This group say they want
to protect on one
hand - but then allow
the deviant of society
to brain wash and then
misuse others or each
other outside the Laws
of Nature; Allowing for
the existence of
Voluntary Slavery
and Slavery - Through
the relinquishment of
inalienable rights. This
Group, Communist /
Socialist in
nature, places a
form of "Subjugated
Peace" under a central
national
government;
Instead of abiding by
the True Principles of
Freedom established in
small well represented
and independent
republics;
They are a proponent
of reverse hate; and
are a proponent for
the use of National
Federal force,
accumulated by
government "laws"
which have been
created without
authority - i.e.
under thePRETENSE
OF AUTHORITY.
Georgia State Elections
Division
Suite 1104, West
Tower
2 Martin Luther King,
Jr. Drive, SE
Atlanta, GA 30334-1505
(404) 656-2871 FAX (404)
651-9536 http://www.sos.state.ga.u
s/elections
Division of
Elections
Office of the Attorney
General
44 South Clinton Avenue,
7th Floor
P.O Box 304
Trenton, New Jersey
08625-0304
(609) 292-3760 FAX
(609)777-1280 http://www.njelections.org
Director of Elections,
General Law Division
Secretary of State/
Election Division
Post Office Box 12060
Austin, TX 78711-2060
(512) 463-5650 FAX (512)
475-2811 http://www.sos.state.tx.us
/elections/index.shtml
UTAH
Utah State Elections
Office
Utah State Capitol
Complex
East Office Building,
Suite E325
P.O. Box 142325
Salt Lake City, UT
84114-2325
(801) 538-1041 FAX (801)
538-1133 http://www.elections.utah.
gov
VERMONT
Director of
Elections and Campaign
Finance
Office of Secretary of
State
26 Terrace Street,
Drawer 09
Montpelier, Vermont
05609-1101
(802) 828-2304 FAX (802)
828-5171 http://www.sec.state.vt.us
/#elections
VIRGIN ISLANDS
Supervisor of
Elections
Election System of the
Virgin Islands
Post Office Box 1499,
Kingshill
St. Croix, VI 00851-1499
(340) 773-1021 FAX (340)
773-4523 http://www.vivote.gov
VIRGINIA
Secretary of State,
Board of Elections
200 North 9th Street,
Room 101
Richmond, VA 23219
(800) 552-9745 or (804)
864-8901 FAX (804)
371-0194 http://www.sbe.state.va.u
s
WASHINGTON
Office of Secretary
of State, Elections
Division
Legislative Building,
P.O. Box 40220
Olympia, WA 98504-0220
(360) 902-4180 FAX (360)
586-5629 http://www.vote.wa.gov
WEST VIRGINIA
Manager of Elections
West Virginia Secretary
of State Elections
Division
1900 Kanawha Blvd E.
State Capitol Room 157-K
Charleston, WV
25305-0770
(304) 558-6000 FAX (304)
558-0900 http://www.wvsos.com
WISCONSIN
Wisconsin State
Elections Board
17 West Main Street,
Suite 310
Madison, WI 53703-3305
P.O. Box 2973
Madison, WI 53701-2973
(608) 266-8087 FAX (608)
267-0500 http://elections.state.wi.us
George Mason
6-16-1788: Who are the MILITIA? They
consist NOW of the "WHOLE PEOPLE"..."
See quotes and source link
regarding MILITIAS at bottom of
this page.
American Patriot Party
is aANTI-
"Globalist",ANTI-
"World Government" and
ANTI- Unconstitutional
UnAuthoritative
Government Party. Authority
was established
in the Founding
Documents and
Original
Constitutional
Compact.APP
aims to Empower
Inalienable Natural
Rights and Protect
Private Property.
Private Property Rights
over County; County over
State and State over
Federal; For Adequate
Representation, American
Patriot Party promotes
Statehood for all
Counties so to remove
distant legislatures,
empower local
communities and protect
natural and
Constitutional Rights.
American
Patriot Party continues to
endorse Donald
J. Trump for President
2024,
for his hard work, sacrifice
and devotion to restoring
Constitutional Principles to
the United States during his
first 4 year term. Seldom do
you see someone so
actively focused on that
goal and the advancement of
justice for all. American
Patriot Party finds that our
goal of returning to the
principles envisioned by our
Founding Fathers is well
served by the
re-election of Donald J.
Trump for President 2024.
APP promotes
investigation of the 2020
election. Follow Trump on
TRUTH SOCIAL.
Isaiah 51:7-9: "Hearken
unto me, ye that know
righteousness, the
people in whose heart is
my law; fear ye not the
reproach of men, neither
be ye afraid of their
revilings. For the moth
shall eat them up like a
garment, and the worm
shall eat them like
wool: but my
righteousness shall be
for ever, and my
salvation from
generation to
generation. Awake,
awake, put on strength,
O arm of the LORD;
awake, as in the ancient
days, in the generations
of old. Art thou not it
that hath cut Rahab, and
wounded the dragon?" https://americasvoice.news/video/68299/
#199.
"As usurpation is
the exercise of
power which another
hath a right to, so
tyranny is the
exercise of power
beyond right, which
nobody can have a
right to..."
#200: "...Thus,
that learned king,who
well understood
the notions of
things,makes
the difference
betwixt a king
and a tyrant
to consist
only in this:that one
makes the laws
the bounds of
his power and
the good of
the public the
end of his
government;
the other
makes all give
way to his own
will and
appetite..."
#201. It
is a mistake
to think this
fault is
proper only to
monarchies.Other
forms of
government are
liable to it
as well as
that;for
wherever the
power that is
put in any
hands for the
government of
the people and
thepreservation
of their
properties is
applied to
other ends,and
made use ofto impoverish, harass, or subdue them to the
arbitrary and
irregular
commands of
those that
have it,there it
presently
becomes
tyranny,whether
those that
thus use it
are one or
many..."
#202. "Wherever law
ends, tyranny
begins, if the law
be transgressed to
another's harm;and
whosoever in authority
exceeds the power
given him by the law,
and makes use of the
force he has under his
command to compass
that upon the subject
which the law allows
not,ceases in that
to be a magistrate,
and acting
without authority
may be opposed, as
any other man who
by force invades
the right of
another.
This is acknowledged
in subordinate
magistrates.He
that hath authority to
seize my person in the
street
may be opposed as
a thief and a
robber if he
endeavours to
break into my
house to execute a
writ,
notwithstanding
that I know he has
such a warrantand
such a legal
authority as will
empower him to
arrest me abroad.
And why this should
not hold in the
highest, as well as in
the most inferior
magistrate,I would
gladly be
informed..."
-------
BRUTUS (Robert Yates)
Warning:
"History furnishes no
example of a free
republic, any thing like
the extent of the United
States. The Grecian
republics were of small
extent; so also was that
of the Romans.
Both of these, it is
true, in process of
time, extended their
conquests over large
territories of
country; and the
consequence was, that
their governments were
CHANGED FROM that of
free governments to
those of the MOST
"TYRANNICAL" that ever
existed in the world."
Read
Republics and
Representation on
why the "One Nation"
view created by a
socialist in 1880s
endangers our freedoms;
and what James Madison
Warned in the Virginia
Resolutions,1798
that Consolidating the
states into "one
Sovereignty" ie "One
Nation" Changes and
Endangers the Republican
Form of government of
Free Independent states,
into a MIXED
MONARCHY!
Read on!
Call your Representative
NOW at: 202-224-3121 -
NO DEALS ON THE SECOND
AMENDMENT!
THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
Read
James Madison
Federalist #46:
Minimum Power Ratio -25
to 1 - Citizen OVER US
Military. Learn why
lower on this page.
Welcome to "American Patriot
Party"! The only party that
follows the Constitution as
the Founders intended.
Make sure to read our
Welcome page and
our
Suggested Reading.
Beware of those trying
to imitate our party using
titles such as"THE"
American patriot party or
other similar modified
organization titles that
attempt to divert you from
our party, the true
Constitutional Originalism
and the Law of Nature
principles that our party
promotesBecome
a Member Now!
If we would
follow the Original
Constitution as it was
defined in the Ratifying
Conventions of 1788 that
defined the words /
phrases within it and
follow the Laws of
Nature which the
Constitution and
founding documents were
meant to preserve, all
the attacks upon our
freedoms would subside.
All those corrupting
persons, organizations,
treaties etc. will have
no footing to stand
upon.
Take Unions for example,
being an "Exclusive
Privilege" of the state,
equally with
corporations and tax
supported special
interests none of which
were to be allowed in a
free country, the
Founders recognized a
Common Law principle:
Samuel
Adams, Absolute Rights
of the Colonists, 1772:
"...Governors have
no right to seek
what they please(APP:
UNIONS SEEK WHAT THEY
PLEASE) by
this, instead of being
content with the station
assigned them, that of
honourable
servants of the society,
they would soon become
Absolute masters,
Despots, and Tyrants.
Hence as a private man has a
right to say, what wages he
will give in his private
affairs, so has a
Community to
determine what they will
give and grant of their
Substance, for the
Administration of publick
affairs. And in both
cases more are ready
generally to offer their
Service at the proposed and
stipulated price, than are
able and willing to perform
their duty.--"
This
principle was carried
over to the Constitutionand actually
even a important EXISTING
CONSTITUTIONAL "Term
Limit"
if anyone would read it and
enforce it; Here James
Madison establishes in the
Ratifying Convention of
6-14-1788 the terminating
factor to
a representative if he or
any of those in house or
senate vote to raise their
own salary or accept a raise
in their own salary by such
a vote:
James
Madison,Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-14-1788: "...
The Constitution
has taken a medium between
the two extremes, and
perhaps with more wisdom
than either the British or
the state governments, with
respect to their "ELIGIBILITY"
to office.
They can "FILL" "NO" new
"offices" created by
themselves, "NOR"
"OLD ONES" of
which they "
INCREASED THE SALARIES
"."
So why are not all
those politicians
in the House and Senate
that voted for an
increase in their
salaries not gone?
See?
Simply obey and enforce
the Original
Constitutional Compact
every politician swore to
uphold and they would be "TERM
LIMITED"and GONE!
The Ratifying Convention
of 6-16-1788
establishes that congress
cannot,"by
any means"
arrogate ANY
new power.
This
includes
states
ratifying or
amending the
Constitution
(a means) as
those
processes are
for protecting
our freedoms,
NOT arrogating
new federal
powers which
is prohibited.
Please
Contribute directly
to help us educate others
and bypass de-platforming
& shadow banning,
compete on the political
stage.
Richard Taylor
Chair
American Patriot Party -
National Headquarters
#americanpatriotparty
#americanpatriot
#patriotparty #patriot
#listofpoliticalpartiesintheunitedstates
The only
way to protect property is
to get rid of property tax.
The only way to be secure in
person, papers and effects
(property) is to get rid of
flat percentage or other
types of income, property
and sales tax. The only way
to keep wealth from being
abused uncontrollably is to
get rid of exclusive
privileges such as unions,
corporations, tax supported
special interests, zoning
and unnecessary regulations.
The only way to control
the federal government from
over taxing is to have
citizen controlled,
consensual, enumerated
taxes on imports ONLY as
established in the Original
US Constitution and in
states by an anonymously
collected "enumerated" toll
tax, earmarked, collected
and placed in accounts by
which they where collected
for, that then cannot be
touched by governments but
must be spent on what they
were Consented to
and Enumerated for -
BEFORE COLLECTED.See
The
Anonymity APP -A- Tax.
°
Return to the
Original
Constitution of
Federal Taxation
= Enumerated
Taxation on
Imports Alone.
° States and
Counties
Taxation = APP A
Tax: Enumerated
(Consent), Anonymous
(No Names, No
Numbers) Auto
Pass Toll
Tax ONLY.
See
The Anonymity APP -A-
Tax.
NO PROPERTY,
SALES OR INCOME
TAX. This is the
ONLY way to obey
the Constitution
to be SECURE IN
ONES PERSON,
PAPERS AND
EFFECTS
(PROPERTY).
Locke
- #194.
Their persons
are free by a
native right,
and their
properties, be
they more or
less, are
their own, and
at their own
dispose, and
not at his; or
else it is no
property.Supposing
the conqueror
gives to one
man a thousand
acres, to him
and his heirs
for ever; to
another he
lets a
thousand
acres, for his
life, under
the rent of
L50 or L500
per annum. Has
not the one of
these a right
to his
thousand acres
for ever, and
the other
during his
life, paying
the said rent?
And hath not
the tenant for
life a
property in
all that he
gets over and
above his
rent, by his
labour and
industry,
during the
said term,
supposing it
be double the
rent?Can
any one say,
the king, or
conqueror,
after his
grant, may, by
his power of
conqueror,
take away all,
or part of the
land, from the
heirs of one,
or from the
other during
his life, he
paying the
rent?Or,
can he take
away from
either the
goods or money
they have got
upon the said
land at his
pleasure?If he
can, then all
free and
voluntary
contracts
cease, and are
void in the
world; there
needs nothing
but power
enough to
dissolve them
at any time,
and all the
grants and
promises of
men in power
are but
mockery and
collusion. For
can there be
anything more
ridiculous
than to say,I
give you and
yours this for
ever, and
that in the
surest and
most solemn
way of
conveyance can
be devised,
and yet it is
to be
understood
that I have
right, if I
please, to
take it away
from you again
to-morrow?
APP
Note:Relate
this toUS
Land Patentsabsolute
granting of
properties and
the Attempt of
the Federal
Government to
condemn such
land (or water
by common law
attached to
the land)
later, or the
state to
condemn such
property after
giving consent
to adjudicate
such transfer
by authority
of the United
States by
which it was a
party, or to
create new
regulations
upon it after
granting it
with none; To
encircle that
land in
national
monument and
control the
inroads and
water, or to
regulate
limits to
anything with
regard to it,
or to
arbitrarily
tax it into
debt and
thereby
rendering the
land not owned
but rented,
when no taxes
were in
established at
the receiving
of it, or to
tax itwithout
consent,
or tax without
consent for
things built
upon that
property to
improve its
value, or
raised upon it
to derive
sustenance and
earnings from
his labors, or
derive any
such without
consent from
those he wills
it to.
And you will
find the
neither the
federal
government,
nor the state
government has
no power to do
so, nor has
any power of
such been
delegated to
it by the
Original
Compact.
For once
property is
possessed of a
person, it is
any
governments
duty to
protect it,
and not to
devise a
design to
wrest it away
after all
rights had
been released
; As this
clearly
established by
Lockethat
the protection
of propertyis
the purpose of
governmentand
the reason
that the
person enters
into society. Locke:
138. Thirdly,
the supreme
power cannot
take from any
man any part
of his
property
without his
own consent.(APP
Note: See
these exact
words in theRights
of the
Colonists)For thepreservation
of property
being the end
of government,and
that for which
men enter into
society, it
necessarily
supposes and
requires that
the people
should have
property,
without which
they must be
supposed to
lose that by
entering into
society which
was the end
for which they
entered into
it; too
gross an
absurdity for
any man to
own.Men,
therefore, in
society having
property, they
have such a
right to the
goods, which by
the law of the
community are
theirs, that nobody hath a right to take them, or any part
of them, from
them without
their own
consent;
without this
they have no
property at
all. For I
have truly no
property in
that which
another can by
right take
from me when
he pleases against
my consent.
Hence it is a
mistake to think
that the supreme
or legislative
power of any
commonwealth can
do what it will,
and dispose of
the estates of
the subject
arbitrarily, or
take any part of
them at
pleasure...."
In 2014 the United
States CIA
established a
Ukraine Coup and set
the stage for 8
years of Western
Ukraine terrorizing
Eastern Russian
speaking Ukrainians.
Russia rightfully
stepped in. Western
Ukraine has lost the
right to govern
Eastern Ukraine's
people, businesses
and properties.
APP Peace
Solution:
1.) Grant Eastern
Ukraine states
Independent
Country Status.
2.) Zelinsky's
Western Ukraine
stays out of NATO
3.) No NATO Missiles
on Russia's borders.
"...All Men have a
Right to remain in
a State of Nature
as long as they
please: And in
case of
intolerable
Oppression, Civil
or Religious, to
leave the Society
they belong to,
and enter into
another..."
ie. The Right to
Secede.
Western Ukraine, let Eastern Ukraine be free. Stop
enslaving and
harassing
those people
that want
nothing to do
with youor your vision for Ukraine. *Stop
Escalation
Toward War in
Ukraine or
China:
*Identify the
Instigators of War
and Shut them
Down.
*Stop Funding /
Arming Zelinsky's
Western Ukraine.
*Investigate US
and Ukraine
Corruption -
INDICT, TRY,
PROCECUTE,
INCARCERATE THOSE
GUILTY. Western Ukraine Loss Eminent. Seek Peace by Giving
Eastern
Ukraine States
Independent
Country Status
- Protected by
Russia.
Western
Ukraine Having
Bombed Their
Own Eastern
Ukraine
Citizens for 8
Years Since
2014 CIA COUP
have Lost the
Right to
Govern Eastern
Ukrainians or
Their Land.
-------
R.I.N.O.(Republicans
In Name Only):
THE REAL
DEFINITION OF A
"RINO" IS SIMPLY
A DEMOCRAT USING
THE REPUBLICAN
PARTY TO EXPAND
THE POWER OF THE
FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT IN
ONE WAY (Federal
Law &
Policing
Powers); WHILE
THE DEMOCRAT
PARTY EXPANDS
THE POWER OF THE
FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT IN
ANOTHER WAY
(Government
Unions through
Expanding
Federal
Bureaucracies
&
Departments).
THEY ARE BOTH
LEFTISTS AND
BOTH SOCIALISTS.
BOTH WANT YOU
ENSLAVED.READ THE FOUNDERS DOCUMENTS THAT DEFINE THE
CONSTITUTION;
KNOW WHAT
FREEDOM IS SO
THAT YOU ARE
NOT DECEIVED.
START WITH OUR
SUGGESTED
READING
FOUNDERS
DOCUMENTS.
--------
GO
WOKE GO BROKE!SEND
THE WOKE
CORPORATIONS
&
GOVERNMENT
INSTITUTIONS
TO THE TRASH
DUMP OF
HISTORY. MAKE
YOUR "DO
NOT BUY LIST"
AND POST IT
WIDELY! NEVER
BUY FROM THEM
AGAIN OR
ANYONE WHO IS
ASSOCIATED
WITH THEM.
SHUN THEM FROM
SOCIETY! CEASE
TO ASSOCIATE
OR ALLOW YOUR
CHILDREN TO
ASSOCIATE,
SCHOOLED OR
INVOLVED IN
ANY WAY WITH
THEM OR BUY
THEIR
PRODUCTS.
BREAK THEM!
UNAWARE
INVESTORS
&
STOCKHOLDERS
SHOULD SUE ALL
CORPORATE
HEADS FOR
THEIR LOSSES!HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE TO THE LAST MAN
OR WOMAN.
BOYCOTT
WIKIPEDIA
WIKIPEDIA Editors promote Woke
ideologies
whenever they
can in wiki
articles and
prohibit
definitions
not aligning
with socialist
viewpoints. It
is clear that
socialist
editors hover
over certain
words articles
to guard their
twisted
definitions
and article
points. These
Wiki editor's
existence put
a question as
to whether or
not they are
volunteerism
or paid
volunteerism.
From our
experience
since 2006
which has
removed and
then
prohibited the
further
existence of
an American
Patriot Party
wiki page, we
believe it is
the latter.
Thomas
Jefferson on
Freedom of
Speech:
Kentucky
Resolutions,
1798
" ...3. Resolved, That it
is true as a
general
principle, and
is also
expressly
declared by
one of the
amendments to
the
Constitutions,
that "the
powers not
delegated to
the United
States by the
Constitution,
our prohibited
by it to the
States, are
reserved to
the States
respectively,
or to the
people"; and
that NO power
over the
freedom of
religion,
freedom of
speech, or
freedom of the
press being
delegated to
the United
States by the
Constitution,
nor prohibited
by it to the
States, all
lawful powers
respecting the
same did of
right remain,
and were
reserved to
the States or
the
people: that
thus was
manifested
their
determination
to retain
to themselves
the right of
judging how
far the
licentiousness
of speech and
of the press
may be
abridged
without
lessening
their useful
freedom, and
how far those
abuses which
cannot be
separated from
their use
should be
tolerated, rather
than the use
be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against ALL
abridgment by
the United
States of the
freedom of
religious
opinions and
exercises, and
retained to
themselves the
right of
protecting the
same, as this
State, by a
law passed on
the general
demand of its
citizens,had already protected themfrom "ALL" human restraint or
interference.
And that in addition to this general principle and
express
declaration,
another and
more special
provision has
been made by
one of the
amendments to
the
Constitution,
which
expressly
declares,
that "Congress
shall make no
law respecting
an
establishment
of religion,
or prohibiting
the free
exercise
thereof, or
abridging the
freedom of
speech or of
the
press": thereby
guarding in
the same
sentence, and
under the same
words, the
freedom of
religion, of
speech, and of
the press:
insomuch, that whatever
violated
either, throws
down the
sanctuary
which covers
the
others, arid
that libels,
falsehood, and
defamation,
equally with
heresy and
false
religion, are
WITHHELD from the cognizance of Federal Tribunals. That, therefore, the act of Congress of the United
States, passed
on the 14th
day of July,
1798,
intituled "An
Act in
addition to
the act
intituled An
Act for the
punishment of
certain crimes
against the
United
States," which
does abridge
the freedom of
the press,is
"NOT LAW", but
is "ALTOGETHER"
"VOID", and of
"NOFORCE"..."
-----------
Falling Prey. Europe / Britain 20 Years Under
Creeping
Attack from
Islam:
9-6-2024:
WATCH TUCKER
CARLSON TOUR
EXCLUSIVE
INTERVIEW -
Vivek
Ramaswamy
& RFK Jr:
Brazil Banning
X, the New
Russian Hoax,
and the Kamala
Harris Scam: https://tuckercarlson.com/vivek-tour-rfk
8-24-2024:
Fauchi
Contracts Rare
West Nile
Virus. Raises
the question
on whether he
is conducting
"Gain of
Function" and
other
experiments in
his home
basement.
Peter Navarro
Begins 4 Month
Misdemeanor
Prison Term.
Support Peter
by Sending Him
Letters to:
Peter
K Navarro
(04370-510)
15801 S.W.
137th Ave
Miami FL 33177
You can also
support Peter
and MAGA by
Pre-Ordering
Peter's new
book THE NEW
MAGA DEAL:
https://winningpublishing.com/products/the-new-maga-deal-pre-order
Glenn Beck
Blaze
Journalist
Steve Baker
Being Arrested
By FBI
Tomorrow.
Baker Suggests
Capitol Police
May be
Blackmailing
Representatives
including
Johnson, as
they "know
where all the
bodies are
buried". https://www.glennbeck.com/radio/jan-6-journalist-fbi-arrest
COVERUP!Tucker
Carlson
Uncensored
InterviewsSteve
Kirsch -Data
Reveals
Estimated 17
Million died
from the COVID
shot and
childhood
Vaccines
actually cause
autism. Steve
Kirsch has
looked at the
data.
https://tuckercarlson.com/uncensored-the-vaccine-interview/
Tucker
Carlson
Interview on
Glenn Beck.Federal
Government
Declares New
Cold War With
RussiaWithout
Constitutional
Authority or
Civilian
Consent. Major
Danger of a
Military
populated by
Illegals with
no affection
to our
Constitution.
The Necessity
of Getting Out
of NATO &
UN. APP:
Re-Affirms the
Need for
Smaller States
for Adequate
Representation,
Protection of
Private
Property &
Law and Order
based upon
Natural Law.Re-Affirms
that
Democracies
can never
protect your
rights; only
Republics
based upon
natural rights
can. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64r6ko9o51o
Tucker
Carlson
Encounters
Bret Weinstein
at the Darien
Gap:United
Nations (UN),
IOM - OIM and
NGO's Wage War
on United
States At
Panama Canal -
Supported by
United States
Federal
Government
Miss-Using US
Citizen Taxesin
Grantsto
Fund
Invasion.
This Federal
Finance of NGO
Funding of
Unlimited
Illegal
Immigrants of
Military Aged
Men With No
Intention of
Becoming
Americans
Endangers
US. https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-bret-weinstein-at-the-darien-gap/
"Lost Voices
of Fentanyl"
Organization
Calls for
Listing
Fentanyl as a
Weapon of Mass
Destruction
and Cartels as
Terrorists to
Drive the War
on
Drugs: https://lvof.org/
Britain's
Parliament
Frightened of
Backlash from
the Islamic
Religious
Immigrants,
Attempts
Appeasement by
supporting the
Establishment
of a
Palestinian
State filled
with Radical
Islamic Hamas.
Netherlands:
Geert
Wilders:
"We have
imported a
monster into
Europe and
that monster
is Islam"
https://twitter.com/i/status/1755902446340096220
Follow
American
Patriot Party
on X: https://twitter.com/AmPatriotParty APP Report:
Communists
Senator Edward
Markey
Democrat
Massachusetts
& Jamie
Raskin,
Democrat
Maryland's 8th
District in
the U.S. House
of
Representatives
(Video @
23:35)Attempt
to pass a bill
to outlaw
Citizen
Militias and
Citizen Arms
and Tactical
Training.
These Democrat
Traitors are
Complete
&Total
Communist
Idiots that
want to spit
on our
Constitution
and Natural
Right of Self
Preservation.
Apparently
they have not
read James
Madison
Federalist 46(See James Madison QUOTE below
on this page)
who
established a
MINIMUM POWER
RATIO of 25 to
1 - Citizens
OVER the U.S.
Military. And
defined
Militia as "officered by men chosen among THEMSELVES"not
government or
military; for
the purpose of
being an
OPPOSING force
to the United
States federal
military
should they
become the
tools of a
tyrant or
attempt to
overthrow the
Original
Constitutional
Compact. Nor
have they read
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788
George Mason
establishing
militias were
ALL PEOPLE;
and under the
Constitution
the existence
of militias
were to be
protected.
These fools
are in direct
violation of
their oath to
protect the
Constitution
and should
loose their
jobs
immediately:
World View
Report with
Brannon Howse:
(@ 23:35):https://rumble.com/v4c2qui-appeals-court-stacked-with-biden-judges-rules-against-president-trump.html
TUCKER CARLSON
- VLADIMIR
PUTIN
INTERVIEW
- TUCKER
CARLSON
NETWORK
EXCLUSIVE https://tuckercarlson.com/the-vladimir-putin-interview/
Already the
Left Media
Monopoly
financed by
the Military
Complex, EU
Banking
institutions
scramble to
spin and
downplay this
important
interview.
Biden
& His
Administration
Guilty of
Funding Global
Jihad as he
Continues
Funding
Islamic
Terrorists in
Afghanistan
& Middle
East while
Pushing for
Palestinian
State after
Gruesome
October
Massacre
Against Israel
by Palestinian Terrorists: See Real America's Voice: Special
Report,
January 5th,
2024.
APP opinion on Gaza: Instead of using money given
them to better
themselves,
Palestinians
used those
funds to dig
tunnels andripped out their city plumbing for
pipe to build
missiles to
attack Israel
and butcher
innocent
Israeli
citizens. All Palestinian families
knew of the
miles of
tunnels and
abetted the
horrendous
crimes they
recently
committed;
they did
nothing and
said nothing
to stop it.
APP Calls for
AZ Republican
Party Chair
Jeff DeWit's
and His
Contacts to be
Arrested for
the Crime
Bribery and
Election
Tampering -
Court Order Jeff DeWit's Phone Records and FIND that EAST COAST
BRIBER he was
talking to!!!
GO AFTER
HIM!!!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mis1HvyMidU
American
Stewards -
Fighting for
Property
Rights Against
Natural Asset
Companies(NAC's:I
nternational Communist
Environmentalist
Groups,
International
Corporations
& Foreign
Countries) Purchasing US Land
for Keeping US
Land from US
Citizens: https://americanstewards.us
Julie Kelly DECLASSIFIED: FBI
Created "3
Percenters"
a group
populated with
FBI agents to
entrap
individuals
and Criminally
Agitate crowds
on January 6,
2020: https://substack.com/@juliekelly
Trump Train
Stays on Track
- Remains on
Ballot in
Colorado.
Trump
Derangement
Syndrome
infects yet
another
liberal
elections
official. Same
day as
Colorado
reluctantly
places Donald
Trumps name on
their primary
ballots while
their case
goes to the US
Supreme Court,
Maine’s top
election
official
attempts to
remove Trump
from 2024
primary
ballot; Maine
Secretary of
State Shenna
Bellows
however paused
her decision
pending a
potential
appeal in
state court,
which Trump’s
team said they
intend to file
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/politics/trump-maine-14th-amendment-ballot/index.html
(CNN Attempts
to cover up
the Trump Win
with a
Misleading
Title); In the
state of
Oregon, though
some elections
officials may
have Trump
Derangement
Syndrome, they
correctly
understand the
present issue:
Oregon
Secretary of
State LaVonne
Griffin-Valade
announced on
Nov. 30 that
she does not
have the legal
authority to
remove Trump
from the
primary
ballot. Citing
the Oregon
Department of
Justice,
Griffin-Valade
said a
presidential
primary is not
a case of
someone being
elected.
Instead, it’s
a chance for
voters to tell
their party
who they
prefer to be
the nominee.
Delegates at
the national
convention
ultimately
decide who
that nominee
will be: https://centraloregondaily.com/donald-trump-oregon-primary-ballot-status/
All equal
opening the
way for a
Trump Win in
the Primary,
eventual
Supreme Court
Win and Win in
2024
MUST WATCH:
Collapse of
Building 7 -
The Solomon
Brothers
Building - The
3rd Building
Falling on
9-11-2001 Was
Reported By
BBC it had
Already Fallen
TWENTY MINUTES
BEFORE IT
FELL!!! - Explosive NANO-THERMITE Material https://web.archive.org/web/20111112102751/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf
& https://investigate911.org/
Found at ALL
THREE WORLD
TRADE CENTER
BUILDING
SITES!!! ......Dr. Hulsey of University of Alaska Fairbanks, Who
Led the UAF
Study, Reports
on the Jimmy
Dore Show: https://rumble.com/v40kb91-expert-demolishes-establishment-story-about-wtc-bldg.-7-collapse.html
What
Departments
That ARE
LISTED in this
Show That Were
in These
Buildings
Clearly
Establish a
Government
Coverup and a
FACTUAL
Federal
Government
Corrupt
Criminal
Act...
University of Alaska Fairbanks 4 Year Study Confirms
N.I.S.T.
REPORT FALSE
Regarding
Fall. DOWNLOAD
THE FINAL
REPORT HERE: https://bit.ly/UAF-March2020-Final
Hunter Biden
Blames Others
For Trashing
His and his
Fathers
Character;
When His
Father's
Actions &
Hunter Biden's
Own Laptop
Images
Suggests Any Poor Character Image
Their Own
Doing: Marco
Polo Biden
Laptop Report
(warning adult
images):
https://bidenlaptopmedia.com
*** Tucker on
Ukraine War
Corruption
& China /
Foreign
Control of
Beef Supply -
Interview with
Kentucky Congressman
Thomas
Massie: https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1732163859610321333?s=20
FEDSURRECTION
PROVEN - BEN
SWANN TRUTH IN
MEDIA - LARA
LOGAN
REPORTING -
#TWEET
#RETWEET AND
#RE-POST UNTIL
ALL
#FEDTRAITORS
AND OTHERS
ACTING AGAINST
OUR
CONSTITUTION
ARE ARRESTED
AND SENT AWAY
FOR LIFE
IMPRISONMENT.
#FEDSURRECTION
#JANUARY6th
#INSURRECTION
#CAPITOL:
WATCH VIDEOS:
https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-8-recap-episodes-1-7/
11-7-2023
BREAKING:
INTEREST ALONE
REACHES 1
TRILLION ON
UNITED STATES
DEBT!!!
INTEREST ON
LOANS TAKEN
OUT FROM
FUTURE ENEMY'S
BANKS, SUCH AS
CHINA, BUYS
WEAPONS THAT
WILL BE USED
AGAINST THE
UNITED
STATES!!!
READ: THOMAS JEFFERSON - KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS on YOUR
FREEDOM OF
SPEECH: https://americanpatriotparty.cc/American_Patriot_Party.pdf ESTABLISHING: The FREEDOM OF SPEECH
is "WITHHELD
from FEDERAL
TRIBUNALS"
- i.e. Withheld from
FEDERAL COURTS;
The FREEDOM OF SPEECH: is
"WITHHELD
from - ALL -
HUMAN
INTERFERENCE"
George Floyd
Riots
Instigated By
Fraud.Coroner
Andrew Baker
Attested That
George Floyd
Did Not Die
From
Strangulation
or Anything
Officer May
Have Done. Rob Schmitt , NewsMax Reporting 10-23-23:
Police State:
New Film-
WATCH TRAILER
& TICKETS
ONLY AT: https://policestatefilm.net/
A Film by
Dinesh D'Souza
and Dan
Bongino.
AE911TRUTH -
Get The
Explosive
TRUTH OF
911!
Join over
3,500
Professional
Architects
&
Engineers and
Thousands More
Demanding An
Official
Investigation!
Watch
Documentary
Videos and
Professional
Investigations.
http://www.ae911truth.org
Brave
Australian
Politicians
that will
travel to USA
on Sept. 12 To
Stop
Extradition
&
Free Julian
Assange; Help
finance their
trip &
follow
progress and
sign the
petition at: https://www.change.org/p/free-julian-assange-before-it-s-too-late-stop-usa-extradition/u/31888031
NEWS
FLASH!!!!
CRACKS OPEN IN
REVEALING DEEP
STATE!
Barack
Obama's &
Democrat Lies
Exposed! Sex,
Lies, Murder
of "Loose
Ends"!
Tucker Carlson
Opens Closet
On "Pretty
Boy" Barack
Obama's Sick
Bisexuality
& Lies
Ep.
22
"Larry
Sinclair says
he had a night
of crack
cocaine-fueled
sex with
Barack
Obama..."
Not the only
one! VIDEO:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1699543001473900670
Is Barack
Obama, the
Clintons,
Bushs and
Others Now
"Loose Ends"
to Deep State
Dark Powers?
FBI
& CIA Tied
to Ukrainian
Nazis In
Ukraine and
Nazis Groups
In United
States Who
Support
President
Biden Who is
Supporting
Nazis in
Ukraine. "Nazi
Feds Get
Loomered" Steve
Bannon - RAV
WarRoom
9/5/2023: Lara
Loomer
Reporting:
VIDEOS: https://t.me/s/loomeredofficial
See Also: https://loomered.com/
& https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer Related: Psyop -Known
FBI and
Ukrainian Nazi
Spies Presence
on January
6th: "FBI
identified
Ukrainian
operatives and
Neo Nazis who
were at the US
Capitol on J6
and even
questioned
J6ers about
these
Ukrainian
spies during
interviews
with the
FBI......the
US Capitol was
penetrated by
Ukrainian
spies and the
US Government
and FBI have
still not
arrested these
people or made
the public
aware of
foreign
penetration.
This is an act
of war by
Ukraine
against the
United States,
and yet the US
Government has
sent $200
BILLION to
Ukraine in the
last 2 years.
The CIA is
funding a
color
revolution in
the United
States via
Ukrainian
Nazis and
American Nazis
who are being
recruited by
the CIA and
FBI to fight
overseas in
the Azov
Battalion and
then come back
to the US to
instigate Nazi
political
movements in a
psyop intended
to make right
wingers look
bad. The
reality is,
these people
are Democrats
and Biden
supporters and
the FBI has
been hiding
the fact that
Ukrainian
operatives
penetrated the
US Capitol on
J6 and they
have been
hiding the
fact that they
are working
with Ukrainian
Nazis to
instigate
violence to
subvert the US
Government,
including
actions to
impeach
President
Trump..."Full Report: https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1698710813530300432 https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1698518761194602634
NFSC New
Federation of
China Reveals
CCP China Spy
Networks
Worldwide: https://gettr.com/streaming/p2pnyz71323
TRUMPESQUE
LEANING KEN
PAXTON
impeachment
trial and
securities
fraud trial
both proving
to be a
political move
in both cases
as attorneys
say that the
severity of
the criminal
trial will
hinge on the
impeachment
trial;
suggesting
that if Ken
Paxton is no
longer a
threat
politically,
the criminal
trial is not
really
important: https://www.texastribune.org/2023/08/03/ken-paxton-securities-fraud-courtroom/
Leaked Emails
Suggest Fani
(Fanny)
Willis, Fulton
County,
Georgia DA,
Imposed a
Predetermined
Finding for
Indictment
Against Donald
Trump, Rudy
Giuliani,
Sidney Powell,
Jenna Ellis,
John Eastman,
Mark Meadows,
Kenneth
Chesebro,
Jeffery Clark,
Ray Smith III,
Robert
Cheeley,
Michael Roman,
David Shafer,
Shawn Steel,
Steffan Lee,
Harrison
Floyd, Travian
Kutti, Cathy
Latham, Scott
Hall, Misty
Hampton: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/georgia-court-website-publishes-then-removes-list-of-criminal-charges-against-trump
Chinese Bio
Lab Discovered
in Fresno
California
Near West
Coast Military
Air Base;
Other US Bio
Labs Tied To
China
Laboratory -
Mice found to
carry Corona
Virus:
Real Americas
Voice -
Stenchfield
Tonight -
August 3,
2023: https://gettr.com/streaming/p2ngwq87a53
Floridians
will be able
to carry
concealed guns
without a
permit under a
bill
Republican
Gov. Ron
DeSantis
signed Monday,
giving the
governor
another
legislative
victory as he
prepares a
campaign for
president. The
governor
signed the
bill in a
private
ceremony in
his office.
His only
immediate
public comment
was,“Constitutional
Carry is in
the books,”which he said in a three-paragraph news release.
Italy
considers
sending
warplanes to
Ukraine as is
Other EU
Countries Want
To Cash In on
Bidens US
Billions of
Dollars Dumped
into Ukraine -
No Thought of
Cost of
Ukrainian's
Lives That
Will Be Lost
by Fueling the
Conflict;
instead of
Seeking Peace:
https://www.rt.com/news/571789-italy-send-warplanes-ukraine-media/
Instigators
of War:
Report exposes
how German
media stirs up
militancy in
society and
works to
prevent
negotiations
with Russia -
German
Socialist
Party, EU
Banks, WEF and
International
Corporations
of the
Military
Complex:
https://www.rt.com/news/568595-how-to-sell-war/
Traitors in
OregonAttemptto
Override
Second
Amendment
Limitations on
Government but
will Rightly
Fail in
Supreme Court:https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2021R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/SB554/Enrolled
The
Right of the
People to Keep
and Bear Arms
Shall Not Be
"Infringed".
Read also
Federalist #46
by James
Madison and
the
Established
Minimum Power
Ratio 25 to 1
- Citizen OVER
US Military.
Former British Labour
leader Jeremy Corbyn,
Pentagon Papers
whistleblower Daniel
Ellsberg, famed linguist
and dissident Noam Chomsky
and others gave testimony
Friday at the Belmarsh
Tribunal in Washington,
D.C., calling on President
Biden to drop charges
against Julian Assange.
The WikiLeaks founder has
been languishing for close
to four years in the harsh
Belmarsh prison in London
while appealing
extradition to the United
States. If convicted in
the United States, Julian
Assange could face up to
175 years in jail for
violating the U.S.
Espionage Act for
publishing documents that
exposed U.S. war crimes in
Iraq and Afghanistan.
Friday's event was held at
the National Press Club
and co-chaired by
Democracy Now! host Amy
Goodman. We spend the hour
featuring compelling
excerpts from the
proceedings.
To
watch the full
two-and-a-half-hourlivestream
of theBelmarsh
Tribunal,
visit this link:https://youtu.be/j_QqpYATupw
Bombshell
Proof of Election
Machine Manipulation. States
Governments Derelict In
Their Duty To Protect
Their Own Citizens
Presently
Unconstitutionally
Jailed And Held In
Washington, DC For
January 6th.
WASHINGTON,
DC CLEAN-OUT COMING -
ARRESTS LOOMING---
LEGISLATIVE, DC
POLICE, CIA, FBI
FACING 20 YEARS
FOR CRIMES AGAINST
AMERICAN CITIZENS
JAILED IN DC BIDEN
SPEECH PROVES
COMMUNIST VS
FEDERALIST #46---
BIDEN ATTACKS SECOND
AMENDMENT AND YOUR
RIGHT TO SELF
PRESERVATION -LEARN
TO BUILD ARMS *JULIAN
ASSANGE VINDICATED!
*Ignore
Russia - Focus on
the Instigators of
War:German
Socialist Party (with
French and Belgium EU
Socialist Party
Counterparts) -
European Union Banks -
United States Military
Complex - All
Corporations (foreign
and domestic) that
will Benefit From a
Military Conflict With
Russia Or China -
Focus on those inside
and outside government
Corrupting our
Freedoms and Rights
and Focus on the Biden
Administration
Attempting to Divert
Attention from his,
his administration and
Democrat Party Failed
Woke Liberal Policies.
*Joe
Biden Socialism=Two
Steps Forward, One
Step Back: The
fake and "not anyone's
president", Joe Biden,
unwittingly repeats
the words of communistdictator
Joseph Stalin. It isJoe
Biden, the Democratic
Party and other voting
fraud perpetrators who
are in fact themselves
guilty of unfair
voting which his fake
propaganda attempts to
oppose. This is
because they
themselves have
established corrupt
voting practices andElection
Subversionwith
attempts to pack the
courts, allowing
foreign people to
vote, allow illegal
migrant voting,
establish corrupt
voting machines,allow
electronic switching
of votes,hire
corrupt election
staff, block voting
audits, allow ballot
stuffing of ballot
boxes, promote ballot
mining andchange
the way votes will
be counted.
Dictator
Joseph Stalin,
1923: "...I
consider it completelyunimportant
who in the party
will vote, or how;
but what is
extraordinarily
important is this—WHOWILL
COUNT THE VOTES,and
how."said in
1923; Boris BazhanovThe
Memoirs of Stalin's
Former Secretary(1992);
seeStoppard
Joe
Biden 1-13-2022:"One
thing for certain,
like every other major
civil rights bill that
came along. If we miss
the first time, we can
come back and try it a
second time. We missed
this time. We missed
this time. The
state legislative
bodies can continue to
change the law not as
to who can vote, who
gets to count the
vote. Count the vote.
Count the vote! Its
about election
subversion! Not just
whether or not whether
people get to vote.WHO
COUNTS THE VOTE!"Watch
Video: Joe Biden:
1-13-22: Who Counts
The Votes!
*Corrupt
State Governors
Engage a Corrupted
FBI-Who Use
Battering Rams to
Unjustly Enter
Homes: Violating
The Right To Be
Secure In Person,
Papers And
Property:War
Room Pandemic with
Stephen K Bannon Episode
1428 Part 1 Part 2:Episode
1428 Video Part 1&
2 War
Room PandemicBack
Videoswith Stephen
K Bannon Episode 1427
Part 2:Episode
1427 Video Part 2
WATCH:"UKRAINE
ON FIRE":https://rumble.com/vwxxi8-ukraine-on-fire.html ***Watch out
for the disinformation
crowd of CIA
war-munger propaganda.
No mentions in the
media about about
Western Ukraine
killing, butchering
and bombing innocent
citizens of Eastern
Ukraine for the last 8
years, simply because
the Eastern Ukrainians
want independence.Anyone that
supports Western
Ukraine and the
Zelensky government
supports the corrupt
Nazi nationalistic
political ideals and
CIA puppet
governments. Look at
the history of
Ukraine, not just the
surface feeding media
fools that are poster
boys for RINO
politicians trying to
embroil the US in
another useless,
needless war being
invoked by another CIA
political plant,
President Zelensky, of
Ukraine, who just
passed a law making it
illegal to speak in
favor of Russia with a
15 year prison term -
Apparently he doesn't
really want freedom of
speech or freedom in
his country and but
wants to maintain the
heavy handed
corruption in Ukraine.
The Ukraine government
has been attacking and
killing it's own
people for 8 years,
THIS is fact. Nazi
groups are prevalent
in Western Ukraine
politics, THIS is
fact. Eastern
states want to align
themselves to Russia
with 90% vote in
Crimea, THIS is a
fact. Eastern Ukraine
welcomes Russian
soldiers, as they are
protecting them from
the Western Ukraine's
8 year suppression and
attacks and want their
states to be aligned
with Russia and be
independent, THIS is
fact. Sadly, Western
Ukraine citizens are
getting their just
desserts for
supporting a corrupt
Ukraine government
that has made a habit
of killing and
terrorizing it's own
people in eastern
Ukraine. Russia has
called them on it. The
American
Constitutionalists and
Russian people and
Russian government
have some major things
in common, our dislike
of international
banks, international
corporations and
international military
complex that feed on
the misery of others
and attack our
independent nations
and state's
sovereignty for their
own financial gains.
# 202:"...Wherever
law ends, tyranny
begins,if the law
be transgressed to
another's harm; andwhosoever
in authority exceeds
the power given him
by the law, and
makes use of the force
he has under his
command to compass
that upon the subject
which the law allows
not, ceases in that to
be a magistrate,andacting
without authoritymay
be opposed, as any
other man who by
force invades the
right of another.This
is acknowledged in
subordinate
magistrates.
He that hath
authority to seize my
person in the streetmay
be opposed as a
thief and a
robber if he
endeavours to
break into my
house to execute
a writ,notwithstanding
that I know he has
such a warrant and
such a legal authority
as will empower him to
arrest me abroad. And
why this should not
hold in the highest,
as well as in the most
inferior magistrate, I
would gladly be
informed. ... For
exceeding the bounds
of authority is no
more a right in a
great than a petty
officer, no more
justifiable in a
king than a
constable.But so
much the worsein
himas that he
has more trust put
in him,..."
United States
Constitution:
Amendment IV"The right
of the people to besecurein
their persons,
houses, papers, and
effects,against
unreasonable searches
and seizures,shall
not be violated,
andno
Warrants shall
issue,but
upon probable cause,supported
by Oath or
affirmation,
andparticularly
describingthe
place to be searched,
and the persons or
things to be seized"
Andrew
Jackson:“Gentlemen!
I too have been a close
observer of the doings of
the Bank of the United
States. I have had men
watching you for a long
time, and am convinced that
you have used the funds of
the bank to speculate in the
breadstuffs of the country.
When you won, you divided
the profits amongst you, and
when you lost, you charged
it to the bank. You tell me
that if I take the deposits
from the bank and annul its
charter I shall ruin ten
thousand families. That may
be true, gentlemen, but that
is your sin! Should I let
you go on, you will ruin
fifty thousand families,and
that would be my sin!You are a
den of vipers and thieves.
I have determined to rout
you out, and by the
Eternal God,(bringing
his fist down on the table)I will
rout you out!― Andrew
Jackson-When
he killed the National
Bank.
It
is time to kill it
againandprevent
it from ever rising
in the future with
punishment of
treason to those
that attempt it.
Removing
All Foreign Interests
and Corporate
Exclusive Privileges
From Our Country
END
THE FEDERAL
RESERVE!
END
INTERNATIONAL
BANKING AND ITS
CORRUPTION!
BIDEN AND
ADMINISTRATION -
VERIFIABLY
CRIMINALLY INSANE
All while Biden - Harris
say to Americans: "LET
THEM EAT ICE CREAM CONES!"
3,529ProfessionalARCHITECTS
and ENGINEERS
and 30,984 Citizens call
forinvestigations
that need to be done.To give you
a better insight onwhat
happened on 911and
sign the petition, go to:http://www.ae911truth.org
AE911TRUTH
NIST LAWSUIT - PRAYER
FOR RELIEF(View
Full Amended Complaint):
"...of that RFC denial. 370.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff
respectfully requests this
Court, pursuant to its
authority under the
Administrative Procedures Act,
5 U.S.C. §§ 702, 706,
to: A.Appeal
were arbitrary and capricious,
not in accordance with law,
and without observance of
procedure required by
law; B.Issue
an injunction requiring NIST
to correct its WTC 7 Report so
that this report complies with
the IQA, including requiring
NIST to develop a new WTC 7
possible and consistent with
the evidence; C.Issue
an injunction requiring NIST
to correct its WTC 7 Report so
that this report complies with
the NCST Act; D.Issue
an injunction requiring NIST
to make public all of its WTC
7 computer modelling(s)
including all computer code,
data, assumptions, and input
used with or for that
modelling; E.Issue
an injunction requiring NIST
to make public all evidence in
its possession, and to
disclose and describe all
evidence that has been
destroyed, and all other
evidence known to Defendants
to exist, that evinces or is
consistent with the use of
explosives and/or incendiaries
having caused or contributed
to the collapse of WTC
7. F.Award
Plaintiffs their reasonable
attorney fees incurred in this
action; and G.Grant
such other and further relief
as the Court may deem just and
proper."
Welcome
to the American Patriot
Party!The
Patriots who follow the
Original intent of the
Founding Fathers:
1.)Strong Statesas Intended. 2.)SmallerStatesfor
Adequate
Representation
as the
Constitution
Prescribes,limitingPower
of
"Distant
Legislatures". 3.)Stronger Smaller Countiesfor Local Control. 4.)Limiting the Federal Governmentto the Delegated
Powers of theOriginalConstitutional
Compact:
"...I cannot comprehend that the(VERY
LIMITEDFEDERAL
LEGISLATIVE)power
oflegislatingover
a "SMALL
DISTRICT"(Washington, DC), which"CANNOT EXCEED" "TEN
MILES SQUARE",
andmay "NOT
BE MORE" THAN
"ONE MILE",
will involve
the dangers
which he
(Patrick
Henry)
apprehends.
..."
APP:
Think long and
hard about
that
statement.
George
Mason,
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788:
"...But
I wish aclause
in the
Constitution,
with respect
toALL
POWERSwhichare
NOT granted
(DELEGATED),
that they areRETAINED
by the STATES.OTHERWISE,
the power of
providingfor
the "GENERAL
WELFARE"
may be "PERVERTED
TO IT'S
DESTRUCTION".".....READ
IT HERE -
CLICK.
American Patriot Party
Opposes Lies and Socialism
in Government, Business and
Law.
We oppose
Non-Profit Organizations
(NPOs) and Non-Government
Organizations (NGOs), as it is
a fact that the members of
these organizations do make
profit, big profit, and work
for political and private
institutions that in most
instances are actively working
against the principles of
freedom and constitution; the
definition of Non-Profit is a
lie and misleads in it's
title; such organizations are
also given exclusive
privileges which can not exist
in a truly free country.We
oppose defining corporations
as "individuals" in law (which
in law it is defined that
way); Corporations are"exclusive
privileged collectives",
granted by the state, who
practice "collective title in
property"; "collective title
in property" is the definition
of socialism. Privatized
socialism is still socialism.
Unions practice "collective
title in labor" and is
socialism, Union operation of
dictating their salary is
clearly in opposition of
freedom; Read theThe
Absolute Rights of the
Colonists by Samuel Adams
1772about those in
government who dictate their
own pay and who should
determine their pay. All are
types of entities and
exclusive privileges opposed
by the Founders.Read
why.
FIX
2020 ELECTIONFIRST!
WATCH
ON FRANK SPEECH .COM MIKE
LINDELL'S AUGUST 2021
CYBER SYMPOSIUM The
Pillow Man Cometh to
Imprison the Corrupt! *Over 48 State
Representatives Having Been
Present Head Back to Their
States to Establish Forensic
2020 Election Audits
TECHNICIANS
OPEN STATE COMPUTER ELECTION
PACKETS REVEALED
INTERNATIONAL CORRUPTION AFFIRMINGTRUMP
PRESIDENTIAL 2020
ELECTION VICTORY-
ELECTORAL AND POPULARBY
MILLIONS
240 Leftists
Caught on Video Dumping
Ballots From Back Packs in
Drop Boxes Across State of
Georgia!
----------------------
APP
Warning AgainstElection
Propaganda
Do not believe
China instigated or acted
alone in election fraud or
other incursions into acts
of corruption toward our US
free society.China, a world
power, cannot benefit from a
conflict or cold war with
the United States.Look toward
European Union: it'sGerman,
French & Belgium
Socialist Parties,international
banking&military
arms dealers Do not
forgetour OWN CIA and FBIwho
used Russian Servers andFake
DossierDocuments to
Attack our own sitting
President.Look toward
those who would benefit from
a armed conflict between the
super powers and a weakened
free country, ...
The United
States. The only truly free
country and Constitutional
Republic(s), that maintains
a measure of peace in the
world.
Look toward
international organized drug
crime & private enemy
agenda's against the
Constitution such as George
Soros.
To
illustrate, look at this
video of systematic evil
played out inthe
Parliamentof the
European Union; WatchtheGerman
Socialist Party in
actionJuly 7,2008while
theyremove
political oppositionin
their move to take Europe:
This
is so that you can
recognize who the
traitors and enemies
are.
----------------------
APP ON
IMMIGRATION
Beware
of the Crocodile Tears of
Islamic Asylum Seekers
Shown By Media.
Would You Give Asylum in
the United States of
Hitler Youth and Their
Teachers?
Beware of Inviting
Doctrines Subversive to
Free and Independent
Societies.
EDUCATIONAL DIRECTIVE Need for
Redirection of Islamic
Asylum Seekers and Reverse
Immigration Policies
THE UNITED STATES
IS PRESENTLY UNDER CONTROL OF
AN INSANE AND ILLEGITIMATE
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN,
VICE PRESIDENT AND HISEQUALLY
ILLEGITIMATE ADMINISTRATION
WHICH HAVE BEGUN ASYLUM
IMMIGRATION OF RELIGIOUS
ENEMIES INSIDE OUR BORDERS.
All news
outlets, politicians and
surprisingly conservatives in
their ignorance of
foundational Constitutional
and forgotten Common Law
principles,refuse to
address the real issue of
bringing asylum seeking
immigrants from Afghanistan
(and other Islamic
countries)to the
United States. That issue, if
they would read American
history on thePrinciples
of Toleration by John
Locke,
which defines in this caseNON-tolerationconcerning
certainintolerable
religions.John
Locke's Treatise on
TolerationandSamuel
Adams "Absolute Rights of
the Colonists"clearly
present thislong knownPRINCIPLE
OF FREEDOM. that in
fact and wisely limits
certain types of religions
that are "subversive
to societies"
whose followers take their
marching orders fromforeign
religious leaders:
Samuel
Adams - Absolute Rights of
the Colonists, 1772:
"...In so much that "Mr.
Locke" has asserted, and
"proved beyond the possibility
of contradiction on any solid
ground", that such toleration
ought to be extended toall
whose DOCTRINES are NOT
SUBVERSIVE OF SOCIETY.The
only Sects which he thinks
ought to be(Other
than MUSLIM religion which
has never been compatible
with the Christian
religions, free
governments or any other
besides sharia law),
and whichby
allWISE lawsareEXCLUDED
FROM SUCH TOLERATION,
are those who teachDoctrines
subversive of the Civil
Government under which
they live.The
Roman Catholicks or Papists
are excludedby reason ofsuch
Doctrines as these"that
Princes excommunicated may be
deposed, and those they call
Hereticksmay
be destroyed without
mercy";
besides theirrecognizing
the Pope in so absolute a
manner,in
subversion of Government, by
introducing as far as possible
into the states, under whose
protection they enjoy life,
liberty and property, that
solecism in politicks,
Imperium in imperio2(i.e. aGovernmentwithin
aGovernment)leading
directly to the worst
anarchy and confusion,
civil discord, war and
blood shed--"(A Clear
Warning!) John
Locke on Treatise on
Toleration: "...#71.
Again:ThatChurch can
haveNO
RIGHT to be toleratedby
the magistrate which is
constituted upon such a bottom
that all those who enter into
it do thereby ipso factodeliver
themselves up to the
protection and service ofANOTHER
PRINCE(foreign).
For by this means the
magistratewould give
way to the settling of aforeign
jurisdiction in his own
countryand suffer
his own people to be
listed, as it were,for
SOLDIERS AGAINST his own
Government.Nor
does the frivolous and
fallacious distinction between
the Court and the Church
afford any remedy to this
inconvenience; especially when
both the one and the other are
equally subject to the
absolute authority of the same
person, who has not only power
to persuade the members of his
Church to whatsoever he lists,
either as purely religious, or
in order thereunto, but can
also enjoin it them on pain of
eternal fire.It is
ridiculousfor any one
to profess himself to be a
Mahometan(MUSLIM)only
in his religion, but in
everything else a faithful
subject to a Christian
magistrate,whilst at
the same time he
acknowledges himself
bound to yieldblind
obedienceto the
Mufti(MUSLIM
CLERIC - ISLAMIC
SCHOLAR)of
Constantinople,
who himself is entirely
obedient to the Ottoman
Emperor and frames the
feigned oracles of that
religion according to his
pleasure.But this
Mahometan(MUSLIM)living
amongst Christians would yet
more apparentlyrenounce
their governmentif
he acknowledged the same
person to be head of his
Church who is the supreme
magistrate in the state. ..."
The Catholics
have since set aside any blind
obedience to barbaric demands
by tyrannical Popes and live
peaceably in a free society.
The Muslims by way of their
barbaricDOCTRINEand
blind adherence to it, can
never be content to live in a
free society; this is because
every part of their doctrineitselfis
written to beSUBVERSIVE
and destructive to any
society but their ownas
theyfollow BLIND
OBEDIENCE to sharia law and
those radical leaders who
follow it.They are
and will always be SOLDIERS
AGAINST FREEDOM. If you
believe otherwise, see the
videos posted below on this
page. Attempts to argue
otherwise is and will always
be a fallacy and history
proves it a fallacy. Islam's
own doctrine tells them to lie
until they are in such numbers
as to control the countries
and governments they have
infiltrated. Islamist openly
declare using their population
as a weapon (see their own
videos below) in our country
to implant sharia law and to
destroy the principles of
freedom we hold dear.
The freedom of
religion clearly does not
apply to religions that areintolerantof
all other religions andintolerantof
free societies. As the
Founders rightly deducted from
history and historical facts,
they wisely concluded, that
followers of the Islamic
religion that tolerates no one
but themselves and their own
religion, except only for the
purpose of destroying or
subjugating others under their
religion, should not be
tolerated in any free country.
It is therefore
necessary to redirect Muslims
who seek asylum to Islamic
countries, not the United
States, and to begin reverse
migration of those migrated,
back to countries historically
Islamic. If they want freedom
and the blessings it provides,
they can establish it there;
First
Amendment - Freedom
Acknowledgement Award
First Amendment
Freedom Acknowledgement Award
is given by the American
Patriot Party to Edward
Snowden, Bradley Manning and
Julian Assange. The American
Patriot Party is advocate for
dropping of all United States
charges (past and present)
againstEdward
Snowden,Bradley
Manning,Julian
Assange& National
Guardsman - Jack Teixeira(who has
exposed Biden Administration
Lies & Treason against
United States Citizens)who
have shown great courage in
their actions in exposing
government corruption at great
risk and loss of their own
freedom and liberties. When
there is corruption within the
highest levels in government,
the First Amendment is our
most essential sentinel to our
lives, rights and liberties.
ReadThe Virginia and
Kentucky Resolutions by
James Madison and Thomas
Jeffersonand theVirginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788.
Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky
Resolutions 1798: " ...3.
Resolved, That it is true as a
general principle, and is also
expressly declared by one of
the amendments to the
Constitutions, that "the
powers not delegated to the
United States by the
Constitution, our prohibited
by it to the States, are
reserved to the States
respectively, or to the
people"; andthat NO
power over the freedom of
religion, freedom of speech,
or freedom of the press
being delegated to the
United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States, all
lawful powers respecting the
same did of right remain,
and were reserved to the
States or the people:that
thus was manifested their
determination to retain to
themselves the right of
judging how far the
licentiousness of speech and
of the press may be abridged
without lessening their useful
freedom, and how far those
abuses which cannot be
separated from their use
should be tolerated, rather
than the use be destroyed. And
thus alsothey
guarded against ALL
abridgment by the United
States of the freedom of
religious opinions and
exercises, and retained to
themselves the right of
protecting the same,as
this State, bya law passed
on the general demand of its
citizens, had alreadyprotected
them from "ALL" human
restraint or
interference.
And that in addition to this
general principle and express
declaration, another and more
special provision has been
made by one of the amendments
to the Constitution, which
expressly declares, that
"Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof, or
abridging the freedom of
speech or of the press":
thereby guarding in the same
sentence, and under the same
words, the freedom of
religion, of speech, and of
the press: insomuch, that
whatever violated either,
throws down the sanctuary
which covers the others, arid
that libels, falsehood, and
defamation, equally with
heresy and false religion,are
WITHHELD from the
cognizance of federal
tribunals.That,
therefore, the act of Congress
of the United States, passed
on the 14th day of July, 1798,
intituled "An Act in addition
to the act intituled An Act
for the punishment of certain
crimes against the United
States," which does abridge
the freedom of the press,is
"NOT LAW", but is
"ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and
of "NO FORCE"...."
American
Patriot Independence
Recognition Award:
Recognizes and
bestows highest honor toMichael
Newfor
protesting the United
Nationsby refusing to
wear the U.N. insignia on his
uniform during a United
Nations Protection Force
peacekeeping mission to
Macedonia during the Yugoslav
Wars. This Patriotic Act is
recognized by the Common Law
Principles of patriotism to
ones independent state and
country as outlined by John
Locke's Treatise of Civil
Government that establishes
that a citizen of one country
cannot be delivered up under
the command and control of
another country against his
own consent:
John
Locke Treatise on Civil
Government: #217.
"...Fourthly, thedelivery
also of the peopleinto
the subjection of a
foreign power,
eitherby
the prince or by the
legislative,is
certainlya
change of the
legislative, and
soa
dissolution of the
government.
For the end why people
entered into society being
to be preserved one entire,
free, independent society to
be governed by its own laws,this
is lost whenever they
are given up into the
power of another."
This applies to
NATO, UN and any other
governing body and establishes
any treaty or command both
void and treasonous against
any United States Citizen,
Military or Citizen Militia.
Remember that we
are a nation of Independent
State Republics ofConstitutionallaws
under Original Compacts that
create each republic based
upon the Laws of Nature andNOTjust
any lawthat is passed by
federal or state legislatures.
Educate others to
stop promoting total
democracy,total democracy
(51% enslave 49%) issocialism.
The Founders never spoke of
forming a democracy; The
Founders spoke of and formed
Constitutional Republics that
acknowledge the meanings set
down in the Declaration of
Independence, Ratifying
Conventions that defined the
meaning of the words in the
Constitution and Bill of
Rights, all founded firmly in
the foundational principles of
theLaws
of Nature(See also
TheAbsolute
Rights of the Colonistsby
Samuel Adams) which are
necessary for freedom and
liberty to exist.If you
have not read them, you
must. Without
those principles no country
can be considered a free
community, state or country.
These principles should be
guarded by all US republic
governments, local, state and
federal, and promoted as the
ideal to inspire all those
governments of the world that
wish to experience true
freedom and liberty.
Thomas
Jefferson: "Rightful
liberty is unobstructed action
according to our will within
limits drawn around us by the
equal rights of others.I do not
add 'within the limits of
the law',becauselawis
often butthe tyrant's
will,andalways sowhen
it violates the rights of
theindividual~~"
#3. "Resolved,That
it is true as a general
principle, and is also
expressly declared by one of
the amendments to the
Constitutions, that"the
powersnot
delegatedto the
United States by the
Constitution, our
prohibited by it to the
States, are reserved to
theStatesrespectively,OR
to the People";and
thatNOpower
over the freedom of
religion, freedom of speech,
or freedom of the press
being delegated to the
United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States,all
lawful powers respecting
the same did of right
remain, and were reserved
to the States or the
People:that
thus was manifested their
determination toretain to
themselves the right of
judging how far the
licentiousness of speech and
of the press may be abridged
without lessening their
useful freedom, and how
far those abuses which cannot
be separated from their use
should be tolerated,rather
than the use be destroyed.
And thus also theyguarded
againstALL
abridgmentby
the United States of the
freedom of religious opinions
and exercises, and retained to
themselvesthe right
of protecting the same, as
this State, by a law
passed on the general
demand of its citizens,
had already protected them
from"ALL"human
restraint or interference.And
that in addition to this
general principle and express
declaration, another and more
special provision has been
made by one of the amendments
to the Constitution, which
expressly declares, that"Congress
shall makeno lawrespecting
an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof, or
abridging the freedom of
speech or of the press":thereby
guarding in thesame
sentence, and under the same
words, the freedom of
religion, of speech, and of
the press: insomuch,thatwhatever
violated either, throws
down the sanctuary which
covers the others,arid that
libels, falsehood, and
defamation, equally with
heresy and false religion,are
WITHHELD from the
cognizance of federal
tribunals.That,
therefore, the act of Congress
of the United States, passed
on the 14th day of July, 1798,
intituled "An Act in addition
to the act intituled An Act
for the punishment of certain
crimes against the United
States," which does abridge
the freedom of the press,is "NOT
LAW", but is"ALTOGETHER"
"VOID", and of "NO
FORCE". ..."
Get the word
"Democracy" out of your
vocabulary when describing the
United States; we are
Independent Republics, based
upon theLaws of Nature.
Democracy in our governments
are limited to those
principles; limited to
delegated powers and defined.
"The right of the people to
keep and bear arms shall not
be infringed".That right
"cannot be voted away" by
state or federal
legislatures or any
"democratic process";any
"law" to do so, as clearly
established by the Founders,is "NOT
LAW", but is"ALTOGETHER"
"VOID", and of "NO
FORCE". ...".If
attempted, it is an"act
of apretense of
authority"and an"act
of war against the
people"as clearly
described inJohn
Locke's Second Treatise
on Civil Government. "The
right of self
preservationis
theFirst Law of
Nature",Samuel
Adams, Absolute Rights
of the Colonists, 1772.See
Federalist #46and James
Madison's25
to 1 Power Ratio -
Citizens militia
over military,
below on this page.
APP
IMPORTANT News,
Documents and Videos BE
INFORMED! Posts are
fromOldest
(1.)to
newest (Last - Highest
Number on List): 2020-2021:
APP Statement:
Covid vaccine mandates areBlatantly
Unconstitutional.Religion
has nothing to do with vaccine
exemption, it has to do withCONSENT.No
ability to Consent, No
Freedom. Freedom and NATURAL
RIGHTS belong to civilian
and military personnel
alike.
1.) Virus
establishes itself in the
sinuses (best to stop it
there) then enters the cells
of the lungs 2.) Cells make
mucus in lungs to wage war
against virus.(Covid
pneumonia). 3.) Debris from
the battle falls to the bottom
of the lung like cement and
suffocate cells. 4.) Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome(ARDS)
is the result of the lung's
cells beginning to die and
becoming eviscerated. 5.) Lungs become
damaged, eventually beyond
repair.
6.) Death
Even if the virus
is stopped and the swelling is
reduced in the lungs from
steroids, the damage will
create a weakened state where
death can still occur.
Watch this video:
What you need
to know:Therapeutics:
Be Prepared!
Early Action is Critical: Stay
out of the Hospital:
Note:
Early On, France found -
Zithromax (Azithromycin)
(Z-Pack) and Hydroxicloriquinekilled
the virus
Low Risk
Persons, ie. under 45 years
of age, Prophylaxis (before
you get sick),
symptomatic care and
treatment:Hydroxicloriquine,
Ivermectin, Quercetine (a
Antioxidant flavonoid - from
Apples, fruits and vegetables
reduces inflamation) withVitamin
C gets, Zinc into the cells.
EGCG (epigallocatechin
gallate) a polyphenol a plant
compound - green tea extract.
Act Fast!Time
is Essential!
Act Firstif
you think you are sick!
...THEN Test - DoNOTwait
until you are tested.
1.) Sick? First
Get Monoclonal Antibodies. If
your state or local medical
foundations refuse to
immediately administer it to
you, immediately leave your
state and get to a state,
doctor or hospital that will.
Your life may depend on it.
2.)
Hydroxicloriquine200ml
twice a day for 5 days and
3.) Ivermectin
(These last two are Zinc
Delivery Systems that Deliver
Zinc into the Cell a delivery
system to increase
intercellular zinc). (Note:
ICU patients are given 400ml
twice a day for the first two
days)
In 1764, James Otis,
Jr.: “The Colonists are
by theLaw of Naturefree
born, as indeed
all men are,white or black.”
John Dickinson, in the last of
his twelve Letters from a
Farmer in Pennsylvania of
1767, referred to this natural
rights foundation: “Let these
truths be indelibly impressed
on our minds - that we cannot
be HAPPY, without being FREE -
that we cannot be free,
without beingSECURE in our
PROPERTY- that wecannot be
secure in our property,if,without ourCONSENT,others
may, asby
right,take it
away”;
"#190. Every man is born
with a double right.First,
a right of freedom to his
person, whichno other man
has a power over, but
the free disposal of it lies
in himself. Secondly, a right
before any other man, to
inherit, with his brethren,
his father's goods."; "#191. By
the first of these, a
man is naturallyfree from
subjection to any government,though
he be born in a place under
its jurisdiction....."; "#192....till
they are allowed theirdue
property, which
is so to be proprietors of
what they havethat
nobody can take away any
part of it without theirOWN
CONSENT,without
which, men under
any government are not in the
state of free men,but are
direct SLAVES under the
force of war..." "#193.
... (property) the nature
whereof is, that, withoutaman'sOWN
CONSENT(See
#6&7), itcannot
be taken from him."; "#194.
...For
can there be anything more
RIDICULOUSthan
to say, I give you and yours
this for ever, and that in the
surest and most solemn wayof
conveyance can be devised,
andyet it is to be
understood that I have
right, if I please, to take
it away from you again
to-morrow?(Think how
this relates to property and
income taxes and how far we
have strayed); "#195.
I will not dispute now whether
princes are exempt from the
laws of their country,but this I
am sure, they owe subjection
to theLaws of God and
Nature.Nobody,
no power can exempt them from
the obligations of that
eternal law. Those are so
great and so strong in the
case of promises, that
Omnipotency itself can be tied
by them. Grants, promises, and
oaths are bonds that hold the
Almighty, whatever some
flatterers say to princes of
the world, who, all together,
with all their people joined
to them, are, in comparison of
the great God, but as a drop
of the bucket, or a dust on
the balance -- inconsiderable,
nothing! ..."
Founder's
Warning Come True - Regarding
Washington DC, White House and
Legislature:
Patrick
Henry: "....The people
within that place
(Washington, DC), and the
strongholds, may be excused
from all the burdens imposed
on the rest of the society,
and may enjoy exclusive
emoluments, to the
great injury of the rest of
the people. But
gentlemen say that the power
will not he abused.
They ought to show that it
is necessary. All
their powers may be fully
carried into execution,
without this exclusive
authority in the 'ten miles
square' (Washington,
DC). The sweeping
clause will fully enable
them to do what they
please. What could the
most extravagant and
boundless imagination ask,
but power to do every
thing? I have reason
to suspect ambitious grasps
at power. The
experience of the world
teaches me the jeopardy of
giving enormous power.
Strike this clause out of
the form of the government,
and how will it stand?
Congress will still have
power, by the sweeping
clause, to make laws within
that {438} place and the
strong holds, independently
of the local authority of
the state. I ask you,
if this clause be struck
out, whether the sweeping
clause will not enable them
to protect themselves from
insult. If you grant
them these powers, you
destroy "every degree of
responsibility". They
will fully screen them from
justice, and preclude the
possibility of
punishing them.
No instance can be given of
such a wanton grasp of power
as an exclusive
legislation in all cases
whatever. ..." Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788 James Madison's
Answer: "They(The
Federal Legislature,
Supreme Court, Federal
Judicial and Executive)are
not given that much power...."
Therefore it is
clear the federal government
has exceeded their authority.
Their association with foreign
banks and involvement with
exclusive privileged
organizations such as
international and domestic
corporations, unions,
lobbyists and special
interests has corrupted the
republican form of government
consisting of limited federal
power and small, well
represented, strong state
republics.
Note: If this video above is
taken down (again) by
YouTube, do a search for Ed
Asner 9-11
Solving the Mysteries of WTC
World Trade Center #7 to
view it until we re-post or
view similar videos athttp://www.ae911truth.org
Over 3,000
people died on 911 and no
investigations as to what
the people and businesses
associated with them were
involved with... If even
one person was murdered in
this same city, what that
one person may have been
involved in would bethoroughly
investigated. 3000 +
people are murdered, and
there is nothing said
about the activities of
any of the victims or the
companies associated with
them.
Manipulation of National
Currency, Foreign Currency
and Trade can produce
serious consequences; As
clearly seen with the
"Federal Reserve"
investing in Foreign
Banks,all without
transparent Civilian or
Legislative oversight to
scrutinize poor
investments or, more
importantly, corruption;
Result: We are
now 1.264 TRILLION DOLLARS
in Debt to China alone
(see article below); Our
country is now quaking
from the International
debt caused by poor
legislative governing ofAmerican Tax
Dollars,poor
corporate investments, and
corruption associated with
those investments;
Building 7 held
many records of those
companies involved in the
World Trade Center. The
video recording of the
firemen indicating that
the building wasgoing to bepurposely
collapsed is clear; The
way the building
fallsis
unquestionable.
The
American Patriot Party
promotes having a thorough
investigation, not only of
the buildings, but of the
business activities of the
victims and those associated
with the victims; of the
companies and their
activities, and of all
things leading up to thecollapse;to
find out what actually
occurred,
both for the families of
the victims and the
country.
Watch
and listen to this video
with it's many
professionals. Then you
decide.
Sir Winston Churchill: "How
Dreadful are the curses
which Mohammedanism (Islamic
doctrine)
lays on it's votaries
(Religious Followers)!
...which is as dangerous in
a man as hydrophobia
(Rabies)
in a dog. The effects are
apparent in many countries.
Improvident habits
(thoughtless undisciplined
behavior),
slovenly systems of
agriculture, sluggish
methods of commerce, and
insecurity of property exist
wherever
the followers of the Prophet
rule or live."
Watch
British
Police Attack their OwnSimply for WantingBritish Law
Upheld:The Video "Western
Sharia Police" Warns us of
the upcoming Dangers against
our Freedom of Speech and
Liberties from
Creeping Radical Islam: NOTE:
This Video has many
internet bans including
google chrome browsers
which switches quickly
from start arrow to an X.
You can either try to view
it in different browsers
or reload the page in
chrome but stop the reload
as soon as the arrow is
visible. This should stop
the video ban function and
maintain the arrow to
allow you to start this
video. https://altcensored.com/watch?v=SLT9JOE64WQ
See Also:
Islamic
Britain: The TRUTH About No
Go Zones NOTE:
This Video has many
internet bans including
google chrome browsers
which switches quickly
from start arrow to an
X. You can either try to
view it in different
browsers or reload the
page in chrome but stop
the reload as soon as
the arrow is visible.
This should stop the
video ban function and
maintain the arrow to
allow you to start this
video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBhhxcpJwps&t=1s
American
Patriot Video Archive:Ezra
Taft Benson-
1of2 Globalist Bankers Tactic
to Stifle Freedom and
American Patriot
Movements in America. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTd-CnCMK-8
American
Patriot Video
Archive:Ezra
Taft Benson -2of2
Globalist Bankers Tactic
to Stifle Freedom and
American Patriot
Movements in America. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUu0prLE9no
John
Birch Society's eye
opening Video
against the SPLC
Southern Poverty Law
Center showing
the SPLCSouthern
Poverty Law
Centerto
be a socialist
organization
spreading hate
against the original
Constitution and
those true American
Patriots supporting
it; That
the SPLC does this
by comparing true
American Patriots
whichtheyhatewith
criminal organizations
- Seeagain
Ezra Taft
Benson's
WarningVideo
above of socialist
backed organizations
creating "confusion
followed by
delusion".
Support
the
only party
that actually
follows the
Constitutionas
it was
intended.
No other party
or organizationwill
do this, not
one.
Compare us
to other
parties:The
American
Patriot Partybelieves
in Constitutionaland
Common LawCarryof
armsfor
bearing andconcealment;forpreservation
of self,
family, community,
freedoms,libertiesand
property.The
Founders hid
theircannons,
munitions and
arms from
their
government,
clearly
indicatingconcealment
without
registration
is an
inalienable
right:See
Federalist #46
and James
Madison's 25
to 1 Power
Ratio -
Citizens
militia over
military,See below on this page.This
Constitutional
minimum ratio
is what the
NRA cowers
from
upholding,
however the
American
Patriot Party
does not.
Two
of theseweapons
werepurchased
(without
governmentregistration
as with all
gun purchases
at that time)
from Puckle,
himself a
citizen
attorney
inventor, bythe
2nd Duke of
Montagu.
George
Washington'scall
for the CITIZENSto
manufacture
and havereadily
at handmilitary
grade weaponryFirst
Annual Message
to Congress,
January 8,
1790for
thedefense
of theirfreedoms
and liberties.See
Quotes Below
on this page.
The
American
Patriot Partysupports
formation andarmamentof
Citizens Militias
(all citizens)as
intended by the
Founders.It
is theresponsibilityof
the states and
federal
government to
train and arm
theCitizenmilitias
(See:Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788);Once
trained,
military
members of the
US armed
forceshave
the duty to
continue their
service as
members of the
citizen
militiawhere
they
reside with
those that
have not had
military
service,
work totrain
them,and
to take their
place as James
Madison
indicates in
Federalist#46as
a opposing
force to the
standing
military they
onceserved
as well as
that of foreignaggression;
This is to
balance and
check thepower
of our limited
government(s).
This is not a
anti-governmentstand,or
anti-military
stand;this
is a
Constitutional
check against
the misuse of
power by
governments
acting under apretense
of authorityand
outsidethose
limited
delegated
powers giventhem.
Note that if
the federal
government
fails to arm
and train the
citizens, it
is the right
and duty of
the state,
local
communities
and or
citizens to do
so - including
the right to
import arms;
including to
import arms
outside the
federal pretense
ofcontrol
- which by the
Bill of Rights2nd
Amendment, the
federal
government has
nocontrolregardingarms(See:Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788). George
MasonVirginiaRatifying
Convention
6-16-1788:
"...His fears,
as he had
before
expressed,
were, that
grievous
punishments (LAWS and
Laws againstguns etc.)
would be
inflicted, in
order to
render the
servicedisagreeable
to the
(Citizen)
militia
themselves,and
induce them to
wish its
abolition,
which would
afford aPRETENSEfor
establishing a
standing army...." (APP
Note: This has
already
happened);
John
Marshall:"....If
Congress
neglect our
militia
(citizens),"we can
arm them
OURSELVES".CANNOT
(the state and
or people of)
Virginia
"import arms?
Cannot she put
them into the
hands of
"HER"
militia-men?He
thenconcluded
by observing,
that the power
of governing
the militia
wasNOTvested
in the states
by implication,
because,being "possessed
of it"
"antecedent
to the
adoption of
the government,
and "not
being divested
of it" by
any grant or
restriction in
the
Constitution,
they must
necessarily be
as "FULLY
possessed of
it as ever
they had been.>And
it could NOT
be said that
the states
derived ANY
powers from
that (the
federal
government or
Constitution)
system, "but
RETAINED them,"
>>>>>>>>"though not acknowledged in ANY part
of it". "
See Federalist
#46-James
Madison:
A 25 to 1
Civilian Power
Ratiooverthe
Standing Army
(MILITARY) is
the"minimum
power ratio"inanyfree countryand
the true
definition
of what a
MILITIAis.
".....The highest number to
which,
according to
the best
computation, a
standing army
can be carried
in any
country, does
not exceed one
hundredth part
of the whole
number of
souls; or one
twenty-fifth
part of the
number able to
bear arms.
This
proportion
would not
yield, in the
United States,
an army of
more than
twenty-five or
thirty
thousand men.
"TO THESE"(The United States Military)WOULD BE
"OPPOSED" A(CITIZEN)"MILITIA"amounting
to near half a
million of"CITIZENS"with"ARMS
IN THEIR
HANDS",
OFFICERED BY
MEN CHOSEN
FROM "AMONG
THEMSELVES"(CHOSEN BY THE
LOCAL
CITIZEN'S -
NOT MILITARY
OR FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT -
THE TRUE
DEFINITION OF
MILITIA ),fighting
for their(THE CITIZEN'S)common liberties, and
united and
conducted by
governments
possessing
their(THE CITIZEN MILITIA'S)affections
and
confidence.
It
may well be
doubted,
whether a(CITIZEN)MILITIA
"thus
circumstanced"(25
to 1
ARMED POWER
RATIO)could
ever be
conquered by
such a(SMALL)proportion of"regular
troops"(i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES). ...."
ReadFederalist
#46in
full below on
this page....
Get educated.
World
Immigration
News and
Related Videos
- a MUST
READ!:
When governments
deny the existence
of a radical violent
religious culture
and devious acts of
war; and not
only invite it, but
inject it, into
their country.
War is imminent when
the governments
establish the
condition of it. John
Locke, "Second
Treatise on
Civil
Government
1698"
Chapter
19: Of the
Dissolution of
Government
#211.HE
that will, with
any clearness,
speak of the
dissolution of
government, ought
in the first placeto
distinguish
between the
dissolution of
the society
and the
dissolution of
the government..."
#217. Fourthly,
thedelivery also
of the people into
the subjection of
a foreign power,
eitherby the
prince or by the
legislative,
is certainlya
change of the
legislative,
and soa
dissolution of
the government.
For the end why
people entered into
society being to be
preserved one
entire, free,
independent society
to be governed by
its own laws,this
is lost
whenever they
are given up
into the power
of another.
..."
Read John Locke
"Second Treatise on
Civil Government
1689"
https://americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Civil_Government/locke_civil_government.html
and
https://americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Church_State_Man/locke_church_state_man.html
so that you can
understand the
principles of
toleration that the
Governments of
Europe, Britain and
the United States
have quite
apparently forgot.
"...#71.Again:
That Church can have
no right to be
tolerated by the
magistrate which is
constituted upon
such a bottom that
all those who enter
into it do thereby
ipso facto deliver
themselves up to the
protection and
service of another
prince. For by this
means the magistrate
would give way to
the settling of a
foreign jurisdiction
in his own country
and suffer his own
people to be listed,
as it were, for
soldiers against his
own Government. Nor
does the frivolous
and fallacious
distinction between
the Court and the
Church afford any
remedy to this
inconvenience;
especially when both
the one and the
other are equally
subject to the
absolute authority
of the same person,
who has not only
power to persuade
the members of his
Church to whatsoever
he lists, either as
purely religious, or
in order thereunto,
but can also enjoin
it them on pain of
eternal fire.It
is ridiculous for
any one to profess
himself to be a
Mahometan(Muslim)only
in his religion,
but in everything
else a faithful
subject to a
Christian
magistrate,whilst
at the same time
he acknowledges
himself bound to
yieldblind
obedienceto
the Mufti of
Constantinople,
who himself is
entirely obedient
to the Ottoman
Emperor and frames
the feigned
oracles of that
religionaccording
to his
pleasure.But
this Mahometan
living amongst
Christianswould
yet more
apparently
renounce their
governmentif
he acknowledged the
same person to be
head of his Church
who is the supreme
magistrate in the
state.
#72.Lastly,
those are not at all
to be tolerated who
deny the being of a
God. Promises,
covenants, and
oaths, which are the
bonds of human
society, can have no
hold upon an
atheist. The taking
away of God, though
but even in thought,
dissolves all;
besides also, those
that by their
atheism undermine
and destroy all
religion, can have
no pretence of
religion whereupon
to challenge the
privilege of a
toleration. As for
other practical
opinions, though not
absolutely free from
all error,if
they do not tend
to establish
domination over
others,or
civil impunity to
the Church in which
they are taught,
there can be no
reason why they
should not be
tolerated.
#73.It
remains that I say
something concerning
those assemblies
which, being
vulgarly called and
perhaps having
sometimes been
conventicles and
nurseries of
factions and
seditions, are
thought to afford
against this
doctrine of
toleration. But this
has not happened by
anything peculiar
unto the genius of
such assemblies, but
by the unhappy
circumstances of an
oppressed or
ill-settled liberty.
These accusations
would soon cease if
the law of
toleration were once
so settled that all
Churches were
obliged to lay down
toleration as the
foundation of their
own liberty, and
teach that liberty
of conscience is
every man's natural
right, equally
belonging to
dissenters as to
themselves; and that
nobody ought to be
compelled in matters
of religion either
by law or force. The
establishment of
this one thing would
take away all ground
of complaints and
tumults upon account
of conscience; and
these causes of
discontents and
animosities being
once removed, there
would remain nothing
in these assemblies
that were not more
peaceable and less
apt to produce
disturbance of state
than in any other
meetings whatsoever.
But let us examine
particularly the
heads of these
accusations. "..."
Samuel Adams:
"In regard to
Religeon, mutual
tolleration in the
different
professions thereof,
is what all good and
candid minds in all
ages have ever
practiced; and both
by precept and
example inculcated
on mankind: And it
is now generally
agreed among
christians that this
spirit of toleration
in the fullest
extent consistent
with the being of
civil society "is
the chief
characteristical
mark of the true
church"1 & In so
much that "Mr.
Locke" has asserted,
and "proved beyond
the possibility of
contradiction on any
solid ground", that
such toleration
ought to be extended
to all whose
doctrinesare
not subversive
of society.The
only Sects which he
thinks ought to be,
and which by all
wise laws are
excluded from such
toleration, are
those who teach
Doctrines subversive
of the Civil
Government under
which they live.The
Roman Catholicks
or Papists are
excluded by reason
of such Doctrines
as these "that
Princes
excommunicated may
be deposed, and
those they call
Hereticks may be
destroyed without
mercy; besides
their recognizing
the Pope in so
absolute a manner,
in subversion of
Government, by
introducing as far
as possible into
the states, under
whose protection
they enjoy life,
liberty and
property, that
solecism in
politicks,
Imperium in
imperio2 (i.e. a
Government within
a Government)
leading directly
to the worst
anarchy and
confusion, civil
discord, war and
blood shed-- "
This limitation was
called for because
as Locke presented,
following a
religious leader
from another country
(at that time Popes
that would have
people killed in
other countries for
heresy) is like
having a foreign
soldiers following
the orders of
foreign leaders in
your local state and
community.
Freedom relies on a
set of defined
principles based
upon the "Laws of
Nature" and local
interests of local
communities for the
purpose of local
commonwealths; Not
distant legislators
or leaders.
John Locke:
"Chapter 2:
"...Of the State
of Nature 4."To
understand political
power aright, andderive
it from its
original,we
must consider what
estate all men are
naturally in, and
that is, a state of
perfect freedom to
order their actions,
and dispose of their
possessions and
persons as they
think fit, within
the bounds of the
law of Nature,
without asking leave
or depending upon
the will of any
other man. A state
also of equality,
wherein all the
power and
jurisdiction is
reciprocal, no one
having more than
another, there being
nothing more evident
than that creatures
of the same species
and rank,
promiscuously born
to all the same
advantages of
Nature, and the use
of the same
faculties, should
also be equal one
amongst another,
without
subordination or
subjection,..."
6. But though this
be a state of
liberty,yet it is
not a state of
license;
though man in that
state have an
uncontrollable
liberty to dispose
of his person or
possessions, yet he
has not liberty to
destroy himself, or
so much as any
creature in his
possession, but
where some nobler
use than its bare
preservation calls
for it. The "State
of Nature" has a
"Law of Nature" to
govern it, which
obliges every one,
and REASON, which is
that law, teaches
all mankind who will
but consult it, that
being all equal and
independent, no one
ought to harm
another in his life,
health, liberty or
possessions; for men
being all the
workmanship of one
omnipotent and
infinitely wise
Maker; all the
servants of one
sovereign Master,
sent into the world
by His order and
about His business;
they are His
property, whose
workmanship they are
made to last during
His, not one
another's pleasure.
And, being furnished
with like faculties,
sharing all in one
community of Nature,
there cannot be
supposed any such
subordination among
us that may
authorise us to
destroy one another,
as if we were made
for one another's
uses, as the
inferior ranks of
creatures are for
ours. Every one as
he is bound to
preserve himself,
and not to quit his
station wilfully, so
by the like reason,
when his own
preservation comes
not in competition,
ought he as much as
he can to preserve
the rest of mankind,
and not unless it be
to do justice on an
offender, take away
or impair the life,
or what tends to the
preservation of the
life, the liberty,
health, limb, or
goods of another.
7. And that all men
may berestrained
from invading
others' rights,
and from doing
hurt to one
another, and the
law of Nature be
observed,
which willeth the
peace and
preservation of all
mankind, the
execution of the law
of Nature is in that
state put into every
man's hands, whereby
every one has a
right to punish the
transgressors of
that law to such a
degree as may hinder
its violation.For
the Law of Nature
would, as all
other laws that
concern men in
this world, be in
vain if there were
nobody that in the
State of Nature
had a power to
execute that law,
and thereby
preserve the
innocent and
restrain
offenders;and
if any one in the
state of Nature may
punish another for
any evil he has
done, every one may
do so. For in that
state of perfect
equality, where
naturally there is
no superiority or
jurisdiction of one
over another, what
any may do in
prosecution of that
law, every one must
needs have a right
to do.
8. And thus, in the
state of Nature, one
man comes by a power
over another, but
yet no absolute or
arbitrary power to
use a criminal, when
he has got him in
his hands, according
to the passionate
heats or boundless
extravagancy of his
own will, but only
to retribute to him
so far as calm
reason and
conscience dictate,
what is
proportionate to his
transgression, which
is so much as may
serve for reparation
and restraint. For
these two are the
only reasons why one
man may lawfully do
harm to another,
which is that we
call punishment. In
transgressing the
law of Nature, the
offender declares
himself to live by
another rule than
that of reason and
common equity, which
is that measure God
has set to the
actions of men for
their mutual
security, and so he
becomes dangerous to
mankind; the tie
which is to secure
them from injury and
violence being
slighted and broken
by him, which being
a trespass against
the whole species,
and the peace and
safety of it,
provided for by the
law of Nature, every
man upon this score,
by the right he hath
to preserve mankind
in general, may
restrain, or where
it is necessary,
destroy things
noxious to them, and
so may bring such
evil on any one who
hath transgressed
that law, as may
make him repent the
doing of it, and
thereby deter him,
and, by his example,
others from doing
the like mischief.
And in this case,
and upon this
ground, every man
hath a right to
punish the offender,
and be executioner
of the law of
Nature."
The
Principle of
Freedom added by
Samuel Adams is
this:"If
men through fear,
fraud or mistake,
should in terms
renounce and give up
any essential
natural right, the
eternal law of
reason and the great
end of society,
would absolutely
vacate such
renunciation;the
[Volume 5, Page
396] right to
freedom being the
gift of God
Almighty, it is
not in the power
of Man to alienate
this gift, and
voluntarily become
a slave--"
This is the most
important addition
to the definition of
true freedom, as no
individual can give
up the laws of
nature and allow
himself to give up
(voluntary slavery),
or allow others to
accept his
relinquishment
(Slavery), of those
rights to any one,
or any religion, or
any government, or
any leader; Period.
Freedom requires
consent, but you
cannot consent to
give up any
inalienable right
that keeps you free.
Here are a few
videos taken fromYoutube
for your review and
see if you can
recognize that there
are those that will
misuse freedom to
take away your
freedoms.
Ron
Paul had the
correct
statement to
our military
presence in
Iraq; "We
marched them
over there, we
can march them
back";
And ask yourself
regarding the below
videos, would not
the same answer by
reversing the
actions of
governments that
created this problem
be the solution; and
let them improve
their own countries
to their liking if
that is what they
truly wish to do.
This has nothing to
do with racism; it
has to do with
freedom and free
societies vs the
Muslim religion that
does not respect or
recognize either;
and mirrors the
condition that old
world Catholics and
Papists imposed on
those that sought
refuge in the new
world from religious
persecution.
It is also about
governments whose
purpose is to
protect private
property,
vacating that
purpose byplacing
huge tax burdensuponthe
properties,societyandearningsof
its citizens.
This change of
purpose
is, by alldefinitions
of civil
society and
explained by
John Locke, an
act of war
against
their own
citizens;and
can in no way
be an act of a
representative
government:
John Locke
Second
Treatise on
Civil
Government:
Locke:
" #222. The
reason why men
enter into
society is thepreservation of their property;and the
end while they
choose and
authorise a
legislative is
that there may
be laws made,
and rules set,as
guards andfences to the propertiesof all the society,
to limit the
power and
moderate the
dominion of
every part and
member of the
society.For since it can never be supposed to be the will of
the society
that the
legislative
should have a
power to
destroy that
which every
one designs to
secure by
entering into
society,
and for which
the people
submitted
themselves to
legislators of
their own
making:whenever
the
legislators
endeavour to
take away and
destroy the
property of
the people, or
to reduce them
to slavery
under
arbitrary
power, they
put themselves
into a state
of war with
the people,who
are thereupon
absolved from
any farther
obedience, and
are left to
the common
refuge which
God hath
provided for
all men
against force
and violence.Whensoever,
therefore, the
legislative
shall
transgress
this
fundamental
rule of
society, and
either by
ambition,fear,folly,
orcorruption,...
(APP
Note: See this
in Samuel
Adams
Statement
within the
Rights of the
Colonists,
1772:
"If men
throughfear,fraudormistake,
should in
terms renounce
and give up
any essential
natural right,
the eternal
law of reason
and the great
end of
society, would
absolutely
vacate such
renunciation;
the right to
freedom being
the gift of
God Almighty,
it is not in
the power of
Man to
alienate this
gift, and
voluntarily
become a
slave.")
...endeavour
to grasp
themselves, or"put into the hands of
any other"(which they do when they force support of
immigrants
from the money
derived from
their citizens
property and
labor), an
absolute power
over the
lives,
liberties, and
estates of the
people,by this
"breach of
trust" they
forfeit the
power the
people had put
into their
hands for
quite contrary
ends, andit
devolves tothe
people,
who havea
right to
resumetheiroriginal
liberty,
and by the
establishment
of anew
legislative
(such as they
shall think
fit),provide
for their own
safety and
security,(APP Note:
See this in
the
Declaration of
Independence)which
is the end for
which they are
in society...."
Macron sets
stage for a
French civil
war and
promotes a EU
army to subdue
it.
As Germany
wreaths from
the agony of
EU mandated
uncontrolled
mass
immigration
and president
Merkels
disregaurd to
it's citizen's
anguish of the
establishment
and digging in
of Islamic
fundamentalists,
French
president
Macron, French
socialist,
takes strides
in destroying
his own
country to
step up in
power in the
European Union
(EU); Favoring
mass
immigration
and ignoring
the cries of
his French
countrymen.
Make
no mistake,
this is and
has always
been a
religious war.
The Muslim
plan, as you
will see in
these videos
from their own
words
is to use
population as
a weapon to
take over the
countries they
have
been allowed
to infiltrate.
Beware of "Crocodile
Tears" from those
that want tolerationonly
to gain power to
inflict upon
others their own
intolerance.
Locke and the
Founders understood
that allowing
distant or foreign
religious figures to
control the beliefs
and actions of those
within
a local community is
like having foreign
armies stationed
within your local
communities borders.
Knowing "Distant
Legislatures" can
never provide
representation.
And for this reason
Catholics and
Papists "at that
time in history",
whose Popes could
have anyone opposing
the Catholic Church
in a
foreign country
killed for heresy,
could never be
tolerated. Today,
the Muslim religionis
using the
people's
ignorance of
this important
limitation to
"tolerance"to
allow their foothold
in other countries
only so to establish
their religious
control over those
countries.
John
Locke - Church,
State Man - #71:
"...
71."
...Again: That
Church can haveNO RIGHT to
be TOLERATEDby the
magistrate which
is constituted
upon such a bottom
that all those who
enter into it do
thereby ipso facto
deliver themselves
up to the
protection and
service ofanother
prince. For
by this means the
magistrate would
give way to the
settling of aforeign jurisdiction in his own country and suffer his
own people to
be listed, as
it were, for
soldiers
against his
own
Government.Nor
does the frivolous
and fallacious
distinction
between the Court
and the Church
afford any remedy
to this
inconvenience;
especially when
both the one and
the other are
equally subject to
the absolute
authority of the
same person, who
has not only power
to persuade the
members of his
Church to
whatsoever he
lists, either as
purely religious,
or in order
thereunto, but can
also enjoin it
them on pain of
eternal fire. It
is ridiculous for
any one to profess
himself to be a
Mahometan (Muslim)
only in his
religion, but in
everything else a
faithful subject
to a Christian
magistrate, whilst
at the same time
he acknowledges
himself bound to
yield blind
obedience to the
Mufti of
Constantinople,
who himself is
entirely obedient
to the Ottoman
Emperor andframes the
feigned
oracles of
that religion
according to
his pleasure.
But this
Mahometan
(Muslim)
living amongst
Christians
would yet more
apparently
renounce their
government if
he
acknowledged
the same
person to be
head of his
Church who is
the supreme
magistrate in
the state." Samuel
Adams - Absolute
Rights of the
Colonists, 1772:
"Just and
true liberty,
equal and
impartial
liberty" in
matters
spiritual and
temporal, is a
thing that all
Men are
clearly
entitled to,by
theeternal
and immutable
laws Of God
and nature,
as well as by
the law of
Nations, &
all well
grounded
municipal laws,which
must have
their
foundation in
the former.--
In regard to
Religeon,mutual
tollerationin the
different
professions
thereof, is what
all good and
candid minds in
all ages have
ever practiced;
and both by
precept and
example
inculcated on
mankind: And it
is now generallyagreed
among
christians
that this
spirit of
toleration in
the fullest
extent
consistent
with the being
of civil
society "is
the chief
characteristical
mark of the
true church"1&
In so much that
Mr. Lock has
asserted, and
proved beyond
the possibility
of contradiction
on any solid
ground,that
such
toleration
ought to be
extended to
all whose
doctrines are
not subversive
of society(this would exclude radical Muslims as well as it did
radical
Catholics and
Papists).The
only Sects which
he thinks ought
to be, andwhich
by all wise
lawsare
excluded from
such
toleration,are
those who
teach
Doctrines
subversive of
theCivil
Government
under which
they live.TheRoman
Catholicks or
Papists are
excluded by
reason of such
Doctrines as
these "that
Princes
excommunicated
may be
deposed, and
those they
call Hereticks
may be
destroyed
without mercy;besides their recognizing the Pope in so absolute a
manner, in
subversion of
Government,by
introducing as
far as
possible into
the states,
under whose
protection
they enjoy
life, liberty
and property,
that solecism
in politicks,Imperium
in imperio2(i.e. aGovernment
within a
Government)leading
directly to
the worst
anarchy and
confusion,
civil discord,
war and blood
shed--..."
The United Nations is
acting as a DISTANT
LEGISLATURE to assume
power over sovereign
nations and remove
power from citizens
and place them under
the direction and
power of those people
directing and
controlling the United
Nations.
Remember, ruling by
Distant Legislatures,
collectivism,
socialism and creating
dependency are what
endanger our freedom's
and liberties, as
there can be NO
representation by
Distant Legislatures:
".....Now what
liberty can there
be, where property
is taken awaywithout
"consent"?
Can it be said with
any colour of truth
and Justice, that this
Continent of three
thousand miles in
length, and a breadth
as yet unexplored, in
which however, its
supposed, there are
five millions of
people, has the least
voice, vote or
influence in the
decisions of the
British Parliament?
Have they, all
together, any more
right or power to
return a single member
to that house of
commons,who
have not
inadvertently, but
DELIBERATELYassumeda
power to dispose
of theirlives,
8 Liberties and
properties,than
to choose an Emperor
of China! Had the
Colonists a right to
return members to the
British parliament, it
would only be
hurtfull; as from
their local situation
and circumstancesit
is impossiblethey
should be ever
truly and properly
represented there.
The inhabitants of
this country in all
probability in a few
years will be more
numerous, than those
of Great Britain and
Ireland together; yet
it is absurdly
expected [Volume 5,
Page 397] by the
promoters of the
present measures, that
these, with their
posterity to all
generations, should be
easywhile their
property,shall
be disposed ofby
a house of
commons atTHREE
THOUSAND MILES
DISTANTfrom
them;
andwho
cannot be
supposed to have
the least care
or concern for
their real
interest: Who
have not only
"NO natural care
for their
interest", but
must be in
effect "BRIBED
AGAINST IT";as
every burden they lay
on the colonists is so
much saved or gained
to themselves.
Hitherto many of the
Colonists have been
free from Quit Rents;
but if the breath of a
british house of
commons can originate
an act fortaking
away all our money,
our lands will go
nextor be
subject to rack rents
from haughty and
relentless landlords
who will ride at ease,
while we are trodden
in the dirt. The
Colonists have been
branded with the
odious names of
traitors and rebels,
only for complaining
of their grievances;How
long such treatment
will, or ought to be
born is submitted. "
--------
What is it thatdissolves
governmentsthat
are suppose to defend
our liberties? John
Locke presents this
scenario:
-------- John
Lock - Second
Treatise on
Civil Government
- 1689:
"...#212. Besides
this overturning
from without,governments
aredissolved
from within:
First.When the
legislative is
altered,
...When any one,
or more, shall
take upon them to
make laws whom the
people have not
appointed so to
do, they make laws
without authority,
which the people
are not therefore
bound to obey;by
which means they
come again to be out
of subjection, and
may constitute to
themselves a new
legislative, as they
think best,being
in full liberty to
resist the force
of those who,
without authority,
would impose
anything upon them.Every
one is at the
disposure of his own
will, when those who
had, by the"delegation"of
the society, the
declaring of the
public will, are
excluded from it,
and others usurp the
place who have no
such authority or
delegation. "
"...2. "
Resolved,That
the Constitution
of the United
States, having
delegated to
Congress (thefederal
government)a
power to punish:
a.)
treason,
b.)
counterfeiting the
securities and
current coin of the
United States,
c.) piracies,
and felonies
committed on the
high seas, and
d.) offenses
against the law of
nations,
and
>>>>NO
OTHER CRIMES>>>"WHATSOEVER";
and it being
trueas a general
principle, and
one of the
amendments to the
Constitution having
also declared, that
"the powersnot delegated to
the United States by
the Constitution, not prohibited
by it to the States,are reserved to
theStates
respectively,or to the
people,"
therefore
the act of
Congress, passed
on the 14th day of
July, 1798, and
intituled "An Act
in addition to the
act intituled An
Act for the
punishment of
certain crimes
against the United
States," as also
the act passed by
them on the — day
of June, 1798,
intituled "An Act
to punish frauds
committed on the
bank of the United
States,"(>>>>
and ALL their OTHER
ACTS which assume toCREATE,DEFINE,
orPUNISHcrimes,OTHER
than THOSE so
"ENUMERATED" in
the Constitution,)
>>> are "ALTOGETHER"
"VOID", and
of "NO FORCE";
and that the
power to create,
define, and punish
such other crimes is
reserved, and, of
right,appertainsSOLELYandEXCLUSIVELYto
the respective
"STATES", each
within its own
territory..."
To
guard againststatesgiving
away or taking
your rights and
preparedto
defend
your rights,
states need to
be:
1.)smallto
giveAdequateRepresentation,
and
2.) strong to
opposethe
corruption ofDistant(Federal
and
International)Legislatures.
----------
LOCKE
CONTINUED:
#213. This
being usually
brought about by
such in the
commonwealth,who
misuse the power
they have,..."
#217. Fourthly,
thedelivery also of
the people into thesubjection
of a foreign power,eitherby
the prince (president/executive)or
by the legislative,
is certainlya
change of the
legislative,
and soa
dissolution of the
government. For the end why
people entered into
society being to be
preserved one entire,
free, independent
society to be governed
by itsOWNlaws,this is lost
whenever they are
given up into the
power of ANOTHER.
"
---------
APP
NOTE: The United
States are
actually
SovereignIndependentStates,
each with their
own republic
(Which even
smaller
independent
republics can be
created i.e.
divided and
formed into
smaller
independent
states as
provided under
the Constitution
to give adequate
representation)
- The
Constitution
does not take
that away, as
the Constitution
is a very
LIMITED
"COMPACT" See
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788https://americanpatriotparty.cc/americanpatriotpartynewsletterand
Virginia
Resolutions 1798https://americanpatriotparty.cc/candidates-
"...RESOLVED,That
the General
Assembly of
Virginia, doth
unequivocably
express a firm
resolution to
maintain and
defend theCONSTITUTIONof
the United
States,ANDtheCONSTITUTIONOF THIS
STATE,against
every
aggression
either foreign
or domestic, and that
they will
support"the
government"of the
United States
in all
measures"WARRANTED"
by "the former".
That this
assembly most
solemnly
declares a
warm
attachment to
the Union of
the"States", to
maintain which
it pledges all
its powers;
and that for
this end,it is
their duty to
watch over and
opposeevery
infractionof those
principles
which
constitute the"only
basis"of that
Union, becausea
faithful
observance of
them, can
alone secure
it's existence
and the public
happiness.
That
this Assembly
doth
explicitly and
peremptorily
declare, that
it views the
powers of the
federal
government, as
resulting from
the compact,
to which the
states are
parties;as
limited by the"plain
sense and
intention"of the
instrument
constituting
the"compact"; as NO
further valid
that they are
authorized by
the grants
"ENUMERATED"in"THAT
COMPACT";and thatin case
of a
deliberate,
palpable, and
dangerous
exercise of
other powers,
not granted by
thesaid
COMPACT, theSTATESwho are
parties
thereto,have the
right, and are
in DUTY bound,
tointerposefor
arresting the
progress of
the "EVIL", and for
maintaining
within theirrespective
limits, the
authorities,
rights and
liberties
appertaining
to them.
That the
General Assemblydoth
alsoexpress
itsDEEP REGRET,that a
spirit has in
sundry instances,
beenmanifested
by the federal
government, to
"enlarge its
powers by FORCED
constructions"of the
constitutional
charter which
defines them;
and
thatimplications
have appearedofa "design"to"EXPOUND"certain>>>"GENERAL
"PHRASES"(which
having been copied
from the very
limited grant of
power, in the former
articles of
confederation were
theless liable
to be
misconstrued)so as to
destroy the
meaning and
effect, of the
particular
"ENUMERATION"
which NECESSARILY
EXPLAINS AND
LIMITS THE GENERAL
PHRASES;
andso as to
consolidate the
states by degrees,
into"ONE
SOVEREIGNTY"(APP:
i.e. "ONE
NATION" -NO WHERE
INTENDEDby
the Founders),the
obvioustendency
andINEVITABLECONSEQUENCEof
which would be,
to>>>"TRANSFORM"the present
"republican""SYSTEM"(of which there
are numerous
"independent
Republics")of
the United
State"s",into "an
absolute", or "at
best" aMIXED>>>"MONARCHY".
..."
----------
(APP:
a"Mixed
Monarchy" is a
ruling class which
we can see
emerging today
with two Clintons
and three Bush's
attempting to
monopolize the
presidency and
control of the
United States -
this was warned by
George Mason in
the Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788)
----------
WE ARENOTONE NATION:
TheaboveFounders
documents show
we areNOT"One
Sovereignty"and
we areNOT"One
Nation";
When
compared with
the FoundersOriginal
intentas spoken
byJames
Madison abovein the
Virginia
Resolutions
1798andinThe
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788show how farwe have
strayed from
the true
definition of
free republics, liberty
and freedom as
defined in theOriginalFounding Documents
andOriginalLIMITEDConstitutional
COMPACT.
Our
states when they
transferundelegatedpowers
to the federal
government and
federal
governments,dissolve
themselveswhen
they attempt
to make us"One
Nation",
OR when either
of them attempt
totransfer
the authoritygiven
to them into the
hands of the
United Nations
as clearly
explained here
by Locke.
A more
accurate pledge would be
one that would
follow the
written intent
and principles
of freedom and
indicate the
flagfollowsthose
principles,
and one that wouldnot
lend itself to
blind
nationalism;
orblindly
following a
image ofa
flag whose
legislatures
change the meaning of on
a regular
basis;orto
any such blind
nationalsocialism;
This
pledgewould
be and we
propose:
New
PledgeofAllegiance:
"I
pledge
allegianceto thoseInalienable
RightsrespectingtheLaws
of Nature,which
definestheFlagof theUnited
States of
America;
and to
protectingourFree
Common Law
Societies in
which theyconsenttoform;
Independent
State
Republics,
United under
God, with
liberty and
justice for
all."
Richard Taylor
- American
Patriot Party
----------
LOCKE
CONTINUED:
#220. In these,
and the like
cases,when the
government isDISSOLVED,the people are at
liberty to
provide for
themselves by
erecting a new
legislative
differing from
the other by
the change of
persons, or
form, or both,
as they shall
find it most
for their
safety and
good.For
the societycan
never, by the
fault of
another, lose
the native and
original right
it has to
preserve itself,
which can only be
done by a settled
legislative and a
fair and impartial
execution of the
laws made by it.
But the state of
mankind is not so
miserable that
they are not
capable of using
this remedy till
it be too late to
look for any. To
tell people they
may provide for
themselves by
erecting a new
legislative, when,
by oppression,
artifice, or being
delivered over to
a foreign power,
their old one is
gone, is only to
tell them they may
expect relief when
it is too late,
and the evil is
past cure.This
is, in effect,
no more than
to bid them
first be
slaves, and
then to take
care of their
liberty, and,
when their
chains are on,
tell them they
may act like
free men.This,
if barely so,is
rather mockery
than relief,
and men can
never be
secure from
tyranny if
there be no
means to
escape it till
they are
perfectly
under it;and,
therefore,it
is that they
have not only
a right to get
out of it, but
to prevent it.
#221. There
is, therefore,
secondly,
another way
whereby
governments are
dissolved,
and that is, when
the legislative,
or the prince,
either of themact
contrary to
their trust.
For the
legislative acts
against the trust
reposed in them
when they
endeavour to
invade the
property of the
subject,and to
make themselves,
or any part of
the community,
masters or
arbitrary
disposers of the
lives,
liberties, or
fortunes of the
people.
#222. The reason
why men enter
into society is
the preservation
of their
property;and
the end while they
choose and
authorise a
legislative is
that there may be
laws made, and
rules set,as
guards and
fences to the
properties of
all the
society,
to limit the power
and moderate the
dominion of every
part and member of
the society.For
since it can
never be
supposed to be
the will of the
society that the
legislative
should have a
power to destroy
that which every
one designs to
secure by
entering into
society, and
for which the
people submitted
themselves to
legislators of
their own making:whenever
the
legislators
endeavour to
take away and
destroy the
property of
the people, or
to reduce them
to slavery
under
arbitrary
power, they
put themselves
into a state
of war with
the people,who are
thereupon
absolved from
any farther
obedience, and
are left to the
common refuge
which God hath
provided for all
men against
force and
violence.Whensoever,
therefore, the
legislative
shall transgress
this fundamental
rule of society,
and either by
ambition,fear,folly,
orcorruption,
...
(APP Note:
See this in
Samuel Adams
Statement within
the Rights of
the Colonists,
1772: "If
men throughfear,fraudormistake,
should in terms
renounce and
give up any
essential
natural right,
the eternal law
of reason and
the great end of
society, would
absolutely
vacate such
renunciation;
the right to
freedom being
the gift of God
Almighty, it is
not in the power
of Man to
alienate this
gift, and
voluntarily
become a
slave.")
endeavour
to grasp
themselves, orPUT
INTO THE HANDS
OF "ANY OTHER",
an absolute power
over the lives,
liberties, and
estates of the
people,by this
BREACH OF
TRUST they
forfeit the
power the
people had put
into their
hands for
quite contrary
ends, andit
devolves to the
people, who havea
right to
resumetheiroriginal
liberty,
and by the
establishment of anew
legislative
(such as they
shall think fit),provide
for their own
safety and
security,(APP Note:
See this in the
Declaration of
Independence)which is
the end for
which they are
in society.
What I have said
here concerning
the legislative in
general holds true
also concerning
the supreme
executor, who
having a double
trust put in him,
both to have a
part in the
legislative and
the supreme
execution of the
law, acts against
both, when he goes
about to set up
his own arbitrary
will as the law of
the society. He
acts also contrary
to his trust when
he employs the
force, treasure,
and offices of the
society to corrupt
the
representatives
and gain them to
his purposes, when
he openly
pre-engages the
electors, and
prescribes, to
their choice, such
whom he has, by
solicitation,
threats, promises,or
otherwise, wonto
his "designs",
and employs them
to bring in such
who have promised
beforehand what to
vote and what to
enact. Thus to
regulate
candidates and
electors, and new
model the ways of
election, what is
it but to cut up
the government by
the roots, and
poison the very
fountain of public
security? For thepeople
having reserved
to themselves
the choice of
their
representativesas
the fence to
their
properties,
could do it for no
other end but that
they might always
be freely chosen,
and so chosen,
freely act and
advise as the
necessity of the
commonwealth and
the public good
should, upon
examination and
mature debate, be
judged to require.
This, those who
give their votes
before they hear
the debate, and
have weighed the
reasons on all
sides, are not
capable of doing.
To prepare such an
assembly as this,
and endeavour to
set up the
declared abettors
of his own will,
for the true
representatives of
the people, and
the law-makers of
the society, is
certainly as great
a breach of trust,
andas perfect adeclaration
of a "design"..."
(APP Note:
See this in the
Declaration of
Independence and
compare 223-226:
" ... But
when a long
train of abuses
and usurpations,
pursuing
invariably the
same object,evinces
a "design"to reduce
them under
absolute
despotism, it is
theirright,
it is theirduty,
to THROW OFF
such
government
and to provide
new guards for
their future
security.)
LOCKE CONTINUED:"...to subvert the
government, as
is possible to
be met with.
To which, if one
shall add rewards
and punishments
visibly employed
to the same end,
and all the arts
of perverted law
made use of to
take off and
destroy all that
stand in the wayof
such a
>>"design",
and will not
comply and consenttobetray
the liberties
of their
country,it
will be past
doubt what is
doing.
What power they
ought to have in
the society who
thus employ it
contrary to the
trust that along
with it in its
first institution,
is easy to
determine;and one
cannot but see
that he who
has once
attempted any
such thing as
this cannot
any longer be
trusted."
-------------------------
CBC SPECIAL
REPORT: Global Warming Doomsday CalledOff
"It is amistaketo think this fault is
proper only to monarchies.Other
forms of governmentareliable
to itas wellas
that;
forWHEREVERthepowerthat
is put in any hands for
the governmentof the
peopleand thepreservationof
theirpropertiesis applied to"other ends",
andmade use of to"IMPOVERISH",
"HARASS", or"SUBDUE"them
to theARBITRARYandIRREGULARcommands
ofthose that have
it,
THERE it
presently becomes
TYRANNY,
whetherthose
that thus use it areone
or many. Thus
we read of the thirty
tyrants at Athens, as well
as one at Syracuse; and
the intolerable dominion
of the Decemviri at Romewas
nothing better."
..."
-------------------------
FROM
DEBT - TODEFENSELESSNESS
-TO
SLAVERY - UNITED STATES FINANCES CHINA'S MILITARYBUDGETON DEBT INTEREST ALONE
"...Forbes based his comments on fiscal2011,in which the CBO estimates
the government
will spend
$225 billion,
or
$616,438,356
per day, on
interest
payments.
China held
12.1 percent
of public debt
at the end of
February. So
if the 2011
estimates hold
and China
holds the same
proportion of
debt
throughout the
year, it would
receive about
$74.4
million per
day...."
That is26
BILLION 156
MILLION A YEARIN
INTEREST ALONEALREADY
PAID - BACK IN2011!!!
Investments
the Chinese
make with this
money
compounds the
danger TEN
FOLD TIMES
TEN.
Free
trade is fine.
Handing our Country
for free to the
Chinese or reducing
our defense by
empowering a Communist
Country to our
eventual demise is
NOT.
Presently, the
interest owed on money
borrowed from China
and being paid to
China, is financing alarge
percentage of the
CHINESE MILITARY.
Interest
to the debt owed
to China By 2020,
if not curtailed,
can and will
finance theENTIRE
CHINESE ANNUAL
MILITARY BUDGET:
"As another example, in2012China
published a
defense budget
of RMB670.274
billion,
with an
increase from
2011 of RMB
67.604 billion
and agrowth
rate of 11.2
percent."
2013:"....Military spending is
set to rise this
year to740.6 billionyuan($119 billion) from 669.1 billion yuan, the
Ministry of
Finance said in
a report.China
has the
second-biggest
military
budgetin
the world after
the U.S., which
spent nearly six
times more on
defense than
China last year
and is now
cutting those
outlays. ..."
We are presently
financing and
arming our
potential future
enemiesIN
MASS.
-------------------------
CHINA
ARMED BY US
FEDERALGOVERNMENT-WHILE
UNITED STATESCITIZENS
ARE DISARMED
BY STATE &
US FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT
APPARENTLY
OUR STATE AND
FEDERAL
REPRESENTATIVES
BELIEVE THE
CHINESE
MILITARY HAVE
A GREATER
RIGHT TO BEAR
ARMS AND SELFPRESERVATION
THAN THE
CITIZENS OF
THE UNITED
STATES.
Our Federal and
State SO CALLED
Representatives
are financing
through wasteful
spending, lavish
salary raises and
retirements,
forced taxation to
pay for forced
UNION "MAXIMUM"
WAGES, WASTEFUL
CORPORATE
CONTRACTS,UNCONSTITUTIONAL
AND NEEDLESS
UNENDING WARSand
DEBTCREATED
BY THESE to which
the interest owed
China is nowthe
Arming of Chinese
with Machine guns,
Tanks, Cannons,
Missiles, Jet
fighters and
Nuclear Arsenals;
ALL
WHILE passing
laws here to
prohibit
citizens fromfrom owning even a machine guntodefend
ourselves,
communities and
countries.
How more stupid and
ignorant can those
"so called"
"REPRESENTATIVES"
"you" have elected
be?
But it is a fact
that these
representatives are
not "stupid and ignorant",but
fully aware andcalculating;
These
Representatives, every
one, are guilty of
rendering aid to our
enemies;
These representatives,
every one, are guilty
of the crimes of
treason; Those who
support or protect
them in any fashion
bear the same title -
your duty to a "job"
does not exceed your
DUTY to uphold the
Constitution or
Essential Natural
Rightswhich
exceed even the
Constitution as our
Founders have
established.
Neither retirement nor
time can reduce these
crimes thesecorrupted
representativeshave
already committed.
Are
you ready toREADandLEARN?
ARE
YOU READY TO VOTE FOR
("so called" by the
Socialist Collectives
Left and Socialist
Corporates Collectives
False Right )"RADICAL"
Constitutionalism
the Founders
readily PRESCRIBEDYET?
...YES?
OR......Maybe
you want to "wait"
just a "little
longer"?... and
"hope" it gets
"better"......
NO?
Then how ready
are you to put
the federal
government
back in it's"10
MILE SQUARE
BOX"intended for the federal government and all their"DEPARTMENTS"before they Enslave you to a point you cannot even defend
yourself?Don't
Know
what
>>>>
"BOX" I
speak
of?
......... Are
You Ready to
Learn? .......Lets see if you are....
Virgina
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788:
JAMES
MADISON:(Author
of the
Constitution)
"Mr. Chairman:
...ICANNOT
COMPREHENDthat
the(FEDERAL
LEGISLATURES,
EXECUTIVE,
FEDERAL
SUPREME COURT,
FEDERALGOVERNMENT
AND ALL THEIR"DEPARTMENTS") "power ofLEGISLATING"over
a"SMALL"
"DISTRICT"(Washington , DC-DISTRICTCAPITOL),
which >>>"CANNOTEXCEED"
>>>"TEN MILES SQUARE",(
I.E. ......THE
>>>>>>>
"BOX" )
and may
>>>"NOT BE"
more than "ONE"MILE,(Limit of PhysicalStructures)will
involve theDANGERSwhich he(Patrick
Henry)apprehends. ..."
SEE
THEPHYSICAL
LIMITSOF
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT?
Gettingsmarter?
Want to learn
more? Keep
Reading and
Read theLinksprovided
as well.
Right now,
even those
that are beingproppedup
as
"Patriotic",are setting you up for
another
fall.
How? Because
most of the
Citizenry have
never readwhat
real
freedom is;and
they are using
that
ignoranceto
set you up.
"RAND"Paul
andincludingsuch
others asMatt
Kibbe - Freedomworks,
Mike Huckabee,
Sean Hannity,
Glenn
Beck,
Mark Levin and
others;whoarepromoting
a UNCONSTITUTIONAL"UN-ENUMERATED"FLAT
SALES TAX or"FAIRTAX"that
will"SHOE
HORN" the
federal
governments
controloverthe
states and
local
communities;
Which is very
foolish and
IGNORANT.
See more on Taxes Below.
RAND
Paul is also trying to
establish and continue
to empower
"Undelegated federal
powers of "certain
crimes" to
unconstitutionally
regulate the
statesandlocal
communities;
SUCH AS-EXCHANGING
the regulating
power
practiced with
Roe VS Wade
with yet
another
UN-DELEGATED
FEDERAL power
over the
states,
"INSTEAD OF" simply
removing the
"unconstitutional
Federal Power"thatenforcesRoe
vs Wade
and replace it
with
"NOTHING"; and
then let the
local
communities
regulate it;
By placing the
issues where they
belong - WITH THE
STATES AND LOCAL
COMMUNITIES -
it would
resolve many of
the "just issues"
Rand wishes to
accomplish;
Simply
continuing to give
issues to a federal
court; Giving
to it authority to
decide where it has
absolutely NO
Constitutional
authority, is not
the way. This simply
allows the federal
government to
arrogate or continue
to arrogate
undelegated powers
under a "PRETENSE OF
AUTHORITY".
CAUTION
NOTE
THATEVERYOTHER
PARTY (and
almost every
talk show host
and public
figure)is
followingand
promotingdistorted
and deceptive
definitions of
the
Constitution.
Claimingto
defend the
Constitution
on one hand,
whilecontinuing
to hackat
the
Constitution's
rootswith
the other.
ONLY
theAMERICAN
PATRIOT PARTYis
following the
Founders
INTENT,
Constitutional
Ratified
Blueprint,
Common Law
Definitionsof
True Free
Societies and
that of
IndependentLocal
andWell
RepresentativeConstitutionalRepublics.
Read
us and see for
yourself.
If you trust
yourself to
any other
party or
organizational
leadership, youWILLbe
misled and deceived.
TAXES
AN
IMPORTANT MESSAGE
FROM THE AMERICAN
PATRIOT PARTYON
TAXATION:
DO
NOT BE TAKEN
IN BYNEWTAX
SCHEMES-
SUCH AS THENATIONAL
FLAT TAX OR
FAIRTAX;
DO NOT LET OLD
TAX SCHEMES
SUCH AS THE INCOME
TAXREMAIN.
THE
INCOME TAX:
The
INCOME TAX isnot unconstitutional
because it was, or was
not, Ratified by
enough states (as
oftensurmised);
The INCOME TAX IS
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL"
"BECAUSE" IT IS A
EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED
"ARROGATION" OF POWER
- OUTSIDE THE LIMITED
DELEGATED POWERS
GRANTED.
THIS TYPE OF TAX
"CANNOT BE RATIFIED"BY THE
STATES TO AMEND THE
CONSTITUTION AND
ARROGATE A POWER "NO
WHERE
INTENDED" UPON THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Changing the "LIMITED"
power of "ENUMERATED"
taxationwhich isa
DELEGATED POWER,
into a "UNLIMITED"
"UN-ENUMERATED" form
of taxation OUTSIDE
the DELEGATED POWER,
is an ARROGATION OF
POWER. It is a "NEW
POWER", EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.
PATRICK
HENRY(WARNS):
"...I
conjure you once
more to remember
the admonition of
that sage man who
told you that,"when you give power, you
know not what
you give".I
know the
absolute
necessity of an
energetic
government.But
is it
consistent
with any
principle of
prudence or
good policy to
grant
unlimited,
unbounded
authority,
which is so
totally
unnecessary
that gentlemen
say it will
"never be
exercised"?But
gentlemensay
that we must
make
experiments.A
wonderful and
unheard-of
experiment it
will be, to
give"unlimited
power
unnecessarily"!...""...The experience of the worldteaches
me the
jeopardy of
giving
enormous
power.Strike this clause out of the form of the
government,
and how will
it stand?
Congress will
still have
power, by thesweeping(supremacy)clause, to make laws within that {438} place and the
strongholds,independently of the local authority of the state.I ask you, if this clause be
struck out,
whether thesweeping clausewill not enable them to protect themselves from insult.If you grant them these powers, you destroy"every
degree of
responsibility".They will fully screen them from justice, and
preclude the
possibility of
punishing
them. No
instance can
be given of
such a wanton
grasp of power
as an
exclusive
legislation
"in all cases
whatever"."
EDMUND PENDLETON:"...I
understand that (Supremacy
- Sweeping)clause
asNOTgoing
a"SINGLE
STEP BEYOND"the"DELEGATED
powers"(APP:
i.e.
THE POWER IS
LIMITEDTO THE
DELEGATED POWERSAND
THESE CAN NEVER BE
CHANGED - THIS IS
WHAT MAKES US A
REPUBLIC UNDER A
"ORIGINAL
COMPACT").What
can it act upon?Some
power given by"THIS"Constitution.If
they should be about
to pass a law in
consequence of this
clause, they must
pursue some of the"DELEGATED
powers", but
can by "NO MEANS"DEPART
from them, (N)OR "ARROGATE"
"ANY NEW"powers;for
thePLAIN LANGUAGEof
the clause is, to
give them power to
pass laws in order
to give "effect"
to the "DELEGATED"
powers"."
GEORGE
NICHOLAS:"...If I
understand it right,NO"NEW"power
can be exercised."
JAMES
MADISON:"....The
honorable member(PATRICK
HENRY)asks,
Why ask for this
power, and if the
subsequent clause be
not fully
competent for
the same purpose. If
so,WHAT
NEW TERRORScan
arise from thisparticular
clause? It
is only a superfluity.
If that"LATITUDE"of"CONSTRUCTION"which
he contends for were
to take placewith
respect to the"sweeping(supremacy
Article 1-
Section 8) clause",there"WOULD"be room
forthose HORRORS.But
it gives "NO"
supplementary power.
It only enables them
to execute the
"DELEGATED powers".
"IF" the "DELEGATION"(SET
LIMITATIONS)of
their powers be "SAFE"(UN-CORRUPTED
FROM THEIRORIGINAL
INTENT AND FORM),no
possible
inconvenience can
arise from this
clause.It is at
most "BUT"
explanatory...."
GEORGE
NICHOLAS:The
gentleman last up(PATRICK
HENRY)says
that the power of
legislation includes
every thing. Ageneralpower
of legislation does.But
this is a "special
power" of
legislation.Therefore,
it does"NOT
contain that
plenitude of power
which he imagines.They(The
Federal
Government,
Executive, Federal
Legislative and
Federal Supreme
Court)"CANNOT
LEGISLATE" in "ANY
case" but those"PARTICULARLY
ENUMERATED"(DELEGATED).
APP: The
Ratifying and
AMENDMENT PROCESSES
of the Constitution
were established to
make changes
"WITHIN" the
DELEGATED powers;
These processes were
to limit and correct
unnecessary powerand only
WITHIN the DELEGATED
powers;
These
processes were NEVER
MEANT to ARROGATE
"NEW" POWERS upon
the federal government at
the will of the
state or federal
representatives
outside of thevery
limited
DELEGATED
powers.
-------------------------
DANGER!
NATIONALFLAT
TAX/FAIRTAXDECEPTION
A NATIONAL "FLAT
TAX" OR THE
"FAIRTAX" WILL
ENSLAVE YOU FURTHER;
ATTEMPTS ARE BEING
MADE TO DECEIVE YOU
BY NATIONAL
CORPORATE &
UNION MEDIA.
Mark Levin
and other talk show
hosts(including
RAND Paul - Flat
Tax)are
promotingtheFairTax
and or Flat Tax.
DO NOT BE
FOOLED! Like the
Income Tax,
these areUNENUMERATED
tax schemes.
Worse yet, these
tax schemesinvite
the federal
government
into your
state to
define"WHAT
IS AND WHAT IS
NOT A
BUSINESS"!Using
this
reasoning willallow
the FairTax
and FlatTax to
invite and
"shoehorn" the
federal
governmentright
into your home
and computer;
This isas
everything,
including your
person and
labor, will be
considered"a
business";opening
everyoneand
everything to
be scrutinized
by theNEW JOINT Federal / StateHybrid
form of the
IRS Created by
the FAIRTAX
and FLAT TAX
Systems.The FairTax and Flat Tax systemsareBUY, SELL and TRADETAXES.They further do not get rid of the
IRS, they
simply change
the name to a
far
more dangerous
and invasive
bureaucracy.Theysimply
insure that
the waste in
government
continue; Both
taxschemesare
like the
income tax,
theyuse
jealousy to
sell you into
deeper
slavery.
Thepeople
that are
promoting
these
unconstitutional
tax systems
are also
stating they
are for
obeying the
Constitution.
This is clear
deception.
Remember-RAND
PAULIS NOTRON
PAUL;
RONPAUL
as with other
true
Constitutionalists
understand the
limitation of
the
Constitution
andwant
to get rid of
the IRS and
Income tax and
replace them
withNOTHING!
This
will change
everything to
the BETTER.
Mark
Levin, Sean Hannity,Glenn
Beck (all
promoting the
same corporate
message), RAND
PAUL and other
republicans
and democrats,
as well as
special
interests such
as
FREEDOMWORKS,
all want to
maintain the
flow of FLAT
PERCENTAGE
UN-ENUMERATEDTAX
MONEY to the
federal
government by
simply
changing theFORM
of the IRS.(Even
though they
"preach"
differently).
The
FairTax
and Flat Tax
"Tax Schemes"
willCHANGENOTHING;Buttheywillin fact make
thingsWORSE;
This is
because it
will give"more invasive power" to the federal governmentand"tighter
grip" over
your "local
and state laws"!
You
will jump from
the frying pan
into theFIRE!
Every gain in "other areas" against
a tyrannical
government
will mean
"NOTHING"; ---
"UNLESS"the tyrannical grip upon the "purse strings" are"pried from
their
fingers";and
the power is
returned to
the states and
local
communities so
that theirCONSENTmust
be granted to
an"ENUMERATED"TAX,"BEFORE"it
is directed to
be collected -
as originally
established in
the
Constitution.
Anything less, will
allow the tyrannical
government tofinance
and shield itselffrom
necessary change which
will return us to true
representative
government as the
Founders intended.
Let
these talk
show hosts and
representatives
know that this
is NOT THE
WAY!
BE
RELENTLESS!
YOU AND THEY -
ARE BEING SET
UP FOR A FALL!
-------
LET US
REVIEW THE
FACTS:
TheOriginalConstitution
was written to
safeguard
against suchcorruption
and abuse of
power.All
taxationhad
to beENUMERATEDBEFORE
CONSENSUALLY
being
collected, it
was also
derived from
imports,
collected
simply from
viewing the
finished
product;so
your businessaffairs,
income and
paperswere
private:
Article
1 Section 9:"No Capitation, or OTHER direct, Tax shall be laid,
"UNLESS" in
"Proportion to
the Census or
"ENUMERATION"
herein "BEFORE"
directed to be
taken."
....This
allows you the time
and meansto
grant your"CONSENT"
before it is
"taken".
Amendment
XVI:"The
Congress shall have
power to lay and
collect taxes on
incomes, fromwhatever
source derived,
without
apportionment among
the several States,
and"WITHOUTREGARD"to
any census of
"ENUMERATION"."
The
Federal Government
Takes your money FIRST
in a"FLAT"PERCENT
...THEN
decideswhat
THEY are going to
spend it on "AFTER"
theyTAKE
IT.
......"WITHOUT
YOUR CONSENT".
-------
Can
youSEETHENECESSITYofENUMERATEDTAXATION!!!
...The Founders did!!
SEE THE ARROGATED
POWER?!
SUCH "UN-ENUMERATED"
"FLAT PERCENTAGE" TAXATION
TAKENCONTROL
OF FIRST, WHERE
CONSENT IS NEAR IMPOSSIBLE
TO BE OF ANY
EFFECT,CAN
"NEVER" BE
"CONSTITUTIONAL";
AND"RATIFYING"SUCH
TAXATION,CAN
NEVER BE MADE TO
"AMEND" THE
CONSTITUTION.
NO MATTERHOW
MANY STATES
"RATIFY IT"!.
NO
MATTER WHAT
YOU NAME IT.
NOTE:
The income tax was
found
unconstitutional
twice by the
Supreme Court
before corruption
entered and
renamed a direct
tax a "indirect
tax" and used as
an excuse to
arrogate new
powers expressly
prohibited - It is
in fact stillunconstitutionaland
still an new
arrogated power;
Further, ALL taxes
are DIRECT; a "INDIRECT"
tax is simply a
"DIRECT" tax taken
from you in a
different way or
made to be taken
from you by
someone else
first-
Redefining a tax
as indirect is
NO EXCUSE to tax
you without yourCONSENTor
as a "MEANS"
to arrogatea
taxing and spending
power beyond
the very
limited
DELEGATEDpowers.
Here the
Founders
establish that
creating a new
>>>>>>>"MEANS" to"ARROGATE"
A NEW POWER
(WAY) OF
TAXATIONis
EXPRESSLY
PROHIBITED.
Mr.
EDMUND
PENDELTON:"....With respect to the necessity of theten miles
square(Washington,
DC)being
superseded by
the subsequent
clause, which
gives them(the federal government)power to"make
all laws which
shall be
necessary and
proper for
carrying into
execution the
foregoing
powers, and
all other
powers vested
by this
Constitution
in the
government of
the United
States, or in
any department
or officer
thereof",
I understand
that clause asNOTgoing a"SINGLE
STEP BEYOND"the"DELEGATED
powers".What
can it act
upon?Some
power given byTHISConstitution.If they(the federal legislature)should
be about to
pass a law in
consequence of
this clause,
they must
pursue some of
the"DELEGATED
powers",
but can by
>>>>>>>"NO
MEANS"DEPART
from them,(N)OR "ARROGATE"(create)"ANY NEW"powers;for thePLAIN
LANGUAGEof
the clause is,
to give them
power to pass
laws in order
to give "effect"
to the "DELEGATED"
powers"."
See Also:
"Declaration
of
Independence"
- "17thGrievance"Quote
belowdefining
Taxation
WITHOUT "
CONSENT" isTYRANNY.
-------
If the federal government stayed within their
"delegated"
powers,
funding the
necessary
expenditures
and paying the
national debt
and national
defense would
be easy.
Force the
federal
government
stay within
the limitedDELEGATED
powers;Forcethem
by notfunding
them to be
wasteful,
manipulative
and
tyrannical;
Stop payingfor
your own
enslavement
and
destruction.
Stop
allowing State
bornExclusive
Privileges; Get
Unions, Corporations
and Tax Supported
Special Interests out
of Government.
Remove ALL
Lobbyists from
Washington DC.
Limit them to your
states where they must
confront the local
citizens of the state
and not manipulate our
state representatives
in our national
government in places
far distant from the
citizens that are most
effected by any
legislation.
Reduce the sizeof
statesso that
there is adequate
representation and not
the manipulative
government which
occurs from "Distant
Legislatures";
"NULLIFICATION"is
"the proper remedy"
when delegated powers
have been exceeded.
"...That this state having by its
Convention, which
ratified the federal
Constitution,
expressly declared,
that"AMONG OTHER ESSENTIAL RIGHTS",
"the Liberty of
Conscience and of the
Press"CANNOT BE CANCELED",abridged,restrained,OR
MODIFIEDby
"ANY
AUTHORITY"
of the "United
States"(federal
government),"
(APP:
This includes
Executive Orders
(which in itself is
unconstitutional),
Legislative or Supreme
Court) "...and from its extreme anxiety to guardthese rightsfromEVERY
possible attackof"SOPHISTRY or AMBITION", having with other states, recommended an
amendment for that
purpose, which
amendment was, in
due time, ANNEXED to
the Constitution; it
would mark a "REPROACHABLE" inconsistency,
and"CRIMINAL DEGENERACY", if
an indifference were
now shewn, to the
most palpable
violation ofONE
OF THE RIGHTS,
thus declared and
secured;
and to the
establishment of a
PRECEDENT(UNDER
APRETENSEOF
AUTHORITY)which
may be FATAL TO THE
OTHER(RIGHTS)...."
----------------------
Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322.
"...On every question of "CONSTRUCTION", let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the DEBATES (i.e. THE RATIFYING CONVENTIONS), and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the "probable one" in which it was passed". "
---------------------
Virginia "Ratifying Convention"
6-16-1788-George Nicholas:
"...Congress have
power to define and
punish: a.) piracies
and felonies committed
on the high seas, and
b.) offenses against
the laws of nations;
(c.) Treason & d.)
Counterfeit of Coin)
....but they (APP: the
federal government,
executive, legislature
or supreme court)CANNOTDEFINEorPRESCRIBEthePUNISHMENTof
"ANY
OTHER CRIMEWHATEVER",WITHOUT "VIOLATING the
CONSTITUTION"...."
2.
" Resolved,
That the Constitution
of the United States,
having "DELEGATED" to
Congress a power to
punish:
a.) treason, b.)
counterfeiting the
securities and
current coin of the
United States,
c.) piracies,
and felonies
committed on the
high seas(only),
and
d.) offenses
against the law of
nations,
and>>>>NO
OTHER CRIMES>>>"WHATSOEVER";
and it being trueas
a general
principle,
and one of the
amendments to the
Constitution having
also declared, that
"the powersnot
delegatedto the
United States by the
Constitution, not
prohibited by it to
the States,are
reservedto
theStates
respectively,or
to the people,"therefore
the act of Congress,
passed on the 14th day
of July, 1798, and
intituled "An Act in
addition to the act
intituled An Act for the
punishment of certain
crimes against the
United States," as also
the act passed by them
on the — day of June,
1798, intituled "An Act
to punish frauds
committed on the bank of
the United States,"(>>>>
and ALL their OTHER
ACTS which assume toCREATE,DEFINE,
orPUNISHcrimes,OTHER
than THOSE so
"ENUMERATED" in
the Constitution,)
>>> are "ALTOGETHER"
"VOID",
and of "NO
FORCE";
and
that the power
tocreate,
define, and
punishsuchOTHERCRIMES
isRESERVED, and, "OF RIGHT",appertainsSOLELYandEXCLUSIVELYto
the respective "STATES",
each within its
own territory..."
------------------
Virginia "Ratifying Convention"
6-16-1788-Mr.
PENDLETON."Mr. Chairman, this(SWEEPING
i.e.SUPREMACY)clauseDOES
"NOT" give Congress
power to impede the
operation of ANY
PART of the
Constitution,(N)or to
make"ANY
REGULATION"that(EVEN)"MAY"affect
the interests of the
citizensof the>>>"UNION AT LARGE"....
(APP:Think about
that,....
thenNotethat the federal government
has NO AUTHORITY
to GOVERN POLICE
of ANY KIND,
OUTSIDE the
Washington DC -
i.e. what the
Founders described
as the 10 MILES
SQUARE and can
make NO LAW that
EVEN MAY EFFECT
THE CITIZENS of
the UNION at LARGE
- Here he
continues...)
"....But
it gives them power
over the"LOCAL"police
of"THEPLACE",
so as to be secured
from any interruption
intheir
proceedings. Notwithstanding the violent attack upon it, I
believe, sir,this
is the "fair
CONSTRUCTION of the(SWEEPING
i.e.SUPREMACY)clause".It
gives them power of
exclusive legislation
in any caseWITHIN>>>"THAT
DISTRICT"(WASHINGTON,
DC).
What is the meaning
of this?What
is it opposed to?Is it opposed
to the general
powers of the
federal legislature,
or to those of the
state legislatures?I
understand it as
opposed to the
legislative power of
that state "WHERE" IT
SHALL "BE".What,
then,is
the power?"ITIS",
that Congress shallexclusively
legislate"THERE",in orderto preserve
{440} serve the"POLICE"OF"THE
PLACE"and
their"OWN" "PERSONAL"independence, that
they may not be
overawed or insulted,
and of course to
preserve them in
oppositionto
any attempt by the
stateWHERE IT SHALL "BE", this
is theFAIR
"CONSTRUCTION"...."(of
theSWEEPING i.e.SUPREMACYclause)
-------------------
FBI,CIA,
ATF, ICE etc. All are
policing OUTSIDE the
10 miles Square of
Washington, DC;
andALL OUTSIDE FEDERAL LIMITS
OF AUTHORITY.
ALL
UNDER THE"PRETENSE"OF AUTHORITY.
Any
attempt to claim
Authority by the Federal
Government, which was
NOT DELEGATED in the "Original Compact" is an
ARROGATION of POWER
which is Expressly
Prohibited (See Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788);
#1:
"...this COMPACTwas"NOT"
made the exclusive
or final judge of
the extent of the(federal)powersdelegated to ITSELF(federal
government -i.e.
The Federal Supreme
Court, Executive or
Legislative areNOTthe
final judge);since
that would have made
"IT'S"(the
federal
government's)"DISCRETION",
and "NOT THE
CONSTITUTION",the
"MEASURE" of its
powers;but that, as in ALL OTHER CASES of compact among
powers having no
common judge,each party(STATE)has anEQUAL
right to judge for
itself, aswell of infractions as of the
mode and "MEASURE" of
redress.
JAMES MADISON. (Author
of the Constitution)
"Mr. Chairman: ...Icannot comprehendthat the(FEDERAL
LEGISLATURES,
EXECUTIVE, FEDERAL
SUPREME COURT, FEDERALGOVERNMENT) "power
ofLEGISLATING"over
a"SMALL DISTRICT"(Washington
, DC), which >>>"CANNOTEXCEED" >>>TEN
MILES SQUARE,and
may >>>"NOT BE" more than "ONE"MILE, will involve the
dangers which he(Patrick
Henry)apprehends.
..."
Think
about that physical
limitation the
founders intended.
"...History
furnishes no example
of a free republic,
any thing like the
extent of the United
States.
The Grecian
republics were of
small extent; so
also was that of the
Romans.Both
of these, it is
true,in process
of time,
extended their
conquests overlarge
territories of
country; andthe
consequence was, that their
governments wereCHANGEDFROMthat of free
governments>>>
to those of theMOST"TYRANNICAL"that
ever existed in
the world..."
The federal
governments
"supremacy" powers
under the
"supremacy
(sweeping)
clause" was,
and still is,
limited to the "10
miles square"
of Washington DC.
The supreme lawof
the "land"?Clearly
by the
founders own
words"LAND"
supremacy clausemeantONLY
WITHIN The 10
MILES SQUAREand
"WITHIN"
theDELEGATEDpowers
only.
As
established in
this day
Ratifying
Convention (click
link forfull
Convention
text)DEPARTMENTS
were LIMITED
to the 10
MILES SQUARE;the
federal
governmentCANNOTGOVERN
POLICEoutside
the10 miles
square;CANNOT"DEFINE",
"PRESCRIBE"OR
"PROSECUTE"
BUTFOUR
CRIMES:
1.) Treason,
2.) Piracy on
the High
Seas (only),
3.) Law of
Nations,4.)
Counterfeitof
coin;
Can collect
TAXES under
the "WELFARE
CLAUSE" forONLY
2THINGS
-NATIONAL
DEBTandNATIONALDEFENSE.
Mr.
GEORGE MASON.
"Mr. Chairman,
gentlemen say
there is no
new power
given by this
clause.Is
there any
thing in this
Constitution
which secures
to the states
the powers
which are said
to be
retained?Will powers
remain to the
states which
are not
expressly
guarded and
reserved? I
will suppose a
case.
Gentlemen may
call it an
impossible
case, and"suppose"
that Congress
will act with
wisdom and
integrity.Among
the enumerated
powers,
Congress are
to lay and
collect taxes,
duties,
imposts, and
excises, and
to pay the
debts, and to
provide for
thegeneral
welfare and
common
defence;and
by that clause(so often
called thesweeping
clause)they are to
make all laws
necessary to
execute those
laws.Now,
suppose
oppressions
{442}should
arise under"this"
(USFederal)government,and any
writer should
dare to stand
forth, and
expose to the
community at
large the
abuses of"those"powers;could not
Congress,
under the"idea"of
providing for
the"general
welfare",and
under their"OWN""CONSTRUCTION",say that
this was
destroying the"general
peace",encouraging sedition, and "poisoning the minds of the
people"? And
could they
not, in order
to provideagainst
this, lay
a dangerous
restriction On
the press?
(APP:
Exactly what
happened 10
years after
the
Constitution
in the Alien
and Sedition
Actsby
the federal
Government andstopped
by the"Virginia
and KentuckyResolutions";
Such similarattacks
on on
the freedom of
speechhas
been recently
promoted by
today's
federal
representatives)
Might they not even
bring the trial of
this restriction
within theten miles
square,when
there is no
prohibition against
it?Might they
not thus destroy the
trial by jury? Would
they not"extend"their
implication?
It appears
to me that theyMAYand
"WILL".And
shall the support of our
rights depend on the
bounty of men "whose
interest it may be to
oppress us"?
That
Congress should have
power to provide for thegeneral
welfare(APP Note:
Defense against
"Foreign" aggression)of the
Union, I grant.
But I wish
a clause in the
Constitution, with
respect toALL powerswhichare
NOT granted, that
they areretained by
the states.
Otherwise, the power
of providingfor
the "general welfare"
may be "perverted to
its destruction".
Many gentlemen,
whom I respect, take
different sides of
this question.We
wish this amendment
to be introduced, to
remove our
apprehensions.There was a
clause in the
Confederation
reserving to the
states respectively
every power,
jurisdiction, and
right, not expressly
delegated to the
United States. This
clause has never
been complained of,
but approved by all
Why not, then, have
a similar clause in
this Constitution,in
which it is the more
indispensably
necessary than in
the Confederation,
because of the great
augmentation of
power vested in the
former? In my humble
apprehension, unless
there be some such
clear and finite
expression, this
clause now under
consideration will
go to any thing our
rulers may think
proper.Unless there
be some express
declaration that
every thing not
given is retained,itwillbe
carried toany power
Congress may please.
It
was answered:
Mr.
GEORGE NICHOLAS,
in reply to the
gentlemen opposed to
the clause under
debate, went over
the same
grounds, and
developed the same
principles, which
Mr. Pendleton and
Mr. Madison had
done. The opposers
of the {443} clause,
which gave the power
of providing for the
general welfare,
supposed its dangers
to result from its
connection with, and
extension of, the
powers granted in
the other
clauses. He
endeavored to show
the committee that
it only empowered
Congress to
make such laws
as would be
necessary to enable
them to pay the
public debts
and provide
for the common
defence;
>that this
"GENERAL WELFARE"
was united,"NOT"to "the
general power of
legislation",
but to the>PARTICULAR
power>oflaying and
collecting taxes,
imposts, and
excises,
for the "PURPOSE"of
paying the DEBTS and
providing for the
"COMMON DEFENCE",
that is, that
they could raise(APP:ONLY)AS
"MUCH"money as
wouldpay the"DEBTS"and
provide for the"COMMON
DEFENCE",
in"CONSEQUENCE OF
THIS POWER".
The clause
which was affectedly
called thesweeping(SUPREMACY)clausecontained"NO new grant
of power".
To
illustrate this
position, he
observed that, if it
had been added at
the end of every one
of the enumerated
powers, instead of
being inserted at
the end of all,it would be
obvious to any one
that it was"NO"augmentation
of power.If, for
instance, at the end
of the clause
granting power to
lay and collect
taxes, it had been
added that they
should have power to
make necessary and
proper laws to lay
and collect taxes,
who could suspect it
to be an addition of
power?
As it would
grant"NO"new
powerif inserted at
the end of each
clause, it could not
when subjoined to the
whole.
He then proceeded
thus: But, says he,
who is to determine
the extent of such
powers?I say, the
same power which, inALL
well-regulated
communities,(COUNTY,
STATE, ANY ORGANIZED
COMMUNITIES
THAT ESTABLISH
CONSENT)determines the
"extent" of
"legislative" powers.
If they exceed these
powers,the"JUDICIARY""WILL"(WHERE ARE
OUR LOCAL JUDGES!)declare
it"VOID", or
"ELSE""the
PEOPLE" will have
a "RIGHT" to
declare it "VOID".
Is this depending on
any man? But, says the
gentleman, it may go
to any thing. It may
destroy the trial by
jury; and they may say
it is necessary for
providing for the
general defence. The
power of providing for
the general defence
only extends to raise
any sum of money they
may think necessary,
by taxes, imposts,
But, says he, our only
defence against
oppressive laws
consists in the virtue
of our
representatives.This
was
misrepresented.
If
I understand it right,NO"NEW"POWER
can beEXERCISED.
As to those which
are actually granted, we
trust to the
fellow-feelings of our
representatives;and if we are
deceived, we then"trust
to altering our {444}
government"."
Ask yourself.
Is our federalgovernment,through
our federalso
called
representatives,
collecting
taxes under
the "welfare
clause" for
things
"OTHERTHAN"
the national
debt and
national
defense?
...
Getting
smarter?
PROPERTY
RIGHTS AND
LIMITATIONS
OF
CONDEMNATION
Now
let us look at
the limited
power of
Condemnation
which
DEFINITION has
been so
corrupted by
state and
federal
governments.
The limited condemnation
clause was a war powers
act for "TEMPORARY"
temporary " taking",NOT
TO TAKE AND KEEP;
Nor an excuse for state
governments to take the
meaning to empower
themselves or the
federal government with
the misuse of the term.
Taking property without
CONSENT has never been,
nor will it ever be a
component of freedom or
of free government:
JOHN
LOCKE: 140:"....for
if any one shall
claim a power to lay
and levy TAXES on
the people "by his
own authority", and
without such
"CONSENT of the
people", he thereby
"invades the
fundamental law of
PROPERTY", and
"subverts the end of
government".
>>>
For "what property
have I" in that
which another may"by
right""TAKE"when
he pleases to
himself?
JOHN LOCKE:141.Fourthly.The legislative CANNOT
transfer the power
of making laws to
ANY OTHER HANDS, for
it being but a
delegated power from
the people, they who
have it "CANNOT
PASS" it over to
OTHERS.
JOHN
LOCKE:149:And
thus the communityperpetually
retains asupreme
power of saving
themselvesfrom
the attempts and
designs of
"ANYBODY",even
of their
"LEGISLATORS",whenever
they shall be so
foolish or so wickedas
to lay and carry on
"designs" against
the LIBERTIES AND
PROPERTIES of the
subject.
JOHN LOCKE:151:"...But
yet it is to be
observed that though
oaths of allegiance
and fealty are taken
to him(The
Executive),
it isNOTto
him as supreme
legislator, but as
supreme executor of
the law made by a
joint power of him
withothers,>>>allegiance
being nothing but
an obedience
according to law,
which, when he
VIOLATES, he
has "NO right to
obedience",nor
can claim it otherwise
than as the public
person vested with the
power of the law, and
so is to be considered
as the image, phantom,
or representative of
the commonwealth,
acted by the will of
the society declared
in its laws, and thus
he hasno will, no
power, but that of
the law.But when
hequits
this representation,
this public will,
and acts by his own
private will,heDEGRADES HIMSELF,and
is but asingle
private person
WITHOUT POWER and
without will; the
members owing NO
OBEDIENCE but to
the public will of
the society(i.e.
LAW OF THE
CONSTITUTION).
JOHN LOCKE:155:"It
may be demanded here,what
if the executive
power, being
possessed of the
force of the
commonwealth, shall
make use of that
forceto
hinder the meeting and
acting of the
legislative, when the
original constitution
or the public
exigencies require it?I
say, using force
upon the people,
without authority,
and CONTRARY TO
THE TRUST(i.e.
LIMITS SET DOWN BY
THE CONSTITUTION)put
in him that does
so, >>>is
a "STATE OF WAR
WITH THE PEOPLE", who havea rightto reinstate
their legislative in
the exercise of their
power. For having
erected a legislative
with an intent they
should exercise the
power of making laws,
either at certain set
times, or when there
is need of it, when
they are hindered byany
force from what is
so necessary to the
society, and
wherein the safety and
preservation of the
people consists,the
people have a
"RIGHT TO REMOVE
IT BY FORCE".In all states and conditions
the true remedy of
force "WITHOUT
AUTHORITY" is to
"OPPOSE FORCE TO
IT".The
use of force
"WITHOUT
AUTHORITY" always
puts him that uses
it into a "STATE
OF WAR" as the
AGGRESSOR, and
renders him liable
to be "TREATED
ACCORDINGLY"
JOHN LOCKE:201.
"It is a mistake
to think this
fault is proper
only to monarchies.Other
formsof
government areliable
to it as well as
that; forWHEREVERthe power that is put
in any hands for the
governmentof
the peopleand
thepreservation
of their PROPERTIESis
applied toOTHER
ENDS, andmade use oftoIMPOVERISH,HARASS,
or toSUBDUETHEMto
thearbitrary
and irregular
commandsof
those that have it,THERE
IT PRESENTLY
BECOMES TYRANNY,..."
Thank
You for your
membership,
support and
contributions!
Note:Facebook
removed our
original
American Patriot
Party page with
thousands of
followers and
had long prior
shadow banned
our visibility.Please
go to our page
on GETTR, MEWE
and TRUTH
MEDIA pages
where we are
beginning
again:
"...Among
the many interesting
objects which will
engage your attention,
that of providing for
the common defence
willmerit
particular regard.
To be prepared for
war, is one of the
most effectual means
of preserving peace.
A
"free PEOPLE"(ARMS
EVERYWHERE)ought
NOT ONLYto
be ARMED,
but disciplined; to
which end, a uniform
and well digested
plan is requisite:
and "their" safety
and interest"REQUIREthat
they(the
PEOPLE)should
promotesuch
manufactories"as
tend to render
"them"(THE
"PEOPLE" -ALL
PEOPLE)"INDEPENDENT"
ofOTHERS
(ALL OTHERS-
INCLUDINGand
ESPECIALLY
GOVERNMENT - - -
See Next)
for "ESSENTIAL",>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"PARTICULARLY"
for
>>>>>>>>>>>>"MILITARY"
"SUPPLIES"."
--------------------
President
George Washingtonpresented hismistrust in the federal
governmentvery
clearly and defined
the true intent where
the powers should lay,
and that is in the
hands of theCIVILIANS.
In response to a proposal for
gun registration:
George Washingtonin
1790 said:
"..."Absolutely
not.If the"PEOPLE
are armed"and the"federalists"(FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT)"DO
NOT KNOW WHERE THE
ARMS ARE",
there canNEVERbe
an "oppressive
government."
--------------------
TheRIGHTtoCONCEALfrom
the "STATE" AS WELL AS
"FEDERAL" government;
The purpose clearly
derived in George
Washington'sstatementto
have the power to "PUT
DOWNBY USE OFARMEDFORCE"
anOPPRESSIVE"FEDERAL"
"OR STATE" government.
"He(The
EXECUTIVE / KING)hasaffected to render the military
independent ofandSUPERIORto theCIVIL(CIVILIAN)
"power"."
-------------------
Elbridge
Gerry, a
representative to
Congress from
Massachusetts during
the debates over the
Bill of Rights"What,
Sir, is the use of a
militia? It is topreventthe
establishmentof
astanding army,
thebane of
liberty...WheneverGovernments
mean to invadethe
rights and
liberties of the
people,theyalwaysattempt
todestroy the
militia, in
order toraise
an army upon
their ruins."
-------------------
Which
establishesa
division between
civilian MILITIA
powers and Standing
Military (ARMY),
as this is a important
establishment of those
reasons given by the
Founders.
-------------------
“Arms
discourage and keep
the invader and
plunderer in awe,
and preserve order
in the world as well
as property...
Horrid mischief
would ensue were the
law-abiding deprived
of the use of them.”
― Thomas Paine
TRUE
DEFINITION OF
MILITIA
Let
us reviewother
words ofJames
Madisonwith
regards to militias and
standing armies;The
purposeand thePOWER
RATIObetween
them:
FEDERALIST
#46(QuoteParaphrase - see actual
text bellow):
James
MadisonAuthor of the
Constitution and the
Bill of Rights:
"TheHIGHESTNUMBERto which a "standing army" can be carried in "ANY COUNTRY" doesNOT
EXCEEDone hundredth(1/100th)part of the souls, orone
twenty-fifth(1/25th)part of the numberABLEto bear arms.
This portionwould not yield,
in the United
States, an (STANDING
ARMY) army of more
than twenty-five or
thirty thousand men.
To"THESE"would
be "OPPOSED"(APP:
indicating that the
"MILITIA" is to be a
"OPPOSING force"to
the standing armyaswell
as that of foreign
enemies)
a(CITIZEN)MILITIAamounting to near half a million"CITIZENS"with
ARMS in their
"HANDS","officered
by men chosen from
"AMONG THEMSELVES",(NOTby
government or the
standing army - This
definition is a
determiner of a TRUE
MILITIA)fighting for "THEIR"(the CITIZEN / militia's)common liberties and
united andconductedby
government"S" (LOCAL - Not
Simply State)possessingTHEIR(the CITIZEN / militia's)affections and
confidence.
It may well be doubted
whethera(CITIZEN)MILITIAthus
circumstancedcould ever be
conqueredby such a "proportion"(ratio
in force)of
"regular troops"(i.e. standing army).
Besides the advantage
of beingarmed,it forms a barrier
against the"enterprises of
ambition"(Foreign
Interests,
Corporations, Banks), more insurmountable
than any which a
simple government of
any form can admit of.
The governments of
Europe areafraidto
trustthe
peoplewith arms. If they
did, the people would
surely shake off the
yoke of tyranny,"as"
Americadid.
Let usnot
insultthe free
and gallant citizens
of America with thesuspicionthat
they would be less
able to defend the
rights of which they
would be in actual
possession than thedebased
subjectsofarbitrarypowerwould be
to rescue theirs from
the hands of"their"
oppressors."
-----------
APP: The Actual Quotetext
below should arouse
citizens greatest
fears and prompt a
call of alarm;
Though
the words James
Madison speaks,
shows thatheestablishesthe
correct fact of
the powers of the
citizen militiaand
limitations of the
standing army,James
Madisonlacked
the understanding,which
Patrick Henry in
theVirginia
RatifyingConvention6-16-1788(which
see) clearlypossessed
with regard to
power and
corruption;
The
present danger
correlating with what
James Madison said
could never happen -which
in fact"HAS"
happened,establishes
an urgency that the
counties and states
whoserepresentativeswhom
have not yet
been corrupted or have
not arrived at their
present position in
complete ignorance of
their
rights,duties
andresponsibilities,
should now movetoarm the
CITIZENS of allages
able to bear
arms, to a 25to 1"superior"force
to the standing
army;
Those
in the standing
army,
understanding
their duty to
the
Constitution,
should begin to
relinquish theirsuperiorityand
begin to
transfer any
and all their
armswithin
the United
States, not
necessary torepelforeign
invasion, to
the Citizens
and most
localcommunities
so that the
balance of
power be
resumed; Soto
prevent
themselves,
and their
families as
well, from
being enslaved;
And
to prepare
with local
CITIZEN
MILITIAS, who
are even more
soresponsible
in their Duty
as free
Citizens to
increase their
powers,to
repel a move
by foreign,
national and
international
manipulators
of power toinfiltrateand
control the
standing army
against the
foundations
established in
theOriginal
Constitutions
and Common Law
Principles
of
freedom.
ThefearsJames
Madison
disregards,
in his
optimism of
the sure
limitationsinstituted
by"delegated"
powersset
in the"ORIGINAL
CONSTITUTION"which
were never to
be exceeded,have
become in fact
areality
of today.
Review
the actual Quote fromFederalist
#46below,then
prepare.
Each man is
responsible for
his own freedom:
-----------
James Madison:"...The
only refuge leftfor
those who
prophesy the
downfall of the
State
governments is
the visionary
supposition that
the federal
government may
previously
accumulate a
military forcefor
the projects of
ambition.
The reasonings
contained in these
papers must have
been employed to
little purpose
indeed, if it could
be necessary now todisprove
the reality of
this danger.That
the people and the
States should, for a
sufficient period of
time,elect
an
uninterrupted
succession of
men ready to
betray both;
thatTHE "TRAITORS"should, throughout this period,
uniformly and
systematically
pursue some
fixed plan for
the extension of
the military
establishment;
that
the governments and
the people of theStates
shouldsilently
and patiently
behold the
gathering
storm, and "
continue to
supply the
materials",
"until it
should be
prepared to
burst on their
own heads",
must appear to
every one more
like the
incoherent
dreams of a
delirious
jealousy, or
the misjudged
exaggerations
of a
counterfeit
zeal, than
like the sober
apprehensions
of genuine
patriotism.Extravagant
as the supposition
is, let it however
be made. Let a
regular army, fully
equal to the
resources of the
country, be formed;
and let it be
entirely at the
devotion of the
federal government;
still it would not
be going too far to
say, that theState
governments,
with the people
on their side,
would be able to
repel the danger.
The highest
number to
which,
according to
the best
computation, a
standing army
can be carried
in any
country, does
not exceed one
hundredth part
of the whole
number of
souls; or one
twenty-fifth
part of the
number able to
bear arms.
This
proportion
would not
yield, in the
United States,
an army of
more than
twenty-five or
thirty
thousand men.
"TO THESE"(The United States Military)WOULD BE
"OPPOSED" A(CITIZEN)"MILITIA"
amounting to
near half a
million of
"CITIZENS"
with "ARMS IN
THEIR HANDS",
OFFICERED BY
MEN CHOSEN
FROM "AMONG
THEMSELVES"(CHOSEN BY THE
LOCAL
CITIZEN'S -
NOT MILITARY
OR FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT),fighting
for their(THE
CITIZEN'S)common
liberties, and
united and
conducted by
governments
possessing
their(THE
CITIZEN
MILITIA'S)affections
and
confidence.
It
may well be
doubted,
whether a(CITIZEN)MILITIA
"thus
circumstanced"(25
to 1
ARMED POWER
RATIO)could
ever be
conquered by
such a(SMALL)proportion of"regular
troops"(i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES).
Those who are
best acquainted
with the last
successful
resistance of this
country against
the British arms,
will be most
inclined todeny the possibility of it.
Besides the
advantage of(THE
CITIZENS)being armed, which the Americans(CITIZENS)possess
over the
people of
almost every
other nation,
the existence
of
"subordinate
governments",
to which the
people are
attached, and
by which the(CITIZEN)MILITIA
officers are
appointed(officered by men chosen among themselves,
not by
governments or
military),
forms a
barrier
against the
"enterprises
of ambition",
more
insurmountable
than any which
a simple
government of
any form can
admit of.
Notwithstanding the
military
establishments in
the severalkingdoms
of Europe,
which are carried as
far as the public
resources will bear,the
governments
are afraid to
trust the
people with
arms.And
it is not certain,that
with this aid
alone they would
not be able to
shake off their
yokes.
But were the
people to
"possess" the
additional
advantages of
"LOCAL"
governments
chosen by
themselves,
who could
collect the
national will
and direct the
national
force, and of
officers
appointed out
of the(CIVILIAN)militia,by
these(LOCAL)governments,and attached both to them and to the(CITIZEN)MILITIA,
it may be
"affirmed with
the greatest
assurance",
that the
throne of
"every tyranny
in Europe"
would be
"speedily
overturned" in
spite of the
legions which
surround it.
Let us not
insult the
free and
gallant
citizens of
America with
the suspicion,
that they
would be less
able to defend
the rights of
which they
would be in
"ACTUAL
POSSESSION",
than the
"debased
subjects of
arbitrary
power" would
be to rescue
theirs from
the hands of
their
oppressors.
Let us ratherno
longer insult
themwith
the supposition that
they can ever reduce
themselves to the
necessity of making
the experiment, by a
blind and tame
submission to the"long
train of
insidious
measures which
must precede
and produce
it"."
APP: This should
alarm any US
Citizen, as our
present condition of
Citizens NOT armed
with a 25 to 1
superiority over our
own standing army;
and the fact that
our "Citizen
Militias" officered
by men "chosen among
themselves"do
NOT exist in any
number near this in
military capability
or armament, is
CLEAR EVIDENCE that
the"long train of insidious
measures which
must precede
and produce it"have"ALREADY OCCURRED".
Mr. GEORGE MASON."Mr.
Chairman, a worthy
member has askedwho
are the militia,
if they be notTHE
PEOPLEof
this country, and if
we are not to be
protected from the
fate of the Germans,
Prussians,by
"OUR"
representation?
I
ask, "Who are the
MILITIA"?They
consist NOW of the"WHOLE PEOPLE"(of
each LOCAL COMMUNITY
OR STATE), except a few public officers. But I cannot say
who will be the
militia of the future
day. If "that paper"(THE
LIMITED
CONSTITUTIONAL
COMPACT BEING
CONSIDERED)on
the table gets "no
alteration", the
militia of the future
daymay
notconsist
of all classes, high
and low, and {426}
rich and poor; but
they may be"confined
to the lower and
middle classes of
the people",granting"exclusion
to the higher
classes"of
the people.
If
we should ever see
that day,themost
ignominious
punishments andheavy
fines(APP:
i.e. jail andimprisonment
for simply being
armed - or being
armedwith
equalARMSwith
the standing
federal USMILITARY)may
be expected. Under the
present government,
all ranks of people
are subject to militia
duty. Under such afull
and equal
representationas
ours, there can be noignominious
punishmentinflicted.
But under thisnational,
or rather
consolidated
government, the
casewill be
different. The
representation being "so
small and inadequate",they will have no "FELLOW-FEELING"
for the people. They may discriminate people in their own
predicament, andexempt
from dutyall
the officers andLOWEST CREATURES OF THE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT. ..."
---------
Mr.
JOHN MARSHALL"
asked if gentlemenwere
seriouswhen
they asserted
that, if the state
governments
had power to
interfere with the
militia,it was
by implication.
If they were, he
asked the
committee whether
the"least
attention" would
notshow that
they were
"MISTAKEN".
The state
governments"DID
NOT"derive
their powers from
the general(federal)government;
butEACH(STATE
& LOCAL
COUNTY)governmentderived
its powers from
the PEOPLE,
and each wasto
act accordingto
the powersgiven
it.Would
any gentleman
deny this?He
demandedif
powers not
given were
retained by
implication.
Could any man
say so? Could
any man say
that this
power was not
RETAINED by
the states,as
they hadNOT
given it away?For,
says he, does
not a power
remain till it
is given away?The
state legislatures
had power to
command and govern
their militia
before, and have
itstill,
undeniably,unlessthere
be something in
this Constitution
thattakes
it away.
ForContinental
purposesCongress
may call forth the
militia, as to
suppress
insurrections and
repel invasions.But
the power given to
the states by the
people is "NOT
taken away";for
theConstitution
doesNOTsay
so.In
the Confederation
Congress had this
power;but
the state
legislatures had it
"also".
The power of
legislating given
them within the "ten
miles square"
isexclusiveof
the states,
because it is
"expressed to be
exclusive".
The truth is, that
when power is given
to the general
legislature, if it
was in the state
legislature before,
both shall exercise
it; unless there be
an incompatibility
in the exercise by
one to that by the
other, or negative
words precluding the
state governments
from it.But
there are NO
negative words
here.It
rests, therefore,with
the "STATES".
To
me it appears, then,unquestionablethat
theSTATE
governmentscan
call forth the(CITIZEN)MILITIA,
in case the
Constitution should
be adopted, in the"SAME
MANNER"as
they could have donebeforeits
adoption.
Gentlemen
have said that the
states cannot
defend themselves
without an"application
to Congress",
because "Congress"
caninterpose!
>>>>Does
not every man feel
a "REFUTATION" of
the "argument" in
his own breast?(i.e.
CONGRESSCANNOTINTERPOSE)
I WILL SHOW{420}that
therecould NOT bea
combination, between
those who formed the
Constitution,to
take away this
power.
Allthe
restraintsintendedto
be laid on the state
governments (besides
where an exclusive
power is expressly
given to Congress)
are contained in the
10th section of the
1st article. This
power isNOT
includedin the
restrictions in that
section. But what
excludes every
possibility of
doubt, is the last
part of it that "no
state shall engage
in war, unless
actually invaded, or
in such imminent
danger as will not
admit of delay."When
invaded,they(the
States and People)"CAN"
engage in war,
asalsowhen
in "imminent
danger". Thisclearlyprovesthat
thestatescan
use the militiawhen
they find it
NECESSARY."
"...But
the worthy
member(Patrick
Henry)fears,
that in one part
of the Union
they will be
regulated and
disciplined, and
in another
neglected. This
danger is
enhanced by
leaving this
power to each
state; for some
states may
attend to their
militia, and
others may
neglect them.
If
Congress neglect
our(CITIZEN)militia(i.e.
"CITIZENS"),"WE"(the States and People)"CAN ARM THEM"
"OURSELVES".
>>>CANNOT
Virginia "import
arms?
>>>Cannot
she put them
into the hands
of "HER"
militia-men?
(APP: i.e. THE
CITIZENS OF THE
INDEPENDENT
STATE "CAN"
import arms; and
as clearly
established
above,"without
ANY
application to
Congress /
federal
government")
(APP: So much
for the "MYTH"
that the Federal
government can
"interpose or
prevent"
military arms
from being
imported across
state lines, by
(mis)using
the
Commerce Clause)
He
thenconcluded
by observing,
that the power of
governing the
militia wasNOTvested
in the states by
implication,
because,being
"possessed of
it"
> "antecedent
to the adoption
of the
government,
and "not being
divested of it"
by any grant or
restriction in the
Constitution, they
must necessarily
be as "FULLY
possessed of it
as ever they had
been. >And
it could NOT be
said that the
states derived
ANY powers from
that(the
federal
government or
Constitution)system,
"but RETAINED
them,
"
>>>>>>>>"though
not acknowledged
in ANY PART OF
IT"."
Do
you havethe means
to Donate?Remember:Don't
put all your eggs in
one basketsuch
as the NRA;Donate
to severalpatriotic
and gun groups when
you donate and divide
the money equally;
This keeps those that
want to incrementally
control, manipulate or
sell out your rights
by controlling the
purse strings of just
a few major groups
from doing so; Make it
impossible for them to
try. By giving
to several smaller
groups it will empower
more passionate
Patriotic groups and
helps secure your
rights. Stay away from
Corporations or Non
Profits, they
are usually
compromised. A few
dollars here and a few
dollars there given to
smaller groups by all
those that are already
donating to large
groups will give the
smaller patriotic
groups the ability to
work.Spread
the wealthand
empower freedom; Then
watch the freedom and
Liberty movement grow
strong.
Samuel
Adams - Absolute
Rights of the
Colonists 1772:
1st. Natural
Rights of the
Colonists as
Men.--
"Among the
Natural Rights of
the Colonists are
theseFirst. a
Right to Life;
Secondly to
Liberty; thirdly
to Property;together
with the Right
to support and
defend them in
the"BESTMANNERTHEYCAN"--Those areevident
Branchesof,
rather than
deductions fromthe
"DUTY"
ofSelf
Preservation,commonly
called"THE
FIRST LAW OF
NATURE"--"...
HUNDREDS OF SHERIFFS
STEP FORWARD "NO GUN
CONTROL IN OUR
COUNTY!"
They understand thatit is the
Federal Government
that is LIMITED to the
DELEGATED powers of
the ORIGINAL
CONSTITUTIONAL COMPACT
that created the
AUTHORITY to begin
with. Much respect to
THESE MEN who
understand that we are
REPUBLIC "S" based
upon CERTAIN LAWS (A
COMPACT) and RESERVED
NATURAL RIGHTS. Not a
Total Democracy that
can vote away our
freedoms.In
Wyoming: Jail Time
proposed for for
Feds! - Hundreds
of Sheriffs tell the
Feds "NO GUN CONTROL
IN OUR COUNTIES" and
to OBEY THE
CONSTITUTION!DESPITE BITTER COLD IN MANY STATES, THE FEBRUARY
8th FIREARMS EVENT AS
WITH THE EARLIER
APPRECIATE FIREARMS
DAY & GUNS ACROSS
AMERICAEVENT
WAS A BIG SUCCESS!!!
THOUSANDS CONTINUE TO
ATTEND EVENTS AND MANY
MORE ARE PLANNED THIS
YEAR!
PERIODICALLY CHECK FOR
EVENTS on our FACEBOOK
PAGE....
"If ever time should come,
When vain and aspiring men
shall possess the highest
seats in government, Our
Country will stand in need
of it's experienced Patriots
to prevent it's ruin"
...Samuel Adams
