sbe.state.va.u s
WASHINGTON
Office of Secretary of State, Elections Division Legislative Building, P.O. Box 40220 Olympia, WA 98504-0220 (360) 902-4180 FAX (360) 586-5629 http://www.vote.wa.gov
WEST VIRGINIA
Manager of Elections West Virginia Secretary of State Elections Division 1900 Kanawha Blvd E. State Capitol Room 157-K Charleston, WV 25305-0770 (304) 558-6000 FAX (304) 558-0900 http://www.wvsos.com
WISCONSIN
Wisconsin State Elections Board 17 West Main Street, Suite 310 Madison, WI 53703-3305 P.O. Box 2973 Madison, WI 53701-2973 (608) 266-8087 FAX (608) 267-0500 http://elections.state.wi.us
George Mason 6-16-1788: Who are the MILITIA? They consist NOW of the "WHOLE PEOPLE"..." See quotes and source link regarding MILITIAS at bottom of this page.
American Patriot Party is aANTI- "Globalist",ANTI- "World Government" and ANTI- Unconstitutional UnAuthoritative Government Party. Authority was established in the Founding Documents and Original Constitutional Compact.APP aims to Empower Inalienable Natural Rights and Protect Private Property. Private Property Rights over County; County over State and State over Federal; For Adequate Representation, American Patriot Party promotes Statehood for all Counties so to remove distant legislatures, empower local communities and protect natural and Constitutional Rights.
American Patriot Party continues to endorseDonald J. Trump for President 2024, for his hard work, sacrifice and devotion to restoring Constitutional Principles to the United States during his first 4 year term. Seldom do you see someone so actively focused on that goal and the advancement of justice for all. American Patriot Party finds that our goal of returning to the principles envisioned by our Founding Fathersis well servedby the re-election of Donald J. Trump for President 2024. APPpromotes investigation of the 2020 election. Follow Trump on TRUTH SOCIAL.
Isaiah 51:7-9: "Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings. For the moth shall eat them up like a garment, and the worm shall eat them like wool: but my righteousness shall be for ever, and my salvation from generation to generation. Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm of the LORD; awake, as in the ancient days, in the generations of old. Art thou not it that hath cut Rahab, and wounded the dragon?"https://americasvoice.news/video/68299/
#199. "As usurpation is the exercise of power which another hath a right to, so tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right, which nobody can have a right to..."
#200:"...Thus, that learned king,who well understood the notions of things,makes the difference betwixt a king and a tyrant to consist only in this:that one makes the laws the bounds of his power and the good of the public the end of his government; the other makes all give way to his own will and appetite..."
#201. It is a mistake to think this fault is proper only to monarchies.Other forms of government are liable to it as well as that;for wherever the power that is put in any hands for the government of the people and thepreservation of their properties is applied to other ends,and made use ofto impoverish, harass, or subdue them to the arbitrary and irregular commands of those that have it,there it presently becomes tyranny,whether those that thus use it are one or many..."
#202. "Wherever law ends, tyranny begins, if the law be transgressed to another's harm;and whosoever in authority exceeds the power given him by the law, and makes use of the force he has under his command to compass that upon the subject which the law allows not,ceases in that to be a magistrate, andacting without authority may be opposed, as any other man who by force invades the right of another. This is acknowledged in subordinate magistrates.He that hath authority to seize my person in the streetmay be opposed as a thief and a robber if he endeavours to break into my house to execute a writ,notwithstanding that I know he has such a warrantand such a legal authority as will empower him to arrest me abroad.And why this should not hold in the highest, as well as in the most inferior magistrate,I would gladly be informed..."
-------
BRUTUS (Robert Yates) Warning:
"History furnishes no example of a free republic, any thing like the extent of the United States. The Grecian republics were of small extent; so also was that of the Romans.
Both of these, it is true, in process of time, extended their conquests over large territories of country; and the consequence was, that their governments were CHANGED FROM that of free governmentsto those of the MOST "TYRANNICAL" that ever existed in the world."
ReadRepublics and Representationon why the "One Nation" view created by a socialist in 1880s endangers our freedoms; and what James Madison Warned in theVirginia Resolutions,1798that Consolidating the states into "one Sovereignty" ie "One Nation" Changes and Endangers the Republican Form of government of Free Independent states, into a MIXEDMONARCHY! Read on!
Call your Representative NOW at: 202-224-3121 - NO DEALS ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT!
THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMSSHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! ReadJames MadisonFederalist #46: Minimum Power Ratio -25 to 1 - Citizen OVER US Military. Learn why lower on this page.
Welcome to "American Patriot Party"! The only party that follows the Constitution as the Founders intended. Make sure to read ourWelcome pageand ourSuggested Reading. Bewareof those trying to imitate our party using titles such as"THE" american patriot party or other similar modified organization titles that attempt to divert you from our party, the true Constitutional Originalism and the Law of Nature principles that our party promotes.Become a Member Now!
If we would follow the Original Constitution as it was defined in the Ratifying Conventions of 1788 that defined the words / phrases within it and follow the Laws of Nature which the Constitution and founding documents were meant to preserve, all the attacks upon our freedoms would subside. All those corrupting persons, organizations, treaties etc. will have no footing to stand upon.
Take Unions for example, being an "Exclusive Privilege" of the state, equally with corporations and tax supported special interests none of which were to be allowed in a free country, the Founders recognized a Common Law principle:
Samuel Adams, Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772:"...Governorshaveno right to seek what they please(APP: UNIONS SEEK WHAT THEY PLEASE)by this, instead of being content with the station assigned them, that ofhonourableservants of the society, they wouldsoon becomeAbsolute masters, Despots, and Tyrants. Hence as a private man has a right to say, what wages he will give in his private affairs, so has aCommunityto determine what they will give and grant of their Substance, for the Administration of publick affairs. And in both cases more are ready generally to offer their Service at the proposed and stipulated price, than are able and willing to perform their duty.--"
This principle was carried over to the Constitutionand actuallyevena importantEXISTING CONSTITUTIONAL "Term Limit"if anyone would read it and enforce it; Here James Madison establishes in the Ratifying Convention of 6-14-1788 theterminating factorto a representative if he or any of those in house or senate vote to raise their own salary or accept a raise in their own salary by such a vote:
James Madison,Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-14-1788:"... TheConstitutionhas taken a medium between the two extremes, and perhaps with more wisdom than either the British or the state governments,with respect to their "ELIGIBILITY" to office.They can "FILL" "NO" new "offices" created by themselves,"NOR" "OLD ONES" of whichthey"INCREASED THE SALARIES"."
So why are not all those politiciansin the House and Senate that voted for an increase in their salariesnot gone?
See? Simply obey and enforce the Original Constitutional Compactevery politician swore to uphold and they would be"TERM LIMITED"andGONE!
Please Contributedirectly to help us educate others and bypass de-platforming & shadow banning, compete on the political stage.
Richard Taylor Chair American Patriot Party - National Headquarters #americanpatriotparty #americanpatriot #patriotparty #patriot #listofpoliticalpartiesintheunitedstates
The only way to protect property is to get rid of property tax. The only way to be secure in person, papers and effects (property) is to get rid of flat percentage or other types of income, property and sales tax. The only way to keep wealth from being abused uncontrollably is to get rid of exclusive privileges such as unions, corporations, tax supported special interests, zoning and unnecessary regulations.The only way to control the federal governmentfrom over taxing is to have citizen controlled, consensual, enumeratedtaxes on imports ONLY as established in the Original US Constitution and in states by an anonymously collected "enumerated" toll tax, earmarked, collected and placed in accounts by which they where collected for, that then cannot be touched by governments but must be spent on what they wereConsented toandEnumerated for - BEFORE COLLECTED.See TheAnonymity APP -A- Tax.
In 2014 the United States CIA established a Ukraine Coup and set the stage for 8 years of Western Ukraine terrorizing Eastern Russian speaking Ukrainians. Russia rightfully stepped in. Western Ukraine has lost the right to govern Eastern Ukraine's people, businesses and properties.
APP Peace Solution:
1.) Grant Eastern Ukraine statesIndependent Country Status. 2.) Zelinsky's Western Ukraine stays out of NATO 3.) No NATO Missiles on Russia's borders.
"...All Men have a Right to remain in a State of Nature as long as they please: And in case of intolerable Oppression, Civil or Religious, to leave the Society they belong to, and enter into another..."
ie. The Right to Secede.
Western Ukraine, let Eastern Ukraine be free. Stop enslaving and harassing those people that want nothing to do with youor your vision for Ukraine. *Stop Escalation Toward War in Ukraine or China: *Identify the Instigators of War and Shut them Down. *Stop Funding / Arming Zelinsky's Western Ukraine. *Investigate US and Ukraine Corruption. Western Ukraine Loss Eminent. Seek Peace by Giving Eastern Ukraine States Independent Country Status - Protected by Russia. Western Ukraine Having Bombed Their Own Eastern Ukraine Citizens for 8 Years Since 2014 CIA COUP have Lost the Right to Govern Eastern Ukrainians or Their Land.
-------
R.I.N.O.(Republicans In Name Only): THE REAL DEFINITION OF A "RINO" IS SIMPLY A DEMOCRAT USING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY TO EXPAND THE POWER OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ONE WAY (Federal Law & Policing Powers); WHILE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY EXPANDS THE POWER OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ANOTHER WAY (Government Unions through Expanding Federal Bureaucracies & Departments). THEY ARE BOTH LEFTISTS AND BOTH SOCIALISTS. BOTH WANT YOU ENSLAVED.READ THE FOUNDERS DOCUMENTS THAT DEFINE THE CONSTITUTION; KNOW WHAT FREEDOM IS SO THAT YOU ARE NOT DECEIVED. START WITH OUR SUGGESTED READING FOUNDERS DOCUMENTS.
--------
GO WOKE GO BROKE!SEND THE WOKE CORPORATIONS & GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS TO THE TRASH DUMP OF HISTORY. MAKE YOUR "DO NOT BUY LIST" AND POST IT WIDELY! NEVER BUY FROM THEM AGAIN OR ANYONE WHO IS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM. SHUN THEM FROM SOCIETY! CEASE TO ASSOCIATE OR ALLOW YOUR CHILDREN TO ASSOCIATE, SCHOOLED OR INVOLVED IN ANY WAY WITH THEM OR BUY THEIR PRODUCTS. BREAK THEM! UNAWARE INVESTORS & STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD SUE ALL CORPORATE HEADS FOR THEIR LOSSES!HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE TO THE LAST MAN OR WOMAN.
BOYCOTT WIKIPEDIA
WIKIPEDIA Editors promote Woke ideologies whenever they can in wiki articles and prohibit definitions not aligning with socialist viewpoints. It is clear that socialist editors hover over certain words articles to guard their twisted definitions and article points. These Wiki editor's existence put a question as to whether or not they are volunteerism or paid volunteerism. From our experience since 2006 which has removed and then prohibited the further existence of an American Patriot Party wiki page, we believe it is the latter.
Thomas Jefferson on Freedom of Speech: Kentucky Resolutions, 1798
" ...3. Resolved, That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitutions, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, our prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"; and that NO power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against ALL abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same, as this State, by a law passed on the general demand of its citizens,had already protected themfrom "ALL" human restraintorinterference.
And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press": thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, arid that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are WITHHELD fromthe cognizance ofFederal Tribunals. That, therefore, the act of Congress of the United States, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," which does abridge the freedom of the press,is "NOT LAW", but is "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NOFORCE"..."
-----------
Falling Prey. Europe / Britain 20 Years Under Creeping Attack from Islam:
Peter Navarro Begins 4 Month Misdemeanor Prison Term. Support Peter by Sending Him Letters to: Peter K Navarro (04370-510) 15801 S.W. 137th Ave Miami FL 33177 You can also support Peter and MAGA by Pre-Ordering Peter's new book THE NEW MAGA DEAL:https://winningpublishing.com/products/the-new-maga-deal-pre-order
Glenn Beck Blaze Journalist Steve Baker Being Arrested By FBI Tomorrow. Baker Suggests Capitol Police May be Blackmailing Representatives including Johnson, as they "know where all the bodies are buried". https://www.glennbeck.com/radio/jan-6-journalist-fbi-arrest
COVERUP!Tucker Carlson Uncensored InterviewsSteve Kirsch -Data Reveals Estimated 17 Million died from the COVID shot and childhood Vaccines actually cause autism. Steve Kirsch has looked at the data.https://tuckercarlson.com/uncensored-the-vaccine-interview/
Tucker Carlson Interview on Glenn Beck.Federal Government Declares New Cold War With RussiaWithout Constitutional Authority or Civilian Consent. Major Danger of a Military populated by Illegals with no affection to our Constitution. The Necessity of Getting Out of NATO & UN. APP: Re-Affirms the Need for Smaller States for Adequate Representation, Protection of Private Property & Law and Order based upon Natural Law.Re-Affirms that Democracies can never protect your rights; only Republics based upon natural rights can.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64r6ko9o51o
Tucker Carlson Encounters Bret Weinstein at the Darien Gap:United Nations (UN), IOM - OIM and NGO's Wage War on United States At Panama Canal - Supported by United States Federal Government Miss-Using US Citizen Taxesin Grantsto Fund Invasion. This Federal Finance of NGO Funding of Unlimited Illegal Immigrants of Military Aged Men With No Intention of Becoming Americans Endangers US. https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-bret-weinstein-at-the-darien-gap/
"Lost Voices of Fentanyl" Organization Calls for Listing Fentanyl as a Weapon of Mass Destruction and Cartels as Terrorists to Drive the War on Drugs: https://lvof.org/
Britain's Parliament Frightened of Backlash from the Islamic Religious Immigrants, Attempts Appeasement by supporting the Establishment of a Palestinian State filled with Radical Islamic Hamas.
Netherlands: Geert Wilders: "We have imported a monster into Europe and that monster is Islam"https://twitter.com/i/status/1755902446340096220 Follow American Patriot Party on X:https://twitter.com/AmPatriotParty APP Report:Communists Senator Edward Markey Democrat Massachusetts & Jamie Raskin, Democrat Maryland's 8th District in the U.S. House of Representatives(Video @ 23:35)Attempt to pass a bill to outlaw Citizen Militias and Citizen Arms and Tactical Training. These Democrat Traitors are Complete &Total Communist Idiots that want to spit on our Constitution and Natural Right of Self Preservation. Apparently they have not read James Madison Federalist 46(SeeJames Madison QUOTEbelow on this page)who established a MINIMUM POWER RATIO of 25 to 1 - Citizens OVER the U.S. Military. And defined Militia as"officered by men chosen among THEMSELVES"not government or military; for the purpose of being an OPPOSING force to the United States federal military should they become the tools of a tyrant or attempt to overthrow the Original Constitutional Compact. Nor have they readVirginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788George Mason establishing militias were ALL PEOPLE; and under the Constitution the existence of militias were to be protected. These fools are in direct violation of their oath to protect the Constitution and should loose their jobsimmediately: World View Report with Brannon Howse:(@ 23:35):https://rumble.com/v4c2qui-appeals-court-stacked-with-biden-judges-rules-against-president-trump.html
TUCKER CARLSON - VLADIMIR PUTIN INTERVIEW -TUCKER CARLSON NETWORK EXCLUSIVE https://tuckercarlson.com/the-vladimir-putin-interview/ Already the Left Media Monopoly financed by the Military Complex, EU Banking institutions scramble to spin and downplay this important interview.
Biden & His Administration Guilty of Funding Global Jihad as he Continues Funding Islamic Terrorists in Afghanistan & Middle East while Pushing for Palestinian State after Gruesome October Massacre Against Israel byPalestinianTerrorists: See Real America's Voice: Special Report, January 5th, 2024.
APP opinion on Gaza: Instead of using money given them to better themselves, Palestinians used those funds to dig tunnels andripped out their city plumbingfor pipe to build missiles to attack Israel and butcher innocent Israeli citizens. AllPalestinianfamilies knew of the miles of tunnels and abetted the horrendous crimes they recently committed; they did nothing and said nothing to stop it.
APP Calls for AZ Republican Party Chair Jeff DeWit's and His Contacts to be Arrested for the Crime Bribery and Election Tampering - Court OrderJeff DeWit's Phone Records and FIND that EAST COAST BRIBER he was talking to!!! GO AFTER HIM!!!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mis1HvyMidU
American Stewards - Fighting for Property Rights Against Natural Asset Companies(NAC's:InternationalCommunistEnvironmentalist Groups, International Corporations & Foreign Countries)Purchasing US Landfor Keeping US Land from US Citizens:https://americanstewards.us
Julie KellyDECLASSIFIED:FBI Created "3 Percenters"a group populated with FBI agents to entrap individuals and Criminally Agitate crowds on January 6, 2020: https://substack.com/@juliekelly
Trump Train Stays on Track - Remains on Ballot in Colorado.
Trump Derangement Syndrome infects yet another liberal elections official. Same day as Colorado reluctantly places Donald Trumps name on their primary ballots while their case goes to the US Supreme Court, Maine’s top election official attempts to remove Trump from 2024 primary ballot; Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows however paused her decision pending a potential appeal in state court, which Trump’s team said they intend to file.https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/politics/trump-maine-14th-amendment-ballot/index.html (CNN Attempts to cover up the Trump Win with a Misleading Title); In the state of Oregon, though some elections officials may have Trump Derangement Syndrome, they correctly understand the present issue: Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade announced on Nov. 30 that she does not have the legal authority to remove Trump from the primary ballot. Citing the Oregon Department of Justice, Griffin-Valade said a presidential primary is not a case of someone being elected. Instead, it’s a chance for voters to tell their party who they prefer to be the nominee. Delegates at the national convention ultimately decide who that nominee will be:https://centraloregondaily.com/donald-trump-oregon-primary-ballot-status/ All equal opening the way for a Trump Win in the Primary, eventual Supreme Court Win and Win in 2024 MUST WATCH: Collapse of Building 7 - The Solomon Brothers Building - The 3rd Building Falling on 9-11-2001 Was Reported By BBC it had Already Fallen TWENTY MINUTES BEFORE IT FELL!!!- Explosive NANO-THERMITE Materialhttps://web.archive.org/web/20111112102751/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf&https://investigate911.org/Found at ALL THREE WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING SITES!!!......Dr. Hulsey of University of Alaska Fairbanks, Who Led the UAF Study, Reports on the Jimmy Dore Show:https://rumble.com/v40kb91-expert-demolishes-establishment-story-about-wtc-bldg.-7-collapse.htmlWhat Departments That ARE LISTED in this Show That Were in These Buildings Clearly Establish a Government Coverup and a FACTUAL Federal Government Corrupt Criminal Act...
University of Alaska Fairbanks 4 Year Study Confirms N.I.S.T. REPORT FALSE Regarding Fall. DOWNLOAD THE FINAL REPORT HERE:https://bit.ly/UAF-March2020-Final
Hunter Biden Blames Others For Trashing His and his Fathers Character; When His Father's Actions & Hunter Biden's Own Laptop Images Suggests AnyPoor Character ImageTheir Own Doing: Marco Polo Biden Laptop Report (warning adult images): https://bidenlaptopmedia.com
*** Tucker on Ukraine War Corruption & China / Foreign Control of Beef Supply - Interview withKentucky CongressmanThomas Massie: https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1732163859610321333?s=20 FEDSURRECTION PROVEN - BEN SWANN TRUTH IN MEDIA - LARA LOGAN REPORTING - #TWEET #RETWEET AND #RE-POST UNTIL ALL #FEDTRAITORS AND OTHERS ACTING AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTION ARE ARRESTED AND SENT AWAY FOR LIFE IMPRISONMENT. #FEDSURRECTION #JANUARY6th #INSURRECTION #CAPITOL: WATCH VIDEOS:https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-8-recap-episodes-1-7/
11-7-2023 BREAKING: INTEREST ALONE REACHES 1 TRILLION ON UNITED STATES DEBT!!! INTEREST ON LOANS TAKEN OUT FROM FUTURE ENEMY'S BANKS, SUCH AS CHINA, BUYS WEAPONS THAT WILL BE USED AGAINST THE UNITED STATES!!!
READ: THOMAS JEFFERSON - KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS onYOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH: https://americanpatriotparty.cc/American_Patriot_Party.pdf ESTABLISHING: TheFREEDOM OF SPEECH:isWITHHELD from FEDERAL TRIBUNALS- i.e.Withheld fromFEDERAL COURTS: TheFREEDOM OF SPEECH:isWITHHELD from - ALL - HUMAN INTERFERENCE
George FloydRiots Instigated By Fraud.Coroner Andrew Baker Attested That George Floyd Did Not Die From Strangulation or Anything Officer May Have Done.Rob Schmitt , NewsMax Reporting 10-23-23:
Police State: New Film- WATCH TRAILER & TICKETS ONLY AT:https://policestatefilm.net/ A Film by Dinesh D'Souza and Dan Bongino.
AE911TRUTH - Get The Explosive TRUTH OF 911! Join over 3,500 Professional Architects & Engineers and Thousands More Demanding An Official Investigation! Watch Documentary Videos and Professional Investigations.http://www.ae911truth.org
Brave Australian Politicians that will travel to USA on Sept. 12 To Stop Extradition & Free Julian Assange; Help finance their trip & follow progress and sign the petition at:https://www.change.org/p/free-julian-assange-before-it-s-too-late-stop-usa-extradition/u/31888031 NEWS FLASH!!!! CRACKS OPEN IN REVEALING DEEP STATE! Barack Obama's & Democrat Lies Exposed! Sex, Lies, Murder of "Loose Ends"! Tucker Carlson Opens Closet On "Pretty Boy" Barack Obama's Sick Bisexuality & Lies Ep. 22 "Larry Sinclair says he had a night of crack cocaine-fueled sex with Barack Obama..." Not the only one!VIDEO:https://twitter.com/i/status/1699543001473900670 Is Barack Obama, the Clintons, Bushs and Others Now "Loose Ends" to Deep State Dark Powers?
FBI & CIA Tied to Ukrainian Nazis In Ukraine and Nazis Groups In United States Who Support President Biden Who is Supporting Nazis in Ukraine. "Nazi Feds Get Loomered"Steve Bannon - RAV WarRoom 9/5/2023: Lara Loomer Reporting: VIDEOS: https://t.me/s/loomeredofficial See Also:https://loomered.com/&https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer Related: Psyop -Known FBI and Ukrainian Nazi Spies Presence on January 6th: "FBI identified Ukrainian operatives and Neo Nazis who were at the US Capitol on J6 and even questioned J6ers about these Ukrainian spies during interviews with the FBI......the US Capitol was penetrated by Ukrainian spies and the US Government and FBI have still not arrested these people or made the public aware of foreign penetration. This is an act of war by Ukraine against the United States, and yet the US Government has sent $200 BILLION to Ukraine in the last 2 years. The CIA is funding a color revolution in the United States via Ukrainian Nazis and American Nazis who are being recruited by the CIA and FBI to fight overseas in the Azov Battalion and then come back to the US to instigate Nazi political movements in a psyop intended to make right wingers look bad. The reality is, these people are Democrats and Biden supporters and the FBI has been hiding the fact that Ukrainian operatives penetrated the US Capitol on J6 and they have been hiding the fact that they are working with Ukrainian Nazis to instigate violence to subvert the US Government, including actions to impeach President Trump..."Full Report: https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1698710813530300432 https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1698518761194602634
NFSC New Federation of China Reveals CCP China Spy Networks Worldwide: https://gettr.com/streaming/p2pnyz71323 TRUMPESQUE LEANING KEN PAXTON impeachment trial and securities fraud trial both proving to be a political move in both cases as attorneys say that the severity of the criminal trial will hinge on the impeachment trial; suggesting that if Ken Paxton is no longer a threat politically, the criminal trial is not really important:https://www.texastribune.org/2023/08/03/ken-paxton-securities-fraud-courtroom/
Leaked Emails Suggest Fani (Fanny) Willis, Fulton County, Georgia DA, Imposed a Predetermined Finding for Indictment Against Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Kenneth Chesebro, Jeffery Clark, Ray Smith III, Robert Cheeley, Michael Roman, David Shafer, Shawn Steel, Steffan Lee, Harrison Floyd, Travian Kutti, Cathy Latham, Scott Hall, Misty Hampton:https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/georgia-court-website-publishes-then-removes-list-of-criminal-charges-against-trump
Chinese Bio Lab Discovered in Fresno California Near West Coast Military Air Base; Other US Bio Labs Tied To China Laboratory - Mice found to carry Corona Virus: Real Americas Voice - Stenchfield Tonight - August 3, 2023: https://gettr.com/streaming/p2ngwq87a53
Floridians will be able to carry concealed guns without a permit under a bill Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed Monday, giving the governor another legislative victory as he prepares a campaign for president. The governor signed the bill in a private ceremony in his office. His only immediate public comment was,“Constitutional Carry is in the books,”which he said in a three-paragraph news release.
Italy considers sending warplanes to Ukraine as is Other EU Countries Want To Cash In on Bidens US Billions of Dollars Dumped into Ukraine - No Thought of Cost of Ukrainian's Lives That Will Be Lost by Fueling the Conflict; instead of Seeking Peace :https://www.rt.com/news/571789-italy-send-warplanes-ukraine-media/
Instigators of War: Report exposes how German media stirs up militancy in society and works to prevent negotiations with Russia - German Socialist Party, EU Banks, WEF and International Corporations of the Military Complex:https://www.rt.com/news/568595-how-to-sell-war/
Traitors in OregonAttemptto Override Second Amendment Limitations on Government but will Rightly Fail in Supreme Court:https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2021R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/SB554/Enrolled The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms Shall Not Be "Infringed". Read also Federalist #46 by James Madison and the Established Minimum Power Ratio 25 to 1 - Citizen OVER US Military.
Former British Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, famed linguist and dissident Noam Chomsky and others gave testimony Friday at the Belmarsh Tribunal in Washington, D.C., calling on President Biden to drop charges against Julian Assange. The WikiLeaks founder has been languishing for close to four years in the harsh Belmarsh prison in London while appealing extradition to the United States. If convicted in the United States, Julian Assange could face up to 175 years in jail for violating the U.S. Espionage Act for publishing documents that exposed U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Friday's event was held at the National Press Club and co-chaired by Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman. We spend the hour featuring compelling excerpts from the proceedings.
To watch the full two-and-a-half-hourlivestream of theBelmarsh Tribunal, visit this link:https://youtu.be/j_QqpYATupw
Bombshell Proof of Election Machine Manipulation. States Governments Derelict In Their Duty To Protect Their Own Citizens Presently Unconstitutionally Jailed And Held In Washington, DC For January 6th.
WASHINGTON, DC CLEAN-OUT COMING - ARRESTS LOOMING--- LEGISLATIVE, DC POLICE, CIA, FBI FACING 20 YEARS FOR CRIMES AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS JAILED IN DC BIDEN SPEECH PROVES COMMUNIST VS FEDERALIST #46--- BIDEN ATTACKS SECOND AMENDMENT AND YOUR RIGHT TO SELF PRESERVATION -LEARN TO BUILD ARMS *JULIAN ASSANGE VINDICATED!
*Ignore Russia - Focus on the Instigators of War:German Socialist Party (with French and Belgium EU Socialist Party Counterparts) - European Union Banks - United States Military Complex - All Corporations (foreign and domestic) that will Benefit From a Military Conflict With Russia Or China - Focus on those inside and outside government Corrupting our Freedoms and Rights and Focus on the Biden Administration Attempting to Divert Attention from his, his administration and Democrat Party Failed Woke Liberal Policies.
*Joe Biden Socialism=Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The fake and "not anyone's president", Joe Biden, unwittingly repeats the words of communistdictator Joseph Stalin. It isJoe Biden, the Democratic Party and other voting fraud perpetrators who are in fact themselves guilty of unfair voting which his fake propaganda attempts to oppose. This is because they themselves have established corrupt voting practices andElection Subversionwith attempts to pack the courts, allowing foreign people to vote, allow illegal migrant voting, establish corrupt voting machines,allow electronic switching of votes,hire corrupt election staff, block voting audits, allow ballot stuffing of ballot boxes, promote ballot mining andchange the way votes will be counted.
Dictator Joseph Stalin, 1923: "...I consider it completelyunimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—WHOWILL COUNT THE VOTES,and how."said in 1923; Boris BazhanovThe Memoirs of Stalin's Former Secretary(1992); seeStoppard
Joe Biden 1-13-2022:"One thing for certain, like every other major civil rights bill that came along. If we miss the first time, we can come back and try it a second time. We missed this time. We missed this time. The state legislative bodies can continue to change the law not as to who can vote, who gets to count the vote. Count the vote. Count the vote! Its about election subversion! Not just whether or not whether people get to vote.WHO COUNTS THE VOTE!"Watch Video: Joe Biden: 1-13-22: Who Counts The Votes!
*Corrupt State Governors Engage a Corrupted FBI-Who Use Battering Rams to Unjustly Enter Homes: Violating The Right To Be Secure In Person, Papers And Property:War Room Pandemic with Stephen K Bannon Episode 1428 Part 1 Part 2:Episode 1428 Video Part 1& 2 War Room PandemicBack Videoswith Stephen K Bannon Episode 1427 Part 2:Episode 1427 Video Part 2
WATCH:"UKRAINE ON FIRE":https://rumble.com/vwxxi8-ukraine-on-fire.html ***Watch out for the disinformation crowd of CIA war-munger propaganda. No mentions in the media about about Western Ukraine killing, butchering and bombing innocent citizens of Eastern Ukraine for the last 8 years, simply because the Eastern Ukrainians want independence.Anyone that supports Western Ukraine and the Zelensky government supports the corrupt Nazi nationalistic political ideals and CIA puppet governments. Look at the history of Ukraine, not just the surface feeding media fools that are poster boys for RINO politicians trying to embroil the US in another useless, needless war being invoked by another CIA political plant, President Zelensky, of Ukraine, who just passed a law making it illegal to speak in favor of Russia with a 15 year prison term - Apparently he doesn't really want freedom of speech or freedom in his country and but wants to maintain the heavy handed corruption in Ukraine. The Ukraine government has been attacking and killing it's own people for 8 years, THIS is fact. Nazi groups are prevalent in Western Ukraine politics, THIS is fact. Eastern states want to align themselves to Russia with 90% vote in Crimea, THIS is a fact. Eastern Ukraine welcomes Russian soldiers, as they are protecting them from the Western Ukraine's 8 year suppression and attacks and want their states to be aligned with Russia and be independent, THIS is fact. Sadly, Western Ukraine citizens are getting their just desserts for supporting a corrupt Ukraine government that has made a habit of killing and terrorizing it's own people in eastern Ukraine. Russia has called them on it. The American Constitutionalists and Russian people and Russian government have some major things in common, our dislike of international banks, international corporations and international military complex that feed on the misery of others and attack our independent nations and state's sovereignty for their own financial gains.
# 202:"...Wherever law ends, tyranny begins,if the law be transgressed to another's harm; andwhosoever in authority exceeds the power given him by the law, and makes use of the force he has under his command to compass that upon the subject which the law allows not, ceases in that to be a magistrate,andacting without authoritymay be opposed, as any other man who by force invades the right of another.This is acknowledged in subordinate magistrates.
He that hath authority to seize my person in the streetmay be opposed as a thief and a robber if he endeavours to break into my house to execute a writ,notwithstanding that I know he has such a warrant and such a legal authority as will empower him to arrest me abroad. And why this should not hold in the highest, as well as in the most inferior magistrate, I would gladly be informed. ... For exceeding the bounds of authority is no more a right in a great than a petty officer, no more justifiable in a king than a constable.But so much the worsein himas that he has more trust put in him,..."
United States Constitution: Amendment IV"The right of the people to besecurein their persons, houses, papers, and effects,against unreasonable searches and seizures,shall not be violated, andno Warrants shall issue,but upon probable cause,supported by Oath or affirmation, andparticularly describingthe place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"
Andrew Jackson:“Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families,and that would be my sin!You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal God,(bringing his fist down on the table)I will rout you out!― Andrew Jackson-When he killed the National Bank.
It is time to kill it againandprevent it from ever rising in the future with punishment of treason to those that attempt it.
Removing All Foreign Interests and Corporate Exclusive Privileges From Our Country
END THE FEDERAL RESERVE!
END INTERNATIONAL BANKING AND ITS CORRUPTION!
BIDEN AND ADMINISTRATION - VERIFIABLY CRIMINALLY INSANE All while Biden - Harris say to Americans: "LET THEM EAT ICE CREAM CONES!"
3,529ProfessionalARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS and 30,984 Citizens call forinvestigations that need to be done.To give you a better insight onwhat happened on 911and sign the petition, go to:http://www.ae911truth.org
AE911TRUTH NIST LAWSUIT - PRAYER FOR RELIEF(View Full Amended Complaint): "...of that RFC denial. 370. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court, pursuant to its authority under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 702, 706, to: A.Appeal were arbitrary and capricious, not in accordance with law, and without observance of procedure required by law; B.Issue an injunction requiring NIST to correct its WTC 7 Report so that this report complies with the IQA, including requiring NIST to develop a new WTC 7 possible and consistent with the evidence; C.Issue an injunction requiring NIST to correct its WTC 7 Report so that this report complies with the NCST Act; D.Issue an injunction requiring NIST to make public all of its WTC 7 computer modelling(s) including all computer code, data, assumptions, and input used with or for that modelling; E.Issue an injunction requiring NIST to make public all evidence in its possession, and to disclose and describe all evidence that has been destroyed, and all other evidence known to Defendants to exist, that evinces or is consistent with the use of explosives and/or incendiaries having caused or contributed to the collapse of WTC 7. F.Award Plaintiffs their reasonable attorney fees incurred in this action; and G.Grant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper."
Welcome to the American Patriot Party!The Patriots who follow the Original intent of the Founding Fathers:
1.)Strong Statesas Intended. 2.)SmallerStatesfor Adequate Representation as the Constitution Prescribes,limitingPower of "Distant Legislatures". 3.)Stronger Smaller Countiesfor Local Control. 4.)Limiting the Federal Governmentto the Delegated Powers of theOriginalConstitutional Compact:
"...I cannot comprehend that the(VERY LIMITEDFEDERAL LEGISLATIVE)power oflegislatingover a "SMALL DISTRICT"(Washington, DC), which"CANNOT EXCEED" "TEN MILES SQUARE", andmay "NOT BE MORE" THAN "ONE MILE", will involve the dangers which he (Patrick Henry) apprehends. ..."
APP: Think long and hard about that statement.
George Mason, Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:
"...But I wish aclause in the Constitution, with respect toALL POWERSwhichare NOT granted (DELEGATED), that they areRETAINED by the STATES.OTHERWISE, the power of providingfor the "GENERAL WELFARE" may be "PERVERTED TO IT'S DESTRUCTION".".....READ IT HERE - CLICK.
American Patriot Party Opposes Lies and Socialism in Government, Business and Law.
We oppose Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), as it is a fact that the members of these organizations do make profit, big profit, and work for political and private institutions that in most instances are actively working against the principles of freedom and constitution; the definition of Non-Profit is a lie and misleads in it's title; such organizations are also given exclusive privileges which can not exist in a truly free country.We oppose defining corporations as "individuals" in law (which in law it is defined that way); Corporations are"exclusive privileged collectives", granted by the state, who practice "collective title in property"; "collective title in property" is the definition of socialism. Privatized socialism is still socialism. Unions practice "collective title in labor" and is socialism, Union operation of dictating their salary is clearly in opposition of freedom; Read theThe Absolute Rights of the Colonists by Samuel Adams 1772about those in government who dictate their own pay and who should determine their pay. All are types of entities and exclusive privileges opposed by the Founders.Read why.
FIX 2020 ELECTIONFIRST!
WATCH ON FRANK SPEECH .COM MIKE LINDELL'S AUGUST 2021 CYBER SYMPOSIUM The Pillow Man Cometh to Imprison the Corrupt! *Over 48 State Representatives Having Been Present Head Back to Their States to Establish Forensic 2020 Election Audits
TECHNICIANS OPEN STATE COMPUTER ELECTION PACKETS REVEALED INTERNATIONAL CORRUPTION AFFIRMINGTRUMP PRESIDENTIAL 2020 ELECTION VICTORY- ELECTORAL AND POPULARBY MILLIONS
240 Leftists Caught on Video Dumping Ballots From Back Packs in Drop Boxes Across State of Georgia!
----------------------
APP Warning AgainstElection Propaganda
Do not believe China instigated or acted alone in election fraud or other incursions into acts of corruption toward our US free society.China, a world power, cannot benefit from a conflict or cold war with the United States.Look toward European Union: it'sGerman, French & Belgium Socialist Parties,international banking&military arms dealers Do not forgetour OWN CIA and FBIwho used Russian Servers andFake DossierDocuments to Attack our own sitting President.Look toward those who would benefit from a armed conflict between the super powers and a weakened free country, ...
The United States. The only truly free country and Constitutional Republic(s), that maintains a measure of peace in the world.
Look toward international organized drug crime & private enemy agenda's against the Constitution such as George Soros.
To illustrate, look at this video of systematic evil played out inthe Parliamentof the European Union; WatchtheGerman Socialist Party in actionJuly 7,2008while theyremove political oppositionin their move to take Europe:
This is so that you can recognize who the traitors and enemies are.
----------------------
APP ON IMMIGRATION
Beware of the Crocodile Tears of Islamic Asylum Seekers Shown By Media. Would You Give Asylum in the United States of Hitler Youth and Their Teachers? Beware of Inviting Doctrines Subversive to Free and Independent Societies.
EDUCATIONAL DIRECTIVE Need for Redirection of Islamic Asylum Seekers and Reverse Immigration Policies
THE UNITED STATES IS PRESENTLY UNDER CONTROL OF AN INSANE AND ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, VICE PRESIDENT AND HISEQUALLY ILLEGITIMATE ADMINISTRATION WHICH HAVE BEGUN ASYLUM IMMIGRATION OF RELIGIOUS ENEMIES INSIDE OUR BORDERS.
All news outlets, politicians and surprisingly conservatives in their ignorance of foundational Constitutional and forgotten Common Law principles,refuse to address the real issue of bringing asylum seeking immigrants from Afghanistan (and other Islamic countries)to the United States. That issue, if they would read American history on thePrinciples of Toleration by John Locke, which defines in this caseNON-tolerationconcerning certainintolerable religions.John Locke's Treatise on TolerationandSamuel Adams "Absolute Rights of the Colonists"clearly present thislong knownPRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM. that in fact and wisely limits certain types of religions that are "subversive to societies" whose followers take their marching orders fromforeign religious leaders:
Samuel Adams - Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772: "...In so much that "Mr. Locke" has asserted, and "proved beyond the possibility of contradiction on any solid ground", that such toleration ought to be extended toall whose DOCTRINES are NOT SUBVERSIVE OF SOCIETY.The only Sects which he thinks ought to be(Other than MUSLIM religion which has never been compatible with the Christian religions, free governments or any other besides sharia law), and whichby allWISE lawsareEXCLUDED FROM SUCH TOLERATION, are those who teachDoctrines subversive of the Civil Government under which they live.The Roman Catholicks or Papists are excludedby reason ofsuch Doctrines as these"that Princes excommunicated may be deposed, and those they call Hereticksmay be destroyed without mercy"; besides theirrecognizing the Pope in so absolute a manner,in subversion of Government, by introducing as far as possible into the states, under whose protection they enjoy life, liberty and property, that solecism in politicks, Imperium in imperio2(i.e. aGovernmentwithin aGovernment)leading directly to the worst anarchy and confusion, civil discord, war and blood shed--"(A Clear Warning!) John Locke on Treatise on Toleration: "...#71. Again:ThatChurch can haveNO RIGHT to be toleratedby the magistrate which is constituted upon such a bottom that all those who enter into it do thereby ipso factodeliver themselves up to the protection and service ofANOTHER PRINCE(foreign). For by this means the magistratewould give way to the settling of aforeign jurisdiction in his own countryand suffer his own people to be listed, as it were,for SOLDIERS AGAINST his own Government.Nor does the frivolous and fallacious distinction between the Court and the Church afford any remedy to this inconvenience; especially when both the one and the other are equally subject to the absolute authority of the same person, who has not only power to persuade the members of his Church to whatsoever he lists, either as purely religious, or in order thereunto, but can also enjoin it them on pain of eternal fire.It is ridiculousfor any one to profess himself to be a Mahometan(MUSLIM)only in his religion, but in everything else a faithful subject to a Christian magistrate,whilst at the same time he acknowledges himself bound to yieldblind obedienceto the Mufti(MUSLIM CLERIC - ISLAMIC SCHOLAR)of Constantinople, who himself is entirely obedient to the Ottoman Emperor and frames the feigned oracles of that religion according to his pleasure.But this Mahometan(MUSLIM)living amongst Christians would yet more apparentlyrenounce their governmentif he acknowledged the same person to be head of his Church who is the supreme magistrate in the state. ..."
The Catholics have since set aside any blind obedience to barbaric demands by tyrannical Popes and live peaceably in a free society. The Muslims by way of their barbaricDOCTRINEand blind adherence to it, can never be content to live in a free society; this is because every part of their doctrineitselfis written to beSUBVERSIVE and destructive to any society but their ownas theyfollow BLIND OBEDIENCE to sharia law and those radical leaders who follow it.They are and will always be SOLDIERS AGAINST FREEDOM. If you believe otherwise, see the videos posted below on this page. Attempts to argue otherwise is and will always be a fallacy and history proves it a fallacy. Islam's own doctrine tells them to lie until they are in such numbers as to control the countries and governments they have infiltrated. Islamist openly declare using their population as a weapon (see their own videos below) in our country to implant sharia law and to destroy the principles of freedom we hold dear.
The freedom of religion clearly does not apply to religions that areintolerantof all other religions andintolerantof free societies. As the Founders rightly deducted from history and historical facts, they wisely concluded, that followers of the Islamic religion that tolerates no one but themselves and their own religion, except only for the purpose of destroying or subjugating others under their religion, should not be tolerated in any free country.
It is therefore necessary to redirect Muslims who seek asylum to Islamic countries, not the United States, and to begin reverse migration of those migrated, back to countries historically Islamic. If they want freedom and the blessings it provides, they can establish it there;
First Amendment - Freedom Acknowledgement Award
First Amendment Freedom Acknowledgement Award is given by the American Patriot Party to Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning and Julian Assange. The American Patriot Party is advocate for dropping of all United States charges (past and present) againstEdward Snowden,Bradley Manning,Julian Assange& National Guardsman - Jack Teixeira(who has exposed Biden Administration Lies & Treason against United States Citizens)who have shown great courage in their actions in exposing government corruption at great risk and loss of their own freedom and liberties. When there is corruption within the highest levels in government, the First Amendment is our most essential sentinel to our lives, rights and liberties. ReadThe Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions by James Madison and Thomas Jeffersonand theVirginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788.
Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions 1798: " ...3. Resolved, That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitutions, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, our prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"; andthat NO power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the people:that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus alsothey guarded against ALL abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same,as this State, bya law passed on the general demand of its citizens, had alreadyprotected them from "ALL" human restraint or interference. And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press": thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, arid that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion,are WITHHELD from the cognizance of federal tribunals.That, therefore, the act of Congress of the United States, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," which does abridge the freedom of the press,is "NOT LAW", but is "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE"...."
American Patriot Independence Recognition Award:
Recognizes and bestows highest honor toMichael Newfor protesting the United Nationsby refusing to wear the U.N. insignia on his uniform during a United Nations Protection Force peacekeeping mission to Macedonia during the Yugoslav Wars. This Patriotic Act is recognized by the Common Law Principles of patriotism to ones independent state and country as outlined by John Locke's Treatise of Civil Government that establishes that a citizen of one country cannot be delivered up under the command and control of another country against his own consent:
John Locke Treatise on Civil Government: #217. "...Fourthly, thedelivery also of the peopleinto the subjection of a foreign power, eitherby the prince or by the legislative,is certainlya change of the legislative, and soa dissolution of the government. For the end why people entered into society being to be preserved one entire, free, independent society to be governed by its own laws,this is lost whenever they are given up into the power of another."
This applies to NATO, UN and any other governing body and establishes any treaty or command both void and treasonous against any United States Citizen, Military or Citizen Militia.
Remember that we are a nation of Independent State Republics ofConstitutionallaws under Original Compacts that create each republic based upon the Laws of Nature andNOTjust any lawthat is passed by federal or state legislatures.
Educate others to stop promoting total democracy,total democracy (51% enslave 49%) issocialism. The Founders never spoke of forming a democracy; The Founders spoke of and formed Constitutional Republics that acknowledge the meanings set down in the Declaration of Independence, Ratifying Conventions that defined the meaning of the words in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, all founded firmly in the foundational principles of theLaws of Nature(See also TheAbsolute Rights of the Colonistsby Samuel Adams) which are necessary for freedom and liberty to exist.If you have not read them, you must. Without those principles no country can be considered a free community, state or country. These principles should be guarded by all US republic governments, local, state and federal, and promoted as the ideal to inspire all those governments of the world that wish to experience true freedom and liberty.
Thomas Jefferson: "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.I do not add 'within the limits of the law',becauselawis often butthe tyrant's will,andalways sowhen it violates the rights of theindividual~~"
#3. "Resolved,That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitutions, that"the powersnot delegatedto the United States by the Constitution, our prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to theStatesrespectively,OR to the People";and thatNOpower over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the People:that thus was manifested their determination toretain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated,rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also theyguarded againstALL abridgmentby the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselvesthe right of protecting the same, as this State, by a law passed on the general demand of its citizens, had already protected them from"ALL"human restraint or interference.And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that"Congress shall makeno lawrespecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press":thereby guarding in thesame sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch,thatwhatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others,arid that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion,are WITHHELD from the cognizance of federal tribunals.That, therefore, the act of Congress of the United States, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," which does abridge the freedom of the press,is "NOT LAW", but is"ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE". ..."
Get the word "Democracy" out of your vocabulary when describing the United States; we are Independent Republics, based upon theLaws of Nature. Democracy in our governments are limited to those principles; limited to delegated powers and defined. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".That right "cannot be voted away" by state or federal legislatures or any "democratic process";any "law" to do so, as clearly established by the Founders,is "NOT LAW", but is"ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE". ...".If attempted, it is an"act of apretense of authority"and an"act of war against the people"as clearly described inJohn Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government. "The right of self preservationis theFirst Law of Nature",Samuel Adams, Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772.See Federalist #46and James Madison's25 to 1 Power Ratio - Citizens militia over military, below on this page.
APP IMPORTANT News, Documents and Videos BE INFORMED! Posts are fromOldest (1.)to newest (Last - Highest Number on List): 2020-2021:
APP Statement: Covid vaccine mandates areBlatantly Unconstitutional.Religion has nothing to do with vaccine exemption, it has to do withCONSENT.No ability to Consent, No Freedom. Freedom and NATURAL RIGHTS belong to civilian and military personnel alike.
1.) Virus establishes itself in the sinuses (best to stop it there) then enters the cells of the lungs 2.) Cells make mucus in lungs to wage war against virus.(Covid pneumonia). 3.) Debris from the battle falls to the bottom of the lung like cement and suffocate cells. 4.) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome(ARDS) is the result of the lung's cells beginning to die and becoming eviscerated. 5.) Lungs become damaged, eventually beyond repair. 6.) Death
Even if the virus is stopped and the swelling is reduced in the lungs from steroids, the damage will create a weakened state where death can still occur.
Watch this video:
What you need to know:Therapeutics:
Be Prepared! Early Action is Critical: Stay out of the Hospital:
Note: Early On, France found - Zithromax (Azithromycin) (Z-Pack) and Hydroxicloriquinekilled the virus
Low Risk Persons, ie. under 45 years of age, Prophylaxis (before you get sick), symptomatic care and treatment:Hydroxicloriquine, Ivermectin, Quercetine (a Antioxidant flavonoid - from Apples, fruits and vegetables reduces inflamation) withVitamin C gets, Zinc into the cells. EGCG (epigallocatechin gallate) a polyphenol a plant compound - green tea extract.
Act Fast!Time is Essential!
Act Firstif you think you are sick! ...THEN Test - DoNOTwait until you are tested.
1.) Sick? First Get Monoclonal Antibodies. If your state or local medical foundations refuse to immediately administer it to you, immediately leave your state and get to a state, doctor or hospital that will. Your life may depend on it.
2.) Hydroxicloriquine200ml twice a day for 5 days and
3.) Ivermectin (These last two are Zinc Delivery Systems that Deliver Zinc into the Cell a delivery system to increase intercellular zinc). (Note: ICU patients are given 400ml twice a day for the first two days)
In 1764, James Otis, Jr.: “The Colonists are by theLaw of Naturefree born, as indeed all men are,white or black.” John Dickinson, in the last of his twelve Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania of 1767, referred to this natural rights foundation: “Let these truths be indelibly impressed on our minds - that we cannot be HAPPY, without being FREE - that we cannot be free, without beingSECURE in our PROPERTY- that wecannot be secure in our property,if,without ourCONSENT,others may, asby right,take it away”;
"#190. Every man is born with a double right.First, a right of freedom to his person, whichno other man has a power over, but the free disposal of it lies in himself. Secondly, a right before any other man, to inherit, with his brethren, his father's goods."; "#191. By the first of these, a man is naturallyfree from subjection to any government,though he be born in a place under its jurisdiction....."; "#192....till they are allowed theirdue property, which is so to be proprietors of what they havethat nobody can take away any part of it without theirOWN CONSENT,without which, men under any government are not in the state of free men,but are direct SLAVES under the force of war..." "#193. ... (property) the nature whereof is, that, withoutaman'sOWN CONSENT(See #6&7), itcannot be taken from him."; "#194. ...For can there be anything more RIDICULOUSthan to say, I give you and yours this for ever, and that in the surest and most solemn wayof conveyance can be devised, andyet it is to be understood that I have right, if I please, to take it away from you again to-morrow?(Think how this relates to property and income taxes and how far we have strayed); "#195. I will not dispute now whether princes are exempt from the laws of their country,but this I am sure, they owe subjection to theLaws of God and Nature.Nobody, no power can exempt them from the obligations of that eternal law. Those are so great and so strong in the case of promises, that Omnipotency itself can be tied by them. Grants, promises, and oaths are bonds that hold the Almighty, whatever some flatterers say to princes of the world, who, all together, with all their people joined to them, are, in comparison of the great God, but as a drop of the bucket, or a dust on the balance -- inconsiderable, nothing! ..."
Founder's Warning Come True - Regarding Washington DC, White House and Legislature:
Patrick Henry: "....The people within that place (Washington, DC), and the strongholds, may be excused from all the burdens imposed on the rest of the society, and may enjoy exclusive emoluments, to the great injury of the rest of the people. But gentlemen say that the power will not he abused. They ought to show that it is necessary. All their powers may be fully carried into execution, without this exclusive authority in the 'ten miles square' (Washington, DC). The sweeping clause will fully enable them to do what they please. What could the most extravagant and boundless imagination ask, but power to do every thing? I have reason to suspect ambitious grasps at power. The experience of the world teaches me the jeopardy of giving enormous power. Strike this clause out of the form of the government, and how will it stand? Congress will still have power, by the sweeping clause, to make laws within that {438} place and the strong holds, independently of the local authority of the state. I ask you, if this clause be struck out, whether the sweeping clause will not enable them to protect themselves from insult. If you grant them these powers, you destroy "every degree of responsibility". They will fully screen them from justice, and preclude the possibility of punishing them. No instance can be given of such a wanton grasp of power as an exclusive legislation in all cases whatever. ..." Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 James Madison's Answer: "They(The Federal Legislature, Supreme Court, Federal Judicial and Executive)are not given that much power...."
Therefore it is clear the federal government has exceeded their authority. Their association with foreign banks and involvement with exclusive privileged organizations such as international and domestic corporations, unions, lobbyists and special interests has corrupted the republican form of government consisting of limited federal power and small, well represented, strong state republics.
Note: If this video above is taken down (again) by YouTube, do a search for Ed Asner 9-11 Solving the Mysteries of WTC World Trade Center #7 to view it until we re-post or view similar videos athttp://www.ae911truth.org
Over 3,000 people died on 911 and no investigations as to what the people and businesses associated with them were involved with... If even one person was murdered in this same city, what that one person may have been involved in would bethoroughly investigated. 3000 + people are murdered, and there is nothing said about the activities of any of the victims or the companies associated with them.
Manipulation of National Currency, Foreign Currency and Trade can produce serious consequences; As clearly seen with the "Federal Reserve" investing in Foreign Banks,all without transparent Civilian or Legislative oversight to scrutinize poor investments or, more importantly, corruption;
Result: We are now 1.264 TRILLION DOLLARS in Debt to China alone (see article below); Our country is now quaking from the International debt caused by poor legislative governing ofAmerican Tax Dollars,poor corporate investments, and corruption associated with those investments;
Building 7 held many records of those companies involved in the World Trade Center. The video recording of the firemen indicating that the building wasgoing to bepurposely collapsed is clear; The way the building fallsis unquestionable.
The American Patriot Party promotes having a thorough investigation, not only of the buildings, but of the business activities of the victims and those associated with the victims; of the companies and their activities, and of all things leading up to thecollapse;to find out what actually occurred, both for the families of the victims and the country.
Watch and listen to this video with it's many professionals. Then you decide.
Sir Winston Churchill: "How Dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism (Islamic doctrine) lays on it's votaries (Religious Followers)! ...which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia (Rabies) in a dog. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits (thoughtless undisciplined behavior), slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live."
Watch British Police Attack their OwnSimply for WantingBritish Law Upheld:The Video "Western Sharia Police" Warns us of the upcoming Dangers against our Freedom of Speech and Liberties from Creeping Radical Islam: NOTE: This Video has many internet bans including google chrome browsers which switches quickly from start arrow to an X. You can either try to view it in different browsers or reload the page in chrome but stop the reload as soon as the arrow is visible. This should stop the video ban function and maintain the arrow to allow you to start this video. https://altcensored.com/watch?v=SLT9JOE64WQ
See Also:
Islamic Britain: The TRUTH About No Go Zones NOTE: This Video has many internet bans including google chrome browsers which switches quickly from start arrow to an X. You can either try to view it in different browsers or reload the page in chrome but stop the reload as soon as the arrow is visible. This should stop the video ban function and maintain the arrow to allow you to start this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBhhxcpJwps&t=1s
American Patriot Video Archive:Ezra Taft Benson- 1of2 Globalist Bankers Tactic to Stifle Freedom and American Patriot Movements in America. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTd-CnCMK-8
American Patriot Video Archive:Ezra Taft Benson -2of2 Globalist Bankers Tactic to Stifle Freedom and American Patriot Movements in America. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUu0prLE9no
John Birch Society's eye opening Video against the SPLC Southern Poverty Law Center showing the SPLCSouthern Poverty Law Centerto be a socialist organization spreading hate against the original Constitution and those true American Patriots supporting it; That the SPLC does this by comparing true American Patriots whichtheyhatewith criminal organizations - Seeagain Ezra Taft Benson's WarningVideo above of socialist backed organizations creating "confusion followed by delusion".
Support the only party that actually follows the Constitutionas it was intended.
No other party or organizationwill do this, not one.
Compare us to other parties:The American Patriot Partybelieves in Constitutionaland Common LawCarryof armsfor bearing andconcealment;forpreservation of self, family, community, freedoms,libertiesand property.The Founders hid theircannons, munitions and arms from their government, clearly indicatingconcealment without registration is an inalienable right:See Federalist #46 and James Madison's 25 to 1 Power Ratio - Citizens militia over military,See below on this page.This Constitutional minimum ratio is what the NRA cowers from upholding, however the American Patriot Party does not.
Two of theseweapons werepurchased (without governmentregistration as with all gun purchases at that time) from Puckle, himself a citizen attorney inventor, bythe 2nd Duke of Montagu.
George Washington'scall for the CITIZENSto manufacture and havereadily at handmilitary grade weaponryFirst Annual Message to Congress, January 8, 1790for thedefense of theirfreedoms and liberties.See Quotes Below on this page.
The American Patriot Partysupports formation andarmamentof Citizens Militias (all citizens)as intended by the Founders.It is theresponsibilityof the states and federal government to train and arm theCitizenmilitias (See:Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788);Once trained, military members of the US armed forceshave the duty to continue their service as members of the citizen militiawhere they reside with those that have not had military service, work totrain them,and to take their place as James Madison indicates in Federalist#46as a opposing force to the standing military they onceserved as well as that of foreignaggression; This is to balance and check thepower of our limited government(s). This is not a anti-governmentstand,or anti-military stand;this is a Constitutional check against the misuse of power by governments acting under apretense of authorityand outsidethose limited delegated powers giventhem. Note that if the federal government fails to arm and train the citizens, it is the right and duty of the state, local communities and or citizens to do so - including the right to import arms; including to import arms outside the federal pretense ofcontrol - which by the Bill of Rights2nd Amendment, the federal government has nocontrolregardingarms(See:Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788). George MasonVirginiaRatifying Convention 6-16-1788: "...His fears, as he had before expressed, were, that grievous punishments (LAWS and Laws againstguns etc.) would be inflicted, in order to render the servicedisagreeable to the (Citizen) militia themselves,and induce them to wish its abolition, which would afford aPRETENSEfor establishing a standing army...." (APP Note: This has already happened);
John Marshall:"....If Congress neglect our militia (citizens),"we can arm them OURSELVES".CANNOT (the state and or people of) Virginia "import arms? Cannot she put them into the hands of "HER" militia-men?He thenconcluded by observing, that the power of governing the militia wasNOTvested in the states by implication, because,being "possessed of it" "antecedent to the adoption of the government, and "not being divested of it" by any grant or restriction in the Constitution, they must necessarily be as "FULLY possessed of it as ever they had been.>And it could NOT be said that the states derived ANY powers from that (the federal government or Constitution) system, "but RETAINED them," >>>>>>>>"though not acknowledged in ANY part of it". "
See Federalist #46-James Madison: A 25 to 1 Civilian Power Ratiooverthe Standing Army (MILITARY) is the"minimum power ratio"inanyfree countryand the true definition of what a MILITIAis.
".....The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.
"TO THESE"(The United States Military)WOULD BE "OPPOSED" A(CITIZEN)"MILITIA"amounting to near half a million of"CITIZENS"with"ARMS IN THEIR HANDS", OFFICERED BY MEN CHOSEN FROM "AMONG THEMSELVES"(CHOSEN BY THE LOCAL CITIZEN'S - NOT MILITARY OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - THE TRUE DEFINITION OF MILITIA ),fighting for their(THE CITIZEN'S)common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their(THE CITIZEN MILITIA'S)affections and confidence.
It may well be doubted, whether a(CITIZEN)MILITIA "thus circumstanced"(25 to 1 ARMED POWER RATIO)could ever be conquered by such a(SMALL)proportion of"regular troops"(i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES). ...."
ReadFederalist #46in full below on this page.... Get educated.
World Immigration News and Related Videos - a MUST READ!:
When governments deny the existence of a radical violent religious culture and devious acts of war; and not only invite it, but inject it, into their country.
War is imminent when the governments establish the condition of it. John Locke, "Second Treatise on Civil Government 1698" Chapter 19: Of the Dissolution of Government
#211.HE that will, with any clearness, speak of the dissolution of government, ought in the first placeto distinguish between the dissolution of the society and the dissolution of the government..."
#217. Fourthly, thedelivery also of the people into the subjection of a foreign power, eitherby the prince or by the legislative, is certainlya change of the legislative, and soa dissolution of the government. For the end why people entered into society being to be preserved one entire, free, independent society to be governed by its own laws,this is lost whenever they are given up into the power of another. ..."
Read John Locke "Second Treatise on Civil Government 1689" https://americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Civil_Government/locke_civil_government.html and https://americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Church_State_Man/locke_church_state_man.html so that you can understand the principles of toleration that the Governments of Europe, Britain and the United States have quite apparently forgot.
"...#71.Again: That Church can have no right to be tolerated by the magistrate which is constituted upon such a bottom that all those who enter into it do thereby ipso facto deliver themselves up to the protection and service of another prince. For by this means the magistrate would give way to the settling of a foreign jurisdiction in his own country and suffer his own people to be listed, as it were, for soldiers against his own Government. Nor does the frivolous and fallacious distinction between the Court and the Church afford any remedy to this inconvenience; especially when both the one and the other are equally subject to the absolute authority of the same person, who has not only power to persuade the members of his Church to whatsoever he lists, either as purely religious, or in order thereunto, but can also enjoin it them on pain of eternal fire.It is ridiculous for any one to profess himself to be a Mahometan(Muslim)only in his religion, but in everything else a faithful subject to a Christian magistrate,whilst at the same time he acknowledges himself bound to yieldblind obedienceto the Mufti of Constantinople, who himself is entirely obedient to the Ottoman Emperor and frames the feigned oracles of that religionaccording to his pleasure.But this Mahometan living amongst Christianswould yet more apparently renounce their governmentif he acknowledged the same person to be head of his Church who is the supreme magistrate in the state.
#72.Lastly, those are not at all to be tolerated who deny the being of a God. Promises, covenants, and oaths, which are the bonds of human society, can have no hold upon an atheist. The taking away of God, though but even in thought, dissolves all; besides also, those that by their atheism undermine and destroy all religion, can have no pretence of religion whereupon to challenge the privilege of a toleration. As for other practical opinions, though not absolutely free from all error,if they do not tend to establish domination over others,or civil impunity to the Church in which they are taught, there can be no reason why they should not be tolerated.
#73.It remains that I say something concerning those assemblies which, being vulgarly called and perhaps having sometimes been conventicles and nurseries of factions and seditions, are thought to afford against this doctrine of toleration. But this has not happened by anything peculiar unto the genius of such assemblies, but by the unhappy circumstances of an oppressed or ill-settled liberty. These accusations would soon cease if the law of toleration were once so settled that all Churches were obliged to lay down toleration as the foundation of their own liberty, and teach that liberty of conscience is every man's natural right, equally belonging to dissenters as to themselves; and that nobody ought to be compelled in matters of religion either by law or force. The establishment of this one thing would take away all ground of complaints and tumults upon account of conscience; and these causes of discontents and animosities being once removed, there would remain nothing in these assemblies that were not more peaceable and less apt to produce disturbance of state than in any other meetings whatsoever. But let us examine particularly the heads of these accusations. "..."
Samuel Adams: "In regard to Religeon, mutual tolleration in the different professions thereof, is what all good and candid minds in all ages have ever practiced; and both by precept and example inculcated on mankind: And it is now generally agreed among christians that this spirit of toleration in the fullest extent consistent with the being of civil society "is the chief characteristical mark of the true church"1 & In so much that "Mr. Locke" has asserted, and "proved beyond the possibility of contradiction on any solid ground", that such toleration ought to be extended to all whose doctrinesare not subversive of society.The only Sects which he thinks ought to be, and which by all wise laws are excluded from such toleration, are those who teach Doctrines subversive of the Civil Government under which they live.The Roman Catholicks or Papists are excluded by reason of such Doctrines as these "that Princes excommunicated may be deposed, and those they call Hereticks may be destroyed without mercy; besides their recognizing the Pope in so absolute a manner, in subversion of Government, by introducing as far as possible into the states, under whose protection they enjoy life, liberty and property, that solecism in politicks, Imperium in imperio2 (i.e. a Government within a Government) leading directly to the worst anarchy and confusion, civil discord, war and blood shed-- "
This limitation was called for because as Locke presented, following a religious leader from another country (at that time Popes that would have people killed in other countries for heresy) is like having a foreign soldiers following the orders of foreign leaders in your local state and community.
Freedom relies on a set of defined principles based upon the "Laws of Nature" and local interests of local communities for the purpose of local commonwealths; Not distant legislators or leaders.
John Locke: "Chapter 2: "...Of the State of Nature 4."To understand political power aright, andderive it from its original,we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man. A state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another, there being nothing more evident than that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of Nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another, without subordination or subjection,..."
6. But though this be a state of liberty,yet it is not a state of license; though man in that state have an uncontrollable liberty to dispose of his person or possessions, yet he has not liberty to destroy himself, or so much as any creature in his possession, but where some nobler use than its bare preservation calls for it. The "State of Nature" has a "Law of Nature" to govern it, which obliges every one, and REASON, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions; for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise Maker; all the servants of one sovereign Master, sent into the world by His order and about His business; they are His property, whose workmanship they are made to last during His, not one another's pleasure.
And, being furnished with like faculties, sharing all in one community of Nature, there cannot be supposed any such subordination among us that may authorise us to destroy one another, as if we were made for one another's uses, as the inferior ranks of creatures are for ours. Every one as he is bound to preserve himself, and not to quit his station wilfully, so by the like reason, when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he as much as he can to preserve the rest of mankind, and not unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.
7. And that all men may berestrained from invading others' rights, and from doing hurt to one another, and the law of Nature be observed, which willeth the peace and preservation of all mankind, the execution of the law of Nature is in that state put into every man's hands, whereby every one has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree as may hinder its violation.For the Law of Nature would, as all other laws that concern men in this world, be in vain if there were nobody that in the State of Nature had a power to execute that law, and thereby preserve the innocent and restrain offenders;and if any one in the state of Nature may punish another for any evil he has done, every one may do so. For in that state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another, what any may do in prosecution of that law, every one must needs have a right to do.
8. And thus, in the state of Nature, one man comes by a power over another, but yet no absolute or arbitrary power to use a criminal, when he has got him in his hands, according to the passionate heats or boundless extravagancy of his own will, but only to retribute to him so far as calm reason and conscience dictate, what is proportionate to his transgression, which is so much as may serve for reparation and restraint. For these two are the only reasons why one man may lawfully do harm to another, which is that we call punishment. In transgressing the law of Nature, the offender declares himself to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity, which is that measure God has set to the actions of men for their mutual security, and so he becomes dangerous to mankind; the tie which is to secure them from injury and violence being slighted and broken by him, which being a trespass against the whole species, and the peace and safety of it, provided for by the law of Nature, every man upon this score, by the right he hath to preserve mankind in general, may restrain, or where it is necessary, destroy things noxious to them, and so may bring such evil on any one who hath transgressed that law, as may make him repent the doing of it, and thereby deter him, and, by his example, others from doing the like mischief. And in this case, and upon this ground, every man hath a right to punish the offender, and be executioner of the law of Nature."
The Principle of Freedom added by Samuel Adams is this:"If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation;the [Volume 5, Page 396] right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave--"
This is the most important addition to the definition of true freedom, as no individual can give up the laws of nature and allow himself to give up (voluntary slavery), or allow others to accept his relinquishment (Slavery), of those rights to any one, or any religion, or any government, or any leader; Period.
Freedom requires consent, but you cannot consent to give up any inalienable right that keeps you free.
Here are a few videos taken fromYoutube for your review and see if you can recognize that there are those that will misuse freedom to take away your freedoms.
Ron Paul had the correct statement to our military presence in Iraq; "We marched them over there, we can march them back";
And ask yourself regarding the below videos, would not the same answer by reversing the actions of governments that created this problem be the solution; and let them improve their own countries to their liking if that is what they truly wish to do.
This has nothing to do with racism; it has to do with freedom and free societies vs the Muslim religion that does not respect or recognize either; and mirrors the condition that old world Catholics and Papists imposed on those that sought refuge in the new world from religious persecution.
It is also about governments whose purpose is to protect private property, vacating that purpose byplacing huge tax burdensuponthe properties,societyandearningsof its citizens. This change of purpose is, by alldefinitions of civil society and explained by John Locke, an act of war against their own citizens;and can in no way be an act of a representative government:
John Locke Second Treatise on Civil Government:
Locke: " #222. The reason why men enter into society is thepreservation of their property;and the end while they choose and authorise a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set,as guards andfences to the propertiesof all the society, to limit the power and moderate the dominion of every part and member of the society.For since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making:whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people,who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence.Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition,fear,folly, orcorruption,...
(APP Note: See this in Samuel Adams Statement within the Rights of the Colonists, 1772: "If men throughfear,fraudormistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.")
...endeavour to grasp themselves, or"put into the hands of any other"(which they do when they force support of immigrants from the money derived from their citizens property and labor), an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people,by this "breach of trust" they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, andit devolves tothe people, who havea right to resumetheiroriginal liberty, and by the establishment of anew legislative (such as they shall think fit),provide for their own safety and security,(APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence)which is the end for which they are in society...."
Macron sets stage for a French civil war and promotes a EU army to subdue it.
As Germany wreaths from the agony of EU mandated uncontrolled mass immigration and president Merkels disregaurd to it's citizen's anguish of the establishment and digging in of Islamic fundamentalists, French president Macron, French socialist, takes strides in destroying his own country to step up in power in the European Union (EU); Favoring mass immigration and ignoring the cries of his French countrymen.
Make no mistake, this is and has always been a religious war. The Muslim plan, as you will see in these videos from their own words is to use population as a weapon to take over the countries they have been allowed to infiltrate.
Beware of "Crocodile Tears" from those that want tolerationonly to gain power to inflict upon others their own intolerance. Locke and the Founders understood that allowing distant or foreign religious figures to control the beliefs and actions of those within a local community is like having foreign armies stationed within your local communities borders. Knowing "Distant Legislatures" can never provide representation.
And for this reason Catholics and Papists "at that time in history", whose Popes could have anyone opposing the Catholic Church in a foreign country killed for heresy, could never be tolerated. Today, the Muslim religionis using the people's ignorance of this important limitation to "tolerance"to allow their foothold in other countries only so to establish their religious control over those countries.
John Locke - Church, State Man - #71: "... 71." ...Again: That Church can haveNO RIGHT to be TOLERATEDby the magistrate which is constituted upon such a bottom that all those who enter into it do thereby ipso facto deliver themselves up to the protection and service ofanother prince. For by this means the magistrate would give way to the settling of aforeign jurisdiction in his own country and suffer his own people to be listed, as it were, for soldiers against his own Government.Nor does the frivolous and fallacious distinction between the Court and the Church afford any remedy to this inconvenience; especially when both the one and the other are equally subject to the absolute authority of the same person, who has not only power to persuade the members of his Church to whatsoever he lists, either as purely religious, or in order thereunto, but can also enjoin it them on pain of eternal fire. It is ridiculous for any one to profess himself to be a Mahometan (Muslim) only in his religion, but in everything else a faithful subject to a Christian magistrate, whilst at the same time he acknowledges himself bound to yield blind obedience to the Mufti of Constantinople, who himself is entirely obedient to the Ottoman Emperor andframes the feigned oracles of that religion according to his pleasure. But this Mahometan (Muslim) living amongst Christians would yet more apparently renounce their government if he acknowledged the same person to be head of his Church who is the supreme magistrate in the state." Samuel Adams - Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772:
"Just and true liberty, equal and impartial liberty" in matters spiritual and temporal, is a thing that all Men are clearly entitled to,by theeternal and immutable laws Of God and nature, as well as by the law of Nations, & all well grounded municipal laws,which must have their foundation in the former.--
In regard to Religeon,mutual tollerationin the different professions thereof, is what all good and candid minds in all ages have ever practiced; and both by precept and example inculcated on mankind: And it is now generallyagreed among christians that this spirit of toleration in the fullest extent consistent with the being of civil society "is the chief characteristical mark of the true church"1& In so much that Mr. Lock has asserted, and proved beyond the possibility of contradiction on any solid ground,that such toleration ought to be extended to all whose doctrines are not subversive of society(this would exclude radical Muslims as well as it did radical Catholics and Papists).The only Sects which he thinks ought to be, andwhich by all wise lawsare excluded from such toleration,are those who teach Doctrines subversive of theCivil Government under which they live.TheRoman Catholicks or Papists are excluded by reason of such Doctrines as these "that Princes excommunicated may be deposed, and those they call Hereticks may be destroyed without mercy;besides their recognizing the Pope in so absolute a manner, in subversion of Government,by introducing as far as possible into the states, under whose protection they enjoy life, liberty and property, that solecism in politicks,Imperium in imperio2(i.e. aGovernment within a Government)leading directly to the worst anarchy and confusion, civil discord, war and blood shed--..."
The United Nations is acting as a DISTANT LEGISLATURE to assume power over sovereign nations and remove power from citizens and place them under the direction and power of those people directing and controlling the United Nations.
Remember, ruling by Distant Legislatures, collectivism, socialism and creating dependency are what endanger our freedom's and liberties, as there can be NO representation by Distant Legislatures:
".....Now what liberty can there be, where property is taken awaywithout "consent"?
Can it be said with any colour of truth and Justice, that this Continent of three thousand miles in length, and a breadth as yet unexplored, in which however, its supposed, there are five millions of people, has the least voice, vote or influence in the decisions of the British Parliament? Have they, all together, any more right or power to return a single member to that house of commons,who have not inadvertently, but DELIBERATELYassumeda power to dispose of theirlives, 8 Liberties and properties,than to choose an Emperor of China! Had the Colonists a right to return members to the British parliament, it would only be hurtfull; as from their local situation and circumstancesit is impossiblethey should be ever truly and properly represented there. The inhabitants of this country in all probability in a few years will be more numerous, than those of Great Britain and Ireland together; yet it is absurdly expected [Volume 5, Page 397] by the promoters of the present measures, that these, with their posterity to all generations, should be easywhile their property,shall be disposed ofby a house of commons atTHREE THOUSAND MILES DISTANTfrom them;
andwho cannot be supposed to have the least care or concern for their real interest: Who have not only "NO natural care for their interest", but must be in effect "BRIBED AGAINST IT";as every burden they lay on the colonists is so much saved or gained to themselves. Hitherto many of the Colonists have been free from Quit Rents; but if the breath of a british house of commons can originate an act fortaking away all our money, our lands will go nextor be subject to rack rents from haughty and relentless landlords who will ride at ease, while we are trodden in the dirt. The Colonists have been branded with the odious names of traitors and rebels, only for complaining of their grievances;How long such treatment will, or ought to be born is submitted. "
--------
What is it thatdissolves governmentsthat are suppose to defend our liberties? John Locke presents this scenario:
-------- John Lock - Second Treatise on Civil Government - 1689:
"...#212. Besides this overturning from without,governments aredissolved from within:
First.When the legislative is altered, ...When any one, or more, shall take upon them to make laws whom the people have not appointed so to do, they make laws without authority, which the people are not therefore bound to obey;by which means they come again to be out of subjection, and may constitute to themselves a new legislative, as they think best,being in full liberty to resist the force of those who, without authority, would impose anything upon them.Every one is at the disposure of his own will, when those who had, by the"delegation"of the society, the declaring of the public will, are excluded from it, and others usurp the place who have no such authority or delegation. "
"...2. " Resolved,That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress (thefederal government)a power to punish:
a.) treason, b.) counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, c.) piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and d.) offenses against the law of nations,
and >>>>NO OTHER CRIMES>>>"WHATSOEVER";
and it being trueas a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powersnot delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the States,are reserved to theStates respectively,or to the people,"
therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the — day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States,"(>>>> and ALL their OTHER ACTS which assume toCREATE,DEFINE, orPUNISHcrimes,OTHER than THOSE so "ENUMERATED" in the Constitution,) >>> are "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE";
and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right,appertainsSOLELYandEXCLUSIVELYto the respective "STATES", each within its own territory..."
To guard againststatesgiving away or taking your rights and preparedto defend your rights, states need to be:
1.)smallto giveAdequateRepresentation, and 2.) strong to opposethe corruption ofDistant(Federal and International)Legislatures.
----------
LOCKE CONTINUED:
#213. This being usually brought about by such in the commonwealth,who misuse the power they have,..."
#217. Fourthly, thedelivery also of the people into thesubjection of a foreign power,eitherby the prince (president/executive)or by the legislative, is certainlya change of the legislative, and soa dissolution of the government. For the end why people entered into society being to be preserved one entire, free, independent society to be governed by itsOWNlaws,this is lost whenever they are given up into the power of ANOTHER. "
---------
APP NOTE: The United States are actually SovereignIndependentStates, each with their own republic (Which even smaller independent republics can be created i.e. divided and formed into smaller independent states as provided under the Constitution to give adequate representation) - The Constitution does not take that away, as the Constitution is a very LIMITED "COMPACT" See Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788https://americanpatriotparty.cc/americanpatriotpartynewsletterand Virginia Resolutions 1798https://americanpatriotparty.cc/candidates-
"...RESOLVED,That the General Assembly of Virginia, doth unequivocably express a firm resolution to maintain and defend theCONSTITUTIONof the United States,ANDtheCONSTITUTIONOF THIS STATE,against every aggression either foreign or domestic, and that they will support"the government"of the United States in all measures"WARRANTED" by "the former".
That this assembly most solemnly declares a warm attachment to the Union of the"States", to maintain which it pledges all its powers; and that for this end,it is their duty to watch over and opposeevery infractionof those principles which constitute the"only basis"of that Union, becausea faithful observance of them, can alone secure it's existence and the public happiness.
That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties;as limited by the"plain sense and intention"of the instrument constituting the"compact"; as NO further valid that they are authorized by the grants "ENUMERATED"in"THAT COMPACT";and thatin case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by thesaid COMPACT, theSTATESwho are parties thereto,have the right, and are in DUTY bound, tointerposefor arresting the progress of the "EVIL", and for maintaining within theirrespective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.
That the General Assemblydoth alsoexpress itsDEEP REGRET,that a spirit has in sundry instances, beenmanifested by the federal government, to "enlarge its powers by FORCED constructions"of the constitutional charter which defines them;
and thatimplications have appearedofa "design"to"EXPOUND"certain>>>"GENERAL "PHRASES"(which having been copied from the very limited grant of power, in the former articles of confederation were theless liable to be misconstrued)so as to destroy the meaning and effect, of the particular "ENUMERATION" which NECESSARILY EXPLAINS AND LIMITS THE GENERAL PHRASES;
andso as to consolidate the states by degrees, into"ONE SOVEREIGNTY"(APP: i.e. "ONE NATION" -NO WHERE INTENDEDby the Founders),the obvioustendency andINEVITABLECONSEQUENCEof which would be,
to>>>"TRANSFORM"the present "republican""SYSTEM"(of which there are numerous "independent Republics")of the United State"s",into "an absolute", or "at best" aMIXED>>>"MONARCHY". ..."
----------
(APP: a"Mixed Monarchy" is a ruling class which we can see emerging today with two Clintons and three Bush's attempting to monopolize the presidency and control of the United States - this was warned by George Mason in the Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788)
----------
WE ARENOTONE NATION:
TheaboveFounders documents show we areNOT"One Sovereignty"and we areNOT"One Nation";
When compared with the FoundersOriginal intentas spoken byJames Madison abovein the Virginia Resolutions 1798andinThe Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788show how farwe have strayed from the true definition of free republics, liberty and freedom as defined in theOriginalFounding Documents andOriginalLIMITEDConstitutional COMPACT.
Our states when they transferundelegatedpowers to the federal government and federal governments,dissolve themselveswhen they attempt to make us"One Nation", OR when either of them attempt totransfer the authoritygiven to them into the hands of the United Nations as clearly explained here by Locke.
A more accurate pledge would be one that would follow the written intent and principles of freedom and indicate the flagfollowsthose principles, and one that wouldnot lend itself to blind nationalism; orblindly following a image ofa flag whose legislatures change the meaning of on a regular basis;orto any such blind nationalsocialism;
This pledgewould be and we propose:
New PledgeofAllegiance:
"I pledge allegianceto thoseInalienable RightsrespectingtheLaws of Nature,which definestheFlagof theUnited States of America;
and to protectingourFree Common Law Societies in which theyconsenttoform; Independent State Republics, United under God, with liberty and justice for all."
Richard Taylor - American Patriot Party
----------
LOCKE CONTINUED:
#220. In these, and the like cases,when the government isDISSOLVED,the people are at liberty to provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative differing from the other by the change of persons, or form, or both, as they shall find it most for their safety and good.For the societycan never, by the fault of another, lose the native and original right it has to preserve itself, which can only be done by a settled legislative and a fair and impartial execution of the laws made by it. But the state of mankind is not so miserable that they are not capable of using this remedy till it be too late to look for any. To tell people they may provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative, when, by oppression, artifice, or being delivered over to a foreign power, their old one is gone, is only to tell them they may expect relief when it is too late, and the evil is past cure.This is, in effect, no more than to bid them first be slaves, and then to take care of their liberty, and, when their chains are on, tell them they may act like free men.This, if barely so,is rather mockery than relief, and men can never be secure from tyranny if there be no means to escape it till they are perfectly under it;and, therefore,it is that they have not only a right to get out of it, but to prevent it.
#221. There is, therefore, secondly, another way whereby governments are dissolved, and that is, when the legislative, or the prince, either of themact contrary to their trust.
For the legislative acts against the trust reposed in them when they endeavour to invade the property of the subject,and to make themselves, or any part of the community, masters or arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties, or fortunes of the people.
#222. The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property;and the end while they choose and authorise a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set,as guards and fences to the properties of all the society, to limit the power and moderate the dominion of every part and member of the society.For since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making:whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people,who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence.Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition,fear,folly, orcorruption, ...
(APP Note: See this in Samuel Adams Statement within the Rights of the Colonists, 1772: "If men throughfear,fraudormistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.")
endeavour to grasp themselves, orPUT INTO THE HANDS OF "ANY OTHER", an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people,by this BREACH OF TRUST they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, andit devolves to the people, who havea right to resumetheiroriginal liberty, and by the establishment of anew legislative (such as they shall think fit),provide for their own safety and security,(APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence)which is the end for which they are in society. What I have said here concerning the legislative in general holds true also concerning the supreme executor, who having a double trust put in him, both to have a part in the legislative and the supreme execution of the law, acts against both, when he goes about to set up his own arbitrary will as the law of the society. He acts also contrary to his trust when he employs the force, treasure, and offices of the society to corrupt the representatives and gain them to his purposes, when he openly pre-engages the electors, and prescribes, to their choice, such whom he has, by solicitation, threats, promises,or otherwise, wonto his "designs", and employs them to bring in such who have promised beforehand what to vote and what to enact. Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new model the ways of election, what is it but to cut up the government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security? For thepeople having reserved to themselves the choice of their representativesas the fence to their properties, could do it for no other end but that they might always be freely chosen, and so chosen, freely act and advise as the necessity of the commonwealth and the public good should, upon examination and mature debate, be judged to require. This, those who give their votes before they hear the debate, and have weighed the reasons on all sides, are not capable of doing. To prepare such an assembly as this, and endeavour to set up the declared abettors of his own will, for the true representatives of the people, and the law-makers of the society, is certainly as great a breach of trust, andas perfect adeclaration of a "design"..."
(APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence and compare 223-226:
" ... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object,evinces a "design"to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is theirright, it is theirduty, to THROW OFF such government and to provide new guards for their future security.)
LOCKE CONTINUED:"...to subvert the government, as is possible to be met with. To which, if one shall add rewards and punishments visibly employed to the same end, and all the arts of perverted law made use of to take off and destroy all that stand in the wayof such a >>"design", and will not comply and consenttobetray the liberties of their country,it will be past doubt what is doing. What power they ought to have in the society who thus employ it contrary to the trust that along with it in its first institution, is easy to determine;and one cannot but see that he who has once attempted any such thing as this cannot any longer be trusted."
-------------------------
CBC SPECIAL REPORT: Global Warming Doomsday CalledOff
"It is amistaketo think this fault is proper only to monarchies.Other forms of governmentareliable to itas wellas that;
forWHEREVERthepowerthat is put in any hands for the governmentof the peopleand thepreservationof theirpropertiesis applied to"other ends",
andmade use of to"IMPOVERISH", "HARASS", or"SUBDUE"them to theARBITRARYandIRREGULARcommands ofthose that have it,
THERE it presently becomes TYRANNY,
whetherthose that thus use it areone or many. Thus we read of the thirty tyrants at Athens, as well as one at Syracuse; and the intolerable dominion of the Decemviri at Romewas nothing better." ..."
-------------------------
FROM DEBT - TODEFENSELESSNESS -TO SLAVERY - UNITED STATES FINANCES CHINA'S MILITARYBUDGETON DEBT INTEREST ALONE
"...Forbes based his comments on fiscal2011,in which the CBO estimates the government will spend $225 billion, or $616,438,356 per day, on interest payments. China held 12.1 percent of public debt at the end of February. So if the 2011 estimates hold and China holds the same proportion of debt throughout the year, it would receive about
$74.4 million per day...."
That is26 BILLION 156 MILLION A YEARIN INTEREST ALONEALREADY PAID - BACK IN2011!!!
Investments the Chinese make with this money compounds the danger TEN FOLD TIMES TEN.
Free trade is fine.
Handing our Country for free to the Chinese or reducing our defense by empowering a Communist Country to our eventual demise is NOT.
Presently, the interest owed on money borrowed from China and being paid to China, is financing alarge percentage of the CHINESE MILITARY.
Interest to the debt owed to China By 2020, if not curtailed, can and will finance theENTIRE CHINESE ANNUAL MILITARY BUDGET:
"As another example, in2012China published a defense budget of RMB670.274 billion, with an increase from 2011 of RMB 67.604 billion and agrowth rate of 11.2 percent."
2013:"....Military spending is set to rise this year to740.6 billionyuan($119 billion) from 669.1 billion yuan, the Ministry of Finance said in a report.China has the second-biggest military budgetin the world after the U.S., which spent nearly six times more on defense than China last year and is now cutting those outlays. ..."
We are presently financing and arming our potential future enemiesIN MASS.
-------------------------
CHINA ARMED BY US FEDERALGOVERNMENT-WHILE UNITED STATESCITIZENS ARE DISARMED BY STATE & US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
APPARENTLY OUR STATE AND FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES BELIEVE THE CHINESE MILITARY HAVE A GREATER RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS AND SELFPRESERVATION THAN THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES.
Our Federal and State SO CALLED Representatives are financing through wasteful spending, lavish salary raises and retirements, forced taxation to pay for forced UNION "MAXIMUM" WAGES, WASTEFUL CORPORATE CONTRACTS,UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND NEEDLESS UNENDING WARSand DEBTCREATED BY THESE to which the interest owed China is nowthe Arming of Chinese with Machine guns, Tanks, Cannons, Missiles, Jet fighters and Nuclear Arsenals;
ALL WHILE passing laws here to prohibit citizens fromfrom owning even a machine guntodefend ourselves, communities and countries.
How more stupid and ignorant can those "so called" "REPRESENTATIVES" "you" have elected be?
But it is a fact that these representatives are not "stupid and ignorant",but fully aware andcalculating;
These Representatives, every one, are guilty of rendering aid to our enemies;
These representatives, every one, are guilty of the crimes of treason; Those who support or protect them in any fashion bear the same title - your duty to a "job" does not exceed your DUTY to uphold the Constitution or Essential Natural Rightswhich exceed even the Constitution as our Founders have established.
Neither retirement nor time can reduce these crimes thesecorrupted representativeshave already committed.
Are you ready toREADandLEARN?
ARE YOU READY TO VOTE FOR ("so called" by the Socialist Collectives Left and Socialist Corporates Collectives False Right )"RADICAL" Constitutionalism the Founders readily PRESCRIBEDYET? ...YES? OR......Maybe you want to "wait" just a "little longer"?... and "hope" it gets "better"...... NO?
Then how ready are you to put the federal government back in it's"10 MILE SQUARE BOX"intended for the federal government and all their"DEPARTMENTS"before they Enslave you to a point you cannot even defend yourself?Don't Know what >>>> "BOX" I speak of? ......... Are You Ready to Learn? .......Lets see if you are.... Virgina Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:
JAMES MADISON:(Author of the Constitution) "Mr. Chairman: ...ICANNOT COMPREHENDthat the(FEDERAL LEGISLATURES, EXECUTIVE, FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, FEDERALGOVERNMENT AND ALL THEIR"DEPARTMENTS") "power ofLEGISLATING"over a"SMALL" "DISTRICT"(Washington , DC-DISTRICTCAPITOL),
which >>>"CANNOTEXCEED" >>>"TEN MILES SQUARE",( I.E. ......THE >>>>>>> "BOX" ) and may >>>"NOT BE" more than "ONE"MILE,(Limit of PhysicalStructures)will involve theDANGERSwhich he(Patrick Henry)apprehends. ..."
SEE THEPHYSICAL LIMITSOF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?
Gettingsmarter? Want to learn more? Keep Reading and Read theLinksprovided as well.
Right now, even those that are beingproppedup as "Patriotic",are setting you up for another fall.
How? Because most of the Citizenry have never readwhat real freedom is;and they are using that ignoranceto set you up.
"RAND"Paul andincludingsuch others asMatt Kibbe - Freedomworks, Mike Huckabee, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin and others;whoarepromoting a UNCONSTITUTIONAL"UN-ENUMERATED"FLAT SALES TAX or"FAIRTAX"that will"SHOE HORN" the federal governments controloverthe states and local communities; Which is very foolish and IGNORANT.
See more on Taxes Below. RAND Paul is also trying to establish and continue to empower "Undelegated federal powers of "certain crimes" to unconstitutionally regulate the statesandlocal communities;
SUCH AS-EXCHANGING the regulating power practiced with Roe VS Wade with yet another UN-DELEGATED FEDERAL power over the states, "INSTEAD OF" simply removing the "unconstitutional Federal Power"thatenforcesRoe vs Wade and replace it with "NOTHING"; and then let the local communities regulate it;
By placing the issues where they belong - WITH THE STATES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES - it would resolve many of the "just issues" Rand wishes to accomplish;
Simply continuing to give issues to a federal court; Giving to it authority to decide where it has absolutely NO Constitutional authority, is not the way. This simply allows the federal government to arrogate or continue to arrogate undelegated powers under a "PRETENSE OF AUTHORITY".
CAUTION
NOTE THATEVERYOTHER PARTY (and almost every talk show host and public figure)is followingand promotingdistorted and deceptive definitions of the Constitution. Claimingto defend the Constitution on one hand, whilecontinuing to hackat the Constitution's rootswith the other.
ONLY theAMERICAN PATRIOT PARTYis following the Founders INTENT, Constitutional Ratified Blueprint, Common Law Definitionsof True Free Societies and that of IndependentLocal andWell RepresentativeConstitutionalRepublics.
Read us and see for yourself.
If you trust yourself to any other party or organizational leadership, youWILLbe misled and deceived.
TAXES
AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM THE AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTYON TAXATION:
DO NOT BE TAKEN IN BYNEWTAX SCHEMES- SUCH AS THENATIONAL FLAT TAX OR FAIRTAX;
DO NOT LET OLD TAX SCHEMES SUCH AS THE INCOME TAXREMAIN.
THE INCOME TAX:
The INCOME TAX isnot unconstitutional because it was, or was not, Ratified by enough states (as oftensurmised);
The INCOME TAX IS "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" "BECAUSE" IT IS A EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED "ARROGATION" OF POWER - OUTSIDE THE LIMITED DELEGATED POWERS GRANTED.
THIS TYPE OF TAX "CANNOT BE RATIFIED"BY THE STATES TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION AND ARROGATE A POWER "NO WHERE INTENDED" UPON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Changing the "LIMITED" power of "ENUMERATED" taxationwhich isa DELEGATED POWER,
into a "UNLIMITED" "UN-ENUMERATED" form of taxation OUTSIDE the DELEGATED POWER, is an ARROGATION OF POWER. It is a "NEW POWER", EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.
PATRICK HENRY(WARNS): "...I conjure you once more to remember the admonition of that sage man who told you that,"when you give power, you know not what you give".I know the absolute necessity of an energetic government.But is it consistent with any principle of prudence or good policy to grant unlimited, unbounded authority, which is so totally unnecessary that gentlemen say it will "never be exercised"?But gentlemensay that we must make experiments.A wonderful and unheard-of experiment it will be, to give"unlimited power unnecessarily"!...""...The experience of the worldteaches me the jeopardy of giving enormous power.Strike this clause out of the form of the government, and how will it stand? Congress will still have power, by thesweeping(supremacy)clause, to make laws within that {438} place and the strongholds,independently of the local authority of the state.I ask you, if this clause be struck out, whether thesweeping clausewill not enable them to protect themselves from insult.If you grant them these powers, you destroy"every degree of responsibility".They will fully screen them from justice, and preclude the possibility of punishing them. No instance can be given of such a wanton grasp of power as an exclusive legislation "in all cases whatever"."
EDMUND PENDLETON:"...I understand that (Supremacy - Sweeping)clause asNOTgoing a"SINGLE STEP BEYOND"the"DELEGATED powers"(APP: i.e. THE POWER IS LIMITEDTO THE DELEGATED POWERSAND THESE CAN NEVER BE CHANGED - THIS IS WHAT MAKES US A REPUBLIC UNDER A "ORIGINAL COMPACT").What can it act upon?Some power given by"THIS"Constitution.If they should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the"DELEGATED powers", but can by "NO MEANS"DEPART from them, (N)OR "ARROGATE" "ANY NEW"powers;for thePLAIN LANGUAGEof the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the "DELEGATED" powers"."
GEORGE NICHOLAS:"...If I understand it right,NO"NEW"power can be exercised."
JAMES MADISON:"....The honorable member(PATRICK HENRY)asks, Why ask for this power, and if the subsequent clause be not fully competent for the same purpose. If so,WHAT NEW TERRORScan arise from thisparticular clause? It is only a superfluity.
If that"LATITUDE"of"CONSTRUCTION"which he contends for were to take placewith respect to the"sweeping(supremacy Article 1- Section 8) clause",there"WOULD"be room forthose HORRORS.But it gives "NO" supplementary power. It only enables them to execute the "DELEGATED powers".
"IF" the "DELEGATION"(SET LIMITATIONS)of their powers be "SAFE"(UN-CORRUPTED FROM THEIRORIGINAL INTENT AND FORM),no possible inconvenience can arise from this clause.It is at most "BUT" explanatory...."
GEORGE NICHOLAS:The gentleman last up(PATRICK HENRY)says that the power of legislation includes every thing. Ageneralpower of legislation does.But this is a "special power" of legislation.Therefore, it does"NOT contain that plenitude of power which he imagines.They(The Federal Government, Executive, Federal Legislative and Federal Supreme Court)"CANNOT LEGISLATE" in "ANY case" but those"PARTICULARLY ENUMERATED"(DELEGATED).
APP: The Ratifying and AMENDMENT PROCESSES of the Constitution were established to make changes "WITHIN" the DELEGATED powers;
These processes were to limit and correct unnecessary powerand only WITHIN the DELEGATED powers;
These processes were NEVER MEANT to ARROGATE "NEW" POWERS upon the federal government at the will of the state or federal representatives outside of thevery limited DELEGATED powers.
-------------------------
DANGER!
NATIONALFLAT TAX/FAIRTAXDECEPTION
A NATIONAL "FLAT TAX" OR THE "FAIRTAX" WILL ENSLAVE YOU FURTHER;
ATTEMPTS ARE BEING MADE TO DECEIVE YOU BY NATIONAL CORPORATE & UNION MEDIA.
Mark Levin and other talk show hosts(including RAND Paul - Flat Tax)are promotingtheFairTax and or Flat Tax. DO NOT BE FOOLED! Like the Income Tax, these areUNENUMERATED tax schemes. Worse yet, these tax schemesinvite the federal government into your state to define"WHAT IS AND WHAT IS NOT A BUSINESS"!Using this reasoning willallow the FairTax and FlatTax to invite and "shoehorn" the federal governmentright into your home and computer; This isas everything, including your person and labor, will be considered"a business";opening everyoneand everything to be scrutinized by theNEW JOINT Federal / StateHybrid form of the IRS Created by the FAIRTAX and FLAT TAX Systems.The FairTax and Flat Tax systemsareBUY, SELL and TRADETAXES.They further do not get rid of the IRS, they simply change the name to a far more dangerous and invasive bureaucracy.Theysimply insure that the waste in government continue; Both taxschemesare like the income tax, theyuse jealousy to sell you into deeper slavery.
Thepeople that are promoting these unconstitutional tax systems are also stating they are for obeying the Constitution. This is clear deception.
Remember-RAND PAULIS NOTRON PAUL;
RONPAUL as with other true Constitutionalists understand the limitation of the Constitution andwant to get rid of the IRS and Income tax and replace them withNOTHING!
This will change everything to the BETTER.
Mark Levin, Sean Hannity,Glenn Beck (all promoting the same corporate message), RAND PAUL and other republicans and democrats, as well as special interests such as FREEDOMWORKS, all want to maintain the flow of FLAT PERCENTAGE UN-ENUMERATEDTAX MONEY to the federal government by simply changing theFORM of the IRS.(Even though they "preach" differently).
The FairTax and Flat Tax "Tax Schemes" willCHANGENOTHING;Buttheywillin fact make thingsWORSE;
This is because it will give"more invasive power" to the federal governmentand"tighter grip" over your "local and state laws"!
You will jump from the frying pan into theFIRE!
Every gain in "other areas" against a tyrannical government will mean "NOTHING"; --- "UNLESS"the tyrannical grip upon the "purse strings" are"pried from their fingers";and the power is returned to the states and local communities so that theirCONSENTmust be granted to an"ENUMERATED"TAX,"BEFORE"it is directed to be collected - as originally established in the Constitution.
Anything less, will allow the tyrannical government tofinance and shield itselffrom necessary change which will return us to true representative government as the Founders intended.
Let these talk show hosts and representatives know that this is NOT THE WAY!
BE RELENTLESS!
YOU AND THEY - ARE BEING SET UP FOR A FALL!
-------
LET US REVIEW THE FACTS:
TheOriginalConstitution was written to safeguard against suchcorruption and abuse of power.All taxationhad to beENUMERATEDBEFORE CONSENSUALLY being collected, it was also derived from imports, collected simply from viewing the finished product;so your businessaffairs, income and paperswere private:
Article 1 Section 9:"No Capitation, or OTHER direct, Tax shall be laid, "UNLESS" in "Proportion to the Census or "ENUMERATION" herein "BEFORE" directed to be taken."
....This allows you the time and meansto grant your"CONSENT" before it is "taken".
Amendment XVI:"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, fromwhatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and"WITHOUTREGARD"to any census of "ENUMERATION"."
The Federal Government Takes your money FIRST in a"FLAT"PERCENT ...THEN decideswhat THEY are going to spend it on "AFTER" theyTAKE IT. ......"WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT".
-------
Can youSEETHENECESSITYofENUMERATEDTAXATION!!! ...The Founders did!!
SEE THE ARROGATED POWER?!
SUCH "UN-ENUMERATED" "FLAT PERCENTAGE" TAXATION TAKENCONTROL OF FIRST, WHERE CONSENT IS NEAR IMPOSSIBLE TO BE OF ANY EFFECT,CAN "NEVER" BE "CONSTITUTIONAL";
AND"RATIFYING"SUCH TAXATION,CAN NEVER BE MADE TO "AMEND" THE CONSTITUTION.
NO MATTERHOW MANY STATES "RATIFY IT"!.
NO MATTER WHAT YOU NAME IT. NOTE: The income tax was found unconstitutional twice by the Supreme Court before corruption entered and renamed a direct tax a "indirect tax" and used as an excuse to arrogate new powers expressly prohibited - It is in fact stillunconstitutionaland still an new arrogated power; Further, ALL taxes are DIRECT; a "INDIRECT" tax is simply a "DIRECT" tax taken from you in a different way or made to be taken from you by someone else first-
Redefining a tax as indirect is NO EXCUSE to tax you without yourCONSENTor as a "MEANS" to arrogatea taxing and spending power beyond the very limited DELEGATEDpowers.
Here the Founders establish that creating a new >>>>>>>"MEANS" to"ARROGATE" A NEW POWER (WAY) OF TAXATIONis EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.
Mr. EDMUND PENDELTON:"....With respect to the necessity of theten miles square(Washington, DC)being superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them(the federal government)power to"make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof", I understand that clause asNOTgoing a"SINGLE STEP BEYOND"the"DELEGATED powers".What can it act upon?Some power given byTHISConstitution.If they(the federal legislature)should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the"DELEGATED powers", but can by >>>>>>>"NO MEANS"DEPART from them,(N)OR "ARROGATE"(create)"ANY NEW"powers;for thePLAIN LANGUAGEof the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the "DELEGATED" powers"."
See Also: "Declaration of Independence" - "17thGrievance"Quote belowdefining Taxation WITHOUT " CONSENT" isTYRANNY.
-------
If the federal government stayed within their "delegated" powers, funding the necessary expenditures and paying the national debt and national defense would be easy.
Force the federal government stay within the limitedDELEGATED powers;Forcethem by notfunding them to be wasteful, manipulative and tyrannical;
Stop payingfor your own enslavement and destruction.
Stop allowing State bornExclusive Privileges; Get Unions, Corporations and Tax Supported Special Interests out of Government.
Remove ALL Lobbyists from Washington DC. Limit them to your states where they must confront the local citizens of the state and not manipulate our state representatives in our national government in places far distant from the citizens that are most effected by any legislation.
Reduce the sizeof statesso that there is adequate representation and not the manipulative government which occurs from "Distant Legislatures";
"NULLIFICATION"is "the proper remedy" when delegated powers have been exceeded.
"...That this state having by its Convention, which ratified the federal Constitution, expressly declared, that"AMONG OTHER ESSENTIAL RIGHTS", "the Liberty of Conscience and of the Press"CANNOT BE CANCELED",abridged,restrained,OR MODIFIEDby "ANY AUTHORITY" of the "United States"(federal government),"
(APP: This includes Executive Orders (which in itself is unconstitutional), Legislative or Supreme Court) "...and from its extreme anxiety to guardthese rightsfromEVERY possible attackof"SOPHISTRY or AMBITION", having with other states, recommended an amendment for that purpose, which amendment was, in due time, ANNEXED to the Constitution; it would mark a "REPROACHABLE" inconsistency, and"CRIMINAL DEGENERACY", if an indifference were now shewn, to the most palpable violation ofONE OF THE RIGHTS, thus declared and secured; and to the establishment of a PRECEDENT(UNDER APRETENSEOF AUTHORITY)which may be FATAL TO THE OTHER(RIGHTS)...."
----------------------
Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322.
"...On every question of "CONSTRUCTION", let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the DEBATES (i.e. THE RATIFYING CONVENTIONS), and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the "probable one" in which it was passed". "
---------------------
Virginia "Ratifying Convention" 6-16-1788-George Nicholas: "...Congress have power to define and punish: a.) piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and b.) offenses against the laws of nations; (c.) Treason & d.) Counterfeit of Coin) ....but they (APP: the federal government, executive, legislature or supreme court)CANNOTDEFINEorPRESCRIBEthePUNISHMENTof "ANY OTHER CRIMEWHATEVER",WITHOUT "VIOLATING the CONSTITUTION"...."
2. " Resolved, That the Constitution of the United States, having "DELEGATED" to Congress a power to punish:
a.) treason, b.) counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, c.) piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas(only), and d.) offenses against the law of nations,
and>>>>NO OTHER CRIMES>>>"WHATSOEVER";
and it being trueas a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powersnot delegatedto the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the States,are reservedto theStates respectively,or to the people,"therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the — day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States,"(>>>> and ALL their OTHER ACTS which assume toCREATE,DEFINE, orPUNISHcrimes,OTHER than THOSE so "ENUMERATED" in the Constitution,)
>>> are "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE";
and that the power tocreate, define, and punishsuchOTHERCRIMES isRESERVED, and, "OF RIGHT",appertainsSOLELYandEXCLUSIVELYto the respective "STATES", each within its own territory..."
------------------
Virginia "Ratifying Convention" 6-16-1788-Mr. PENDLETON."Mr. Chairman, this(SWEEPING i.e.SUPREMACY)clauseDOES "NOT" give Congress power to impede the operation of ANY PART of the Constitution,(N)or to make"ANY REGULATION"that(EVEN)"MAY"affect the interests of the citizensof the>>>"UNION AT LARGE"....
(APP:Think about that,.... thenNotethat the federal government has NO AUTHORITY to GOVERN POLICE of ANY KIND, OUTSIDE the Washington DC - i.e. what the Founders described as the 10 MILES SQUARE and can make NO LAW that EVEN MAY EFFECT THE CITIZENS of the UNION at LARGE - Here he continues...)
"....But it gives them power over the"LOCAL"police of"THEPLACE", so as to be secured from any interruption intheir proceedings. Notwithstanding the violent attack upon it, I believe, sir,this is the "fair CONSTRUCTION of the(SWEEPING i.e.SUPREMACY)clause".It gives them power of exclusive legislation in any caseWITHIN>>>"THAT DISTRICT"(WASHINGTON, DC). What is the meaning of this?What is it opposed to?Is it opposed to the general powers of the federal legislature, or to those of the state legislatures?I understand it as opposed to the legislative power of that state "WHERE" IT SHALL "BE".What, then,is the power?"ITIS", that Congress shallexclusively legislate"THERE",in orderto preserve {440} serve the"POLICE"OF"THE PLACE"and their"OWN" "PERSONAL"independence, that they may not be overawed or insulted, and of course to preserve them in oppositionto any attempt by the stateWHERE IT SHALL "BE", this is theFAIR "CONSTRUCTION"...."(of theSWEEPING i.e.SUPREMACYclause)
-------------------
FBI,CIA, ATF, ICE etc. All are policing OUTSIDE the 10 miles Square of Washington, DC;
andALL OUTSIDE FEDERAL LIMITS OF AUTHORITY.
ALL UNDER THE"PRETENSE"OF AUTHORITY.
Any attempt to claim Authority by the Federal Government, which was NOT DELEGATED in the "Original Compact" is an ARROGATION of POWER which is Expressly Prohibited (See Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788);
#1: "...this COMPACTwas"NOT" made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the(federal)powersdelegated to ITSELF(federal government -i.e. The Federal Supreme Court, Executive or Legislative areNOTthe final judge);since that would have made "IT'S"(the federal government's)"DISCRETION", and "NOT THE CONSTITUTION",the "MEASURE" of its powers;but that, as in ALL OTHER CASES of compact among powers having no common judge,each party(STATE)has anEQUAL right to judge for itself, aswell of infractions as of the mode and "MEASURE" of redress.
JAMES MADISON. (Author of the Constitution) "Mr. Chairman: ...Icannot comprehendthat the(FEDERAL LEGISLATURES, EXECUTIVE, FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, FEDERALGOVERNMENT) "power ofLEGISLATING"over a"SMALL DISTRICT"(Washington , DC), which >>>"CANNOTEXCEED" >>>TEN MILES SQUARE,and may >>>"NOT BE" more than "ONE"MILE, will involve the dangers which he(Patrick Henry)apprehends. ..."
Think about that physical limitation the founders intended.
"...History furnishes no example of a free republic, any thing like the extent of the United States.
The Grecian republics were of small extent; so also was that of the Romans.Both of these, it is true,in process of time, extended their conquests overlarge territories of country; andthe consequence was, that their governments wereCHANGEDFROMthat of free governments>>> to those of theMOST"TYRANNICAL"that ever existed in the world..."
The federal governments "supremacy" powers under the "supremacy (sweeping) clause" was, and still is, limited to the "10 miles square" of Washington DC.
The supreme lawof the "land"?Clearly by the founders own words"LAND" supremacy clausemeantONLY WITHIN The 10 MILES SQUAREand "WITHIN" theDELEGATEDpowers only.
As established in this day Ratifying Convention (click link forfull Convention text)DEPARTMENTS were LIMITED to the 10 MILES SQUARE;the federal governmentCANNOTGOVERN POLICEoutside the10 miles square;CANNOT"DEFINE", "PRESCRIBE"OR "PROSECUTE" BUTFOUR CRIMES: 1.) Treason, 2.) Piracy on the High Seas (only), 3.) Law of Nations,4.) Counterfeitof coin;
Can collect TAXES under the "WELFARE CLAUSE" forONLY 2THINGS -NATIONAL DEBTandNATIONALDEFENSE.
Mr. GEORGE MASON. "Mr. Chairman, gentlemen say there is no new power given by this clause.Is there any thing in this Constitution which secures to the states the powers which are said to be retained?Will powers remain to the states which are not expressly guarded and reserved? I will suppose a case. Gentlemen may call it an impossible case, and"suppose" that Congress will act with wisdom and integrity.Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for thegeneral welfare and common defence;and by that clause(so often called thesweeping clause)they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws.Now, suppose oppressions {442}should arise under"this" (USFederal)government,and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of"those"powers;could not Congress, under the"idea"of providing for the"general welfare",and under their"OWN""CONSTRUCTION",say that this was destroying the"general peace",encouraging sedition, and "poisoning the minds of the people"? And could they not, in order to provideagainst this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press?
(APP: Exactly what happened 10 years after the Constitution in the Alien and Sedition Actsby the federal Government andstopped by the"Virginia and KentuckyResolutions"; Such similarattacks on on the freedom of speechhas been recently promoted by today's federal representatives)
Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within theten miles square,when there is no prohibition against it?Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury? Would they not"extend"their implication?
It appears to me that theyMAYand "WILL".And shall the support of our rights depend on the bounty of men "whose interest it may be to oppress us"?
That Congress should have power to provide for thegeneral welfare(APP Note: Defense against "Foreign" aggression)of the Union, I grant.
But I wish a clause in the Constitution, with respect toALL powerswhichare NOT granted, that they areretained by the states.
Otherwise, the power of providingfor the "general welfare" may be "perverted to its destruction".
Many gentlemen, whom I respect, take different sides of this question.We wish this amendment to be introduced, to remove our apprehensions.There was a clause in the Confederation reserving to the states respectively every power, jurisdiction, and right, not expressly delegated to the United States. This clause has never been complained of, but approved by all Why not, then, have a similar clause in this Constitution,in which it is the more indispensably necessary than in the Confederation, because of the great augmentation of power vested in the former? In my humble apprehension, unless there be some such clear and finite expression, this clause now under consideration will go to any thing our rulers may think proper.Unless there be some express declaration that every thing not given is retained,itwillbe carried toany power Congress may please.
It was answered:
Mr. GEORGE NICHOLAS, in reply to the gentlemen opposed to the clause under debate, went over the same grounds, and developed the same principles, which Mr. Pendleton and Mr. Madison had done. The opposers of the {443} clause, which gave the power of providing for the general welfare, supposed its dangers to result from its connection with, and extension of, the powers granted in the other clauses. He endeavored to show the committee that it only empowered Congress to make such laws as would be necessary to enable them to pay the public debts and provide for the common defence;
>that this "GENERAL WELFARE" was united,"NOT"to "the general power of legislation",
but to the>PARTICULAR power>oflaying and collecting taxes, imposts, and excises,
for the "PURPOSE"of paying the DEBTS and providing for the "COMMON DEFENCE",
that is, that they could raise(APP:ONLY)AS "MUCH"money as wouldpay the"DEBTS"and provide for the"COMMON DEFENCE",
in"CONSEQUENCE OF THIS POWER".
The clause which was affectedly called thesweeping(SUPREMACY)clausecontained"NO new grant of power".
To illustrate this position, he observed that, if it had been added at the end of every one of the enumerated powers, instead of being inserted at the end of all,it would be obvious to any one that it was"NO"augmentation of power.If, for instance, at the end of the clause granting power to lay and collect taxes, it had been added that they should have power to make necessary and proper laws to lay and collect taxes, who could suspect it to be an addition of power?
As it would grant"NO"new powerif inserted at the end of each clause, it could not when subjoined to the whole.
He then proceeded thus: But, says he, who is to determine the extent of such powers?I say, the same power which, inALL well-regulated communities,(COUNTY, STATE, ANY ORGANIZED COMMUNITIES THAT ESTABLISH CONSENT)determines the "extent" of "legislative" powers.
If they exceed these powers,the"JUDICIARY""WILL"(WHERE ARE OUR LOCAL JUDGES!)declare it"VOID", or "ELSE""the PEOPLE" will have a "RIGHT" to declare it "VOID". Is this depending on any man? But, says the gentleman, it may go to any thing. It may destroy the trial by jury; and they may say it is necessary for providing for the general defence. The power of providing for the general defence only extends to raise any sum of money they may think necessary, by taxes, imposts, But, says he, our only defence against oppressive laws consists in the virtue of our representatives.This was misrepresented.
If I understand it right,NO"NEW"POWER can beEXERCISED.
As to those which are actually granted, we trust to the fellow-feelings of our representatives;and if we are deceived, we then"trust to altering our {444} government"."
Ask yourself.
Is our federalgovernment,through our federalso called representatives, collecting taxes under the "welfare clause" for things "OTHERTHAN" the national debt and national defense? ...
Getting smarter?
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND
LIMITATIONS OF CONDEMNATION
Now let us look at the limited power of Condemnation which DEFINITION has been so corrupted by state and federal governments.
The limited condemnation clause was a war powers act for "TEMPORARY" temporary " taking",NOT TO TAKE AND KEEP;
Nor an excuse for state governments to take the meaning to empower themselves or the federal government with the misuse of the term.
Taking property without CONSENT has never been, nor will it ever be a component of freedom or of free government:
JOHN LOCKE: 140:"....for if any one shall claim a power to lay and levy TAXES on the people "by his own authority", and without such "CONSENT of the people", he thereby "invades the fundamental law of PROPERTY", and "subverts the end of government".
>>> For "what property have I" in that which another may"by right""TAKE"when he pleases to himself?
JOHN LOCKE:141.Fourthly.The legislative CANNOT transfer the power of making laws to ANY OTHER HANDS, for it being but a delegated power from the people, they who have it "CANNOT PASS" it over to OTHERS.
JOHN LOCKE:149:And thus the communityperpetually retains asupreme power of saving themselvesfrom the attempts and designs of "ANYBODY",even of their "LEGISLATORS",whenever they shall be so foolish or so wickedas to lay and carry on "designs" against the LIBERTIES AND PROPERTIES of the subject.
JOHN LOCKE:151:"...But yet it is to be observed that though oaths of allegiance and fealty are taken to him(The Executive), it isNOTto him as supreme legislator, but as supreme executor of the law made by a joint power of him withothers,>>>allegiance being nothing but an obedience according to law, which, when he VIOLATES, he has "NO right to obedience",nor can claim it otherwise than as the public person vested with the power of the law, and so is to be considered as the image, phantom, or representative of the commonwealth, acted by the will of the society declared in its laws, and thus he hasno will, no power, but that of the law.But when hequits this representation, this public will, and acts by his own private will,heDEGRADES HIMSELF,and is but asingle private person WITHOUT POWER and without will; the members owing NO OBEDIENCE but to the public will of the society(i.e. LAW OF THE CONSTITUTION).
JOHN LOCKE:155:"It may be demanded here,what if the executive power, being possessed of the force of the commonwealth, shall make use of that forceto hinder the meeting and acting of the legislative, when the original constitution or the public exigencies require it?I say, using force upon the people, without authority, and CONTRARY TO THE TRUST(i.e. LIMITS SET DOWN BY THE CONSTITUTION)put in him that does so, >>>is a "STATE OF WAR WITH THE PEOPLE", who havea rightto reinstate their legislative in the exercise of their power. For having erected a legislative with an intent they should exercise the power of making laws, either at certain set times, or when there is need of it, when they are hindered byany force from what is so necessary to the society, and wherein the safety and preservation of the people consists,the people have a "RIGHT TO REMOVE IT BY FORCE".In all states and conditions the true remedy of force "WITHOUT AUTHORITY" is to "OPPOSE FORCE TO IT".The use of force "WITHOUT AUTHORITY" always puts him that uses it into a "STATE OF WAR" as the AGGRESSOR, and renders him liable to be "TREATED ACCORDINGLY"
JOHN LOCKE:201. "It is a mistake to think this fault is proper only to monarchies.Other formsof government areliable to it as well as that; forWHEREVERthe power that is put in any hands for the governmentof the peopleand thepreservation of their PROPERTIESis applied toOTHER ENDS, andmade use oftoIMPOVERISH,HARASS, or toSUBDUETHEMto thearbitrary and irregular commandsof those that have it,THERE IT PRESENTLY BECOMES TYRANNY,..."
Thank You for your membership, support and contributions!
Note:Facebook removed our original American Patriot Party page with thousands of followers and had long prior shadow banned our visibility.Please go to our page on GETTR, MEWE and TRUTH MEDIA pages where we are beginning again:
"...Among the many interesting objects which will engage your attention, that of providing for the common defence willmerit particular regard. To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.
A "free PEOPLE"(ARMS EVERYWHERE)ought NOT ONLYto be ARMED, but disciplined; to which end, a uniform and well digested plan is requisite: and "their" safety and interest"REQUIREthat they(the PEOPLE)should promotesuch manufactories"as tend to render "them"(THE "PEOPLE" -ALL PEOPLE)"INDEPENDENT" ofOTHERS
(ALL OTHERS- INCLUDINGand ESPECIALLY GOVERNMENT - - - See Next)
for "ESSENTIAL",>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"PARTICULARLY" for >>>>>>>>>>>>"MILITARY" "SUPPLIES"."
--------------------
President George Washingtonpresented hismistrust in the federal governmentvery clearly and defined the true intent where the powers should lay, and that is in the hands of theCIVILIANS.
In response to a proposal for gun registration:
George Washingtonin 1790 said:
"..."Absolutely not.If the"PEOPLE are armed"and the"federalists"(FEDERAL GOVERNMENT)"DO NOT KNOW WHERE THE ARMS ARE", there canNEVERbe an "oppressive government."
-------------------- TheRIGHTtoCONCEALfrom the "STATE" AS WELL AS "FEDERAL" government;
The purpose clearly derived in George Washington'sstatementto have the power to "PUT DOWNBY USE OFARMEDFORCE" anOPPRESSIVE"FEDERAL" "OR STATE" government.
"He(The EXECUTIVE / KING)hasaffected to render the military independent ofandSUPERIORto theCIVIL(CIVILIAN) "power"."
-------------------
Elbridge Gerry, a representative to Congress from Massachusetts during the debates over the Bill of Rights"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is topreventthe establishmentof astanding army, thebane of liberty...WheneverGovernments mean to invadethe rights and liberties of the people,theyalwaysattempt todestroy the militia, in order toraise an army upon their ruins."
-------------------
Which establishesa division between civilian MILITIA powers and Standing Military (ARMY), as this is a important establishment of those reasons given by the Founders.
-------------------
“Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property... Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.” ― Thomas Paine
TRUE DEFINITION OF MILITIA
Let us reviewother words ofJames Madisonwith regards to militias and standing armies;The purposeand thePOWER RATIObetween them:
FEDERALIST #46(QuoteParaphrase - see actual text bellow):
James MadisonAuthor of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights:
"TheHIGHESTNUMBERto which a "standing army" can be carried in "ANY COUNTRY" doesNOT EXCEEDone hundredth(1/100th)part of the souls, orone twenty-fifth(1/25th)part of the numberABLEto bear arms.
This portionwould not yield, in the United States, an (STANDING ARMY) army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.
To"THESE"would be "OPPOSED"(APP: indicating that the "MILITIA" is to be a "OPPOSING force"to the standing armyaswell as that of foreign enemies)
a(CITIZEN)MILITIAamounting to near half a million"CITIZENS"with ARMS in their "HANDS","officered by men chosen from "AMONG THEMSELVES",(NOTby government or the standing army - This definition is a determiner of a TRUE MILITIA)fighting for "THEIR"(the CITIZEN / militia's)common liberties and united andconductedby government"S" (LOCAL - Not Simply State)possessingTHEIR(the CITIZEN / militia's)affections and confidence.
It may well be doubted whethera(CITIZEN)MILITIAthus circumstancedcould ever be conqueredby such a "proportion"(ratio in force)of "regular troops"(i.e. standing army). Besides the advantage of beingarmed,it forms a barrier against the"enterprises of ambition"(Foreign Interests, Corporations, Banks), more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.
The governments of Europe areafraidto trustthe peoplewith arms. If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny,"as" Americadid.
Let usnot insultthe free and gallant citizens of America with thesuspicionthat they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than thedebased subjectsofarbitrarypowerwould be to rescue theirs from the hands of"their" oppressors."
-----------
APP: The Actual Quotetext below should arouse citizens greatest fears and prompt a call of alarm;
Though the words James Madison speaks, shows thatheestablishesthe correct fact of the powers of the citizen militiaand limitations of the standing army,James Madisonlacked the understanding,which Patrick Henry in theVirginia RatifyingConvention6-16-1788(which see) clearlypossessed with regard to power and corruption;
The present danger correlating with what James Madison said could never happen -which in fact"HAS" happened,establishes an urgency that the counties and states whoserepresentativeswhom have not yet been corrupted or have not arrived at their present position in complete ignorance of their rights,duties andresponsibilities, should now movetoarm the CITIZENS of allages able to bear arms, to a 25to 1"superior"force to the standing army;
Those in the standing army, understanding their duty to the Constitution, should begin to relinquish theirsuperiorityand begin to transfer any and all their armswithin the United States, not necessary torepelforeign invasion, to the Citizens and most localcommunities so that the balance of power be resumed; Soto prevent themselves, and their families as well, from being enslaved;
And to prepare with local CITIZEN MILITIAS, who are even more soresponsible in their Duty as free Citizens to increase their powers,to repel a move by foreign, national and international manipulators of power toinfiltrateand control the standing army against the foundations established in theOriginal Constitutions and Common Law Principles of freedom.
ThefearsJames Madison disregards, in his optimism of the sure limitationsinstituted by"delegated" powersset in the"ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION"which were never to be exceeded,have become in fact areality of today.
Review the actual Quote fromFederalist #46below,then prepare.
Each man is responsible for his own freedom: -----------
James Madison:"...The only refuge leftfor those who prophesy the downfall of the State governments is the visionary supposition that the federal government may previously accumulate a military forcefor the projects of ambition. The reasonings contained in these papers must have been employed to little purpose indeed, if it could be necessary now todisprove the reality of this danger.That the people and the States should, for a sufficient period of time,elect an uninterrupted succession of men ready to betray both;
thatTHE "TRAITORS"should, throughout this period, uniformly and systematically pursue some fixed plan for the extension of the military establishment;
that the governments and the people of theStates shouldsilently and patiently behold the gathering storm, and " continue to supply the materials", "until it should be prepared to burst on their own heads", must appear to every one more like the incoherent dreams of a delirious jealousy, or the misjudged exaggerations of a counterfeit zeal, than like the sober apprehensions of genuine patriotism.Extravagant as the supposition is, let it however be made. Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that theState governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger.
The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.
"TO THESE"(The United States Military)WOULD BE "OPPOSED" A(CITIZEN)"MILITIA" amounting to near half a million of "CITIZENS" with "ARMS IN THEIR HANDS", OFFICERED BY MEN CHOSEN FROM "AMONG THEMSELVES"(CHOSEN BY THE LOCAL CITIZEN'S - NOT MILITARY OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT),fighting for their(THE CITIZEN'S)common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their(THE CITIZEN MILITIA'S)affections and confidence.
It may well be doubted, whether a(CITIZEN)MILITIA "thus circumstanced"(25 to 1 ARMED POWER RATIO)could ever be conquered by such a(SMALL)proportion of"regular troops"(i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES).
Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined todeny the possibility of it.
Besides the advantage of(THE CITIZENS)being armed, which the Americans(CITIZENS)possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of "subordinate governments", to which the people are attached, and by which the(CITIZEN)MILITIA officers are appointed(officered by men chosen among themselves, not by governments or military), forms a barrier against the "enterprises of ambition", more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.
Notwithstanding the military establishments in the severalkingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear,the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.And it is not certain,that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes.
But were the people to "possess" the additional advantages of "LOCAL" governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the(CIVILIAN)militia,by these(LOCAL)governments,and attached both to them and to the(CITIZEN)MILITIA, it may be "affirmed with the greatest assurance", that the throne of "every tyranny in Europe" would be "speedily overturned" in spite of the legions which surround it.
Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in "ACTUAL POSSESSION", than the "debased subjects of arbitrary power" would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors.
Let us ratherno longer insult themwith the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the"long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it"." APP: This should alarm any US Citizen, as our present condition of Citizens NOT armed with a 25 to 1 superiority over our own standing army; and the fact that our "Citizen Militias" officered by men "chosen among themselves"do NOT exist in any number near this in military capability or armament, is CLEAR EVIDENCE that the"long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it"have"ALREADY OCCURRED".
Mr. GEORGE MASON."Mr. Chairman, a worthy member has askedwho are the militia, if they be notTHE PEOPLEof this country, and if we are not to be protected from the fate of the Germans, Prussians,by "OUR" representation?
I ask, "Who are the MILITIA"?They consist NOW of the"WHOLE PEOPLE"(of each LOCAL COMMUNITY OR STATE), except a few public officers. But I cannot say who will be the militia of the future day. If "that paper"(THE LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL COMPACT BEING CONSIDERED)on the table gets "no alteration", the militia of the future daymay notconsist of all classes, high and low, and {426} rich and poor; but they may be"confined to the lower and middle classes of the people",granting"exclusion to the higher classes"of the people.
If we should ever see that day,themost ignominious punishments andheavy fines(APP: i.e. jail andimprisonment for simply being armed - or being armedwith equalARMSwith the standing federal USMILITARY)may be expected. Under the present government, all ranks of people are subject to militia duty. Under such afull and equal representationas ours, there can be noignominious punishmentinflicted.
But under thisnational, or rather consolidated government, the casewill be different. The representation being "so small and inadequate",they will have no "FELLOW-FEELING" for the people. They may discriminate people in their own predicament, andexempt from dutyall the officers andLOWEST CREATURES OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT. ..."
---------
Mr. JOHN MARSHALL" asked if gentlemenwere seriouswhen they asserted that, if the state governments had power to interfere with the militia,it was by implication. If they were, he asked the committee whether the"least attention" would notshow that they were "MISTAKEN".
The state governments"DID NOT"derive their powers from the general(federal)government; butEACH(STATE & LOCAL COUNTY)governmentderived its powers from the PEOPLE, and each wasto act accordingto the powersgiven it.Would any gentleman deny this?He demandedif powers not given were retained by implication. Could any man say so? Could any man say that this power was not RETAINED by the states,as they hadNOT given it away?For, says he, does not a power remain till it is given away?The state legislatures had power to command and govern their militia before, and have itstill, undeniably,unlessthere be something in this Constitution thattakes it away.
ForContinental purposesCongress may call forth the militia, as to suppress insurrections and repel invasions.But the power given to the states by the people is "NOT taken away";for theConstitution doesNOTsay so.In the Confederation Congress had this power;but the state legislatures had it "also". The power of legislating given them within the "ten miles square" isexclusiveof the states, because it is "expressed to be exclusive". The truth is, that when power is given to the general legislature, if it was in the state legislature before, both shall exercise it; unless there be an incompatibility in the exercise by one to that by the other, or negative words precluding the state governments from it.But there are NO negative words here.It rests, therefore,with the "STATES".
To me it appears, then,unquestionablethat theSTATE governmentscan call forth the(CITIZEN)MILITIA, in case the Constitution should be adopted, in the"SAME MANNER"as they could have donebeforeits adoption.
Gentlemen have said that the states cannot defend themselves without an"application to Congress", because "Congress" caninterpose!
>>>>Does not every man feel a "REFUTATION" of the "argument" in his own breast?(i.e. CONGRESSCANNOTINTERPOSE)
I WILL SHOW{420}that therecould NOT bea combination, between those who formed the Constitution,to take away this power.
Allthe restraintsintendedto be laid on the state governments (besides where an exclusive power is expressly given to Congress) are contained in the 10th section of the 1st article. This power isNOT includedin the restrictions in that section. But what excludes every possibility of doubt, is the last part of it that "no state shall engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay."When invaded,they(the States and People)"CAN" engage in war, asalsowhen in "imminent danger". Thisclearlyprovesthat thestatescan use the militiawhen they find it NECESSARY."
"...But the worthy member(Patrick Henry)fears, that in one part of the Union they will be regulated and disciplined, and in another neglected. This danger is enhanced by leaving this power to each state; for some states may attend to their militia, and others may neglect them.
If Congress neglect our(CITIZEN)militia(i.e. "CITIZENS"),"WE"(the States and People)"CAN ARM THEM" "OURSELVES".
>>>CANNOT Virginia "import arms? >>>Cannot she put them into the hands of "HER" militia-men?
(APP: i.e. THE CITIZENS OF THE INDEPENDENT STATE "CAN" import arms; and as clearly established above,"without ANY application to Congress / federal government")
(APP: So much for the "MYTH" that the Federal government can "interpose or prevent" military arms from being imported across state lines, by (mis)using the Commerce Clause)
He thenconcluded by observing, that the power of governing the militia wasNOTvested in the states by implication, because,being "possessed of it" > "antecedent to the adoption of the government, and "not being divested of it" by any grant or restriction in the Constitution, they must necessarily be as "FULLY possessed of it as ever they had been. >And it could NOT be said that the states derived ANY powers from that(the federal government or Constitution)system, "but RETAINED them,
" >>>>>>>>"though not acknowledged in ANY PART OF IT"."
Do you havethe means to Donate?Remember:Don't put all your eggs in one basketsuch as the NRA;Donate to severalpatriotic and gun groups when you donate and divide the money equally; This keeps those that want to incrementally control, manipulate or sell out your rights by controlling the purse strings of just a few major groups from doing so; Make it impossible for them to try. By giving to several smaller groups it will empower more passionate Patriotic groups and helps secure your rights. Stay away from Corporations or Non Profits, they are usually compromised. A few dollars here and a few dollars there given to smaller groups by all those that are already donating to large groups will give the smaller patriotic groups the ability to work.Spread the wealthand empower freedom; Then watch the freedom and Liberty movement grow strong.
Samuel Adams - Absolute Rights of the Colonists 1772:
1st. Natural Rights of the Colonists as Men.--
"Among the Natural Rights of the Colonists are theseFirst. a Right to Life; Secondly to Liberty; thirdly to Property;together with the Right to support and defend them in the"BESTMANNERTHEYCAN"--Those areevident Branchesof, rather than deductions fromthe "DUTY" ofSelf Preservation,commonly called"THE FIRST LAW OF NATURE"--"...
HUNDREDS OF SHERIFFS STEP FORWARD "NO GUN CONTROL IN OUR COUNTY!"
They understand thatit is the Federal Government that is LIMITED to the DELEGATED powers of the ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONAL COMPACT that created the AUTHORITY to begin with. Much respect to THESE MEN who understand that we are REPUBLIC "S" based upon CERTAIN LAWS (A COMPACT) and RESERVED NATURAL RIGHTS. Not a Total Democracy that can vote away our freedoms.In Wyoming: Jail Time proposed for for Feds! - Hundreds of Sheriffs tell the Feds "NO GUN CONTROL IN OUR COUNTIES" and to OBEY THE CONSTITUTION!DESPITE BITTER COLD IN MANY STATES, THE FEBRUARY 8th FIREARMS EVENT AS WITH THE EARLIER APPRECIATE FIREARMS DAY & GUNS ACROSS AMERICAEVENT WAS A BIG SUCCESS!!! THOUSANDS CONTINUE TO ATTEND EVENTS AND MANY MORE ARE PLANNED THIS YEAR!
PERIODICALLY CHECK FOR EVENTS on our FACEBOOK PAGE....
"If ever time should come, When vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, Our Country will stand in need of it's experienced Patriots to prevent it's ruin" ...Samuel Adams
