American Patriot Party Official National Web Site, American
Patriot Party National Campaign and Elections Headquarters, Oregon
Patriot Party, The American Patriot Party State of Oregon Web
Site, State of Oregon Elections Division History, Oregon State
Elections Division, Oregon Political Parties List and Comparison
Chart and Graph, Political Party of Oregon, US Political
Education, US Pacific Commander Education, Anti Federalists USA
Patriots News, American Patriot Party National and State
Headquarters News in Medford Oregon, Ashland Oregon , True Thomas
Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans Party, Oregon State American
Patriot Party of American Patriots, Ron Paul, Tea Party, Tea Party
Patriots, Won Caucus Straw Poll Results, Delegates Winner, Ron
Paul for President 2012, President and Presidential Primaries
News, Who is Running for President, Donald J. Trump, Barack Obama
AMERICAN
PATRIOT PARTY OF THE
INDEPENDENT AND UNITED
STATES:
This
group say they want to
protect on one hand -
but then allow the deviant
of society to brain wash and
then misuse others or each
other outside the Laws of
Nature; Allowing for the
existence of Voluntary
Slavery and Slavery -
Through the relinquishment
of inalienable rights. This
Group, Communist / Socialist
in nature, places a
form of "Subjugated Peace"
under a central national
government; Instead of
abiding by the True
Principles of Freedom
established in small well
represented and independent
republics;
They are a proponent of
reverse hate; and are a
proponent for the use of
National Federal force,
accumulated by government
"laws" which have been
created without
authority - i.e.
under the PRETENSE
OF AUTHORITY.
Georgia State Elections
Division
Suite 1104, West Tower
2 Martin Luther King, Jr.
Drive, SE
Atlanta, GA 30334-1505
(404) 656-2871 FAX (404)
651-9536 http://www.sos.state.ga.u
s/elections
Division of Elections
Office of the Attorney
General
44 South Clinton Avenue, 7th
Floor
P.O Box 304
Trenton, New Jersey
08625-0304
(609) 292-3760 FAX
(609)777-1280 http://www.njelections.org
Director of Elections,
General Law Division
Secretary of State/ Election
Division
Post Office Box 12060
Austin, TX 78711-2060
(512) 463-5650 FAX (512)
475-2811 http://www.sos.state.tx.us
/elections/index.shtml
UTAH
Utah State Elections
Office
Utah State Capitol Complex
East Office Building, Suite
E325
P.O. Box 142325
Salt Lake City, UT
84114-2325
(801) 538-1041 FAX (801)
538-1133 http://www.elections.utah.
gov
VERMONT
Director of Elections
and Campaign Finance
Office of Secretary of State
26 Terrace Street, Drawer 09
Montpelier, Vermont
05609-1101
(802) 828-2304 FAX (802)
828-5171 http://www.sec.state.vt.us
/#elections
VIRGIN ISLANDS
Supervisor of Elections
Election System of the
Virgin Islands
Post Office Box 1499,
Kingshill
St. Croix, VI 00851-1499
(340) 773-1021 FAX (340)
773-4523 http://www.vivote.gov
VIRGINIA
Secretary of State,
Board of Elections
200 North 9th Street, Room
101
Richmond, VA 23219
(800) 552-9745 or (804)
864-8901 FAX (804) 371-0194 http://www.sbe.state.va.u
s
WASHINGTON
Office of Secretary of
State, Elections Division
Legislative Building, P.O.
Box 40220
Olympia, WA 98504-0220
(360) 902-4180 FAX (360)
586-5629 http://www.vote.wa.gov
WEST VIRGINIA
Manager of Elections
West Virginia Secretary of
State Elections Division
1900 Kanawha Blvd E.
State Capitol Room 157-K
Charleston, WV 25305-0770
(304) 558-6000 FAX (304)
558-0900 http://www.wvsos.com
WISCONSIN
Wisconsin State
Elections Board
17 West Main Street, Suite
310
Madison, WI 53703-3305
P.O. Box 2973
Madison, WI 53701-2973
(608) 266-8087 FAX (608)
267-0500 http://elections.state.wi.us
George Mason
6-16-1788: Who are the MILITIA?
They consist NOW of the "WHOLE
PEOPLE"..."
See quotes and source link
regarding MILITIAS at bottom of
this page.
American Patriot Party
is a ANTI-
"Globalist", ANTI-
"World Government" and
ANTI- Unconstitutional
UnAuthoritative
Government
Party. Authority
was
established in
the Founding
Documents and
Original
Constitutional
Compact. APP
aims to Empower
Inalienable Natural
Rights and Protect
Private Property.
Private Property
Rights over County;
County over State and
State over Federal;
For Adequate
Representation,
American Patriot Party
promotes Statehood for
all Counties so to
remove distant
legislatures, empower
local communities and
protect natural and
Constitutional Rights.
APP
Continued Endorsement of
Donald J. Trump:(WATCH
TURNING POINT
USA TRUMP SPEECH
- C-SPAN VIDEO -
CLICK) American
Patriot Party continues to
endorse Donald
J. Trump for President
2024,
for his hard work,
sacrifice and devotion to
restoring Constitutional
Principles to the United
States during his first 4
year term. Seldom do you
see someone so
actively focused on that
goal and the advancement
of justice for all.
American Patriot Party
finds that our goal of
returning to the
principles envisioned by
our Founding Fathers is
well served by the
re-election of Donald J.
Trump for President 2024.
APP promotes
investigation of the
2020 election. Follow
Trump on TRUTH SOCIAL.
Isaiah 51:7-9:
"Hearken unto me, ye
that know
righteousness, the
people in whose heart
is my law; fear ye not
the reproach of men,
neither be ye afraid
of their revilings.
For the moth shall eat
them up like a
garment, and the worm
shall eat them like
wool: but my
righteousness shall be
for ever, and my
salvation from
generation to
generation. Awake,
awake, put on
strength, O arm of the
LORD; awake, as in the
ancient days, in the
generations of old.
Art thou not it that
hath cut Rahab, and
wounded the dragon?"https://americasvoice.news/video/68299/
#199.
"As usurpation is
the exercise of
power which
another hath a
right to, so
tyranny is the
exercise of power
beyond right,
which nobody can
have a right
to..."
#200: "...Thus,
that learned
king,who
well
understood the
notions of
things,makes
the difference
betwixt a king
and a tyrant
to consist
only in this:that
one makes the
laws the
bounds of his
power and the
good of the
public the end
of his
government;
the other
makes all give
way to his own
will and
appetite..."
#201.
It is a
mistake to
think this
fault is
proper only to
monarchies.Other
forms of
government are
liable to it
as well as
that;for
wherever the
power that is
put in any
hands for the
government of
the people and
the preservation
of their
properties is
applied to
other ends, and
made use of to impoverish, harass, or subdue them to the
arbitrary and
irregular
commands of
those that
have it,there
it presently
becomes
tyranny,whether
those that
thus use it
are one or
many..."
#202. "Wherever
law ends, tyranny
begins, if the law
be transgressed to
another's harm;and
whosoever in
authority exceeds
the power given him
by the law, and
makes use of the
force he has under
his command to
compass that upon
the subject which
the law allows not,
ceases in that to
be a magistrate,
and acting
without
authority may be
opposed, as any
other man who by
force invades
the right of
another.
This is acknowledged
in subordinate
magistrates.He that
hath authority to
seize my person in
the street may
be opposed as a
thief and a
robber if he
endeavours to
break into my
house to execute
a writ,notwithstanding
that I know he
has such a
warrant
and such a legal
authority as
will empower him
to arrest me
abroad.
And why this should
not hold in the
highest, as well as
in the most inferior
magistrate, I
would gladly be
informed..."
-------
BRUTUS (Robert Yates)
Warning:
"History furnishes no
example of a free
republic, any thing
like the extent of the
United States. The
Grecian republics were
of small extent; so
also was that of the
Romans.
Both of these, it is
true, in process of
time, extended their
conquests over large
territories of
country; and the
consequence was, that
their governments were
CHANGED FROM that of
free governments to
those of the MOST
"TYRANNICAL" that
ever existed in the
world."
Read Republics
and Representation
on why the "One
Nation" view created
by a socialist in
1880s endangers our
freedoms; and what
James Madison Warned
in the Virginia
Resolutions,1798
that Consolidating the
states into "one
Sovereignty" ie "One
Nation" Changes and
Endangers the
Republican Form of
government of Free
Independent states,
into a MIXED MONARCHY!
Read on!
Call your
Representative NOW at:
202-224-3121 - NO
DEALS ON THE SECOND
AMENDMENT!
THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
SHALL NOT BE
INFRINGED!
Read James
Madison Federalist
#46: Minimum
Power Ratio -
25 to 1 - Citizen OVER
US Military. Learn why
lower on this page.
Welcome to "American
Patriot Party"! The only
party that follows the
Constitution as the
Founders intended.
Make sure to read our Welcome
pageand our Suggested
Reading. Beware
of those trying to imitate
our party using titles
such as "THE"
american patriot party or
other similar modified
organization titles that
attempt to divert you from
our party, the true
Constitutional Originalism
and the Law of Nature
principles that our party
promotes. Become a
Member Now!
If we
would follow the
Original Constitution
as it was defined in
the Ratifying
Conventions of 1788
that defined the words
/ phrases within it
and follow the Laws of
Nature which the
Constitution and
founding documents
were meant to
preserve, all the
attacks upon our
freedoms would
subside. All those
corrupting persons,
organizations,
treaties etc. will
have no footing to
stand upon.
Take Unions for
example, being an
"Exclusive Privilege"
of the state, equally
with corporations and
tax supported special
interests none of
which were to be
allowed in a free
country, the Founders
recognized a Common
Law principle:
Samuel
Adams, Absolute
Rights of the
Colonists, 1772:
"...Governors
have
no right to seek
what they please(APP:
UNIONS SEEK WHAT THEY
PLEASE) by
this, instead of being
content with the station
assigned them, that
of honourableservants
of the society, they
would soon becomeAbsolute
masters, Despots,
and Tyrants.
Hence as a private man has
a right to say, what wages
he will give in his
private affairs, so has a
Community to
determine what they will
give and grant of their
Substance, for the
Administration of publick
affairs. And in both
cases more are ready
generally to offer their
Service at the proposed
and stipulated price, than
are able and willing to
perform their duty.--"
This
principle was carried
over to the
Constitution and actually
evena
important EXISTING
CONSTITUTIONAL "Term
Limit"
if anyone would read it
and enforce it; Here James
Madison establishes in the
Ratifying Convention of
6-14-1788 the terminating
factor
to a representative if he
or any of those in house
or senate vote to raise
their own salary or accept
a raise in their own
salary by such a vote:
James
Madison,Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-14-1788:"...
The Constitution
has taken a medium between
the two extremes, and
perhaps with more wisdom
than either the British or
the state governments, with
respect to their "ELIGIBILITY"
to office.
They can "FILL" "NO" new
"offices" created by
themselves, "NOR"
"OLD ONES" of
which they
"INCREASED THE
SALARIES"."
So why are not all
those politicians
in the House and
Senate that voted for
an increase in their
salaries not gone?
See?
Simply obey and
enforce the Original
Constitutional Compact
every politician swore to
uphold and they would be "TERM
LIMITED"and
GONE!
Please
Contribute directly
to help us educate others
and bypass de-platforming
& shadow banning,
compete on the political
stage.
Richard Taylor
Chair
American Patriot Party -
National Headquarters
#americanpatriotparty
#americanpatriot
#patriotparty #patriot
#listofpoliticalpartiesintheunitedstates
The only way
to protect property is to
get rid of property tax.
The only way to be secure
in person, papers and
effects (property) is to
get rid of flat percentage
or other types of income,
property and sales tax.
The only way to keep
wealth from being abused
uncontrollably is to get
rid of exclusive
privileges such as unions,
corporations, tax
supported special
interests, zoning and
unnecessary regulations. The
only way to control the
federal government
from over taxing is to
have citizen controlled,
consensual, enumerated
taxes on imports ONLY as
established in the
Original US Constitution
and in states by an
anonymously collected
"enumerated" toll tax,
earmarked, collected and
placed in accounts by
which they where collected
for, that then cannot be
touched by governments but
must be spent on what they
were Consented to
and Enumerated for -
BEFORE COLLECTED.See The Anonymity
APP -A- Tax.
In 2014 the United
States CIA
established a
Ukraine Coup and
set the stage for
8 years of Western
Ukraine
terrorizing
Eastern Russian
speaking
Ukrainians. Russia
rightfully stepped
in. Western
Ukraine has lost
the right to
govern Eastern
Ukraine's people,
businesses and
properties.
APP Peace
Solution:
1.) Grant Eastern
Ukraine states Independent
Country Status.
2.) Zelinsky's
Western Ukraine
stays out of NATO
3.) No NATO
Missiles on
Russia's borders.
"...All Men have
a Right to
remain in a
State of Nature
as long as they
please: And in
case of
intolerable
Oppression,
Civil or
Religious, to
leave the
Society they
belong to, and
enter into
another..."
ie. The Right to
Secede.
Western Ukraine, let Eastern Ukraine be free. Stop
enslaving and
harassing
those people
that want
nothing to do
with you or your vision for Ukraine. *Stop Escalation Toward War in Ukraine or China:
*Identify the
Instigators of
War and Shut
them Down.
*Stop Funding /
Arming
Zelinsky's
Western Ukraine.
*Investigate US
and Ukraine
Corruption. Western Ukraine Loss Eminent. Seek Peace by Giving
Eastern
Ukraine States
Independent
Country Status
- Protected by
Russia.
Western
Ukraine Having
Bombed Their
Own Eastern
Ukraine
Citizens for 8
Years Since
2014 CIA COUP
have Lost the
Right to
Govern Eastern
Ukrainians or
Their Land.
-------
R.I.N.O. (Republicans In Name
Only): THE
REAL
DEFINITION OF
A "RINO" IS
SIMPLY A
DEMOCRAT USING
THE REPUBLICAN
PARTY TO
EXPAND THE
POWER OF THE
FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT IN
ONE WAY
(Federal Law
& Policing
Powers); WHILE
THE DEMOCRAT
PARTY EXPANDS
THE POWER OF
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT IN
ANOTHER WAY
(Government
Unions through
Expanding
Federal
Bureaucracies
&
Departments).
THEY ARE BOTH
LEFTISTS AND
BOTH
SOCIALISTS.
BOTH WANT YOU
ENSLAVED. READ THE FOUNDERS DOCUMENTS THAT DEFINE THE
CONSTITUTION;
KNOW WHAT
FREEDOM IS SO
THAT YOU ARE
NOT DECEIVED.
START WITH OUR
SUGGESTED
READING
FOUNDERS
DOCUMENTS.
--------
GO
WOKE GO BROKE!
SEND
THE WOKE
CORPORATIONS
&
GOVERNMENT
INSTITUTIONS
TO THE TRASH
DUMP OF
HISTORY. MAKE
YOUR "DO
NOT BUY LIST"
AND POST IT
WIDELY! NEVER
BUY FROM THEM
AGAIN OR
ANYONE WHO IS
ASSOCIATED
WITH THEM.
SHUN THEM FROM
SOCIETY! CEASE
TO ASSOCIATE
OR ALLOW YOUR
CHILDREN TO
ASSOCIATE,
SCHOOLED OR
INVOLVED IN
ANY WAY WITH
THEM OR BUY
THEIR
PRODUCTS.
BREAK THEM!
UNAWARE
INVESTORS
&
STOCKHOLDERS
SHOULD SUE ALL
CORPORATE
HEADS FOR
THEIR LOSSES!
HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE TO THE LAST MAN
OR WOMAN.
BOYCOTT
WIKIPEDIA
WIKIPEDIA Editors promote Woke
ideologies
whenever they
can in wiki
articles and
prohibit
definitions
not aligning
with socialist
viewpoints. It
is clear that
socialist
editors hover
over certain
words articles
to guard their
twisted
definitions
and article
points. These
Wiki editor's
existence put
a question as
to whether or
not they are
volunteerism
or paid
volunteerism.
From our
experience
since 2006
which has
removed and
then
prohibited the
further
existence of
an American
Patriot Party
wiki page, we
believe it is
the latter.
Thomas Jefferson on Freedom of Speech:
Kentucky
Resolutions,
1798
" ...3. Resolved, That it
is true as a
general
principle, and
is also
expressly
declared by
one of the
amendments to
the
Constitutions,
that "the
powers not
delegated to
the United
States by the
Constitution,
our prohibited
by it to the
States, are
reserved to
the States
respectively,
or to the
people"; and
that NO power
over the
freedom of
religion,
freedom of
speech, or
freedom of the
press being
delegated to
the United
States by the
Constitution,
nor prohibited
by it to the
States, all
lawful powers
respecting the
same did of
right remain,
and were
reserved to
the States or
the
people: that
thus was
manifested
their
determination
to retain
to themselves
the right of
judging how
far the
licentiousness
of speech and
of the press
may be
abridged
without
lessening
their useful
freedom, and
how far those
abuses which
cannot be
separated from
their use
should be
tolerated, rather
than the use
be destroyed.
And thus also they guarded against ALL
abridgment by
the United
States of the
freedom of
religious
opinions and
exercises, and
retained to
themselves the
right of
protecting the
same, as this
State, by a
law passed on
the general
demand of its
citizens, had already protected them from "ALL" human restraint
or interference.
And that in addition to this general principle and
express
declaration,
another and
more special
provision has
been made by
one of the
amendments to
the
Constitution,
which
expressly
declares,
that "Congress
shall make no
law respecting
an
establishment
of religion,
or prohibiting
the free
exercise
thereof, or
abridging the
freedom of
speech or of
the
press": thereby
guarding in
the same
sentence, and
under the same
words, the
freedom of
religion, of
speech, and of
the press:
insomuch, that whatever
violated
either, throws
down the
sanctuary
which covers
the
others, arid
that libels,
falsehood, and
defamation,
equally with
heresy and
false
religion, are
WITHHELD from the cognizance of Federal Tribunals. That, therefore, the act of Congress of the United
States, passed
on the 14th
day of July,
1798,
intituled "An
Act in
addition to
the act
intituled An
Act for the
punishment of
certain crimes
against the
United
States," which
does abridge
the freedom of
the press,is
"NOT LAW", but
is "ALTOGETHER"
"VOID", and of
"NO FORCE"..."
-----------
Falling Prey. Europe / Britain 20 Years Under
Creeping
Attack from
Islam:
Peter Navarro
Begins 4 Month
Misdemeanor
Prison Term.
Support Peter
by Sending Him
Letters to:
Peter K Navarro (04370-510) 15801 S.W. 137th Ave Miami
FL 33177
You can also
support Peter
and MAGA by
Pre-Ordering
Peter's new
book THE NEW
MAGA DEAL: https://winningpublishing.com/products/the-new-maga-deal-pre-order
Glenn Beck
Blaze
Journalist
Steve Baker
Being Arrested
By FBI
Tomorrow.
Baker Suggests
Capitol Police
May be
Blackmailing
Representatives
including
Johnson, as
they "know
where all the
bodies are
buried". https://www.glennbeck.com/radio/jan-6-journalist-fbi-arrest
COVERUP!
Tucker
Carlson
Uncensored
Interviews Steve
Kirsch - Data
Reveals
Estimated 17
Million died
from the COVID
shot and
childhood
Vaccines
actually cause
autism. Steve
Kirsch has
looked at the
data. https://tuckercarlson.com/uncensored-the-vaccine-interview/
Tucker
Carlson
Interview on
Glenn Beck. Federal
Government
Declares New
Cold War With
Russia Without
Constitutional
Authority or
Civilian
Consent. Major
Danger of a
Military
populated by
Illegals with
no affection
to our
Constitution.
The Necessity
of Getting Out
of NATO &
UN. APP:
Re-Affirms the
Need for
Smaller States
for Adequate
Representation,
Protection of
Private
Property &
Law and Order
based upon
Natural Law.
Re-Affirms
that
Democracies
can never
protect your
rights; only
Republics
based upon
natural rights
can. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64r6ko9o51o
Tucker
Carlson
Encounters
Bret Weinstein
at the Darien
Gap: United
Nations (UN),
IOM - OIM and
NGO's Wage War
on United
States At
Panama Canal -
Supported by
United States
Federal
Government
Miss-Using US
Citizen Taxes
in
Grants to
Fund
Invasion.
This Federal
Finance of NGO
Funding of
Unlimited
Illegal
Immigrants of
Military Aged
Men With No
Intention of
Becoming
Americans
Endangers
US. https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-bret-weinstein-at-the-darien-gap/
"Lost Voices
of Fentanyl"
Organization
Calls for
Listing
Fentanyl as a
Weapon of Mass
Destruction
and Cartels as
Terrorists to
Drive the War
on
Drugs: https://lvof.org/
Britain's
Parliament
Frightened of
Backlash from
the Islamic
Religious
Immigrants,
Attempts
Appeasement by
supporting the
Establishment
of a
Palestinian
State filled
with Radical
Islamic Hamas.
Netherlands:
Geert
Wilders:
"We have
imported a
monster into
Europe and
that monster
is Islam" https://twitter.com/i/status/1755902446340096220
Follow
American
Patriot Party
on X: https://twitter.com/AmPatriotParty APP Report:
Communists
Senator Edward
Markey
Democrat
Massachusetts
& Jamie
Raskin,
Democrat
Maryland's 8th
District in
the U.S. House
of
Representatives
(Video
@ 23:35)
Attempt to
pass a bill to
outlaw Citizen
Militias and
Citizen Arms
and Tactical
Training.
These Democrat
Traitors are
Complete
&Total
Communist
Idiots that
want to spit
on our
Constitution
and Natural
Right of Self
Preservation.
Apparently
they have not
read James
Madison
Federalist 46
(See James Madison QUOTE below
on this page)
who
established a
MINIMUM POWER
RATIO of 25 to
1 - Citizens
OVER the U.S.
Military. And
defined
Militia as "officered by men chosen among THEMSELVES" not
government or
military; for
the purpose of
being an
OPPOSING force
to the United
States federal
military
should they
become the
tools of a
tyrant or
attempt to
overthrow the
Original
Constitutional
Compact. Nor
have they read
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788 George
Mason
establishing
militias were
ALL PEOPLE;
and under the
Constitution
the existence
of militias
were to be
protected.
These fools
are in direct
violation of
their oath to
protect the
Constitution
and should
loose their
jobs immediately:
World View
Report with
Brannon Howse:
(@ 23:35):https://rumble.com/v4c2qui-appeals-court-stacked-with-biden-judges-rules-against-president-trump.html
TUCKER CARLSON
- VLADIMIR
PUTIN
INTERVIEW
-TUCKER
CARLSON
NETWORK
EXCLUSIVE https://tuckercarlson.com/the-vladimir-putin-interview/
Already the
Left Media
Monopoly
financed by
the Military
Complex, EU
Banking
institutions
scramble to
spin and
downplay this
important
interview.
Biden
& His
Administration
Guilty of
Funding Global
Jihad as he
Continues
Funding
Islamic
Terrorists in
Afghanistan
& Middle
East while
Pushing for
Palestinian
State after
Gruesome
October
Massacre
Against Israel
by Palestinian Terrorists: See Real America's Voice: Special Report,
January 5th,
2024.
APP opinion on Gaza: Instead of using money given
them to better
themselves,
Palestinians
used those
funds to dig
tunnels and ripped out their city plumbing for
pipe to build
missiles to
attack Israel
and butcher
innocent
Israeli
citizens. All
Palestinian families
knew of the
miles of
tunnels and
abetted the
horrendous
crimes they
recently
committed;
they did
nothing and
said nothing
to stop it.
APP Calls for
AZ Republican
Party Chair
Jeff DeWit's
and His
Contacts to be
Arrested for
the Crime
Bribery and
Election
Tampering -
Court Order Jeff DeWit's Phone Records and FIND that EAST COAST
BRIBER he was
talking to!!!
GO AFTER
HIM!!!:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mis1HvyMidU
American
Stewards -
Fighting for
Property
Rights Against
Natural Asset
Companies (NAC's: International Communist
Environmentalist
Groups,
International
Corporations
& Foreign
Countries) Purchasing US Land for
Keeping US
Land from US
Citizens: https://americanstewards.us
Julie Kelly DECLASSIFIED: FBI
Created "3
Percenters"
a group
populated with
FBI agents to
entrap
individuals
and Criminally
Agitate crowds
on January 6,
2020: https://substack.com/@juliekelly
Trump Train
Stays on Track
- Remains on
Ballot in
Colorado.
Trump
Derangement
Syndrome
infects yet
another
liberal
elections
official. Same
day as
Colorado
reluctantly
places Donald
Trumps name on
their primary
ballots while
their case
goes to the US
Supreme Court,
Maine’s top
election
official
attempts to
remove Trump
from 2024
primary
ballot; Maine
Secretary of
State Shenna
Bellows
however paused
her decision
pending a
potential
appeal in
state court,
which Trump’s
team said they
intend to
file. https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/politics/trump-maine-14th-amendment-ballot/index.html
(CNN Attempts
to cover up
the Trump Win
with a
Misleading
Title); In the
state of
Oregon, though
some elections
officials may
have Trump
Derangement
Syndrome, they
correctly
understand the
present issue:
Oregon
Secretary of
State LaVonne
Griffin-Valade
announced on
Nov. 30 that
she does not
have the legal
authority to
remove Trump
from the
primary
ballot. Citing
the Oregon
Department of
Justice,
Griffin-Valade
said a
presidential
primary is not
a case of
someone being
elected.
Instead, it’s
a chance for
voters to tell
their party
who they
prefer to be
the nominee.
Delegates at
the national
convention
ultimately
decide who
that nominee
will be: https://centraloregondaily.com/donald-trump-oregon-primary-ballot-status/
All equal
opening the
way for a
Trump Win in
the Primary,
eventual
Supreme Court
Win and Win in
2024
MUST WATCH:
Collapse of
Building 7 -
The Solomon
Brothers
Building - The
3rd Building
Falling on
9-11-2001 Was
Reported By
BBC it had
Already Fallen
TWENTY MINUTES
BEFORE IT
FELL!!! - Explosive NANO-THERMITE Material https://web.archive.org/web/20111112102751/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf
& https://investigate911.org/ Found
at ALL THREE
WORLD TRADE
CENTER
BUILDING
SITES!!! ......Dr. Hulsey of University of Alaska Fairbanks, Who
Led the UAF
Study, Reports
on the Jimmy
Dore Show: https://rumble.com/v40kb91-expert-demolishes-establishment-story-about-wtc-bldg.-7-collapse.html
What
Departments
That ARE
LISTED in this
Show That Were
in These
Buildings
Clearly
Establish a
Government
Coverup and a
FACTUAL
Federal
Government
Corrupt
Criminal
Act...
University of Alaska Fairbanks 4 Year Study Confirms
N.I.S.T.
REPORT FALSE
Regarding
Fall. DOWNLOAD
THE FINAL
REPORT HERE: https://bit.ly/UAF-March2020-Final
Hunter Biden
Blames Others
For Trashing
His and his
Fathers
Character;
When His
Father's
Actions &
Hunter Biden's
Own Laptop
Images
Suggests Any Poor Character Image Their
Own Doing:
Marco Polo
Biden Laptop
Report
(warning adult
images):
https://bidenlaptopmedia.com
*** Tucker on
Ukraine War
Corruption
& China /
Foreign
Control of
Beef Supply -
Interview with
Kentucky Congressman Thomas
Massie:
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1732163859610321333?s=20
FEDSURRECTION
PROVEN - BEN
SWANN TRUTH IN
MEDIA - LARA
LOGAN
REPORTING -
#TWEET
#RETWEET AND
#RE-POST UNTIL
ALL
#FEDTRAITORS
AND OTHERS
ACTING AGAINST
OUR
CONSTITUTION
ARE ARRESTED
AND SENT AWAY
FOR LIFE
IMPRISONMENT.
#FEDSURRECTION
#JANUARY6th
#INSURRECTION
#CAPITOL:
WATCH VIDEOS:
https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-8-recap-episodes-1-7/
11-7-2023
BREAKING:
INTEREST ALONE
REACHES 1
TRILLION ON
UNITED STATES
DEBT!!!
INTEREST ON
LOANS TAKEN
OUT FROM
FUTURE ENEMY'S
BANKS, SUCH AS
CHINA, BUYS
WEAPONS THAT
WILL BE USED
AGAINST THE
UNITED
STATES!!!
READ: THOMAS JEFFERSON - KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS on YOUR
FREEDOM OF
SPEECH: http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/American_Patriot_Party.pdf ESTABLISHING: The FREEDOM OF SPEECH:
is WITHHELD
from FEDERAL
TRIBUNALS
- i.e. Withheld from FEDERAL
COURTS:
The FREEDOM OF SPEECH:
is WITHHELD
from - ALL -
HUMAN
INTERFERENCE
George Floyd Riots
Instigated By
Fraud. Coroner
Andrew Baker
Attested That
George Floyd
Did Not Die
From
Strangulation
or Anything
Officer May
Have Done. Rob Schmitt , NewsMax Reporting 10-23-23:
Police State:
New Film -
WATCH TRAILER
& TICKETS
ONLY AT: https://policestatefilm.net/
A Film by
Dinesh D'Souza
and Dan
Bongino.
AE911TRUTH -
Get The
Explosive
TRUTH OF
911!
Join over
3,500
Professional
Architects
&
Engineers and
Thousands More
Demanding An
Official
Investigation!
Watch
Documentary
Videos and
Professional
Investigations.
http://www.ae911truth.org
Brave
Australian
Politicians
that will
travel to USA
on Sept. 12 To
Stop
Extradition
&
Free Julian
Assange; Help
finance their
trip &
follow
progress and
sign the
petition at: https://www.change.org/p/free-julian-assange-before-it-s-too-late-stop-usa-extradition/u/31888031
NEWS
FLASH!!!!
CRACKS OPEN IN
REVEALING DEEP
STATE!
Barack
Obama's &
Democrat Lies
Exposed! Sex,
Lies, Murder
of "Loose
Ends"!
Tucker Carlson
Opens Closet
On "Pretty
Boy" Barack
Obama's Sick
Bisexuality
& Lies
Ep.
22
"Larry
Sinclair says
he had a night
of crack
cocaine-fueled
sex with
Barack
Obama..."
Not the only
one! VIDEO:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1699543001473900670
Is Barack
Obama, the
Clintons,
Bushs and
Others Now
"Loose Ends"
to Deep State
Dark Powers?
FBI
& CIA Tied
to Ukrainian
Nazis In
Ukraine and
Nazis Groups
In United
States Who
Support
President
Biden Who is
Supporting
Nazis in
Ukraine. "Nazi
Feds Get
Loomered" Steve Bannon - RAV
WarRoom
9/5/2023: Lara
Loomer
Reporting:
VIDEOS:
https://t.me/s/loomeredofficial
See Also: https://loomered.com/
& https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer Related: Psyop - Known
FBI and
Ukrainian Nazi
Spies Presence
on January
6th: "FBI
identified
Ukrainian
operatives and
Neo Nazis who
were at the US
Capitol on J6
and even
questioned
J6ers about
these
Ukrainian
spies during
interviews
with the
FBI......the
US Capitol was
penetrated by
Ukrainian
spies and the
US Government
and FBI have
still not
arrested these
people or made
the public
aware of
foreign
penetration.
This is an act
of war by
Ukraine
against the
United States,
and yet the US
Government has
sent $200
BILLION to
Ukraine in the
last 2 years.
The CIA is
funding a
color
revolution in
the United
States via
Ukrainian
Nazis and
American Nazis
who are being
recruited by
the CIA and
FBI to fight
overseas in
the Azov
Battalion and
then come back
to the US to
instigate Nazi
political
movements in a
psyop intended
to make right
wingers look
bad. The
reality is,
these people
are Democrats
and Biden
supporters and
the FBI has
been hiding
the fact that
Ukrainian
operatives
penetrated the
US Capitol on
J6 and they
have been
hiding the
fact that they
are working
with Ukrainian
Nazis to
instigate
violence to
subvert the US
Government,
including
actions to
impeach
President
Trump..."
Full Report: https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1698710813530300432 https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1698518761194602634
NFSC New
Federation of
China Reveals
CCP China Spy
Networks
Worldwide: https://gettr.com/streaming/p2pnyz71323
TRUMPESQUE
LEANING KEN
PAXTON
impeachment
trial and
securities
fraud trial
both proving
to be a
political move
in both cases
as attorneys
say that the
severity of
the criminal
trial will
hinge on the
impeachment
trial;
suggesting
that if Ken
Paxton is no
longer a
threat
politically,
the criminal
trial is not
really
important: https://www.texastribune.org/2023/08/03/ken-paxton-securities-fraud-courtroom/
Leaked Emails
Suggest Fani
(Fanny)
Willis, Fulton
County,
Georgia DA,
Imposed a
Predetermined
Finding for
Indictment
Against Donald
Trump, Rudy
Giuliani,
Sidney Powell,
Jenna Ellis,
John Eastman,
Mark Meadows,
Kenneth
Chesebro,
Jeffery Clark,
Ray Smith III,
Robert
Cheeley,
Michael Roman,
David Shafer,
Shawn Steel,
Steffan Lee,
Harrison
Floyd, Travian
Kutti, Cathy
Latham, Scott
Hall, Misty
Hampton: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/georgia-court-website-publishes-then-removes-list-of-criminal-charges-against-trump
Chinese Bio
Lab Discovered
in Fresno
California
Near West
Coast Military
Air Base;
Other US Bio
Labs Tied To
China
Laboratory -
Mice found to
carry Corona
Virus:
Real Americas
Voice -
Stenchfield
Tonight -
August 3,
2023: https://gettr.com/streaming/p2ngwq87a53
Floridians
will be able
to carry
concealed guns
without a
permit under a
bill
Republican
Gov. Ron
DeSantis
signed Monday,
giving the
governor
another
legislative
victory as he
prepares a
campaign for
president. The
governor
signed the
bill in a
private
ceremony in
his office.
His only
immediate
public comment
was, “Constitutional
Carry is in
the books,”
which
he said in a
three-paragraph
news release.
Italy
considers
sending
warplanes to
Ukraine as is
Other EU
Countries Want
To Cash In on
Bidens US
Billions of
Dollars Dumped
into Ukraine -
No Thought of
Cost of
Ukrainian's
Lives That
Will Be Lost
by Fueling the
Conflict;
instead of
Seeking Peace
: https://www.rt.com/news/571789-italy-send-warplanes-ukraine-media/
Instigators
of War:
Report exposes
how German
media stirs up
militancy in
society and
works to
prevent
negotiations
with Russia -
German
Socialist
Party, EU
Banks, WEF and
International
Corporations
of the
Military
Complex: https://www.rt.com/news/568595-how-to-sell-war/
Traitors in
Oregon Attempt
to Override
Second
Amendment
Limitations on
Government but
will Rightly
Fail in
Supreme Court:
https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2021R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/SB554/Enrolled
The
Right of the
People to Keep
and Bear Arms
Shall Not Be
"Infringed".
Read also
Federalist #46
by James
Madison and
the
Established
Minimum Power
Ratio 25 to 1
- Citizen OVER
US Military.
Former British Labour
leader Jeremy Corbyn,
Pentagon Papers
whistleblower Daniel
Ellsberg, famed linguist
and dissident Noam
Chomsky and others gave
testimony Friday at the
Belmarsh Tribunal in
Washington, D.C.,
calling on President
Biden to drop charges
against Julian Assange.
The WikiLeaks founder
has been languishing for
close to four years in
the harsh Belmarsh
prison in London while
appealing extradition to
the United States. If
convicted in the United
States, Julian Assange
could face up to 175
years in jail for
violating the U.S.
Espionage Act for
publishing documents
that exposed U.S. war
crimes in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Friday's
event was held at the
National Press Club and
co-chaired by Democracy
Now! host Amy Goodman.
We spend the hour
featuring compelling
excerpts from the
proceedings.
To
watch the full
two-and-a-half-hour
livestream of the Belmarsh
Tribunal,
visit this link: https://youtu.be/j_QqpYATupw
Bombshell
Proof of Election
Machine
Manipulation. States
Governments Derelict
In Their Duty To
Protect Their Own
Citizens Presently
Unconstitutionally
Jailed And Held In
Washington, DC For
January 6th.
WASHINGTON,
DC CLEAN-OUT COMING
- ARRESTS LOOMING
--- LEGISLATIVE,
DC POLICE, CIA,
FBI FACING 20
YEARS FOR CRIMES
AGAINST AMERICAN
CITIZENS JAILED
IN DC BIDEN
SPEECH PROVES
COMMUNIST VS
FEDERALIST #46 ---
BIDEN ATTACKS SECOND
AMENDMENT AND YOUR
RIGHT TO SELF
PRESERVATION - LEARN
TO BUILD ARMS *JULIAN
ASSANGE
VINDICATED!
*Ignore
Russia - Focus on
the Instigators of
War:German
Socialist Party
(with French and
Belgium EU Socialist
Party Counterparts)
- European Union
Banks - United
States Military
Complex - All
Corporations
(foreign and
domestic) that will
Benefit From a
Military Conflict
With Russia Or China
- Focus on those
inside and outside
government
Corrupting our
Freedoms and Rights
and Focus on the
Biden Administration
Attempting to Divert
Attention from his,
his administration
and Democrat Party
Failed Woke Liberal
Policies.
*Joe
Biden Socialism
= Two Steps
Forward, One Step
Back: The
fake and "not
anyone's president",
Joe Biden,
unwittingly repeats
the words of
communist dictator
Joseph Stalin. It
is Joe
Biden, the
Democratic Party and
other voting fraud
perpetrators who are
in fact themselves
guilty of unfair
voting which his
fake propaganda
attempts to oppose.
This is because they
themselves have
established corrupt
voting practices and
Election
Subversion
with attempts to
pack the courts,
allowing foreign
people to vote,
allow illegal
migrant voting,
establish corrupt
voting machines, allow
electronic
switching of
votes, hire
corrupt election
staff, block voting
audits, allow ballot
stuffing of ballot
boxes, promote
ballot mining and change
the way votes will
be counted.
Dictator
Joseph Stalin,
1923: "...I
consider it
completely unimportant
who in the party
will vote, or how;
but what is
extraordinarily
important is this—WHO
WILL COUNT THE
VOTES, and
how." said in
1923; Boris Bazhanov
The Memoirs of
Stalin's Former
Secretary
(1992); see Stoppard
Joe
Biden 1-13-2022:"One
thing for certain,
like every other
major civil rights
bill that came
along. If we miss
the first time, we
can come back and
try it a second
time. We missed this
time. We missed this
time. The
state legislative
bodies can continue
to change the law
not as to who can
vote, who gets to
count the vote.
Count the vote.
Count the vote! Its
about election
subversion! Not just
whether or not
whether people get
to vote. WHO
COUNTS THE VOTE!"
Watch Video: Joe
Biden: 1-13-22:
Who Counts The
Votes!
*Corrupt
State Governors
Engage a Corrupted
FBI -
Who
Use Battering
Rams to Unjustly
Enter Homes: Violating
The Right To Be
Secure In
Person, Papers
And Property:
War Room Pandemic
with Stephen K Bannon
Episode 1428 Part 1
Part 2: Episode
1428 Video Part 1
& 2
War Room Pandemic Back
Videos with
Stephen K Bannon
Episode 1427 Part 2: Episode
1427 Video Part 2
WATCH:
"UKRAINE ON FIRE": https://rumble.com/vwxxi8-ukraine-on-fire.html
***Watch
out for the
disinformation crowd
of CIA war-munger
propaganda. No
mentions in the
media about about
Western Ukraine
killing, butchering
and bombing innocent
citizens of Eastern
Ukraine for the last
8 years, simply
because the Eastern
Ukrainians want
independence. Anyone
that supports
Western Ukraine and
the Zelensky
government supports
the corrupt Nazi
nationalistic
political ideals and
CIA puppet
governments. Look at
the history of
Ukraine, not just
the surface feeding
media fools that are
poster boys for RINO
politicians trying
to embroil the US in
another useless,
needless war being
invoked by another
CIA political plant,
President Zelensky,
of Ukraine, who just
passed a law making
it illegal to speak
in favor of Russia
with a 15 year
prison term -
Apparently he
doesn't really want
freedom of speech or
freedom in his
country and but
wants to maintain
the heavy handed
corruption in
Ukraine. The Ukraine
government has been
attacking and
killing it's own
people for 8 years,
THIS is fact. Nazi
groups are prevalent
in Western Ukraine
politics, THIS is
fact. Eastern
states want to align
themselves to Russia
with 90% vote in
Crimea, THIS is a
fact. Eastern
Ukraine welcomes
Russian soldiers, as
they are protecting
them from the
Western Ukraine's 8
year suppression and
attacks and want
their states to be
aligned with Russia
and be independent,
THIS is fact. Sadly,
Western Ukraine
citizens are getting
their just desserts
for supporting a
corrupt Ukraine
government that has
made a habit of
killing and
terrorizing it's own
people in eastern
Ukraine. Russia has
called them on it.
The American
Constitutionalists
and Russian people
and Russian
government have some
major things in
common, our dislike
of
international banks,
international
corporations and
international
military complex
that feed on the
misery of others and
attack our
independent nations
and state's
sovereignty for
their own financial
gains.
#
202:
"...Wherever law
ends, tyranny begins, if the law
be transgressed to
another's harm; and
whosoever in
authority exceeds
the power given
him by the law,
and makes use of the
force he has under
his command to
compass that upon
the subject which
the law allows not,
ceases in that to be
a magistrate, and
acting without
authority
may be opposed, as
any other man who
by force invades
the right of
another.
This is acknowledged
in subordinate
magistrates.
He that
hath authority to
seize my person in
the street may be opposed as a thief and a robber if he endeavours
to break into
my house to
execute a writ, notwithstanding that I know he has such
a warrant and such a
legal authority as
will empower him to
arrest me abroad.
And why this should
not hold in the
highest, as well as
in the most inferior
magistrate, I would
gladly be
informed. ... For
exceeding the
bounds of
authority is no
more a right in a
great than a petty
officer, no more
justifiable in a
king than a
constable. But
so much the worsein
himas that
he has more trust
put in him,..."
United States
Constitution:
Amendment IV "The
right of the people
to be secure
in their persons,
houses, papers,
and effects,
against unreasonable
searches and
seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but
upon probable
cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the
place to be
searched, and the
persons or things to
be seized"
Andrew
Jackson:
“Gentlemen! I too have
been a close observer of
the doings of the Bank of
the United States. I have
had men watching you for a
long time, and am
convinced that you have
used the funds of the bank
to speculate in the
breadstuffs of the
country. When you won, you
divided the profits
amongst you, and when you
lost, you charged it to
the bank. You tell me that
if I take the deposits
from the bank and annul
its charter I shall ruin
ten thousand families.
That may be true,
gentlemen, but that is
your sin! Should I let you
go on, you will ruin fifty
thousand families, and
that would be my sin!
You
are a den of vipers and
thieves. I have
determined to rout you
out, and by the Eternal
God, (bringing
his fist down on the
table) I
will rout you out!
― Andrew
Jackson-
When he killed the
National Bank.
It
is time to kill it
again and
prevent it from
ever rising in the
future with
punishment of
treason to those
that attempt it.
Removing
All Foreign
Interests and
Corporate Exclusive
Privileges From Our
Country
END
THE FEDERAL
RESERVE!
END
INTERNATIONAL
BANKING AND ITS
CORRUPTION!
BIDEN AND
ADMINISTRATION -
VERIFIABLY
CRIMINALLY INSANE
All while Biden - Harris
say to Americans: "LET
THEM EAT ICE CREAM
CONES!"
3,529 Professional
ARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS
and 30,984 Citizens call
for investigations
that need to be done.
To give
you a better insight
on what happened
on 911
and sign the petition,
go to: http://www.ae911truth.org
AE911TRUTH
NIST LAWSUIT - PRAYER
FOR RELIEF(View
Full Amended Complaint):
"...of that RFC denial. 370.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff
respectfully requests this
Court, pursuant to its
authority under the
Administrative Procedures
Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 702, 706,
to: A.
Appeal were arbitrary and
capricious, not in
accordance with law, and
without observance of
procedure required by
law; B.
Issue an injunction
requiring NIST to correct
its WTC 7 Report so that
this report complies with
the IQA, including requiring
NIST to develop a new WTC 7
possible and consistent with
the evidence; C.
Issue an injunction
requiring NIST to correct
its WTC 7 Report so that
this report complies with
the NCST Act; D.
Issue an injunction
requiring NIST to make
public all of its WTC 7
computer modelling(s)
including all computer code,
data, assumptions, and input
used with or for that
modelling; E.
Issue an injunction
requiring NIST to make
public all evidence in its
possession, and to disclose
and describe all evidence
that has been destroyed, and
all other evidence known to
Defendants to exist, that
evinces or is consistent
with the use of explosives
and/or incendiaries having
caused or contributed to the
collapse of WTC 7. F.
Award Plaintiffs their
reasonable attorney fees
incurred in this action;
and G.
Grant such other and further
relief as the Court may deem
just and proper."
Welcome
to the American
Patriot Party!
The Patriots who follow
the Original intent of the
Founding Fathers:
1.) Strong
States
as Intended.
2.) Smaller States for
Adequate
Representation
as the
Constitution
Prescribes,
limiting
Power of
"Distant
Legislatures".
3.) Stronger
Smaller
Counties
for Local
Control.
4.) Limiting
the Federal
Government
to the
Delegated
Powers of the
Original
Constitutional
Compact: James
Madison
- Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788:
"...I cannot comprehend that the (VERY
LIMITEDFEDERAL
LEGISLATIVE)
power of legislating
over a "SMALL
DISTRICT"
(Washington,
DC),
which
"CANNOT
EXCEED" "TEN
MILES SQUARE",
and may
"NOT BE MORE"
THAN "ONE
MILE",
will involve
the dangers
which he
(Patrick
Henry)
apprehends.
..."
APP:
Think long and
hard about
that
statement. George
Mason,
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788:
"...But I wish
a clause
in the
Constitution,
with respect
to ALL
POWERS
which are
NOT granted
(DELEGATED),
that they are
RETAINED by
the STATES.
OTHERWISE, the
power of
providing
for the "GENERAL
WELFARE"
may be "PERVERTED
TO IT'S
DESTRUCTION"."
..... READ
IT
HERE - CLICK.
American Patriot Party
Opposes Lies and Socialism
in Government, Business
and Law. We oppose
Non-Profit Organizations
(NPOs) and Non-Government
Organizations (NGOs), as it
is a fact that the members
of these organizations do
make profit, big profit, and
work for political and
private institutions that in
most instances are actively
working against the
principles of freedom and
constitution; the definition
of Non-Profit is a lie and
misleads in it's title; such
organizations are also given
exclusive privileges which
can not exist in a truly
free country. We
oppose defining corporations
as "individuals" in law
(which in law it is defined
that way); Corporations are
"exclusive
privileged collectives",
granted by the state, who
practice "collective title
in property"; "collective
title in property" is the
definition of socialism.
Privatized socialism is
still socialism. Unions
practice "collective title
in labor" and is socialism,
Union operation of dictating
their salary is clearly in
opposition of freedom; Read
the The
Absolute Rights of the
Colonists by Samuel Adams
1772 about those in
government who dictate their
own pay and who should
determine their pay. All are
types of entities and
exclusive privileges opposed
by the Founders. Read
why.
---------------------- APP
Warning Against Election Propaganda Do not
believe China instigated
or acted alone in election
fraud or other incursions
into acts of corruption
toward our US free
society. China, a
world power, cannot
benefit from a conflict or
cold war with the United
States. Look
toward European Union:
it's German,
French & Belgium
Socialist Parties,
international
banking
& military
arms dealers Do
not forget our OWN CIA
and FBI who used
Russian Servers and Fake
Dossier Documents to
Attack our own sitting
President. Look toward
those who would benefit
from a armed conflict
between the super powers
and a weakened free
country, ... The United
States. The only truly
free country and
Constitutional
Republic(s), that
maintains a measure of
peace in the world. Look toward
international organized
drug crime & private
enemy agenda's against the
Constitution such as
George Soros. To
illustrate, look at
this video of
systematic evil played
out in the
Parliament of
the European Union; Watch
the German
Socialist Party in
action July
7, 2008
while they remove
political opposition
in their move to take
Europe:
VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svnf25FUrqw (Title:
Kafkaesque EU
Parliament: Corbett's
Report) Focus on the
instigators, bankers and
the benefactors. Finger
and punish the real
international criminals and
domestic political
traitors. Read the
Founders documents such as
the Ratifying
Conventions of 1788
that define the words in
the Constitution; This
is so that you can
recognize who the
traitors and enemies
are.
----------------------
APP ON
IMMIGRATION
Beware
of the Crocodile Tears
of Islamic Asylum
Seekers Shown By Media.
Would You Give Asylum in
the United States of
Hitler Youth and Their
Teachers?
Beware of Inviting
Doctrines Subversive to
Free and Independent
Societies.
EDUCATIONAL DIRECTIVE Need for
Redirection of Islamic
Asylum Seekers and
Reverse Immigration
Policies
THE UNITED
STATES IS PRESENTLY UNDER
CONTROL OF AN INSANE AND
ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT
JOE BIDEN, VICE
PRESIDENT AND HIS EQUALLY
ILLEGITIMATE ADMINISTRATION
WHICH HAVE BEGUN ASYLUM
IMMIGRATION OF RELIGIOUS
ENEMIES INSIDE OUR BORDERS. All news
outlets, politicians and
surprisingly conservatives
in their ignorance of
foundational Constitutional
and forgotten Common Law
principles, refuse to
address the real issue of
bringing asylum seeking
immigrants from
Afghanistan (and other
Islamic countries)
to the United States. That
issue, if they would read
American history on the Principles
of Toleration by John
Locke,
which defines in this case NON-toleration
concerning certain intolerable
religions. John
Locke's Treatise on
Toleration and
Samuel Adams "Absolute
Rights of the Colonists"
clearly present this long known
PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM.
that in fact and wisely
limits certain types of
religions that are "subversive
to societies"
whose followers take their
marching orders from foreign
religious leaders: Samuel
Adams - Absolute Rights of
the Colonists, 1772:
"...In so much that "Mr.
Locke" has asserted, and
"proved beyond the
possibility of contradiction
on any solid ground", that
such toleration ought to be
extended to all
whose DOCTRINES are
NOT SUBVERSIVE OF
SOCIETY.
The only Sects which he
thinks ought to be (Other
than MUSLIM religion
which has never been
compatible with the
Christian religions,
free governments or any
other besides sharia
law), and
which by
all WISE laws are
EXCLUDED FROM SUCH
TOLERATION,
are those who teach Doctrines
subversive of the Civil
Government under which
they live. The
Roman Catholicks or Papists
are excluded by reason
of such Doctrines
as these
"that Princes excommunicated
may be deposed, and those
they call Hereticks may
be destroyed without
mercy";
besides their
recognizing the Pope in
so absolute a manner,
in subversion of Government,
by introducing as far as
possible into the states,
under whose protection they
enjoy life, liberty and
property, that solecism in
politicks, Imperium in
imperio2 (i.e. a
Government within
a Government)leading
directly to the worst
anarchy and confusion,
civil discord, war and
blood shed--"(A
Clear Warning!) John
Locke on Treatise on
Toleration: "...#71.
Again: That Church
can have NO
RIGHT to be tolerated
by the magistrate which is
constituted upon such a
bottom that all those who
enter into it do thereby
ipso facto deliver
themselves up to the
protection and service of
ANOTHER PRINCE(foreign).
For by this means the
magistrate would
give way to the
settling of a foreign
jurisdiction in his
own country and
suffer his own people to
be listed, as it were, for
SOLDIERS AGAINST his
own Government.
Nor does the frivolous and
fallacious distinction
between the Court and the
Church afford any remedy to
this inconvenience;
especially when both the one
and the other are equally
subject to the absolute
authority of the same
person, who has not only
power to persuade the
members of his Church to
whatsoever he lists, either
as purely religious, or in
order thereunto, but can
also enjoin it them on pain
of eternal fire. It is
ridiculous for any
one to profess himself to
be a Mahometan (MUSLIM)
only in his religion, but
in everything else a
faithful subject to a
Christian magistrate, whilst
at the same time he
acknowledges himself
bound to yield blind
obedience to
the Mufti (MUSLIM
CLERIC - ISLAMIC
SCHOLAR) of
Constantinople,
who himself is entirely
obedient to the Ottoman
Emperor and frames the
feigned oracles of that
religion according to his
pleasure. But this
Mahometan (MUSLIM)
living amongst Christians
would yet more apparently renounce
their government
if he acknowledged the same
person to be head of his
Church who is the supreme
magistrate in the state.
..." The Catholics
have since set aside any
blind obedience to barbaric
demands by tyrannical Popes
and live peaceably in a free
society. The Muslims by way
of their barbaric DOCTRINE
and blind adherence to it,
can never be content to live
in a free society; this is
because every part of their
doctrine itself is
written to be SUBVERSIVE
and destructive to any
society but their own
as they follow
BLIND OBEDIENCE to sharia
law and those radical
leaders who follow it.
They are and will always be
SOLDIERS AGAINST FREEDOM. If
you believe otherwise, see
the videos posted below on
this page. Attempts to argue
otherwise is and will always
be a fallacy and history
proves it a fallacy. Islam's
own doctrine tells them to
lie until they are in such
numbers as to control the
countries and governments
they have infiltrated.
Islamist openly declare
using their population as a
weapon (see their own videos
below) in our country to
implant sharia law and to
destroy the principles of
freedom we hold dear. The freedom of
religion clearly does not
apply to religions that are
intolerant
of all other religions and intolerant
of free societies. As the
Founders rightly deducted
from history and historical
facts, they wisely
concluded, that followers of
the Islamic religion that
tolerates no one but
themselves and their own
religion, except only for
the purpose of destroying or
subjugating others under
their religion, should not
be tolerated in any free
country. It is
therefore necessary to
redirect Muslims who seek
asylum to Islamic countries,
not the United States, and
to begin reverse migration
of those migrated, back to
countries historically
Islamic. If they want
freedom and the blessings it
provides, they can establish
it there;
First
Amendment - Freedom
Acknowledgement Award
First
Amendment Freedom
Acknowledgement Award is
given by the American
Patriot Party to Edward
Snowden, Bradley Manning and
Julian Assange. The American
Patriot Party is advocate
for dropping of all United
States charges (past and
present) against Edward
Snowden, Bradley
Manning,Julian
Assange & National
Guardsman - Jack Teixeira (who has
exposed Biden
Administration Lies &
Treason against United
States Citizens)
who have shown great courage
in their actions in exposing
government corruption at
great risk and loss of their
own freedom and liberties.
When there is corruption
within the highest levels in
government, the First
Amendment is our most
essential sentinel to our
lives, rights and liberties.
Read The
Virginia and Kentucky
Resolutions by James
Madison and Thomas
Jefferson and the Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788.
Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky
Resolutions 1798: " ...3.
Resolved, That it is true as
a general principle, and is
also expressly declared by
one of the amendments to the
Constitutions, that "the
powers not delegated to the
United States by the
Constitution, our prohibited
by it to the States, are
reserved to the States
respectively, or to the
people"; and that NO
power over the freedom of
religion, freedom of
speech, or freedom of the
press being delegated to
the United States by the
Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the
States, all lawful powers
respecting the same did of
right remain, and were
reserved to the States or
the people: that
thus was manifested their
determination to retain to
themselves the right of
judging how far the
licentiousness of speech and
of the press may be abridged
without lessening their
useful freedom, and how far
those abuses which cannot be
separated from their use
should be tolerated, rather
than the use be destroyed.
And thus also they
guarded against ALL
abridgment by the United
States of the freedom of
religious opinions and
exercises, and retained to
themselves the right of
protecting the same,
as this State, by a law
passed on the general
demand of its citizens,
had already protected
them from "ALL" human
restraint or
interference.
And that in addition to this
general principle and
express declaration, another
and more special provision
has been made by one of the
amendments to the
Constitution, which
expressly declares, that
"Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof,
or abridging the freedom of
speech or of the press":
thereby guarding in the same
sentence, and under the same
words, the freedom of
religion, of speech, and of
the press: insomuch, that
whatever violated either,
throws down the sanctuary
which covers the others,
arid that libels, falsehood,
and defamation, equally with
heresy and false religion, are
WITHHELD from the
cognizance of federal
tribunals. That,
therefore, the act of
Congress of the United
States, passed on the 14th
day of July, 1798, intituled
"An Act in addition to the
act intituled An Act for the
punishment of certain crimes
against the United States,"
which does abridge the
freedom of the press, is
"NOT LAW", but is
"ALTOGETHER" "VOID",
and of "NO FORCE"...."
American
Patriot Independence
Recognition Award:
Recognizes and
bestows highest honor to Michael
New
for protesting the United
Nations by refusing to
wear the U.N. insignia on
his uniform during a United
Nations Protection Force
peacekeeping mission to
Macedonia during the
Yugoslav Wars. This
Patriotic Act is recognized
by the Common Law Principles
of patriotism to ones
independent state and
country as outlined by John
Locke's Treatise of Civil
Government that establishes
that a citizen of one
country cannot be delivered
up under the command and
control of another country
against his own consent: John Locke
Treatise on Civil
Government:
#217.
"...Fourthly, thedelivery
also of the people into
the subjection of a
foreign power,
eitherby
the prince or by the
legislative,
is certainlya
change of the
legislative,
and soa
dissolution of the
government. For the end
why people entered into
society being to be
preserved one entire,
free, independent society
to be governed by its own
laws,this
is lost whenever they
are given up into the
power of another." This applies
to NATO, UN and any other
governing body and
establishes any treaty or
command both void and
treasonous against any
United States Citizen,
Military or Citizen Militia. Remember that
we are a nation of
Independent State Republics
of Constitutional
laws under Original Compacts
that create each republic
based upon the Laws of
Nature and NOT
just any law that is
passed by federal or state
legislatures.
Educate others
to stop promoting total
democracy, total
democracy (51% enslave
49%) is socialism.
The Founders never spoke of
forming a democracy; The
Founders spoke of and formed
Constitutional Republics
that acknowledge the
meanings set down in the
Declaration of Independence,
Ratifying Conventions that
defined the meaning of the
words in the Constitution
and Bill of Rights, all
founded firmly in the
foundational principles of
the Laws
of Nature (See
also The Absolute
Rights of the Colonists
by Samuel Adams) which are
necessary for freedom and
liberty to exist. If you
have not read them, you
must. Without
those principles no country
can be considered a free
community, state or country.
These principles should be
guarded by all US republic
governments, local, state
and federal, and promoted as
the ideal to inspire all
those governments of the
world that wish to
experience true freedom and
liberty. Thomas
Jefferson: "Rightful
liberty is unobstructed
action according to our will
within limits drawn around
us by the equal rights of
others. I do
not add 'within the
limits of the law',
because law
is often but the
tyrant's will,
and always
so when it violates
the rights of the individual~~"
Thomas
Jefferson, Kentucky
Resolutions, 1798:
#3. " Resolved,
That it is true as a general
principle, and is also
expressly declared by one of
the amendments to the
Constitutions, that "the
powers not
delegated to the
United States by the
Constitution, our
prohibited by it to the
States, are reserved to
the States
respectively,
OR to the People";
and that NO
power over the freedom of
religion, freedom of
speech, or freedom of the
press being delegated to
the United States by the
Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the
States, all
lawful powers respecting
the same did of right
remain, and were
reserved to the States
or the People:
that thus was manifested
their determination to retain
to themselves the right of
judging how far the
licentiousness of speech
and of the press may be
abridged without lessening
their useful freedom,
and how far those abuses
which cannot be separated
from their use should be
tolerated, rather than
the use be destroyed.
And thus also they guarded
against ALL
abridgment
by the United States of the
freedom of religious
opinions and exercises, and
retained to themselves the
right of protecting the
same, as this State, by
a law passed on the
general demand of its
citizens, had already
protected them from"ALL"
human restraint or
interference.
And that in addition to this
general principle and
express declaration, another
and more special provision
has been made by one of the
amendments to the
Constitution, which
expressly declares, that "Congress
shall make no law
respecting an
establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof, or
abridging the freedom of
speech or of the press":
thereby guarding in the same
sentence, and under the
same words, the
freedom of religion, of
speech, and of the press:
insomuch, that whatever
violated either,
throws down the
sanctuary which covers
the others, arid
that libels, falsehood,
and defamation, equally
with heresy and false
religion,are
WITHHELD from the
cognizance of federal
tribunals. That,
therefore, the act of
Congress of the United
States, passed on the 14th
day of July, 1798, intituled
"An Act in addition to the
act intituled An Act for the
punishment of certain crimes
against the United States,"
which does abridge the
freedom of the press, is "NOT
LAW", but is "ALTOGETHER"
"VOID", and of "NO
FORCE". ..."
In 1764, James Otis,
Jr.: “The Colonists
are by the Law of Naturefree born, as
indeed all men are, white
or black.” John
Dickinson, in the last of
his twelve Letters from a
Farmer in Pennsylvania of
1767, referred to this
natural rights foundation:
“Let these truths be
indelibly impressed on our
minds - that we cannot be
HAPPY, without being FREE -
that we cannot be free,
without being SECURE in
our PROPERTY - that we
cannot
be secure in our property, if,
without
our CONSENT,
others may, as by
right, take it
away”; This "reference"
illustrates the closeness of
how the Founders read and
followed John Locke's
philosophies on freedom; See
John Locke's Second
Treaties on Civil
Government 1689:
"#190. Every man is born
with a double right. First,
a right of freedom to his
person, which no other
man has a power over,
but the free disposal of it
lies in himself. Secondly, a
right before any other man,
to inherit, with his
brethren, his father's
goods."; "#191. By
the first of these,
a man is naturally free
from subjection to any
government, though
he be born in a place
under its jurisdiction.....";
"#192.
...till they are allowed
their due
property,
which is so to be
proprietors of what they
have that
nobody can take away any
part of it without their
OWN CONSENT, without
which, men under
any government are not in
the state of free men, but are
direct SLAVES under the
force of war..." "#193.
... (property) the nature
whereof is, that, without a
man's OWN
CONSENT (See
#6&7), it
cannot be taken from him.";
"#194.
... For can
there be anything more
RIDICULOUS
than to say, I give you and
yours this for ever, and
that in the surest and most
solemn way of
conveyance can be
devised, and yet
it is to be understood
that I have right, if I
please, to take it away
from you again to-morrow?
(Think
how this relates to
property and income taxes
and how far we have
strayed); "#195.
I will not dispute now
whether princes are exempt
from the laws of their
country, but this I
am sure, they owe
subjection to the Laws
of God and Nature.
Nobody, no power can exempt
them from the obligations of
that eternal law. Those are
so great and so strong in
the case of promises, that
Omnipotency itself can be
tied by them. Grants,
promises, and oaths are
bonds that hold the
Almighty, whatever some
flatterers say to princes of
the world, who, all
together, with all their
people joined to them, are,
in comparison of the great
God, but as a drop of the
bucket, or a dust on the
balance -- inconsiderable,
nothing! ..." Founder's
Warning Come True -
Regarding Washington DC,
White House and Legislature: Patrick
Henry: "....The
people within that place
(Washington, DC), and the
strongholds, may be
excused from all the
burdens imposed on the
rest of the society, and
may enjoy exclusive
emoluments, to the
great injury of the rest
of the people. But
gentlemen say that the
power will not he
abused. They ought
to show that it is
necessary. All their
powers may be fully
carried into execution,
without this exclusive
authority in the 'ten
miles square' (Washington,
DC). The sweeping
clause will fully enable
them to do what they
please. What could
the most extravagant and
boundless imagination ask,
but power to do every
thing? I have
reason to suspect
ambitious grasps at
power. The
experience of the world
teaches me the jeopardy of
giving enormous
power. Strike this
clause out of the form of
the government, and how
will it stand?
Congress will still have
power, by the sweeping
clause, to make laws
within that {438} place
and the strong holds,
independently of the local
authority of the
state. I ask you, if
this clause be struck out,
whether the sweeping
clause will not enable
them to protect themselves
from insult. If you
grant them these powers,
you destroy "every degree
of responsibility".
They will fully screen
them from justice, and
preclude the possibility
of punishing
them. No instance
can be given of such a
wanton grasp of power as
an exclusive
legislation in all cases
whatever. ..." Virginia
Ratifying Convention
6-16-1788 James
Madison's Answer: "They (The
Federal Legislature,
Supreme Court, Federal
Judicial and Executive)
are not given that much
power...." Therefore it
is clear the federal
government has exceeded
their authority. Their
association with foreign
banks and involvement with
exclusive privileged
organizations such as
international and domestic
corporations, unions,
lobbyists and special
interests has corrupted the
republican form of
government consisting of
limited federal power and
small, well represented,
strong state republics.
Note: If this video above
is taken down (again) by
YouTube, do a search for
Ed Asner 9-11
Solving the Mysteries of
WTC World Trade Center #7
to view it until we
re-post or
view similar videos at http://www.ae911truth.org
Over 3,000
people died on 911 and
no investigations as to
what the people and
businesses associated
with them were involved
with... If even one
person was murdered in
this same city, what
that one person may have
been involved in would
be thoroughly
investigated. 3000
+ people are murdered,
and there is nothing
said about the
activities of any of the
victims or the companies
associated with them.
Manipulation of National
Currency, Foreign
Currency and Trade can
produce serious
consequences; As clearly
seen with the "Federal
Reserve" investing in
Foreign Banks, all without
transparent Civilian or
Legislative oversight to
scrutinize poor
investments or, more
importantly, corruption;
Result: We
are now 1.264 TRILLION
DOLLARS in Debt to China
alone (see article
below); Our country is
now quaking from the
International debt
caused by poor
legislative governing of
American
Tax Dollars, poor
corporate investments,
and corruption
associated with those
investments; Building 7
held many records of
those companies involved
in the World Trade
Center. The video
recording of the firemen
indicating that the
building was going to be
purposely
collapsed is clear; The
way the building
falls is
unquestionable. The
American Patriot Party
promotes having a thorough
investigation, not only of
the buildings, but of the
business activities of the
victims and those
associated with the
victims; of the companies
and their activities, and
of all things leading up
to the collapse;
to find out what actually
occurred,
both for the families of
the victims and the
country.
Watch and listen to this
video with it's many
professionals. Then you
decide. Join:
Architects
and Engineers for 911
Truth:http://www.ae911truth.org Sign
the Petition
Sir Winston Churchill:
"How Dreadful are the
curses which Mohammedanism
(Islamic doctrine)
lays on it's votaries
(Religious Followers)!
...which is as dangerous
in a man as hydrophobia
(Rabies)
in a dog. The effects are
apparent in many
countries. Improvident
habits (thoughtless
undisciplined behavior),
slovenly systems of
agriculture, sluggish
methods of commerce, and
insecurity of property
exist wherever
the followers of the
Prophet rule or live."
Watch
British
Police Attack their Own Simply for
Wanting British Law
Upheld: The Video
"Western Sharia Police"
Warns us of the upcoming
Dangers against our
Freedom of Speech and
Liberties from
Creeping Radical Islam: NOTE:
This Video has many
internet bans including
google chrome browsers
which switches quickly
from start arrow to an
X. You can either try to
view it in different
browsers or reload the
page in chrome but stop
the reload as soon as
the arrow is visible.
This should stop the
video ban function and
maintain the arrow to
allow you to start this
video. https://altcensored.com/watch?v=SLT9JOE64WQ
See Also:
Islamic
Britain: The TRUTH About
No Go Zones NOTE:
This Video has many
internet bans
including google
chrome browsers which
switches quickly from
start arrow to an X.
You can either try to
view it in different
browsers or reload the
page in chrome but
stop the reload as
soon as the arrow is
visible. This should
stop the video ban
function and maintain
the arrow to allow you
to start this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBhhxcpJwps&t=1s
American
Patriot - Ezra Taft
Benson Warning:
"Stand up for Freedom". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxBcodF8Y7Q
American Patriot Video
Archive: Ezra
Taft Benson -
1of2 Globalist
Bankers
Tactic to Stifle
Freedom and American
Patriot Movements in
America.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTd-CnCMK-8 American
Patriot Video
Archive: Ezra
Taft Benson -
2of2
Globalist Bankers
Tactic to Stifle
Freedom and American
Patriot Movements in
America.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUu0prLE9no
John Birch
Society's eye
opening Video
against the SPLC
Southern Poverty
Law Center
showing the SPLC Southern
Poverty Law
Center
to be a socialist
organization
spreading
hate against the
original
Constitution and
those true
American Patriots
supporting it;
That the SPLC does
this by comparing
true American
Patriots which theyhate with
criminal
organizations -
See again
Ezra Taft
Benson's
Warning
Video above of
socialist backed
organizations
creating
"confusion
followed by
delusion". ----------
Support
the
only party
that actually
follows the
Constitution
as it was
intended.
No other party
or organization
will do this,
not one.
Compare us
to other
parties:
The
American
Patriot Party
believes in
Constitutional and
Common Law
Carry of
arms for
bearing and
concealment;
for preservation
of self,
family, community,
freedoms,
liberties
and property.
The
Founders hid
their
cannons,
munitions and
arms from
their
government,
clearly
indicating
concealment
without
registration
is an
inalienable
right:See
Federalist #46
and James
Madison's 25
to 1 Power
Ratio -
Citizens
militia over
military,
See below on
this page.
This
Constitutional
minimum ratio
is what the
NRA cowers
from
upholding,
however the
American
Patriot Party
does not.
Two
of these
weapons were
purchased
(without
government
registration
as with all
gun purchases
at that time)
from Puckle,
himself a
citizen
attorney
inventor, by the
2nd Duke of
Montagu.
George
Washington's
call for the CITIZENS
to manufacture
and have readily
at hand military
grade weaponryFirst
Annual Message
to Congress,
January 8,
1790
for the
defense of
their freedoms
and liberties.
See Quotes
Below on this
page.
The
American
Patriot Party
supports
formation and armament
of Citizens
Militias (all
citizens)
as intended by
the Founders.
It
is the
responsibility
of the states
and federal
government to
train and arm
the Citizen
militias (See:
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788);
Once
trained,
military
members of the
US armed
forces have
the duty to
continue their
service as
members of the
citizen
militia where
they
reside with
those that
have not had
military
service,
work to train
them,
and to take
their place as
James Madison
indicates in
Federalist #46
as a
opposing force
to the
standing
military they
once
served as well
as that of foreign
aggression;
This is to
balance and
check the power
of our limited
government(s).
This is not a
anti-government
stand,
or anti-military
stand;
this is a
Constitutional
check against
the misuse of
power by
governments
acting under a
pretense
of authority
and outside those
limited
delegated
powers given them.
Note that if
the federal
government
fails to arm
and train the
citizens, it
is the right
and duty of
the state,
local
communities
and or
citizens to do
so - including
the right to
import arms;
including to
import arms
outside the
federal pretense
of control
- which by the
Bill of Rights
2nd
Amendment, the
federal
government has
no
control
regarding
arms (See:
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788). George
Mason
Virginia Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788:
"...His fears,
as he had
before
expressed,
were, that
grievous
punishments (LAWS and
Laws against guns etc.)
would be
inflicted, in
order to
render the
service disagreeable
to the
(Citizen)
militia
themselves,
and
induce them to
wish its
abolition,
which would
afford a PRETENSE for
establishing a
standing army. ..." (APP
Note: This has
already
happened);
John
Marshall:
"....If
Congress
neglect our
militia
(citizens), "we can
arm them
OURSELVES".
CANNOT (the
state and or
people of)
Virginia
"import arms?
Cannot she put
them into the
hands of
"HER"
militia-men?He
then concluded
by observing,
that the power
of governing
the militia
was NOT
vested in the
states by
implication,
because, being "possessed
of it"
"antecedent
to the
adoption of
the government,
and "not
being divested
of it" by
any grant or
restriction in
the
Constitution,
they must
necessarily be
as "FULLY
possessed of
it as ever
they had been.>
And it
could NOT be
said that the
states derived
ANY powers
from that (the
federal
government or
Constitution)
system, "but
RETAINED them,"
>>>>>>>>"though not acknowledged in ANY part
of it". "
See Federalist
#46 -
James
Madison:
A 25 to 1
Civilian Power
Ratio
over
the Standing
Army
(MILITARY) is
the
"minimum power
ratio"in any free country
and the true
definition
of what a
MILITIA is.
".....The highest number to
which,
according to
the best
computation, a
standing army
can be carried
in any
country, does
not exceed one
hundredth part
of the whole
number of
souls; or one
twenty-fifth
part of the
number able to
bear arms.
This
proportion
would not
yield, in the
United States,
an army of
more than
twenty-five or
thirty
thousand men.
"TO THESE" (The United States Military) WOULD BE
"OPPOSED" A (CITIZEN) "MILITIA" amounting
to near half a
million of "CITIZENS"
with "ARMS
IN THEIR
HANDS",
OFFICERED BY
MEN CHOSEN
FROM "AMONG
THEMSELVES"
(CHOSEN BY THE LOCAL CITIZEN'S - NOT MILITARY OR FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT -
THE TRUE
DEFINITION OF
MILITIA ),
fighting for
their (THE CITIZEN'S) common liberties,
and united and
conducted by
governments
possessing
their (THE CITIZEN MILITIA'S) affections
and
confidence.
It
may well be
doubted,
whether a (CITIZEN) MILITIA "thus
circumstanced" (25 to 1 ARMED POWER RATIO) could
ever be
conquered by
such a (SMALL) proportion of "regular
troops" (i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES). ...."
Read Federalist
#46
in full below
on this page....
Get educated.
World
Immigration
News and
Related Videos
- a MUST
READ!:
When governments
deny the existence
of a radical
violent religious
culture and
devious acts of
war; and not
only invite it,
but inject it,
into their
country.
War is imminent
when the
governments
establish the
condition of it. John
Locke, "Second
Treatise on
Civil
Government
1698"
Chapter
19: Of the
Dissolution of
Government
#211.
HE that will,
with any
clearness, speak
of the
dissolution of
government,
ought in the
first place to
distinguish
between the
dissolution of
the society
and the
dissolution of
the government..."
#217. Fourthly,
the delivery
also of the
people into the
subjection of a
foreign power,
either by the
prince or by the
legislative,
is certainly a
change of the
legislative,
and so a
dissolution of
the government.
For the end why
people entered
into society being
to be preserved
one entire, free,
independent
society to be
governed by its
own laws, this
is lost
whenever they
are given up
into the power
of another.
..."
Read John Locke
"Second Treatise
on Civil
Government 1689"
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Civil_Government/locke_civil_government.html
and
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Church_State_Man/locke_church_state_man.html
so that you can
understand the
principles of
toleration that
the Governments of
Europe, Britain
and the United
States have quite
apparently forgot.
"...#71.
Again: That Church
can have no right
to be tolerated by
the magistrate
which is
constituted upon
such a bottom that
all those who
enter into it do
thereby ipso facto
deliver themselves
up to the
protection and
service of another
prince. For by
this means the
magistrate would
give way to the
settling of a
foreign
jurisdiction in
his own country
and suffer his own
people to be
listed, as it
were, for soldiers
against his own
Government. Nor
does the frivolous
and fallacious
distinction
between the Court
and the Church
afford any remedy
to this
inconvenience;
especially when
both the one and
the other are
equally subject to
the absolute
authority of the
same person, who
has not only power
to persuade the
members of his
Church to
whatsoever he
lists, either as
purely religious,
or in order
thereunto, but can
also enjoin it
them on pain of
eternal fire. It
is ridiculous
for any one to
profess himself
to be a
Mahometan
(Muslim)
only
in his religion,
but in
everything else
a faithful
subject to a
Christian
magistrate, whilst
at the same
time he
acknowledges
himself bound
to yield blind obedience to the Mufti of
Constantinople,
who himself is
entirely
obedient to the
Ottoman Emperor
and frames the
feigned oracles
of that religion
according
to his
pleasure.
But this Mahometan
living amongst
Christians would
yet more
apparently
renounce their
government if
he acknowledged
the same person to
be head of his
Church who is the
supreme magistrate
in the state.
#72.
Lastly, those are
not at all to be
tolerated who deny
the being of a
God. Promises,
covenants, and
oaths, which are
the bonds of human
society, can have
no hold upon an
atheist. The
taking away of
God, though but
even in thought,
dissolves all;
besides also,
those that by
their atheism
undermine and
destroy all
religion, can have
no pretence of
religion whereupon
to challenge the
privilege of a
toleration. As for
other practical
opinions, though
not absolutely
free from all
error,
if they do not
tend to
establish
domination
over others,
or civil impunity
to the Church in
which they are
taught, there can
be no reason why
they should not be
tolerated.
#73. It
remains that I say
something
concerning those
assemblies which,
being vulgarly
called and perhaps
having sometimes
been conventicles
and nurseries of
factions and
seditions, are
thought to afford
against this
doctrine of
toleration. But
this has not
happened by
anything peculiar
unto the genius of
such assemblies,
but by the unhappy
circumstances of
an oppressed or
ill-settled
liberty. These
accusations would
soon cease if the
law of toleration
were once so
settled that all
Churches were
obliged to lay
down toleration as
the foundation of
their own liberty,
and teach that
liberty of
conscience is
every man's
natural right,
equally belonging
to dissenters as
to themselves; and
that nobody ought
to be compelled in
matters of
religion either by
law or force. The
establishment of
this one thing
would take away
all ground of
complaints and
tumults upon
account of
conscience; and
these causes of
discontents and
animosities being
once removed,
there would remain
nothing in these
assemblies that
were not more
peaceable and less
apt to produce
disturbance of
state than in any
other meetings
whatsoever. But
let us examine
particularly the
heads of these
accusations. "..."
Samuel Adams:
"In regard to
Religeon, mutual
tolleration in the
different
professions
thereof, is what
all good and
candid minds in
all ages have ever
practiced; and
both by precept
and example
inculcated on
mankind: And it is
now generally
agreed among
christians that
this spirit of
toleration in the
fullest extent
consistent with
the being of civil
society "is the
chief
characteristical
mark of the true
church"1 & In
so much that "Mr.
Locke" has
asserted, and
"proved beyond the
possibility of
contradiction on
any solid ground",
that such
toleration ought
to be extended to
all whose
doctrines are not subversive of society. The only
Sects which he
thinks ought to
be, and which by
all wise laws are
excluded from such
toleration, are
those who teach
Doctrines
subversive of the
Civil Government
under which they
live. The
Roman Catholicks
or Papists are
excluded by
reason of such
Doctrines as
these "that
Princes
excommunicated
may be deposed,
and those they
call Hereticks
may be destroyed
without mercy;
besides their
recognizing the
Pope in so
absolute a
manner, in
subversion of
Government, by
introducing as
far as possible
into the states,
under whose
protection they
enjoy life,
liberty and
property, that
solecism in
politicks,
Imperium in
imperio2 (i.e. a
Government
within a
Government)
leading directly
to the worst
anarchy and
confusion, civil
discord, war and
blood shed-- "
This limitation
was called for
because as Locke
presented,
following a
religious leader
from another
country (at that
time Popes that
would have people
killed in other
countries for
heresy) is like
having a foreign
soldiers following
the orders of
foreign leaders in
your local state
and community.
Freedom relies on
a set of defined
principles based
upon the "Laws of
Nature" and local
interests of local
communities for
the purpose of
local
commonwealths; Not
distant
legislators or
leaders.
John
Locke:
"Chapter 2:
"...Of the
State of
Nature 4.
"To understand
political power
aright, and derive
it from its
original, we
must consider what
estate all men are
naturally in, and
that is, a state
of perfect freedom
to order their
actions, and
dispose of their
possessions and
persons as they
think fit, within
the bounds of the
law of Nature,
without asking
leave or depending
upon the will of
any other man. A
state also of
equality, wherein
all the power and
jurisdiction is
reciprocal, no one
having more than
another, there
being nothing more
evident than that
creatures of the
same species and
rank,
promiscuously born
to all the same
advantages of
Nature, and the
use of the same
faculties, should
also be equal one
amongst another,
without
subordination or
subjection,..."
6. But though this
be a state of
liberty, yet it
is not a state
of license;
though man in that
state have an
uncontrollable
liberty to dispose
of his person or
possessions, yet
he has not liberty
to destroy
himself, or so
much as any
creature in his
possession, but
where some nobler
use than its bare
preservation calls
for it. The "State
of Nature" has a
"Law of Nature" to
govern it, which
obliges every one,
and REASON, which
is that law,
teaches all
mankind who will
but consult it,
that being all
equal and
independent, no
one ought to harm
another in his
life, health,
liberty or
possessions; for
men being all the
workmanship of one
omnipotent and
infinitely wise
Maker; all the
servants of one
sovereign Master,
sent into the
world by His order
and about His
business; they are
His property,
whose workmanship
they are made to
last during His,
not one another's
pleasure.
And, being
furnished with
like faculties,
sharing all in one
community of
Nature, there
cannot be supposed
any such
subordination
among us that may
authorise us to
destroy one
another, as if we
were made for one
another's uses, as
the inferior ranks
of creatures are
for ours. Every
one as he is bound
to preserve
himself, and not
to quit his
station wilfully,
so by the like
reason, when his
own preservation
comes not in
competition, ought
he as much as he
can to preserve
the rest of
mankind, and not
unless it be to do
justice on an
offender, take
away or impair the
life, or what
tends to the
preservation of
the life, the
liberty, health,
limb, or goods of
another.
7. And that all
men may be restrained
from invading
others' rights,
and from doing
hurt to one
another, and the
law of Nature be
observed,
which willeth the
peace and
preservation of
all mankind, the
execution of the
law of Nature is
in that state put
into every man's
hands, whereby
every one has a
right to punish
the transgressors
of that law to
such a degree as
may hinder its
violation. For
the Law of
Nature would, as
all other laws
that concern men
in this world,
be in vain if
there were
nobody that in
the State of
Nature had a
power to execute
that law, and
thereby preserve
the innocent and
restrain
offenders;
and if any one in
the state of
Nature may punish
another for any
evil he has done,
every one may do
so. For in that
state of perfect
equality, where
naturally there is
no superiority or
jurisdiction of
one over another,
what any may do in
prosecution of
that law, every
one must needs
have a right to
do.
8. And thus, in
the state of
Nature, one man
comes by a power
over another, but
yet no absolute or
arbitrary power to
use a criminal,
when he has got
him in his hands,
according to the
passionate heats
or boundless
extravagancy of
his own will, but
only to retribute
to him so far as
calm reason and
conscience
dictate, what is
proportionate to
his transgression,
which is so much
as may serve for
reparation and
restraint. For
these two are the
only reasons why
one man may
lawfully do harm
to another, which
is that we call
punishment. In
transgressing the
law of Nature, the
offender declares
himself to live by
another rule than
that of reason and
common equity,
which is that
measure God has
set to the actions
of men for their
mutual security,
and so he becomes
dangerous to
mankind; the tie
which is to secure
them from injury
and violence being
slighted and
broken by him,
which being a
trespass against
the whole species,
and the peace and
safety of it,
provided for by
the law of Nature,
every man upon
this score, by the
right he hath to
preserve mankind
in general, may
restrain, or where
it is necessary,
destroy things
noxious to them,
and so may bring
such evil on any
one who hath
transgressed that
law, as may make
him repent the
doing of it, and
thereby deter him,
and, by his
example, others
from doing the
like mischief. And
in this case, and
upon this ground,
every man hath a
right to punish
the offender, and
be executioner of
the law of
Nature."
The
Principle of
Freedom added
by Samuel
Adams is this:
"If men through
fear, fraud or
mistake, should in
terms renounce and
give up any
essential natural
right, the eternal
law of reason and
the great end of
society, would
absolutely vacate
such renunciation;
the [Volume 5,
Page 396] right
to freedom being
the gift of God
Almighty, it is
not in the power
of Man to
alienate this
gift, and
voluntarily
become a
slave--"
This is the most
important addition
to the definition
of true freedom,
as no individual
can give up the
laws of nature and
allow himself to
give up (voluntary
slavery), or allow
others to accept
his relinquishment
(Slavery), of
those rights to
any one, or any
religion, or any
government, or any
leader; Period.
Freedom requires
consent, but you
cannot consent to
give up any
inalienable right
that keeps you
free.
Here are a few
videos taken from
Youtube
for your review
and see if you can
recognize that
there are those
that will misuse
freedom to take
away your
freedoms.
Ron
Paul had the
correct
statement to
our military
presence in
Iraq; "We
marched them
over there, we
can march them
back";
And ask yourself
regarding the
below videos,
would not the same
answer by
reversing the
actions of
governments that
created this
problem be the
solution; and let
them improve their
own countries to
their liking if
that is what they
truly wish to do.
This has nothing
to do with racism;
it has to do with
freedom and free
societies vs the
Muslim religion
that does not
respect or
recognize either;
and mirrors the
condition that old
world Catholics
and Papists
imposed on those
that sought refuge
in the new world
from religious
persecution.
It is also about
governments whose
purpose is to
protect private
property,
vacating that
purpose by placing
huge tax
burdens upon
the
properties,
society
and earnings
of its
citizens. This
change of purpose
is, by all
definitions
of civil
society and
explained by
John Locke, an
act of war
against
their own
citizens;
and can in no
way be an act
of a representative
government:
John Locke
Second
Treatise on
Civil
Government:
Locke:
" #222. The
reason why men
enter into
society is the
preservation
of their
property;
and the end
while they
choose and
authorise a
legislative is
that there may
be laws made,
and rules set,
as
guards and fences to the properties of all the society,
to limit the
power and
moderate the
dominion of
every part and
member of the
society. For since it can never be supposed to be the will of
the society
that the
legislative
should have a
power to
destroy that
which every
one designs to
secure by
entering into
society,
and for which
the people
submitted
themselves to
legislators of
their own
making: whenever
the
legislators
endeavour to
take away and
destroy the
property of
the people, or
to reduce them
to slavery
under
arbitrary
power, they
put themselves
into a state
of war with
the people, who
are thereupon
absolved from
any farther
obedience, and
are left to
the common
refuge which
God hath
provided for
all men
against force
and violence.
Whensoever,
therefore, the
legislative
shall
transgress
this
fundamental
rule of
society, and
either by
ambition, fear,
folly,
or corruption,...
(APP
Note: See this
in Samuel
Adams
Statement
within the
Rights of the
Colonists,
1772:
"If men
through fear,
fraud
or mistake,
should in
terms renounce
and give up
any essential
natural right,
the eternal
law of reason
and the great
end of
society, would
absolutely
vacate such
renunciation;
the right to
freedom being
the gift of
God Almighty,
it is not in
the power of
Man to
alienate this
gift, and
voluntarily
become a
slave.")
...endeavour
to grasp
themselves, or "put into the hands of
any other" (which they do when they force support of
immigrants
from the money
derived from
their citizens
property and
labor), an
absolute power
over the
lives,
liberties, and
estates of the
people, by this
"breach of
trust" they
forfeit the
power the
people had put
into their
hands for
quite contrary
ends, and it
devolves to
the people,
who have a
right to
resume
their original
liberty,
and by the
establishment
of a new
legislative
(such as they
shall think
fit), provide
for their own
safety and
security,
(APP
Note: See this
in the
Declaration of
Independence)which
is the end for
which they are
in society...."
Macron sets
stage for a
French civil
war and
promotes a EU
army to subdue
it.
As Germany
wreaths from
the agony of
EU mandated
uncontrolled
mass
immigration
and president
Merkels
disregaurd to
it's citizen's
anguish of the
establishment
and digging in
of Islamic
fundamentalists,
French
president
Macron, French
socialist,
takes strides
in destroying
his own
country to
step up in
power in the
European Union
(EU); Favoring
mass
immigration
and ignoring
the cries of
his French
countrymen.
Make
no mistake,
this is and
has always
been a
religious war.
The Muslim
plan, as you
will see in
these videos
from their own
words
is to use
population as
a weapon to
take over the
countries they
have
been allowed
to infiltrate.
Beware of
"Crocodile Tears"
from those that
want toleration only
to gain power
to inflict
upon others
their own
intolerance.
Locke and the
Founders
understood that
allowing distant
or foreign
religious figures
to control the
beliefs and
actions of those
within
a local community
is like having
foreign armies
stationed within
your local
communities
borders. Knowing
"Distant
Legislatures" can
never provide
representation.
And for this
reason Catholics
and Papists "at
that time in
history", whose
Popes could have
anyone opposing
the Catholic
Church in a
foreign country
killed for heresy,
could never be
tolerated. Today,
the Muslim
religion is using the people's ignorance of this important
limitation to
"tolerance" to
allow their
foothold in other
countries only so
to establish their
religious control
over those
countries.
John
Locke - Church,
State Man - #71:
"...
71. "
...Again: That
Church can have
NO RIGHT
to be
TOLERATED by the
magistrate which
is constituted
upon such a
bottom that all
those who enter
into it do
thereby ipso
facto deliver
themselves up to
the protection
and service of another
prince.
For by this
means the
magistrate would
give way to the
settling of a foreign jurisdiction in his own country and suffer his
own people to
be listed, as
it were, for
soldiers
against his
own
Government.
Nor does the
frivolous and
fallacious
distinction
between the
Court and the
Church afford
any remedy to
this
inconvenience;
especially when
both the one and
the other are
equally subject
to the absolute
authority of the
same person, who
has not only
power to
persuade the
members of his
Church to
whatsoever he
lists, either as
purely
religious, or in
order thereunto,
but can also
enjoin it them
on pain of
eternal fire. It
is ridiculous
for any one to
profess himself
to be a
Mahometan
(Muslim) only in
his religion,
but in
everything else
a faithful
subject to a
Christian
magistrate,
whilst at the
same time he
acknowledges
himself bound to
yield blind
obedience to the
Mufti of
Constantinople,
who himself is
entirely
obedient to the
Ottoman Emperor
and frames the
feigned
oracles of
that religion
according to
his pleasure.
But this
Mahometan
(Muslim)
living amongst
Christians
would yet more
apparently
renounce their
government if
he
acknowledged
the same
person to be
head of his
Church who is
the supreme
magistrate in
the state. " Samuel
Adams - Absolute
Rights of the
Colonists, 1772:
"Just
and true
liberty, equal
and impartial
liberty" in
matters
spiritual and
temporal, is a
thing that all
Men are
clearly
entitled to,
by the eternal
and immutable
laws Of God
and nature,
as well as by
the law of
Nations, &
all well
grounded
municipal
laws, which
must have
their
foundation in
the former.--
In regard
to Religeon, mutual
tolleration in the
different
professions
thereof, is
what all good
and candid
minds in all
ages have ever
practiced; and
both by
precept and
example
inculcated on
mankind: And
it is now
generally agreed
among
christians
that this
spirit of
toleration in
the fullest
extent
consistent
with the being
of civil
society "is
the chief
characteristical
mark of the
true church"1
& In so
much that Mr.
Lock has
asserted, and
proved beyond
the
possibility of
contradiction
on any solid
ground, that such toleration ought to be extended to all
whose
doctrines are
not subversive
of society (this would exclude radical Muslims as well as it did
radical
Catholics and
Papists).
The only Sects
which he
thinks ought
to be, and which
by all wise
laws are
excluded from
such
toleration,
are those
who teach
Doctrines
subversive of
the Civil
Government
under which
they live.
The Roman
Catholicks or
Papists are
excluded by
reason of such
Doctrines as
these "that
Princes
excommunicated
may be
deposed, and
those they
call Hereticks
may be
destroyed
without mercy;
besides
their
recognizing
the Pope in so
absolute a
manner, in
subversion of
Government,
by introducing
as far as
possible into
the states,
under whose
protection
they enjoy
life, liberty
and property,
that solecism
in politicks,
Imperium
in imperio2(i.e. a Government
within a
Government)leading
directly to
the worst
anarchy and
confusion,
civil discord,
war and blood
shed--..."
The United Nations
is acting as a
DISTANT LEGISLATURE
to assume power over
sovereign nations
and remove power
from citizens and
place them under the
direction and power
of those people
directing and
controlling the
United Nations.
Remember, ruling by
Distant
Legislatures,
collectivism,
socialism and
creating dependency
are what endanger
our freedom's and
liberties, as there
can be NO
representation by
Distant
Legislatures:
".....Now what
liberty can there
be, where property
is taken away without
"consent"?
Can it be said with
any colour of truth
and Justice, that
this Continent of
three thousand miles
in length, and a
breadth as yet
unexplored, in which
however, its
supposed, there are
five millions of
people, has the
least voice, vote or
influence in the
decisions of the
British Parliament?
Have they, all
together, any more
right or power to
return a single
member to that house
of commons, who
have not
inadvertently,
but DELIBERATELY
assumed a
power to dispose
of their lives,
8 Liberties
and properties,
than to choose an
Emperor of China!
Had the Colonists a
right to return
members to the
British parliament,
it would only be
hurtfull; as from
their local
situation and
circumstances it is impossible they should be ever truly and
properly
represented
there.
The inhabitants of
this country in all
probability in a few
years will be more
numerous, than those
of Great Britain and
Ireland together;
yet it is absurdly
expected [Volume 5,
Page 397] by the
promoters of the
present measures,
that these, with
their posterity to
all generations,
should be easy while
their property, shall
be disposed of
by a house of
commons at THREE
THOUSAND MILES
DISTANT
from them;
and who
cannot be
supposed to
have the least
care or
concern for
their real
interest: Who
have not only
"NO natural
care for their
interest", but
must be in
effect "BRIBED
AGAINST IT";
as every burden they
lay on the colonists
is so much saved or
gained to
themselves. Hitherto
many of the
Colonists have been
free from Quit
Rents; but if the
breath of a british
house of commons can
originate an act for
taking away all
our money, our
lands will go next
or be subject to
rack rents from
haughty and
relentless landlords
who will ride at
ease, while we are
trodden in the dirt.
The Colonists have
been branded with
the odious names of
traitors and rebels,
only for complaining
of their grievances;
How long such
treatment will, or
ought to be born
is submitted. "
--------
What is it that dissolves
governments
that are suppose to
defend our
liberties? John
Locke presents this
scenario:
-------- John
Lock - Second
Treatise on
Civil
Government -
1689:
"...#212. Besides
this overturning
from without, governments
are dissolved
from within:
First. When
the legislative
is altered,
...When any
one, or more,
shall take upon
them to make
laws whom the
people have not
appointed so to
do, they make
laws without
authority, which
the people are
not therefore
bound to obey;by which means
they come again to
be out of
subjection, and
may constitute to
themselves a new
legislative, as
they think best,
being in full
liberty to
resist the force
of those who,
without
authority, would
impose anything
upon them.
Every one is at
the disposure of
his own will, when
those who had, by
the "delegation"
of the society,
the declaring of
the public will,
are excluded from
it, and others
usurp the place
who have no such
authority or
delegation. "
"...2. "
Resolved, That
the Constitution
of the United
States, having
delegated to
Congress (the federal
government) a
power to punish:
a.)
treason,
b.)
counterfeiting the
securities and
current coin of
the United States,
c.)
piracies, and
felonies committed
on the high seas,
and
d.) offenses
against the law of
nations,
and
>>>> NO
OTHER CRIMES
>>>"WHATSOEVER";
and it being
true as a
general
principle,
and one of the
amendments to the
Constitution
having also
declared, that
"the powers not delegated
to the United
States by the
Constitution, not
prohibited by it
to the States, are reserved
to the States
respectively,
or to the
people,"
therefore
the act of
Congress, passed
on the 14th day
of July, 1798,
and intituled
"An Act in
addition to the
act intituled An
Act for the
punishment of
certain crimes
against the
United States,"
as also the act
passed by them
on the — day of
June, 1798,
intituled "An
Act to punish
frauds committed
on the bank of
the United
States,"
(>>>>
and ALL their
OTHER ACTS which
assume to CREATE,
DEFINE, or
PUNISHcrimes,
OTHER than
THOSE so
"ENUMERATED" in
the Constitution,)
>>> are "ALTOGETHER"
"VOID", and
of "NO FORCE";
and that the
power to create,
define, and punish
such other crimes
is reserved, and,
of right, appertains SOLELY
and EXCLUSIVELY
to the respective
"STATES", each
within its own
territory..."
To
guard against states
giving away or
taking your
rights and
prepared
to defend
your rights,
states need to
be:
1.)
small
to give Adequate
Representation,
and
2.) strong to
oppose the
corruption of
Distant
(Federal and
International)
Legislatures.
----------
LOCKE
CONTINUED:
#213. This
being usually
brought about by
such in the
commonwealth, who
misuse the power
they have,..."
#217.
Fourthly, the
delivery also of
the people into
the subjection
of a foreign
power,
either by the
prince (president/executive)
or by the
legislative,
is certainly a
change of the
legislative,
and so a
dissolution of
the government. For the end
why people entered
into society being
to be preserved one
entire, free,
independent society
to be governed by
its OWN
laws, this is
lost whenever
they are given
up into the
power of ANOTHER.
"
---------
APP
NOTE: The
United States
are actually
Sovereign Independent
States, each
with their own
republic
(Which even
smaller
independent
republics can
be created
i.e. divided
and formed
into smaller
independent
states as
provided under
the
Constitution
to give
adequate
representation)
- The
Constitution
does not take
that away, as
the
Constitution
is a very
LIMITED
"COMPACT" See
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788 http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/americanpatriotpartynewsletter
and Virginia
Resolutions
1798 http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/candidates-
"...RESOLVED,
That the
General
Assembly of
Virginia, doth
unequivocably
express a firm
resolution to
maintain and
defend the CONSTITUTION
of the United
States, AND the
CONSTITUTIONOF THIS
STATE,
against
every
aggression
either foreign
or domestic, and that
they will
support "the
government" of the
United States
in all
measures "WARRANTED"
by "the former".
That this
assembly most
solemnly
declares a
warm
attachment to
the Union of
the "States", to
maintain which
it pledges all
its powers;
and that for
this end, it is
their duty to
watch over and
oppose every
infraction of those
principles
which
constitute the
"only
basis" of that
Union, because
a
faithful
observance of
them, can
alone secure
it's existence
and the public
happiness.
That
this Assembly
doth
explicitly and
peremptorily
declare, that
it views the
powers of the
federal
government, as
resulting from
the compact,
to which the
states are
parties; as
limited by the
"plain
sense and
intention" of the
instrument
constituting
the "compact"; as NO
further valid
that they are
authorized by
the grants
"ENUMERATED" in "THAT
COMPACT"; and that
in
case of a
deliberate,
palpable, and
dangerous
exercise of
other powers,
not granted by
the said
COMPACT, the STATES who are
parties
thereto, have the
right, and are
in DUTY bound,
to interpose for
arresting the
progress of
the "EVIL", and for
maintaining
within their respective
limits, the
authorities,
rights and
liberties
appertaining
to them.
That the
General
Assembly
doth also express its DEEP
REGRET, that a
spirit has in
sundry
instances, been
manifested
by the federal
government, to
"enlarge its
powers by FORCED
constructions" of the
constitutional
charter which
defines them;
and
that implications
have appeared
of a "design"to "EXPOUND" certain >>>"GENERAL
"PHRASES" (which
having been copied
from the very
limited grant of
power, in the
former articles of
confederation were
the less
liable to be
misconstrued) so as to
destroy the
meaning and
effect, of the
particular
"ENUMERATION"
which
NECESSARILY
EXPLAINS AND
LIMITS THE
GENERAL PHRASES;
and so as to
consolidate the
states by
degrees, into"ONE
SOVEREIGNTY"(APP:
i.e. "ONE
NATION" -
NO WHERE
INTENDED
by the
Founders),the
obvious
tendency
and INEVITABLE
CONSEQUENCE
of which would
be,
to >>>"TRANSFORM"the
present
"republican" "SYSTEM"(of which
there are numerous
"independent
Republics")
of the United
State"s", into "an
absolute", or
"at best" a MIXED
>>>"MONARCHY". ..."
----------
(APP:
a "Mixed
Monarchy" is a
ruling class
which we can see
emerging today
with two
Clintons and
three Bush's
attempting to
monopolize the
presidency and
control of the
United States -
this was warned
by George Mason
in the Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788)
----------
WE ARENOT
ONE NATION:
The above
Founders
documents show
we are NOT "One Sovereignty" and we are NOT "One Nation";
When
compared with
the Founders Original
intent as spoken
by James
Madison above in the
Virginia
Resolutions
1798 and in The
Virginia
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788
show how far we have
strayed from
the true
definition of
free republics, liberty
and freedom as
defined in the
Original
Founding Documents
and Original
LIMITED
Constitutional
COMPACT.
Our
states when
they transfer
undelegated
powers to the
federal
government and
federal
governments, dissolve
themselves
when they attempt to make us "One
Nation",
OR when either
of them
attempt to transfer
the authority
given to them
into the hands
of the United
Nations as
clearly
explained here
by Locke.
A more
accurate pledge would be
one that would
follow the
written intent
and principles
of freedom and
indicate the
flag follows
those
principles,
and one that would not
lend itself to
blind
nationalism;
or blindly
following a
image of
a flag whose
legislatures
change the meaning of on
a regular
basis;
or
to any such
blind national
socialism;
This
pledge would
be and we
propose:
New
Pledge of Allegiance:
"I
pledge
allegiance to those
Inalienable
Rights respecting
the
Laws of
Nature, which
defines
the
Flag of the
United States
of America;
and to
protecting our
Free Common
Law Societies
in which they
consent
to
form;
Independent
State
Republics,
United under
God, with
liberty and
justice for
all."
Richard Taylor
- American
Patriot Party
----------
LOCKE
CONTINUED:
#220. In these,
and the like
cases, when
the government
is DISSOLVED,
the people
are at liberty
to provide for
themselves by
erecting a new
legislative
differing from
the other by
the change of
persons, or
form, or both,
as they shall
find it most
for their
safety and
good.
For the society
can never, by
the fault of
another, lose
the native and
original right
it has to
preserve
itself,
which can only
be done by a
settled
legislative and
a fair and
impartial
execution of the
laws made by it.
But the state of
mankind is not
so miserable
that they are
not capable of
using this
remedy till it
be too late to
look for any. To
tell people they
may provide for
themselves by
erecting a new
legislative,
when, by
oppression,
artifice, or
being delivered
over to a
foreign power,
their old one is
gone, is only to
tell them they
may expect
relief when it
is too late, and
the evil is past
cure. This
is, in effect,
no more than
to bid them
first be
slaves, and
then to take
care of their
liberty, and,
when their
chains are on,
tell them they
may act like
free men.
This, if barely
so, is
rather mockery
than relief,
and men can
never be
secure from
tyranny if
there be no
means to
escape it till
they are
perfectly
under it;
and, therefore,
it is that
they have not
only a right
to get out of
it, but to
prevent it.
#221.
There is,
therefore,
secondly,
another way
whereby
governments
are dissolved,
and that is,
when the
legislative, or
the prince,
either of them act
contrary to
their trust.
For
the legislative
acts against the
trust reposed in
them when they
endeavour to
invade the
property of the
subject, and
to make
themselves, or
any part of
the community,
masters or
arbitrary
disposers of
the lives,
liberties, or
fortunes of
the people.
#222. The
reason why men
enter into
society is the
preservation
of their
property;
and the end
while they
choose and
authorise a
legislative is
that there may
be laws made,
and rules set, as
guards and
fences to the
properties of
all the
society,
to limit the
power and
moderate the
dominion of
every part and
member of the
society. For
since it can
never be
supposed to be
the will of
the society
that the
legislative
should have a
power to
destroy that
which every
one designs to
secure by
entering into
society,
and for which
the people
submitted
themselves to
legislators of
their own
making: whenever
the
legislators
endeavour to
take away and
destroy the
property of
the people, or
to reduce them
to slavery
under
arbitrary
power, they
put themselves
into a state
of war with
the people, who
are thereupon
absolved from
any farther
obedience, and
are left to
the common
refuge which
God hath
provided for
all men
against force
and violence.
Whensoever,
therefore, the
legislative
shall
transgress
this
fundamental
rule of
society, and
either by
ambition, fear,
folly,
or corruption,
...
(APP
Note: See this
in Samuel
Adams
Statement
within the
Rights of the
Colonists,
1772:
"If men
through fear,
fraud
or mistake,
should in
terms renounce
and give up
any essential
natural right,
the eternal
law of reason
and the great
end of
society, would
absolutely
vacate such
renunciation;
the right to
freedom being
the gift of
God Almighty,
it is not in
the power of
Man to
alienate this
gift, and
voluntarily
become a
slave.")
endeavour
to grasp
themselves, or PUT INTO THE HANDS OF "ANY OTHER",
an absolute
power over the
lives,
liberties, and
estates of the
people, by
this BREACH OF
TRUST they
forfeit the
power the
people had put
into their
hands for
quite contrary
ends, and it
devolves to
the people,
who have a
right to
resume
their original
liberty,
and by the
establishment of
a new
legislative
(such as they
shall think
fit), provide
for their own
safety and
security,
(APP
Note: See this
in the
Declaration of
Independence)which
is the end for
which they are
in society.
What I have said
here concerning
the legislative
in general holds
true also
concerning the
supreme
executor, who
having a double
trust put in
him, both to
have a part in
the legislative
and the supreme
execution of the
law, acts
against both,
when he goes
about to set up
his own
arbitrary will
as the law of
the society. He
acts also
contrary to his
trust when he
employs the
force, treasure,
and offices of
the society to
corrupt the
representatives
and gain them to
his purposes,
when he openly
pre-engages the
electors, and
prescribes, to
their choice,
such whom he
has, by
solicitation,
threats,
promises, or
otherwise, won
to his
"designs",
and employs them
to bring in such
who have
promised
beforehand what
to vote and what
to enact. Thus
to regulate
candidates and
electors, and
new model the
ways of
election, what
is it but to cut
up the
government by
the roots, and
poison the very
fountain of
public security?
For the people
having
reserved to
themselves the
choice of
their
representativesas the
fence to their
properties,
could do it for
no other end but
that they might
always be freely
chosen, and so
chosen, freely
act and advise
as the necessity
of the
commonwealth and
the public good
should, upon
examination and
mature debate,
be judged to
require. This,
those who give
their votes
before they hear
the debate, and
have weighed the
reasons on all
sides, are not
capable of
doing. To
prepare such an
assembly as
this, and
endeavour to set
up the declared
abettors of his
own will, for
the true
representatives
of the people,
and the
law-makers of
the society, is
certainly as
great a breach
of trust, and as
perfect adeclaration
of a "design"..."
(APP
Note: See this
in the
Declaration of
Independence
and compare
223-226:
" ...
But when a
long train of
abuses and
usurpations,
pursuing
invariably the
same object, evinces
a "design" to
reduce them
under absolute
despotism, it
is their right,
it is their duty,
to THROW OFF
such
government
and to provide
new guards for
their future
security.)
LOCKE CONTINUED: "...to subvert the
government, as
is possible to
be met with.
To which, if one
shall add
rewards and
punishments
visibly employed
to the same end,
and all the arts
of perverted law
made use of to
take off and
destroy all that
stand in the way
of such a
>>"design", and will not comply and consent to betray
the liberties
of their
country,
it will be
past doubt
what is doing.
What power they
ought to have in
the society who
thus employ it
contrary to the
trust that along
with it in its
first
institution, is
easy to
determine; and
one cannot but
see that he
who has once
attempted any
such thing as
this cannot
any longer be
trusted."
-------------------------
CBC SPECIAL
REPORT: Global
Warming
Doomsday
Called Off
"It is a mistake to think this fault
is proper only to
monarchies. Other
forms of government
are liable to it as
well as that;
forWHEREVER the power
that is put in any hands
for the government of
the people and the preservation
of their propertiesis applied to"other ends",
and made use of to "IMPOVERISH",
"HARASS", or "SUBDUE"
them to the ARBITRARY
and IRREGULAR
commands ofthose that
have it,
THERE it
presently becomes
TYRANNY,
whether
those that thus use it
are one or many.
Thus we read of the
thirty tyrants at
Athens, as well as one
at Syracuse; and the
intolerable dominion of
the Decemviri at Rome was
nothing better."
..."
-------------------------
FROM
DEBT - TO DEFENSELESSNESS
- TO
SLAVERY - UNITED STATES FINANCES CHINA'S MILITARYBUDGET ON DEBT INTEREST
ALONE
"...Forbes based his comments on fiscal 2011, in which the CBO
estimates the
government
will spend
$225 billion,
or
$616,438,356
per day, on
interest
payments.
China held
12.1 percent
of public debt
at the end of
February. So
if the 2011
estimates hold
and China
holds the same
proportion of
debt
throughout the
year, it would
receive about
$74.4
million per
day.
..."
That is 26
BILLION 156
MILLION A YEARIN INTEREST
ALONEALREADY
PAID - BACK IN
2011
!!!
Investments
the Chinese
make with this
money
compounds the
danger TEN
FOLD TIMES
TEN.
Free
trade is fine.
Handing our Country
for free to the
Chinese or reducing
our defense by
empowering a
Communist Country to
our eventual demise
is NOT.
Presently, the
interest owed on
money borrowed from
China and being paid
to China, is
financing a large
percentage of the
CHINESE MILITARY.
Interest
to the debt owed
to China By
2020, if not
curtailed, can
and will finance
the ENTIRE
CHINESE ANNUAL
MILITARY
BUDGET:
"As another example, in 2012 China published a defense
budget of RMB
670.274
billion,
with an
increase from
2011 of RMB
67.604 billion
and a growth
rate of 11.2
percent.
"
2013:
"....Military
spending is
set to rise
this year to 740.6 billion yuan ($119 billion) from 669.1 billion yuan, the
Ministry of
Finance said
in a report. China
has the
second-biggest
military
budget in
the world
after the
U.S., which
spent nearly
six times more
on defense
than China
last year and
is now cutting
those outlays.
..."
We are presently
financing and
arming our
potential future enemies IN MASS.
-------------------------
CHINA
ARMED BY US
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - WHILE
UNITED STATES
CITIZENS ARE
DISARMED
BY STATE &
US FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT
APPARENTLY
OUR STATE AND
FEDERAL
REPRESENTATIVES
BELIEVE THE
CHINESE
MILITARY HAVE
A GREATER
RIGHT TO BEAR
ARMS AND SELF
PRESERVATION
THAN THE
CITIZENS OF
THE UNITED
STATES.
Our Federal and
State SO CALLED
Representatives
are financing
through wasteful
spending, lavish
salary raises
and retirements,
forced taxation
to pay for
forced UNION
"MAXIMUM" WAGES,
WASTEFUL
CORPORATE
CONTRACTS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL
AND NEEDLESS
UNENDING WARS
and DEBT CREATED
BY THESE to
which the
interest owed
China is now
the Arming of
Chinese with
Machine guns,
Tanks, Cannons,
Missiles, Jet
fighters and
Nuclear
Arsenals;
ALL
WHILE passing
laws here to
prohibit
citizens from
from owning even a machine gun to defend
ourselves,
communities and
countries.
How more stupid
and ignorant can
those "so called"
"REPRESENTATIVES"
"you" have elected
be?
But it is a fact
that these
representatives
are not "stupid
and ignorant",
but
fully aware and
calculating;
These
Representatives,
every one, are
guilty of rendering
aid to our enemies;
These
representatives,
every one, are
guilty of the crimes
of treason; Those
who support or
protect them in any
fashion bear the
same title - your
duty to a "job" does
not exceed your DUTY
to uphold the
Constitution or
Essential Natural
Rights
which exceed even
the Constitution as
our Founders have
established.
Neither retirement
nor time can reduce
these crimes these
corrupted
representatives
have already
committed.
Are
you ready to READ
and LEARN?
ARE
YOU READY TO VOTE
FOR ("so called" by
the Socialist
Collectives Left and
Socialist Corporates
Collectives False
Right )
"RADICAL"
Constitutionalism
the Founders
readily
PRESCRIBED YET?
...YES?
OR......Maybe
you want to "wait"
just a "little
longer"?... and
"hope" it gets
"better"......
NO?
Then how ready
are you to put
the federal
government
back in it's "10
MILE SQUARE
BOX" intended for the federal government and all their
"DEPARTMENTS" before they Enslave you to a point you cannot even defend
yourself? Don't
Know
what
>>>>
"BOX" I
speak
of?
......... Are
You Ready to
Learn?
.......Lets
see if you
are....
Virgina
Ratifying
Convention
6-16-1788:
JAMES
MADISON:
(Author of the
Constitution)
"Mr. Chairman:
...I CANNOT
COMPREHEND
that the (FEDERAL LEGISLATURES, EXECUTIVE, FEDERAL SUPREME COURT,
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
AND ALL THEIR
"DEPARTMENTS")
"power
of LEGISLATING"
over a "SMALL"
"DISTRICT"(Washington
, DC -
DISTRICT
CAPITOL),
which
>>>"CANNOTEXCEED"
>>>"TEN
MILES SQUARE",
(
I.E. ......THE
>>>>>>>
"BOX"
)
and may
>>>"NOT
BE"
more than "ONE"
MILE,
(Limit of
Physical Structures)
will involve
the DANGERS which he (Patrick
Henry)apprehends.
..."
SEE
THE PHYSICAL
LIMITS OF
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT?
Getting
smarter? Want
to learn more?
Keep Reading
and Read the Links
provided as
well.
Right now,
even those
that are being
propped
up as
"Patriotic", are setting you up for
another
fall.
How? Because
most of the
Citizenry have
never read what
real
freedom is;
and they are
using that
ignorance to
set you up.
"RAND"
Paul and including
such others as
Matt Kibbe -
Freedomworks,
Mike Huckabee,
Sean Hannity,
Glenn
Beck,
Mark Levin and
others;
who are
promoting a
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
"UN-ENUMERATED"
FLAT SALES TAX
or "FAIRTAX"
that will "SHOE
HORN" the
federal
governments
control
over the
states and
local
communities;
Which is very
foolish and
IGNORANT.
See more on Taxes Below.
RAND
Paul is also trying
to establish and
continue to empower
"Undelegated federal
powers of "certain
crimes" to
unconstitutionally
regulate the
states and
local
communities;
SUCH AS - EXCHANGING
the regulating
power
practiced with
Roe VS Wade
with yet
another
UN-DELEGATED
FEDERAL power
over the
states,
"INSTEAD OF" simply
removing the
"unconstitutional
Federal Power"
that enforces
Roe vs
Wade
and replace it
with
"NOTHING"; and
then let the
local
communities
regulate it;
By placing the
issues where
they belong -
WITH THE STATES
AND LOCAL
COMMUNITIES -
it would
resolve many of
the "just
issues" Rand
wishes to
accomplish;
Simply
continuing to give
issues to a
federal
court;
Giving to it
authority to
decide where it
has absolutely NO
Constitutional
authority, is not
the way. This
simply allows the
federal government
to arrogate or
continue to
arrogate
undelegated powers
under a "PRETENSE
OF AUTHORITY".
CAUTION
NOTE
THAT EVERY
OTHER PARTY
(and almost
every talk
show host and
public figure) is
following and
promoting distorted
and deceptive
definitions of
the
Constitution.
Claiming to
defend the
Constitution
on one hand,
while
continuing to
hack at
the
Constitution's
roots with
the other.
ONLY
the AMERICAN
PATRIOT PARTY is
following the
Founders
INTENT,
Constitutional
Ratified
Blueprint,
Common Law
Definitions
of True Free
Societies and
that of
Independent
Local and
Well
Representative
Constitutional
Republics.
Read
us and see for
yourself.
If you trust
yourself to
any other
party or
organizational
leadership, you WILL
be misled and
deceived.
TAXES
AN
IMPORTANT
MESSAGE FROM THE
AMERICAN PATRIOT
PARTY ON
TAXATION:
DO
NOT BE TAKEN
IN BY NEW
TAX
SCHEMES -
SUCH AS THE
NATIONAL
FLAT TAX OR
FAIRTAX;
DO NOT LET OLD
TAX SCHEMES
SUCH AS THE INCOME
TAX REMAIN.
THE
INCOME TAX:
The INCOME
TAX is not unconstitutional
because it was, or
was not, Ratified by
enough states (as
often surmised);
The INCOME TAX IS
"UNCONSTITUTIONAL"
"BECAUSE" IT IS A
EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED
"ARROGATION" OF
POWER - OUTSIDE THE
LIMITED DELEGATED
POWERS GRANTED.
THIS TYPE OF TAX
"CANNOT BE RATIFIED" BY THE
STATES TO AMEND
THE CONSTITUTION
AND ARROGATE A
POWER "NO WHERE
INTENDED" UPON
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT.
Changing the
"LIMITED" power of
"ENUMERATED"
taxation which is
a DELEGATED POWER,
into a "UNLIMITED"
"UN-ENUMERATED" form
of taxation OUTSIDE
the DELEGATED POWER,
is an ARROGATION OF
POWER. It is a "NEW
POWER", EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.
PATRICK
HENRY
(WARNS): "...I
conjure you once
more to remember
the admonition
of that sage man
who told you
that,
"when
you give power, you
know not what
you give".
I
know the
absolute
necessity of
an energetic
government.
But
is it
consistent
with any
principle of
prudence or
good policy to
grant
unlimited,
unbounded
authority,
which is so
totally
unnecessary
that gentlemen
say it will
"never be
exercised"?
But
gentlemen say
that we must
make
experiments.
A
wonderful and
unheard-of
experiment it
will be, to
give "unlimited
power
unnecessarily"! ..." "...The experience of the world teaches
me the
jeopardy of
giving
enormous
power. Strike this clause out of the form of the
government,
and how will
it stand?
Congress will
still have
power, by the sweeping (supremacy) clause
, to make laws within that {438} place and the
strongholds, independently of the local authority of the state. I ask you, if this clause
be struck out,
whether the sweeping clause
will
not enable
them to
protect
themselves
from insult. If you grant them these powers, you destroy "every
degree of
responsibility". They will fully screen them from justice, and
preclude the
possibility of
punishing
them. No
instance can
be given of
such a wanton
grasp of power
as an
exclusive
legislation
"in all cases
whatever"."
EDMUND PENDLETON:
"...I
understand that
(Supremacy
- Sweeping) clause
as NOT
going a "SINGLE
STEP BEYOND"
the "DELEGATED
powers"
(APP: i.e.
THE POWER IS
LIMITED TO
THE DELEGATED
POWERS
AND THESE CAN
NEVER BE CHANGED
- THIS
IS WHAT MAKES
US A REPUBLIC
UNDER A
"ORIGINAL
COMPACT").
What
can it act upon?
Some power
given by "THIS" Constitution. If
they should be
about to pass a
law in consequence
of this clause,
they must pursue
some of the "DELEGATED
powers", but
can by "NO
MEANS" DEPART
from them,
(N)OR
"ARROGATE"
"ANY NEW" powers;
for the PLAIN
LANGUAGE of
the clause is, to
give them power to
pass laws in order
to give "effect"
to the "DELEGATED"
powers"."
GEORGE
NICHOLAS:
"...If
I understand it
right, NO
"NEW" power
can be
exercised."
JAMES
MADISON:
"....The honorable
member (PATRICK
HENRY)
asks, Why ask
for this power, and
if the subsequent
clause be not fully
competent for
the same purpose. If
so, WHAT
NEW TERRORS
can arise from this
particular
clause?
It is only a
superfluity.
If that "LATITUDE"
of "CONSTRUCTION"which he contends
for were to take
place
with
respect to the "sweeping
(supremacy
Article 1 -
Section 8)
clause", there
"WOULD"
be room for those
HORRORS.But it gives "NO"
supplementary
power. It only
enables them to
execute the
"DELEGATED
powers".
"IF" the "DELEGATION"
(SET
LIMITATIONS)
of their powers be "SAFE"
(UN-CORRUPTED
FROM THEIR ORIGINAL
INTENT AND FORM), no
possible
inconvenience can
arise from this
clause.
It is at most "BUT"
explanatory...."
GEORGE
NICHOLAS:
The
gentleman last up
(PATRICK
HENRY)
says that the
power of
legislation
includes every
thing. A general
power of
legislation does.
But
this is a "special
power" of
legislation. Therefore,
it does "NOT
contain that
plenitude of power
which he imagines. They
(The
Federal
Government,
Executive,
Federal
Legislative and
Federal Supreme
Court)"CANNOT
LEGISLATE" in "ANY
case" but those
"PARTICULARLY
ENUMERATED" (DELEGATED).
APP: The
Ratifying and
AMENDMENT
PROCESSES of the
Constitution were
established to
make changes
"WITHIN" the
DELEGATED powers;
These processes
were to limit and
correct
unnecessary power
and
only WITHIN the
DELEGATED
powers;
These
processes were
NEVER MEANT to
ARROGATE "NEW"
POWERS upon the
federal government at
the will of
the state or
federal
representatives
outside of the
very
limited
DELEGATED
powers.
-------------------------
DANGER!
NATIONALFLAT TAX
/ FAIRTAXDECEPTION
A NATIONAL "FLAT
TAX" OR THE
"FAIRTAX" WILL
ENSLAVE YOU
FURTHER;
ATTEMPTS ARE BEING
MADE TO DECEIVE
YOU BY NATIONAL
CORPORATE &
UNION MEDIA.
Mark
Levin and other
talk show hosts (including
RAND Paul -
Flat Tax)
are promoting the
FairTax and or
Flat Tax. DO
NOT BE FOOLED!
Like the
Income Tax,
these are UNENUMERATED tax schemes. Worse
yet, these
tax schemes
invite the
federal
government
into your
state to
define "WHAT IS AND WHAT IS NOT A BUSINESS"! Using
this
reasoning will
allow the FairTax
and Flat Tax to
invite and
"shoehorn" the
federal
government right
into your home
and computer;
This is
as everything,
including your
person and
labor, will be
considered "a
business";
opening
everyone and
everything to
be scrutinized
by the NEW JOINT Federal / StateHybrid
form of the
IRS Created by
the FAIRTAX
and FLAT TAX
Systems. The FairTax and Flat Tax systems are
BUY, SELL and TRADE
TAXES. They further do not get rid of the
IRS, they
simply change
the name to a
far
more dangerous
and invasive
bureaucracy.
They simply
insure that
the waste in
government
continue; Both
tax schemes
are
like the
income tax,
they use
jealousy to
sell you into
deeper
slavery.
The
people that
are promoting
these
unconstitutional
tax systems
are also
stating they
are for
obeying the
Constitution.
This is clear
deception.
Remember - RAND
PAUL IS
NOT RON
PAUL;
RON PAUL
as with other
true
Constitutionalists
understand the
limitation of
the
Constitution
and want
to get rid of
the IRS and
Income tax and
replace them
with NOTHING!
This
will change
everything to
the BETTER.
Mark
Levin, Sean Hannity,
Glenn Beck
(all promoting
the same
corporate
message), RAND
PAUL and other
republicans
and democrats,
as well as
special
interests such
as
FREEDOMWORKS,
all want to
maintain the
flow of FLAT
PERCENTAGE
UN-ENUMERATED
TAX
MONEY to the
federal
government by
simply
changing the FORM
of the IRS. (Even
though they
"preach"
differently).
The
FairTax
and Flat Tax
"Tax Schemes"
will CHANGE
NOTHING; But they will in fact
make things WORSE;
This is
because it
will give "more invasive power" to the federal government
and
"tighter grip" over your "local and state laws"!
You
will jump from
the frying pan
into the FIRE!
Every gain in "other areas" against
a tyrannical
government
will mean
"NOTHING"; ---
"UNLESS" the tyrannical grip upon the "purse strings" are "pried from
their
fingers"; and
the power is
returned to
the states and
local
communities so
that their CONSENT
must be
granted to an
"ENUMERATED"
TAX, "BEFORE"
it is directed
to be
collected - as
originally
established in
the
Constitution.
Anything less, will
allow the tyrannical
government to finance
and shield itself from
necessary change which
will return us to true
representative
government as the
Founders intended.
Let
these talk
show hosts and
representatives
know that this
is NOT THE
WAY!
BE
RELENTLESS!
YOU AND THEY -
ARE BEING SET
UP FOR A FALL!
-------
LET US
REVIEW THE
FACTS:
The Original
Constitution
was written to
safeguard
against such corruption
and abuse of
power. All
taxation had
to be ENUMERATED
BEFORE
CONSENSUALLY
being
collected, it
was also
derived from
imports,
collected
simply from
viewing the
finished
product; so
your business
affairs,
income and
papers
were private:
Article
1 Section 9:"No Capitation, or OTHER direct, Tax shall be laid,
"UNLESS" in
"Proportion to
the Census or
"ENUMERATION"
herein "BEFORE"
directed to be
taken. "
....This
allows you the
time and means to
grant your
"CONSENT" before
it is "taken".
Amendment XVI:
"The Congress
shall have power
to lay and collect
taxes on incomes,
from whatever
source derived,
without
apportionment
among the several
States, and "WITHOUT
REGARD"
to any census of
"ENUMERATION"."
The
Federal Government
Takes your money
FIRST in a "FLAT"
PERCENT ...THEN
decides what
THEY are going to
spend it on "AFTER"
they
TAKE
IT.
......"WITHOUT
YOUR CONSENT".
-------
Can you SEE
THE NECESSITY
of ENUMERATED
TAXATION!!!
...The Founders did!!
SEE THE ARROGATED
POWER?!
SUCH
"UN-ENUMERATED"
"FLAT PERCENTAGE"
TAXATION
TAKEN
CONTROL OF FIRST,
WHERE CONSENT IS
NEAR IMPOSSIBLE
TO BE OF ANY
EFFECT,
CAN "NEVER"
BE
"CONSTITUTIONAL";
AND "RATIFYING"
SUCH
TAXATION, CAN
NEVER BE MADE TO
"AMEND" THE
CONSTITUTION.
NO MATTER
HOW MANY
STATES "RATIFY
IT"!.
NO
MATTER WHAT
YOU NAME IT.
NOTE:
The income tax
was found
unconstitutional
twice by the
Supreme Court
before
corruption
entered and
renamed a direct
tax a "indirect
tax" and used as
an excuse to
arrogate new
powers expressly
prohibited - It
is in fact still
unconstitutional
and still an new
arrogated power;
Further, ALL
taxes are
DIRECT; a "INDIRECT"
tax is simply a
"DIRECT" tax
taken from you
in a different
way or made to
be taken from
you by
someone else
first -
Redefining a
tax as
indirect is NO
EXCUSE to tax
you without
your CONSENT
or as a "MEANS"
to arrogate a
taxing and spending
power beyond
the very
limited
DELEGATED powers.
Here the
Founders
establish that
creating a new
>>>>>>>"MEANS" to "ARROGATE"
A NEW POWER
(WAY) OF
TAXATION
is EXPRESSLY
PROHIBITED.
Mr.
EDMUND
PENDELTON: "....With respect to the necessity of the ten
miles square
(Washington,
DC) being
superseded by
the subsequent
clause, which
gives them (the federal government) power to "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for
carrying into
execution the
foregoing
powers, and
all other
powers vested
by this
Constitution
in the
government of
the United
States, or in
any department
or officer
thereof",
I understand
that clause as
NOT going a "SINGLE
STEP BEYOND" the "DELEGATED
powers". What
can it act
upon? Some
power given by
THIS
Constitution.
If they (the federal legislature)
should be
about to pass
a law in
consequence of
this clause,
they must
pursue some of
the "DELEGATED
powers",
but can by
>>>>>>>"NO
MEANS"
DEPART from
them, (N)OR "ARROGATE"
(create)
"ANY NEW"
powers;
for the PLAIN
LANGUAGE
of the clause
is, to give
them power to
pass laws in
order to give
"effect"
to the "DELEGATED"
powers"."
See Also:
"Declaration
of
Independence"
- "17th Grievance"
Quote below defining
Taxation
WITHOUT "
CONSENT" is TYRANNY.
-------
If the federal government
stayed within
their
"delegated"
powers,
funding the
necessary
expenditures
and paying the
national debt
and national
defense would
be easy.
Force the
federal
government
stay within
the limited DELEGATED
powers;
Force them
by not funding
them to be
wasteful,
manipulative
and
tyrannical;
Stop paying for
your own
enslavement
and
destruction.
Stop
allowing State
born Exclusive
Privileges;
Get Unions,
Corporations and Tax
Supported Special
Interests out of
Government.
Remove ALL
Lobbyists from
Washington DC.
Limit them to your
states where they
must confront the
local citizens of
the state and not
manipulate our state
representatives in
our national
government in places
far distant from the
citizens that are
most effected by any
legislation.
Reduce the size of
states so that
there is adequate
representation and
not the manipulative
government which
occurs from "Distant
Legislatures";
"NULLIFICATION"
is "the proper
remedy" when
delegated powers
have been exceeded.
Some
links will still bring
you to our original
sight anyway.
We are working to
update page links to
correct this.
Thank
you for your
patience.
Here
are some defining
words from the
Founders:
Enjoy and Educate
Others!
Lessons
of our Founders:
-------------------------
LIMITS
ON FEDERAL
POWER
James Madison -
Author of the
Constitution -
Virginia
Resolution 1798: "...That
this state having
by its Convention,
which ratified the
federal
Constitution,
expressly declared,
that "AMONG
OTHER ESSENTIAL
RIGHTS",
"the Liberty of
Conscience and of
the Press "CANNOT
BE CANCELED",
abridged,
restrained,
OR
MODIFIED
by "ANY
AUTHORITY"
of the "United
States" (federal
government),"
(APP:
This includes
Executive Orders
(which in itself
is
unconstitutional),
Legislative or
Supreme
Court) "...and from its extreme anxiety to guard these
rights
from EVERY
possible attack
of "SOPHISTRY
or AMBITION", having with other states, recommended an
amendment for that
purpose, which
amendment was, in
due time, ANNEXED
to the
Constitution; it
would mark a "REPROACHABLE"
inconsistency,
and "CRIMINAL
DEGENERACY",
if an indifference
were now shewn, to
the most palpable
violation of ONE
OF THE RIGHTS,
thus declared
and secured;
and to the
establishment of a
PRECEDENT (UNDER
A PRETENSE
OF AUTHORITY)
which may be FATAL
TO THE OTHER (RIGHTS)...."
----------------------
Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322.
"...On every question of "CONSTRUCTION", let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the DEBATES (i.e. THE RATIFYING CONVENTIONS), and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the "probable one" in which it was passed". "
---------------------
Virginia
"Ratifying
Convention"
6-16-1788 -
George
Nicholas:
"...Congress have
power to define and
punish: a.) piracies
and felonies
committed on the
high seas, and b.)
offenses against the
laws of nations;
(c.) Treason &
d.) Counterfeit of
Coin) ....but they
(APP: the federal
government,
executive,
legislature or
supreme court) CANNOTDEFINE
or PRESCRIBE
the PUNISHMENT
of "ANY
OTHER CRIME
WHATEVER", WITHOUT
"VIOLATING the
CONSTITUTION"...."
2.
" Resolved,
That the
Constitution of the
United States,
having "DELEGATED"
to Congress a power
to punish:
a.) treason, b.)
counterfeiting the
securities and
current coin of
the United States,
c.)
piracies, and
felonies committed
on the high seas (only),
and
d.) offenses
against the law of
nations,
and >>>>
NO OTHER CRIMES
>>>"WHATSOEVER";
and it being true
as a
general
principle,
and one of the
amendments to the
Constitution
having also
declared, that
"the powers not
delegated to
the United States by
the Constitution,
not prohibited by it
to the States,are reserved to the States respectively,
or
to the people,"therefore
the act of Congress,
passed on the 14th day
of July, 1798, and
intituled "An Act in
addition to the act
intituled An Act for
the punishment of
certain crimes against
the United States," as
also the act passed by
them on the — day of
June, 1798, intituled
"An Act to punish
frauds committed on
the bank of the United
States," (>>>>
and ALL their
OTHER ACTS which
assume to CREATE,
DEFINE,
or PUNISHcrimes,
OTHER than
THOSE so
"ENUMERATED" in
the Constitution,)
>>> are "ALTOGETHER"
"VOID",
and of "NO
FORCE";
and that the power to create, define, and punish
such OTHER
CRIMES is
RESERVED,
and, "OF RIGHT",
appertains
SOLELY
and EXCLUSIVELY
to the
respective "STATES",
each within its
own
territory..."
------------------
Virginia
"Ratifying
Convention"
6-16-1788
- Mr.
PENDLETON.
"Mr. Chairman, this
(SWEEPING
i.e. SUPREMACY)
clauseDOES
"NOT" give
Congress power to
impede the
operation of ANY
PART of the
Constitution,(N)or
to make"ANY
REGULATION"
that(EVEN)"MAY"affect the
interests of the
citizensof the>>>"UNION
AT LARGE"....
(APP: Think
about that,....
thenNote
that the federal
government has
NO AUTHORITY to
GOVERN POLICE of
ANY KIND,
OUTSIDE the
Washington DC -
i.e. what the
Founders
described as the
10 MILES SQUARE
and can make NO
LAW that EVEN
MAY EFFECT THE
CITIZENS of the
UNION at LARGE -
Here he
continues...)
"....But
it gives them power
over the "LOCAL"
police of "THE
PLACE", so as to be
secured from any
interruption in their
proceedings.
Notwithstanding the
violent attack upon
it, I believe, sir,this
is the "fair
CONSTRUCTION of
the(SWEEPING
i.e. SUPREMACY)
clause". It
gives them power of
exclusive
legislation in any
case WITHIN
>>>"THAT
DISTRICT"(WASHINGTON,
DC).
What is the
meaning of this? What is it
opposed to?Is it
opposed to the
general powers of
the federal
legislature, or to
those of the state
legislatures?I
understand it as
opposed to the
legislative power of
that state "WHERE"
IT SHALL "BE".What,
then, is the
power? "IT
IS",
that Congress shall
exclusively
legislate"THERE", in order
to
preserve {440} serve
the "POLICE"
OF "THE
PLACE"
and their "OWN" "PERSONAL"independence, that
they may not be
overawed or insulted, and
of course to
preserve them in
opposition to
any attempt by the
stateWHERE
IT SHALL "BE"
, this
is theFAIR
"CONSTRUCTION"...."
(of
the SWEEPING
i.e. SUPREMACY
clause)
-------------------
FBI, CIA, ATF,
ICE etc. All are
policing OUTSIDE the
10 miles Square of
Washington, DC;
and ALL
OUTSIDE FEDERAL
LIMITS OF AUTHORITY.
ALL UNDER
THE "PRETENSE"OF
AUTHORITY.
Any attempt to
claim Authority by the
Federal Government,
which was NOT
DELEGATED in the "Original
Compact" is
an ARROGATION of POWER
which is Expressly
Prohibited (See
Virginia Ratifying
Convention 6-16-1788);
#1:
"...this COMPACTwas "NOT"
made the exclusive
or final judge of
the extent of the(federal)
powers delegated
to ITSELF
(federal
government -
i.e. The Federal
Supreme Court,
Executive or
Legislative are NOT
the final judge);since
that would have
made "IT'S" (the
federal
government's) "DISCRETION",
and "NOT THE
CONSTITUTION",
the "MEASURE" of
its powers;but that, as
in ALL OTHER CASES
of compact among
powers having no
common judge, each
party (STATE)
has anEQUAL
right to judge for
itself,
as well of
infractions as of
the mode and
"MEASURE" of
redress.
JAMES MADISON. (Author
of the Constitution)
"Mr. Chairman: ...I cannot
comprehend
that the (FEDERAL
LEGISLATURES,
EXECUTIVE, FEDERAL
SUPREME COURT,
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT)
"power
of LEGISLATING"
over a "SMALL
DISTRICT"(Washington
, DC), which
>>>"CANNOTEXCEED"
>>>TEN
MILES SQUARE,
and may >>>"NOT BE"
more than "ONE"
MILE,
will involve the
dangers which he (Patrick
Henry)
apprehends. ..."
Think
about that physical
limitation the
founders intended.
"...History
furnishes no
example of a free
republic, any
thing like the
extent of the
United States.
The Grecian
republics were of
small extent; so
also was that of
the Romans. Both
of these, it is
true, in
process of time,
extended their
conquests over large
territories of
country; and the
consequence was, that their
governments were CHANGED FROM that of free
governments >>>
to those of the MOST
"TYRANNICAL"
that ever
existed in the
world..."
The federal
governments
"supremacy"
powers under the
"supremacy
(sweeping)
clause"
was, and still
is, limited to
the "10 miles
square" of
Washington DC.
The supreme
law of
the "land"?
Clearly
by the
founders own
words
"LAND"
supremacy clause meant
ONLY WITHIN
The 10 MILES
SQUARE and
"WITHIN"
the DELEGATED
powers only.
As
established in
this day
Ratifying
Convention (click
link for full
Convention
text) DEPARTMENTS
were LIMITED
to the 10
MILES SQUARE; the
federal
government CANNOT
GOVERN POLICE
outside
the 10
miles square;
CANNOT
"DEFINE", "PRESCRIBE"
OR
"PROSECUTE"
BUT FOUR
CRIMES:
1.)
Treason, 2.)
Piracy on the
High
Seas (only),
3.) Law of
Nations, 4.)
Counterfeit of
coin;
Can collect
TAXES under
the "WELFARE
CLAUSE" for ONLY
2 THINGS
- NATIONAL
DEBT and NATIONAL
DEFENSE .
Mr.
GEORGE MASON.
"Mr. Chairman,
gentlemen say
there is no
new power
given by this
clause.
Is
there any
thing in this
Constitution
which secures
to the states
the powers
which are said
to be
retained? Will powers
remain to the
states which
are not
expressly
guarded and
reserved? I
will suppose a
case.
Gentlemen may
call it an
impossible
case, and "suppose"
that Congress
will act with
wisdom and
integrity.
Among the
enumerated
powers,
Congress are
to lay and
collect taxes,
duties,
imposts, and
excises, and
to pay the
debts, and to
provide for
the general
welfare and
common
defence;
and by
that clause (so often
called the sweeping
clause) they are to
make all laws
necessary to
execute those
laws. Now,
suppose
oppressions
{442} should
arise under "this"
(US Federal)
government, and any
writer should
dare to stand
forth, and
expose to the
community at
large the
abuses of "those"powers; could not
Congress,
under the "idea"
of
providing for
the"general
welfare", and
under their "OWN"
"CONSTRUCTION", say that
this was
destroying the"general
peace",
encouraging sedition, and "poisoning the minds of the
people"? And
could they
not, in order
to provide
against this,
lay a
dangerous
restriction On
the press?
(APP:
Exactly what
happened 10
years after
the
Constitution
in the Alien
and Sedition
Acts by
the federal
Government and
stopped by the "Virginia and Kentucky
Resolutions";
Such similar
attacks
on on
the freedom of
speech
has
been recently
promoted by
today's
federal
representatives)
Might they not even
bring the trial of
this restriction
within the ten
miles square,when
there is no
prohibition
against it?
Might they not thus
destroy the trial by
jury? Would they not
"extend"
their
implication?
It
appears to me that
they MAY and "WILL". And
shall the support of
our rights depend on
the bounty of men "whose
interest it may be
to oppress us"?
That
Congress should have
power to provide for
the general
welfare (APP
Note: Defense against
"Foreign" aggression) of
the Union, I grant.
But I
wish a clause in the
Constitution, with
respect to ALL
powers which
are NOT granted,
that they are retained
by the states.
Otherwise, the
power of providing
for the "general
welfare" may be
"perverted to its
destruction".
Many gentlemen,
whom I respect, take
different sides of
this question. We
wish this
amendment to be
introduced, to
remove our
apprehensions.There was a
clause in the
Confederation
reserving to the
states
respectively every
power,
jurisdiction, and
right, not
expressly
delegated to the
United States.
This clause has
never been
complained of, but
approved by all
Why not, then,
have a similar
clause in this
Constitution,
in which it is the
more indispensably
necessary than in
the Confederation,
because of the
great augmentation
of power vested in
the former? In my
humble
apprehension,
unless there be
some such clear
and finite
expression, this
clause now under
consideration will
go to any thing
our rulers may
think proper.Unless there
be some express
declaration that
every thing not
given is retained, it will
be carried toany power
Congress may
please.
It
was answered:
Mr.
GEORGE NICHOLAS,
in reply to the
gentlemen opposed
to the clause
under debate, went
over the
same grounds, and
developed the same
principles, which
Mr. Pendleton and
Mr. Madison had
done. The opposers
of the {443}
clause, which gave
the power of
providing for the
general welfare,
supposed its
dangers to result
from its
connection with,
and extension of,
the powers granted
in the other
clauses. He
endeavored to show
the committee that
it only empowered
Congress to
make such
laws as would be
necessary to
enable them to pay
the public debts
and provide
for the common
defence;
>that
this "GENERAL
WELFARE" was
united, "NOT" to "the
general power of
legislation",
but to the >PARTICULAR
power> of laying and
collecting taxes,
imposts, and
excises,
for the "PURPOSE"
of paying the
DEBTS and
providing for the
"COMMON DEFENCE",
that is, that
they could raise (APP:
ONLY)
AS "MUCH"
money as would pay the "DEBTS"
and provide for the
"COMMON
DEFENCE",
in "CONSEQUENCE
OF THIS POWER".
The clause
which was
affectedly called
the sweeping
(SUPREMACY) clause contained "NO new
grant of power".
To
illustrate this
position, he
observed that, if
it had been added
at the end of
every one of the
enumerated powers,
instead of being
inserted at the
end of all, it would be
obvious to any one
that it was "NO"
augmentation of
power. If, for
instance, at the
end of the clause
granting power to
lay and collect
taxes, it had been
added that they
should have power
to make necessary
and proper laws to
lay and collect
taxes, who could
suspect it to be
an addition of
power?
As it would
grant "NO" new
power if inserted
at the end of each
clause, it could not
when subjoined to
the whole.
He then
proceeded thus: But,
says he, who is to
determine the extent
of such powers? I
say, the same
power which, in ALL
well-regulated
communities,
(COUNTY,
STATE, ANY ORGANIZED
COMMUNITIES
THAT ESTABLISH
CONSENT)
determines the
"extent" of
"legislative" powers.
If they exceed
these powers,the"JUDICIARY"
"WILL" (WHERE ARE
OUR LOCAL JUDGES!)
declare it
"VOID", or "ELSE"
"the PEOPLE"
will have a "RIGHT"
to declare it "VOID".
Is this depending on
any man? But, says
the gentleman, it
may go to any thing.
It may destroy the
trial by jury; and
they may say it is
necessary for
providing for the
general defence. The
power of providing
for the general
defence only extends
to raise any sum of
money they may think
necessary, by taxes,
imposts, But, says
he, our only defence
against oppressive
laws consists in the
virtue of our
representatives. This
was
misrepresented.
If
I understand it
right, NO "NEW"
POWER can be EXERCISED.
As to those which
are actually granted,
we trust to the
fellow-feelings of our
representatives;and if we
are deceived, we
then "trust
to altering our
{444} government"."
Ask yourself.
Is our federal
government,
through
our federal so
called
representatives,
collecting
taxes under
the "welfare
clause" for
things
"OTHER
THAN" the
national debt
and national
defense?
...
Getting
smarter?
PROPERTY
RIGHTS AND
LIMITATIONS
OF
CONDEMNATION
Now
let us look at
the limited
power of
Condemnation
which
DEFINITION has
been so
corrupted by
state and
federal
governments.
The limited
condemnation clause
was a war powers act
for "TEMPORARY"
temporary " taking", NOT
TO TAKE AND KEEP;
Nor an excuse for
state governments to
take the meaning to
empower themselves or
the federal government
with the misuse of the
term.
Taking property
without CONSENT has
never been, nor will
it ever be a component
of freedom or of free
government:
JOHN
LOCKE: 140:"....for
if any one shall
claim a power to
lay and levy TAXES
on the people "by
his own
authority", and
without such
"CONSENT of the
people", he
thereby "invades
the fundamental
law of PROPERTY",
and "subverts the
end of
government".
>>>
For "what
property have I"
in that which
another may
"by right" "TAKE"when he pleases
to himself?
JOHN
LOCKE:141.
Fourthly.
The legislative
CANNOT transfer
the power of
making laws to ANY
OTHER HANDS, for
it being but a
delegated power
from the people,
they who have it
"CANNOT PASS" it
over to OTHERS.
JOHN
LOCKE:149:And
thus the community perpetually
retains asupreme
power of saving
themselvesfrom
the attempts and
designs of
"ANYBODY", even
of their
"LEGISLATORS", whenever
they shall be so
foolish or so
wicked as
to lay and carry
on "designs"
against the
LIBERTIES AND
PROPERTIES of the
subject.
JOHN
LOCKE:151:
"...But
yet it is to be
observed that though
oaths of allegiance
and fealty are taken
to him (The
Executive),
it is NOT
to him as supreme
legislator, but as
supreme executor of
the law made by a
joint power of him
with others,>>>allegiance
being nothing
but an obedience
according to
law, which, when
he VIOLATES,
he has "NO
right to
obedience",
nor can claim it
otherwise than as
the public person
vested with the
power of the law,
and so is to be
considered as the
image, phantom, or
representative of
the commonwealth,
acted by the will of
the society declared
in its laws, and
thus he has no
will, no power,
but that of the
law. But when
he quits
this
representation,
this public will,
and acts by his
own private will,he DEGRADES
HIMSELF,
and is but a single
private person
WITHOUT POWER
and without
will; the
members owing NO
OBEDIENCE but to
the public will
of the society
(i.e. LAW OF THE
CONSTITUTION).
JOHN
LOCKE:155:"It
may be demanded
here, what
if the executive
power, being
possessed of the
force of the
commonwealth,
shall make use of
that force to
hinder the meeting
and acting of the
legislative, when
the original
constitution or the
public exigencies
require it?I
say, using force
upon the people,
without
authority, and
CONTRARY TO THE
TRUST
(i.e. LIMITS SET
DOWN BY THE
CONSTITUTION) put
in him that does
so,
>>>is a
"STATE OF WAR
WITH THE PEOPLE",
who have a right
to reinstate their
legislative in the
exercise of their
power. For having
erected a
legislative with an
intent they should
exercise the power
of making laws,
either at certain
set times, or when
there is need of it,
when they are
hindered by any
force from what is
so necessary to
the society,
and wherein the
safety and
preservation of the
people consists, the
people have a
"RIGHT TO REMOVE
IT BY FORCE".In all
states and
conditions the
true remedy of
force "WITHOUT
AUTHORITY" is to
"OPPOSE FORCE TO
IT".The
use of force
"WITHOUT
AUTHORITY"
always puts him
that uses it
into a "STATE OF
WAR" as the
AGGRESSOR, and
renders him
liable to be
"TREATED
ACCORDINGLY"
JOHN
LOCKE:201.
"It is a mistake
to think this
fault is proper
only to
monarchies. Other
forms of
government are liable
to it as well as
that; for WHEREVER
the power that is
put in any hands for
the government of the
people and
the preservation
of their
PROPERTIES
is applied to OTHER
ENDS, and made
use of to IMPOVERISH,
HARASS,
or to SUBDUE
THEM to the
arbitrary
and irregular
commands of
those that have it,
THERE
IT PRESENTLY
BECOMES TYRANNY,
..."
Thank
You for your
membership,
support and
contributions!
Note:
Facebook
removed our
original
American
Patriot Party
page with
thousands of
followers and
had long prior
shadow banned
our
visibility. Please
go to our page
on GETTR, MEWE
and TRUTH
MEDIA pages
where we are
beginning
again:
"...Among
the many interesting
objects which will
engage your
attention, that of
providing for the
common defence will
merit particular
regard. To be
prepared for war, is
one of the most
effectual means of
preserving peace.
A "free PEOPLE" (ARMS EVERYWHERE) ought
NOT ONLY
to be ARMED,
but disciplined;
to which end, a
uniform and well
digested plan is
requisite: and
"their" safety and
interest
"REQUIRE
that they
(the PEOPLE)
should
promote
such
manufactories"
as tend to render
"them"
(THE "PEOPLE"
- ALL PEOPLE)
"INDEPENDENT" of
OTHERS
(ALL OTHERS
- INCLUDING
and ESPECIALLY
GOVERNMENT - - -
See Next)
for "ESSENTIAL",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"PARTICULARLY"
for
>>>>>>>>>>>>"MILITARY"
"SUPPLIES"."
--------------------
President
George
Washingtonpresented his
mistrust in the
federal government
very clearly and
defined the true
intent where the
powers should lay,
and that is in the
hands of the CIVILIANS.
In
response to a
proposal for gun
registration:
George Washington in
1790 said:
"..."Absolutely
not. If the"PEOPLE
are armed" and the "federalists"
(FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT)"DO
NOT KNOW WHERE THE
ARMS ARE", there can NEVER
be an "oppressive
government."
--------------------
The RIGHT to CONCEAL from the
"STATE" AS WELL AS
"FEDERAL"
government;
The purpose clearly
derived in George
Washington's
statement
to have the power to
"PUT DOWN BY
USE OF ARMED
FORCE" an OPPRESSIVE
"FEDERAL" "OR STATE"
government.
"He (The
EXECUTIVE / KING)
has affected
to render the
military
independent of
and SUPERIOR
to the CIVIL(CIVILIAN)
"power"."
-------------------
Elbridge
Gerry,
a representative
to Congress from
Massachusetts
during the debates
over the Bill of
Rights "What,
Sir, is the use of
a militia? It is
to prevent
the
establishment
of a standing
army, the bane
of liberty
... Whenever Governments
mean
to invade
the rights and
liberties of the
people,
they always
attempt to destroy
the militia,
in order to raise
an army upon
their ruins."
-------------------
Which
establishes a
division between
civilian MILITIA
powers and
Standing Military
(ARMY), as
this is a important
establishment of
those reasons given
by the Founders.
-------------------
TRUE
DEFINITION OF
MILITIA
Let us
review other
words of James
Madison with
regards to militias
and standing armies; The
purpose and the
POWER
RATIO between
them:
FEDERALIST
#46(Quote
Paraphrase
- see actual
text bellow):
James
Madison
Author of the
Constitution and
the Bill of
Rights:
"The HIGHESTNUMBER to which a
"standing army"
can be carried in
"ANY
COUNTRY"
does NOT
EXCEED one
hundredth (1/100th) part of
the souls, or one
twenty-fifth(1/25th)part
of the number ABLE to
bear arms.
This portionwould not
yield, in the
United States, an
(STANDING ARMY)
army of more than
twenty-five or
thirty thousand
men.
To "THESE"would
be "OPPOSED"(APP:
indicating that
the "MILITIA" is
to be a "OPPOSING
force" to
the standing
army as well
as that of
foreign enemies)
a (CITIZEN)MILITIA amounting
to near half a
million "CITIZENS"
with ARMS in
their "HANDS", "officered
by men chosen
from "AMONG
THEMSELVES", (NOT
by government or
the standing army
- This definition
is a determiner of
a TRUE MILITIA)
fighting for "THEIR"
(the
CITIZEN / militia's)
common
liberties and united
and conducted
by government"S"
(LOCAL - Not Simply
State)
possessing THEIR
(the
CITIZEN / militia's)
affections and
confidence.
It may well be
doubted whether a (CITIZEN)
MILITIA thus
circumstanced
could ever be
conquered by
such a "proportion" (ratio
in force)
of "regular troops"
(i.e.
standing army).
Besides the
advantage of being armed, it
forms a barrier
against the "enterprises
of ambition" (Foreign
Interests,
Corporations,
Banks),
more insurmountable
than any which a
simple government of
any form can admit
of.
The governments of
Europe are afraid
to trust the
people
with arms. If they
did, the people
would surely shake
off the yoke of
tyranny, "as"
America did.
Let
us not insult
the free and gallant
citizens of America
with the suspicion
that they would be
less able to defend
the rights of which
they would be in
actual possession
than the debased
subjects
of arbitrarypower
would be to rescue
theirs from the
hands of "their"
oppressors."
-----------
APP: The Actual
Quote
text below
should arouse
citizens greatest
fears and prompt a
call of alarm;
Though the words
James Madison
speaks, shows that he
establishes the
correct fact of
the powers of
the citizen militia
and limitations
of the standing
army,
James
Madison lacked
the
understanding, which
Patrick Henry
in the Virginia
Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788
(which see)
clearly possessed
with regard to
power and
corruption;
The
present danger
correlating with
what James Madison
said could never
happen - which
in fact "HAS"
happened,
establishes an
urgency that the
counties and states
whose representatives
whom have not yet
been corrupted or
have not arrived at
their present
position in complete
ignorance of their
rights, duties
and
responsibilities,
should now move to
arm
the CITIZENS of
all
ages able to
bear arms, to
a 25
to 1
"superior"
force to the
standing army;
Those in the
standing army,
understanding
their duty to
the
Constitution,
should begin
to relinquish
their superiority
and begin to
transfer any
and all their
arms within
the United
States, not
necessary to repel
foreign
invasion, to
the Citizens
and most
local communities
so that the
balance of
power be
resumed; So
to
prevent
themselves,
and their
families as
well, from
being enslaved;
And
to prepare
with local
CITIZEN
MILITIAS, who
are even more
so
responsible in
their Duty as
free Citizens
to increase
their powers,
to repel a
move by
foreign,
national and
international
manipulators
of power to infiltrate
and control
the standing
army against
the
foundations
established in
the Original
Constitutions
and Common Law
Principles
of
freedom.
The
fears James
Madison
disregards,
in his
optimism of
the sure
limitations
instituted by
"delegated"
powers set
in the "ORIGINAL
CONSTITUTION"
which were
never to be
exceeded, have
become in fact
a reality
of today.
Review
the actual Quote
from Federalist
#46
below, then
prepare.
Each man is
responsible for
his own freedom:
-----------
James Madison: "...The
only refuge
leftfor
those who
prophesy the
downfall of
the State
governments is
the visionary
supposition
that the
federal
government may
previously
accumulate a
military force
for
the projects
of ambition.
The reasonings
contained in these
papers must have
been employed to
little purpose
indeed, if it
could be necessary
now to disprove
the reality of
this danger.
That the people
and the States
should, for a
sufficient period
of time, elect
an
uninterrupted
succession of
men ready to
betray both;
that THE "TRAITORS" should, throughout this period,
uniformly and
systematically
pursue some
fixed plan for
the extension
of the
military
establishment;
that
the governments
and the people of
the States
should silently and patiently behold the gathering storm, and "
continue to
supply the
materials",
"until it
should be
prepared to
burst on their
own heads",
must appear to
every one more
like the
incoherent
dreams of a
delirious
jealousy, or
the misjudged
exaggerations
of a
counterfeit
zeal, than
like the sober
apprehensions
of genuine
patriotism.
Extravagant as the
supposition is,
let it however be
made. Let a
regular army,
fully equal to the
resources of the
country, be
formed; and let it
be entirely at the
devotion of the
federal
government; still
it would not be
going too far to
say, that the State
governments,
with the
people on
their side,
would be able
to repel the
danger.
The highest
number to
which,
according to
the best
computation, a
standing army
can be carried
in any
country, does
not exceed one
hundredth part
of the whole
number of
souls; or one
twenty-fifth
part of the
number able to
bear arms.
This
proportion
would not
yield, in the
United States,
an army of
more than
twenty-five or
thirty
thousand men.
"TO THESE" (The United States Military) WOULD BE
"OPPOSED" A (CITIZEN) "MILITIA" amounting to
near half a
million of
"CITIZENS"
with "ARMS IN
THEIR HANDS",
OFFICERED BY
MEN CHOSEN
FROM "AMONG
THEMSELVES"
(CHOSEN BY THE LOCAL CITIZEN'S - NOT MILITARY OR FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT),
fighting for
their (THE CITIZEN'S) common liberties,
and united and
conducted by
governments
possessing
their (THE CITIZEN MILITIA'S) affections
and
confidence.
It
may well be
doubted,
whether a (CITIZEN) MILITIA "thus
circumstanced" (25 to 1 ARMED POWER RATIO) could
ever be
conquered by
such a (SMALL) proportion of "regular
troops" (i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES).
Those who are
best acquainted
with the last
successful
resistance of
this country
against the
British arms,
will be most
inclined todeny
the
possibility of
it.
Besides the
advantage of (THE CITIZENS) being
armed, which
the Americans (CITIZENS) possess over the people of almost
every other
nation, the
existence of
"subordinate
governments",
to which the
people are
attached, and
by which the (CITIZEN) MILITIA officers are appointed
(officered by
men chosen
among
themselves,
not by
governments or
military),
forms a
barrier
against the
"enterprises
of ambition",
more
insurmountable
than any which
a simple
government of
any form can
admit of.
Notwithstanding
the military
establishments in
the several kingdoms
of Europe,
which are carried
as far as the
public resources
will bear,
the
governments
are afraid to
trust the
people with
arms.
And it is
not certain, that
with this aid
alone they would
not be able to
shake off their
yokes.
But were the
people to
"possess" the
additional
advantages of
"LOCAL"
governments
chosen by
themselves,
who could
collect the
national will
and direct the
national
force, and of
officers
appointed out
of the (CIVILIAN) militia,
by these (LOCAL) governments,and
attached both
to them and to
the (CITIZEN) MILITIA, it may be "affirmed with the greatest
assurance",
that the
throne of
"every tyranny
in Europe"
would be
"speedily
overturned" in
spite of the
legions which
surround it.
Let us not
insult the
free and
gallant
citizens of
America with
the suspicion,
that they
would be less
able to defend
the rights of
which they
would be in
"ACTUAL
POSSESSION",
than the
"debased
subjects of
arbitrary
power" would
be to rescue
theirs from
the hands of
their
oppressors.
Let us rather no
longer insult
them
with the
supposition that
they can ever
reduce themselves
to the necessity
of making the
experiment, by a
blind and tame
submission to the
"long
train of
insidious
measures which
must precede
and produce
it"."
APP: This should
alarm any US
Citizen, as our
present condition
of Citizens NOT
armed with a 25 to
1 superiority over
our own standing
army; and the fact
that our "Citizen
Militias"
officered by men
"chosen among
themselves" do
NOT exist in any
number near this
in military
capability or
armament, is CLEAR
EVIDENCE that the
"long train of insidious
measures which
must precede
and produce it" have "ALREADY OCCURRED".
Mr. GEORGE MASON.
"Mr. Chairman, a
worthy member has
asked who
are the militia,
if they be not THE
PEOPLEof
this country, and if
we are not to be
protected from the
fate of the Germans,
Prussians, by
"OUR"
representation?
I
ask, "Who are
the MILITIA"?They
consist NOW of the "WHOLE
PEOPLE" (of
each LOCAL
COMMUNITY OR
STATE), except a
few public officers.
But I cannot say who
will be the militia
of the future day.
If "that paper" (THE
LIMITED
CONSTITUTIONAL
COMPACT BEING
CONSIDERED)
on the table gets
"no alteration", the
militia of the
future day may
not
consist of all
classes, high and
low, and {426} rich
and poor; but they
may be "confined
to the lower and
middle classes of
the people",
granting "exclusion
to the higher
classes" of
the people.
If
we should ever
see that day,
the most
ignominious
punishments and
heavy
fines
(APP:
i.e.
jail and imprisonment
for simply being
armed - or being
armed with
equal
ARMS
with the
standing
federal US MILITARY) may be expected. Under the
present government,
all ranks of people
are subject to
militia duty. Under
such a full and
equal
representation
as ours, there can
be no
ignominious
punishment
inflicted.
But under this national,
or rather
consolidated
government,
the case will be
different. The
representation being
"so small and
inadequate", they
will have no
"FELLOW-FEELING"
for the people. They may
discriminate people
in their own
predicament, and
exempt from duty
all the officers andLOWEST
CREATURES OF THE
NATIONAL
GOVERNMENT.
..."
---------
Mr.
JOHN MARSHALL
" asked if
gentlemen were
serious
when they
asserted that,
if the state
governments
had power to
interfere with
the militia, it
was by
implication.
If they were, he
asked the
committee
whether the "least attention" would not show that they were
"MISTAKEN".
The state
governments "DID
NOT"
derive their
powers from the
general
(federal)
government; but
EACH (STATE & LOCAL COUNTY) government derived
its powers
from the
PEOPLE,
and each was to
act according
to the powers given
it. Would
any gentleman
deny this?
He
demanded if
powers not
given were
retained by
implication.
Could any man
say so? Could
any man say
that this
power was not
RETAINED by
the states,
as they had NOT
given it away?
For, says he,
does not a
power remain
till it is
given away? The
state
legislatures had
power to command
and govern their
militia before,
and have it still,
undeniably, unless
there be
something in
this
Constitution
that takes
it away.
For
Continental
purposes
Congress may
call forth the
militia, as to
suppress
insurrections
and repel
invasions.
But
the power given
to the states by
the people is
"NOT taken
away";
for the Constitution
does NOT
say so. In
the
Confederation
Congress had
this power; but
the state
legislatures had
it "also".
The power of
legislating given
them within the "ten
miles square"
is exclusive
of the states,
because it is
"expressed to be
exclusive".
The truth is, that
when power is
given to the
general
legislature, if it
was in the state
legislature
before, both shall
exercise it;
unless there be an
incompatibility in
the exercise by
one to that by the
other, or negative
words precluding
the state
governments from
it. But
there are NO
negative words
here. It
rests,
therefore, with
the "STATES".
To
me it appears,
then, unquestionable
that the STATE
governments
can call forth the
(CITIZEN)
MILITIA, in case
the Constitution
should be adopted,
in the "SAME
MANNER"
as they could have
done before its adoption.
Gentlemen
have said that
the states
cannot defend
themselves
without an "application
to Congress",
because
"Congress" can interpose!
>>>>Does
not every man
feel a
"REFUTATION" of
the "argument"
in his own
breast?
(i.e. CONGRESS CANNOT
INTERPOSE)
I WILL SHOW
{420} that
there could
NOT be a
combination,
between those who
formed the
Constitution, to
take away this
power.
All
the restraints intended
to be laid on the
state governments
(besides where an
exclusive power is
expressly given to
Congress) are
contained in the
10th section of
the 1st article.
This power is NOT
included in
the restrictions
in that section.
But what excludes
every
possibility
of doubt, is the
last part of it
that "no state
shall engage in
war, unless
actually invaded,
or in such
imminent danger as
will not admit of
delay." When
invaded, they
(the States and
People) "CAN"
engage in war,
as also
when in
"imminent
danger".
This clearly
proves
that the states
can use the
militia when
they find it
NECESSARY."
"...But the worthy member (Patrick
Henry)
fears, that in
one part of
the Union they
will be
regulated and
disciplined,
and in another
neglected.
This danger is
enhanced by
leaving this
power to each
state; for
some states
may attend to
their militia,
and others may
neglect them.
If
Congress neglect
our (CITIZEN)
militia (i.e. "CITIZENS"), "WE" (the States and People) "CAN
ARM THEM"
"OURSELVES".
>>>
CANNOT
Virginia
"import arms?
>>>Cannot
she put them
into the hands
of "HER"
militia-men?
(APP: i.e. THE
CITIZENS OF
THE
INDEPENDENT
STATE "CAN"
import arms;
and as clearly
established
above, "without
ANY
application to
Congress /
federal
government")
(APP: So much
for the "MYTH"
that the
Federal
government can
"interpose or
prevent"
military arms
from being
imported
across state
lines, by
(mis)using
the
Commerce
Clause)
He
then concluded
by observing,
that the power
of governing the
militia was NOT
vested in the
states by
implication,
because, being
"possessed of
it"
> "antecedent
to the
adoption of
the government,
and "not
being divested
of it" by
any grant or
restriction in
the
Constitution,
they must
necessarily be
as "FULLY
possessed of
it as ever
they had been.
>And it
could NOT be
said that the
states derived
ANY powers
from that
(the
federal
government or
Constitution)
system, "but
RETAINED them,
"
>>>>>>>>"though not acknowledged in ANY PART
OF IT"."
That
which is not given,
is reserved
by the people.
Do you have the
means to Donate? Remember:
Don't
put all your eggs
in one basket
such as the NRA; Donate
to several patriotic
and gun groups when
you donate and
divide the money
equally; This keeps
those that want to
incrementally
control, manipulate
or sell out your
rights by
controlling the
purse strings of
just a few major
groups from doing
so; Make it
impossible for them
to try. By
giving to several
smaller groups it
will empower more
passionate Patriotic
groups and helps
secure your rights.
Stay away from
Corporations or Non
Profits, they
are usually
compromised. A few
dollars here and a
few dollars there
given to smaller
groups by all those
that are already
donating to large
groups will give the
smaller patriotic
groups the ability
to work. Spread the
wealth and empower
freedom; Then watch
the freedom and
Liberty movement
grow strong.
Samuel
Adams - Absolute
Rights of the
Colonists 1772:
1st. Natural
Rights of the
Colonists as
Men.--
"Among the
Natural Rights
of the Colonists
are these First.
a Right to
Life; Secondly
to Liberty;
thirdly to
Property;together with
the Right to
support and
defend them in
the "BEST MANNER THEY CAN"--Those
are evident
Branchesof,
rather than
deductions
from the "DUTY"
of Self
Preservation,
commonly
called "THE
FIRST LAW OF
NATURE"--"...
HUNDREDS OF SHERIFFS
STEP FORWARD "NO GUN
CONTROL IN OUR
COUNTY!"
They understand that it is the
Federal Government
that is LIMITED to
the DELEGATED powers
of the ORIGINAL
CONSTITUTIONAL
COMPACT that created
the AUTHORITY to
begin with. Much
respect to THESE MEN
who understand that
we are REPUBLIC "S"
based upon CERTAIN
LAWS (A COMPACT) and
RESERVED NATURAL
RIGHTS. Not a Total
Democracy that can
vote away our
freedoms.
In Wyoming: Jail
Time proposed for
for Feds! -
Hundreds of Sheriffs
tell the Feds "NO
GUN CONTROL IN OUR
COUNTIES" and to
OBEY THE
CONSTITUTION!DESPITE
BITTER COLD IN MANY
STATES, THE FEBRUARY
8th FIREARMS EVENT
AS WITH THE EARLIER
APPRECIATE FIREARMS
DAY & GUNS
ACROSS AMERICA EVENT
WAS A BIG SUCCESS!!!
THOUSANDS CONTINUE
TO ATTEND EVENTS AND
MANY MORE ARE
PLANNED THIS YEAR!
PERIODICALLY CHECK
FOR EVENTS on our
FACEBOOK PAGE....
Army Major Commands,
Army Major
Commands
AMC Â U.S. Army
Material Command
located in Fort
Belvior, VA. The
official web site is
www.amc.army.mil
AMC is the Army's
premier provider of
materiel readiness to
the total force across
the spectrum of joint
military
operations. If a
soldier shoots it,
drives it, flies it,
wears it or eats it,
AMC provides it.
MTMC U.S. Army
Military Traffic
Management Command
located on Alexandria,
VA. The official
website is
www.mtmc.army.mil
MTMC is the Department
of Defense's
heavy-equipment mover
for contingency,
training and
humanitarian
operations.
MEDCOM U.S. Army
Medical Command
located at Fort Sam
Houston, Texas.
The official website
is
www.armymedicine.army.mil
MEDCOM projects and
sustains a healthy and
medically protected
force; trains, equips,
and deploys the
medical force; and
manages and promotes
the health of soldiers
and military families.
USARPAC U.S. Army
Pacific located at
Fort Shafter,
Hawaii. The
official website is
www.usarpac.army.mil
USARPAC provides
trained and ready
forces in support of
military and peacetime
operations in the
Asia-Pacific area in
order to contribute to
regional stability,
crisis response and
decisive victory.
FORSCOM U.S. Army
Forces Command located
at Fort McPherson,
Georgia. The
official website is
www.forscom.army.mil
The Army component of
U.S. Joint Forces
Command, FORSCOM
trains, mobilizes,
deploys and sustains
active and reserve
component forces
capable of operating
in joint and combined
environments to meet
worldwide operational
commitments.
USASOC U.S. Army
Special Operations
Command located at
Fort Bragg, North
Carolina. The
official website is
www.soc.mil
USASOC organizes,
trains, educates,
mans, equips, funds,
administers,
mobilizes, deploys and
sustains Army special
operations forces to
successfully conduct
worldwide special
operations across the
range of military
operations, in support
of regional combatant
commanders, American
ambassadors and other
agencies, as directed.
USARSO U.S. Army,
South located at Fort
Buchanan, Puerto
Rico. The
official website is
www.usarso.army.mil
USARSO commands and
controls Army forces
in the U.S. Southern
Command area of
responsibility and
provides theater
support for Army
forces and
headquarters as
directed by the
USSSOUTHCOM commander
in chief. USARSO
will become a major
subordinate command of
FORSCOM and move to
Fort Sam Houston,
Texas, during fiscal
year 2003.
TRADOC U.S. Army
Training and Doctrine
Command located at
Fort Monroe,
Virginia. The
official website is
www.tradoc.army.mil
TRADOC shapes the
21st-century Army by
training and educating
its soldiers and
leaders while
sustaining the shared
vision of how the Army
operates as a member
of joint service,
combined arms and
multinational teams.
CID U.S. Army Criminal
Investigation Command
located at Fort
Belvoir,
Virginia. The
official website is
www.cid.army.mil
CID is the Army's
criminal investigative
organization and
conducts
investigations in
which the Army is or
may be a party of
interest. CID
provides senior leader
protective-services
and forensic
laboratory support to
investigations;
maintains the Army's
criminal records;
provides logistical
security from factory
to foxhole; conducts
computer network
intrusion
investigations; and
develops
countermeasures to
criminal and
subversive activity.
INSCOM U.S. Army
Intelligence and
Security Command
located at Fort
Belvoir,
Virginia. The
official website is
www.inscom.army.mil
INSCOM conducts
dominant intelligence,
security and
information operations
for commanders and
national
decision-makers, and
provides warfighters
with the seamless
intelligence needed to
understand and
dominate the
battlefield.
SMDC U.S. Space and
Missile Defense
Command located in
Arlington,
Virginia. The
official website is
www.smdc.army.mil
SDMC develops and
provides space and
missile-defense
capabilities for the
Army and the nation.
EUSA Eight U.S. Army
located in Yongsan,
Korea. The
official website is
http://8tharmy.korea.army.mil
EUSA supports
deterrence of North
Korean aggression
against the Republic
of Korea and, should
deterrence fail,
supports
noncombatant-evacuation
operations and
transitions to
hostilities as it
generates combat power
to support the United
Nations Command and
Combined Forces
Command response.
USAREUR U.S. Army,
Europe located at
Heidelberg,
Germany. The
official website is
www.hqusareur.army.mil
As America's Army in
Europe, USAREUR is
structured and trained
as a versatile and
agile power-projection
force, ready for joint
and multinational
operations, and
committed to providing
for the readiness and
well being of its
soldiers, civilians
and families.
USASCE U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers located
in Washington,
D.C. The
official website is
www.usace.army.mil
USACE provides
quality, responsive
engineering services
to the Army,
Department of Defense
and the nation.
MDW U.S. Army Military
District of Washington
located at Fort
McNair, Washington,
D.C. The
official website is
www.mdw.army.mil
MDW responds to
crisis, disaster or
security requirements
in the National
Capital Region;
provides base
operations support for
defense organizations
throughout the NCR,
including operation of
Arlington National
Cemetery; and conducts
official ceremonies on
behalf of the nation's
civilian and military
leaders.
Provided by
MilitaryDial.Com -
home of Discount Long
Distance, Cellular
Accessories, Printer
Ink and Satellite TV
for Military Members.
Pacific Command
- U.S. Army
Pacific 8th U.S.
Army
- 25th Infantry
Division
(Light) -
6th Cavalry Brigade
- U.S. Army
Japan -
17th Aviation Brigade
- U.S. Army
Alaska -
164th ATS Group
- 18th Medical
Command
- 19th Theater
Support Command
- 2nd Infantry
Division (Light)
Unit
Type
Base
Barracks
Pacific Command
(PACOM)
HQ
Honolulu,HI Camp Smith
U.S. Army Pacific
(USARPAC)
HQ Bat
Honolulu,HI Fort
Shafter
45.SuppGr
Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Schofield Bks
68.MedCo (AA)/524.SB
UH-60A Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Wheeler AAF
B.Co/214.Av(M)/524.SB
CH-47D Wahiawa/Oahu,HI
Wheeler AAF
U.S. Army Japan
(USARJ)
HQ Co
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama
9.TSC
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama
78.AvBat
(CMD)
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama/Kastner AAF
78.AvBat/A.Co C-12F,
UH-60A
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama/Kastner AAF
78.AvBat/D.Co
Sagamihara,Japan Camp
Zama/Kastner AAF
U.S. Army Alaska
(USARAK)
HQ
Anchorage,AK Fort
Richardson
ArcticSuppBrig
Anchorage,AK Fort
Richardson
4.Bat/123.Av
(TA)
Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
4.Bat/123.Av/B.Co
(MHC) CH-47D
Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
4.Bat/123.Av/D.Co
(AHC) UH-60A
Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
C.Co/123.Av (AVIM)
UH-60A, CH-47D
Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
68.MedDet (AA) UH-60A
Fairbanks,AK Fort
Wainwright/Ladd AAF
129.MedDet (AA) UH-1V
Anchorage,AK Fort
Richardson/Bryant AAF
USAG Fort Greely/AvDet
UH-1H Delta
Junction,AK Fort
Greely/Allen AAF
Back to
Top
8th U.S. Army (EUSA)
HQ
Yongsan,RoK Yongsan
Main Post 1
6.CavBrig
(Air)
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio
AAF
1.Sq/6.Cav (ATK)
AH-64A Hoengsong,RoK
Camp Eagle
3.Sq/6.Cav (ATK)
AH-64D Pyongtaek,RoK
Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio
AAF
17.AvBrig
(TA)
Yongsan,RoK Yongsan
Main Post 1
1.Bat/52.Av
(CMD)
Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (CS)
UH-60A Songnam,RoK
Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/B.Co (CS)
UH-60A Songnam,RoK
Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/C.Co (CS)
UH-60A Songnam,RoK
Seoul AB
1.Bat/52.Av/D.Co
(AVUM)
Songnam,RoK Seoul AB
2.Bat/52.Av
(MHB)
Pyongtaek,RoK Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio
AAF
2.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (M)
CH-47D Pyongtaek,RoK
Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio
AAF
2.Bat/52.Av/B.Co (M)
CH-47D Pyongtaek,RoK
Camp
Humphreys/Desiderio
AAF
6.Bat/52.Av/A.Co (TA)
C-12F Songnam,RoK
Seoul AB
ACT = Air Cavalry
Troop
AE = Aerial
Exploitation
AHC = Assault
helicopter company
ATK = Attack
ATS = Air traffic
service
AvSuppBat =
Aviation support
battalion
AVUM = Aviation
unit maintenance
AVIM = Aviation
intermediate
maintenance
Bks = Barracks
CAC = Command and
control
CMD = Command
Evac = Evacuation
GSAB = General support
aviation battalion
M = Medium helicopter
MI = Military
intelligence
RC = Reserve component
SAC = Support aviation
company
United States Army
Pacific Command
(USARPAC).
The U. S. Army,
Pacific serves as the
Army Component Command
to the Commander in
Chief U. S. Pacific
Command (USCINCPAC),
less the geographic
area of Korea. USARPAC
commands active U. S.
Army and U. S. Army
Reserve forces in
Alaska, Hawaii, Japan,
and in possessions and
trust territories
administered by the
United States in US
Pacific command.
In October 2000,
USARPAC became a
Multi-Component Unit
(MCU) and Army Service
Component Command
(ASCC) as part of the
US Army transformation
to meet the emerging
security needs of the
United States in which
USARPAC continues to
be a key strategic
player. The whole idea
of the multi-component
unit is to give active
army units additional
resources to
accomplish the
mission. The
multi-component
integration is
important in the
overall picture of the
Army's success going
into the 21st century.
With the Reserve and
National Guard
assuming a more active
role in total Army
operations and the
"One Team, One Fight,
One Future" concept,
multi-component
integration provides
for a better
understanding of each
component's role in
achieving victory.
USARPAC trains Army
Forces for support of
military operations
and peacetime
engagements in order
to contribute to
decisive victory and
promote regional
stability. USARPAC
solicits, awards, and
administers contracts
in support of
mission-related
requirements,
including
administrative
supplies and services,
waste disposal, food
services, minor
construction,
facilities,
maintenance and
repair, grounds
maintenance, ADP
equipment and
services, and laundry
services.
Following World War
II, numerous Army
headquarters in the
central Pacific were
consolidated with the
goal of forming a
single Army command
based in Hawaii. In
1957, the U.S. Army,
Pacific (USARPAC) was
established at Fort
Shafter, following
inactivation of the
Far East Command. As
Army component of the
unified command led by
the U.S. Commander in
Chief Pacific, USARPAC
was assigned a
threefold mission:
Provide necessary
ground Army combat
forces; Support those
forces
administratively and
logistically; and
Provide reserves and
contingency plans to
meet any ground threat
to United States
interests in the
Pacific.
On March 23, 1979, The
Department of the Army
announced the
establishment of the
U.S. Army Western
Command (WESTCOM).
Then, a decade later,
U.S. Army forces in
the Pacific were
further consolidated.
Army units in Alaska
and in Japan were
placed under the
command of the Fort
Shafter headquarters,
which was once again
designated U.S. Army,
Pacific. The new
command was formally
reestablished on
August 30, 1990.
In the years since the
end of the Vietnam
War, Army forces in
the Pacific have
participated in major
peacekeeping
operations in the
Sinai Desert, and have
provided humanitarian
and disaster relief
missions in
Bangladesh, the
Philippines, Guam, and
the island of Kauai.
Although fully trained
for warfare, USARPAC
soldiers are also
skilled in conducting
operations other than
war. Whether it is
assuring order among
refugees at
Guantanamo, providing
flood relief in the
deltas of South Asia,
or maintaining a cease
fire in the Middle
East, USARPAC
personnel operate far
and wide in
peacekeeping and
humanitarian missions.
In late 1994, fully
one half of the 25th
Infantry Division
deployed to Haiti as
the United States and
other governments
worked to restore
democracy to that
unfortunate nation.
Two years later,
USARPAC peacekeepers
went to Bosnia to help
restore hope to that
warshattered
land.
Joint Rear Area
Coordination (JRAC)
The United States Army
Pacific (USARPAC), in
partnership with
local, state and
federal authorities,
have developed a plan
of preparedness for
the state of Hawaii.
The
Commander-in-Chief,
Pacific Command, has
identified the USARPAC
as the executive agent
for joint rear area
coordination (JRAC).
This task is normally
accomplished in a
wartime theater of
operation, but in this
case, it is being
accomplished for the
state of Hawaii.
Teaming with local and
state civil
organizations and
federal agencies,
JRAC-Hawaii (HI) has
accomplished a
significant amount in
the short time since
Sept. 11.
JRAC-HI is protecting
its military
installations by
reducing and
restricting entry
points using roving
patrols. Guard duties
have completely
changed. Guards must
now understand the
changing dynamics of a
more dangerous world,
and must learn to
expect the unexpected.
Military installations
worldwide are now on
the front lines and
are the subject of
surveillance and
probes more than ever
before. Guards must be
more alert to
activities both on and
off the installations,
and they must
constantly vary
security procedure
patterns to eliminate
predictability. They
must also be linked to
local law enforcement
and must be the
beneficiaries and
target audience of a
regular joint and
interagency
intelligence summary.
Because of these
changing conditions,
JRAC-HI reinstituted
more formalized guard
mounts and
instructions tailored
to the current
operational
environment.
JRAC-HI has identified
mission essential or
vulnerable areas
(MEVAs) both on and
off the installations.
MEVAs are facilities
and capabilities
essential to
accomplishing the
military mission.
These MEVAs have been
thoroughly assessed
and security needs
addressed. Tailored
after general defense
plan (GDP) battle
books from the Cold
War in Europe, MEVA
folders detail every
aspect relevant to the
defense of these
critical sites. Local
civil authorities have
done the same with
over 150 of their own
MEVAs and both the
civil and military
authorities regularly
conduct site surveys.
JRAC-HI has
fine-tuned
procedures for
providing military
support to civil
authorities (MSCA) in
the event of a natural
or man-made disaster.
As the executive agent
for MSCA in Hawaii,
American Samoa, and
neighboring islands,
JRAC-HI provides a
defense-coordinating
officer to coordinate
military support of
civilian consequence
management operations.
Even before Sept. 11,
JRAC-HI maintained a
close relationship
with local and state
government leaders,
who can leverage many
standing MSCA concepts
and plans as the JRAC
operation comes
together. JRAC-HI's
participation in
steering committees
and plenary groups,
such as the Hawaii
Emergency Preparedness
Executive Committee,
the Hawaii Energy
Council and the Joint
Armed Services/State
of Hawaii Civil
Defense Coordinating
Committee, is
instrumental in
sharing information
and developing joint
and civil-military
solutions to emerging
challenges.
JRAC-HI has
established quick
reaction forces (QRFs)
drawn from both U.S.
Marine Corps and Army
units. These QRFs are
capable of moving on
short notice by air or
road to any place in
the state to provide
additional security or
to assist in any other
way. While awaiting
adjudication at the
national level on the
procedures for
employing those forces
in domestic
situations, JRAC-HI is
regularly conducting
joint training with
civil authorities.
JRAC-HI has worked to
identify seams in its
collective efforts to
secure Hawaii's soil
and people. This
coordination is taking
place with all the
military services in
Hawaii, state and
local civil defense
(CD), U.S. Coast Guard
(USCG), National Guard
(NG), Honolulu Police
Department (HPD), fire
departments, and a
host of other local
and federal government
agencies such as the
state health and
transportation
departments. Also
included in this
effort are the FBI,
Immigration and
Naturalization Service
(INS), U.S. Customs
Service (USCS) and the
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA),
as well as selected
private firms and
enterprises involved
in supporting Hawaii's
critical
infrastructure. The
Joint Interagency
Planning Group,
established by USARPAC
within days of the
attacks, has been the
principal driver
behind this effort.
"If ever time should
come, When vain and
aspiring men shall
possess the highest
seats in government,
Our Country will stand
in need of it's
experienced Patriots
to prevent it's
ruin" ...Samuel
Adams